WikiLeaks: E-mails Expose Clinton Gun-running to Terrorists
1 August 2016 by Alex Newman
Once-secret e-mails belonging to Democrat Party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton expose the involvement of Obama’s then-secretary of state in shipping weapons to jihadists, including to terrorists in the Islamic State, or ISIS, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said last week. Speaking to the far-left Democracy Now program, Assange highlighted the fact that Clinton played a key role in funneling weaponry from Libya, which she helped destroy alongside jihadist allies on the ground, to Obama-backed terror groups in Syria.
One e-mail reveals that an effort by Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi to create a gold-backed currency for the region was among the key reasons globalists supported killing Gadhafi and destroying Libya. Other e-mails reveal that the Obama administration knowingly supported al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, hoping to create an Islamic State. Another shows that Clinton knew her Libyan “rebels” were massacring blacks as part of an “ethnic cleansing” campaign, along with other war crimes. So far, though, the press has largely ignored the scandals, and in some especially bizarre cases has even tried to deny reality.
The pro-transparency organization WikiLeaks has released, among other documents related to Clinton, a trove of more than 30,000 e-mails and attachments sent to and from her private server. The e-mails cover Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state — perhaps most infamous for the disasters in Libya, including the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans, the takeover of the country by terror armies, and the brutal summary execution of a former U.S. terror-war ally. “We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton boasted about Gadhafi before cackling maniacally. Despite a virtual blackout by the Clinton-supporting establishment media, Clinton’s involvement in the arming, training, and funding of terrorist groups in Libya and Syria has been well known to more informed segments of the electorate for years. In recent months, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump has been making a big issue out of it. The scandals could prove damaging to Clinton once again, especially considering her apparently false testimony made to lawmakers under oath.
Last week, in an interview with Democracy Now host Juan Gonzalez, Assange outlined the importance of the work WikiLeaks was doing. Speaking of Clinton specifically, he said WikiLeaks had helped expose her gun-running to terrorists. “So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates,” Assange said. “So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.”
Assange took the opportunity to tout WikiLeaks, which has also released official U.S. diplomatic cables, hacked Democrat Party e-mails exposing the Clinton camp and the party plotting against Bernie Sanders, and much more. “WikiLeaks has become the rebel library of Alexandria. It is the single most significant collection of information that doesn’t exist elsewhere, in a searchable, accessible, citable form, about how modern institutions actually behave,” he said. “And it’s gone on to set people free from prison, where documents have been used in their court cases; hold the CIA accountable for renditions programs; feed into election cycles, which have resulted in the termination of, in some case — or contributed to the termination of governments, in some cases, taken the heads of intelligence agencies, ministers of defense and so on. So, you know, our civilization can only be as good as our knowledge of what our civilization is. We can’t possibly hope to reform that which we do not understand.”
It is true that WikiLeaks, along with some other institutions and organizations that aim to break through official secrecy, have played an enormous role in exposing potentially treasonous globalist machinations in Libya, Syria, and beyond. Non-profit watchdog Judicial Watch, for example, secured a 2012 U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency document providing proof that the Obama administration has known all along that Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood were the “major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,” yet Obama and his allies “support[ed] the opposition” anyway — a massive violation of federal anti-terror laws, and potentially even giving aid and comfort to America’s enemies. The same document notes that the Obama administration and its allies backing the Islamic jihad against Assad in Syria were hoping to establish what the Pentagon report called a “declared or undeclared Salafist [fundamentalist Islam] principality in Eastern Syria.” Today, that principality is known as ISIS, ISIL, or the Islamic State.
These facts are hardly a secret. The New American magazine first reported on the DIA document well over a year ago, when it was first released by a federal court order. More recently, Breitbart, citing Judicial Watch board member Christopher J. Farrell, confirmed that the explosive DIA document was sent to Clinton based on the recipient markings. GOP candidate Trump shined light on the facts yet again. “Hillary Clinton — is CROOKED!” he wrote in a June 15 Facebook post linking to the Breitbart article that was promptly liked and shared by almost 100,000 other users. “Hillary Clinton received a classified intelligence report stating that the Obama administration was actively supporting Al Qaeda in Iraq, the terrorist group that became the Islamic State.” Indeed, the facts are now well known to informed news consumers, who are increasingly tuning out the establishment’s propaganda organs in favor of “alternative” and “conservative” media outlets.
Of course, the establishment media could not let the facts tarnish Clinton or Obama, both of whom can thank the mischaracterized “mainstream” media for whatever support they actually possess among the citizenry. Most media simply ignored the smoking gun. But in an effort to bolster the White House narrative, the increasingly discredited “PolitiFact” website asked the White House whether it was supporting al-Qaeda. Naturally, the spokesman for the White House said no. (If they had asked Joe Biden, whoexplained in detail during a speech at Harvard how Obama’s anti-ISIS coalition helped al Qaeda and armed, funded, and created ISIS, they might have gotten a different answer). The website, which purports to debunk claims by politicians it does not like, followed up by asking a few globalists and neocon cheerleaders of Obama’s machinations in Syria whether the White House was telling the truth. Misleadingly referring to the trio as “independent experts,” Politifact claimed they “agreed with the White House.” In reality, even the experts acknowledged the Obama support for al Qaeda and ISIS, but they claimed it was “unintended.” Oops!
Other explosive revelations on the globalist-backed use of jihadist proxies in Libya and Syria have also emerged from Clinton’s e-mails, confirming what this magazine and other media outlets have been reporting all along. In 2011, for example, The New American became one of the first media outlets in the world to report on the fact that Gadhafi’s proposed gold-backed currency for the region was likely a major factor in the decision of Western globalists and the United Nations to overthrow his regime by partnering with al Qaeda and other jihadist terrorist groups on the ground. (Al-Qaeda’s Libyan branch was known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, of LIFG, and e-mails show the State Department knew this as well.) Declassified e-mails from the U.S. State Department under Clinton, released on New Year’s Eve and compiled in searchable format by WikiLