Trump’s Amazing Victory Against A Stacked Deck
Nov 18, 2016 by ROGER ARONOFF
While the media and the Democrats are in disarray over last week’s elections, it looks like President-elect Donald Trump’s honeymoon is over before it even began. While there may have been a few reports in the past week that were simply factual about Trump’s transition team and process, virtually all of the reports in the mainstream media have been negative and even hostile towards Trump, his transition team and his supporters.
The media meltdown that accompanied Trump’s victory last week has been a sight to behold. How could they have completely missed this outcome?, they wondered. Most of the articles—such as those by The Washington Post (sampling, weighting and voter estimation), The New York Times (misunderstanding major swaths of our country), and Pew Research (underestimating Trump’s support and “non-response bias”)—attempted to explain away their acknowledged failure. Hillary Clinton and her campaign manager John Podesta are blaming the media, and FBI Director James Comey for his public comments on the ongoing investigation into Hillary’s mishandling of classified information.
But this misses the larger point. In spite of a thoroughly biased and corrupt news media and popular culture that worked their collective hearts out to rid the country and the world of what they viewed as an uncouth, dangerous egotistical businessman and reality TV star, a significant majority, as measured through our Constitutional system of the Electoral College, chose Trump over Hillary. Yes, Hillary won the popular vote, but that’s not how we elect our president.
Whether Trump’s campaign was brilliant, or he was running against such a flawed candidate that he pulled off a win in spite of himself, will long be a subject of dispute. But he did just that. Along the way, he knocked off two political dynasties: Bush and Clinton. Through WikiLeaks, the FBI investigation, Project Veritas—which revealed ties between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and various left-wing activist groups that plotted to create violence and havoc at Trump rallies and pursue efforts at voter fraud—the public learned enough to understand how corrupt and manipulative the Democrat Party and its top leaders had become.
Another explanation is that Trump was the beneficiary of billions of dollars of free publicity on TV that enabled his victory. But the truth is that at least 90 percent of that attention was negative, intended to make him look bad—and some of it deservedly so. Trump did have conservative talk-radio on his side, and several spokespeople who got considerable air time. He had Sean Hannity’s support, and otherwise fairly balanced coverage on Fox News.
But for the most part, the media were apoplectic at the outcome of the election. In essence, their narrative was that Trump was beyond the pale, and that reports of Hillary’s actions were exaggerated and false, especially concerning her handling of classified material, and her actions as secretary of state that might have influenced payments to the Clinton Foundation, to Bill Clinton personally, and to allies of the Clintons, such as in Haiti.
Brian Stelter of CNN’s Reliable Sources said, “Donald Trump was tapping into something that already existed, which was distrust of the media, particularly on the right, but among many Americans who for various reasons distrust the media, partly because they’re told to by conservative talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. But Trump exploited that mistrust and deepened it…Trump tapped into that anger at the media and made it much, much worse.”
Over at MSNBC, Lawrence O’Donnell called Trump a “tyrant,” and said that the Democrats in Congress must do all they can to block him. Rachel Maddow then referred to Trump as “vengeance minded.” Not much of a honeymoon.
I have heard very few complaints about Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson or Green Party candidate Jill Stein. Granted, we don’t really know how many of those who voted for them would have otherwise voted for Hillary, Trump, or stayed home. But, take Michigan, for example. That is the one state that, according to most websites keeping track, still hasn’t been officially called. Trump leads by less than 12,000 votes, while Johnson received 173,000 votes and Stein 50,000. In Wisconsin, Trump won by 27,000, while Johnson received 106,000, and Stein got 31,000. Regarding Florida, Trump won by 120,000, Johnson received 206,000 votes while Stein got 64,000.
Trump could have lost Wisconsin and Michigan and still have received enough electoral votes to win. But if he also had lost Florida, Hillary would have won. In Pennsylvania, Trump won by 64,000, while Johnson/Stein won 190,000 votes. Remember Ralph Nader in 2000? He earned the wrath of Democrats forever for supposedly preventing Al Gore from winning Florida. But that anger aimed at third-party candidates doesn’t seem to have caught on this year. Despite the many pleas from Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Hillary, and the Obamas to not vote for third party candidates, many did anyway.
And now, Republicans dominate the political landscape, with 33 governors, 68 of 99 legislative bodies across the country, the House, the Senate and the White House. The left-wing website Daily Kos has published the best graphics that I found on how dramatic the Republican dominance of the political landscape across the country actually is. Currently Republicans outnumber Democrats in the Senate by 52 to 48. But in 2018, Democrats must defend 25 seats (including the two Independent senators who caucus with the Democrats), while the GOP must defend only eight seats. The Democrats thought that bringing out some big guns—former Sen. Russ Feingold (WI), former Sen. Evan Bayh (IN) and former Gov. Ted Strickland (OH)—would give them control of the Senate. But all three lost. Hillary is being criticized for never having gone to Wisconsin to campaign, overconfident that she would win it. The Democrat blame game and finger-pointing is only beginning
Hillary never held an open press conference throughout this entire year. It was always controlled situations whenever she met the press.
Trump struck a chord with many who haven’t been voting in recent elections through his relentless attacks on the bias and dishonesty of the media, and on the incompetence and corruption of the Obama/Clinton administration. Hillary wrapped herself in Obama’s supposed popularity—he and Michelle certainly worked hard for her victory, at least in the last month or so—but in the end, it was to no avail. His appeal to certain voters didn’t transfer to Hillary.
What is remarkable about Trump’s victory is what he had to overcome to win. Besides the media, two former Republican presidents, Google, Facebook, Pope Francis, pollsters, a money gap (reports indicate that Hillary raised $380 million more than Trump), Trump’s inexperience, and the complete panoply of pop culture—from Lady Gaga to Katy Perry to Miley Cyrus; Bruce Springsteen, Bon Jovi, Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert, everyone on the Comedy Central Channel, many scripted shows such as “Madam Secretary,” and LeBron James—there was active voter fraud, some of which the Public Interest Legal Foundation has documented. And still Trump won.
The name-calling, caterwauling, crying and disgust will continue on the left, as they figure out how to pick up the pieces and move forward.
original here
Pensions for having held elected office were never a part of the vision for America and President-elect Trump is emblematic of a return to the American citizen-servant
“Ethicists” insist on fortune makeover for Trump
Nov 18, 2016 By A. Dru Kristenev
Demonstrating a lack of understanding of America’s founding principles, a murder (that’s a bunch of cackling crows, for those who don’t know) of philosophizing academics are recommending that President-elect Donald Trump divest himself of his fortune before taking office. Only ignorance of this nation’s founding could prompt individuals, who call themselves ethics experts, to make such a call.
Institutionalized politics has managed to destroy the original intent of anyone seeking to serve, and I emphasize the word, the People by attaining elected office. So twisted has the District of Columbia, and every statehouse or city council chambers become that the Founders’ concept of citizen servants has been wiped out and replaced by office occupiers.
These office occupiers are, in these days, expected to come to their seats as paupers, their campaigns bankrolled by moneyed backers who reward the victor with payback during and when they leave (if they leave) office. This is the opposite of how the Constitution was formulated and the representatives of the People were expected to serve. The Founders, themselves having fortunes of which they gave willingly for the privilege of serving, prepared the qualifications and terms of Congress to contribute to an elected official’s temporary occupation of office. After serving, representatives, senators, presidents and appointed officials were encouraged and expected to return to their professions, be it a teacher, farmer, brewer, publisher, or other order of business.
The “twisted” part of this compact as it now stands – keep in mind that ‘to attorn’ means ‘to twist’ – has so far changed direction that politicians have become a separate, elitist class that uses their office to amass fortunes, not make them through free enterprise. The utter irony of this mangling of the foundation of America is that the country was birthed to protect commerce. The Navy and Marines were built to defend commercial vessels plying the seas to sell their wares.
It was unjust taxation that sent the colonies into a paroxysm of revolt, which, had the Declaration of Independence been received as the lawfully submitted document that it was, the war would never have needed to be fought. But, as we see yet again, once a class has seated themselves comfortably in power they are loath to relinquish it and with the election of a non-politician in the usual sense, the political class is using every technique possible to undermine a president from the People’s class, i.e. an entrepreneur just as was originally intended.
So far has D.C. plunged back into the swamp from which it initially emerged, as the land upon which the capital was built was essentially marshland, that the reconfigured political class are insisting Trump divest himself of his assets in order to make him as vulnerable to cash buyouts as are they. Is there any wonder that the average, hard-working American dropped the so-called insiders to throw in their lot with a business mogul? They know how politicians have made a profession out of what was meant to be a temporary divergence from their usual career in order to serve… There’s that word again.
The real conflict of interest involves power and money-hungry politicians who sell their soul to get into office and to stay there. Recent examples are Obama’s ties to George Soros, the Clinton Foundation subservience to most every misogynistic, anti-Christian muslim nation, and Bernie Sanders who sells out for lakefront property. This is the face of corruption that has sold and instituted Marxism over the Founders’ belief in free enterprise. It is also why Trump insists on sidelining lobbyists in his administration; something Obama promised but reneged upon immediately.
By no means should President-elect Trump surrender his fortune to make himself servile to the rest of the money lobby. It is in his and our best interests for the general running of his empire to be entrusted to family and managerial agents during his tenure in the Oval Office rather than setting up some variety of financial wikiup divised by ethics wizards. For then, when he retires from official service, he will return to his home, his family and his business. Pensions for having held elected office were never a part of the vision for America and President-elect Trump is emblematic of a return to the American citizen-servant.
Final thought for retiring public officials? Get a real job.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/ethicists-insist-on-fortune-makeover-for-trump
Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, ISIS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Trump, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House
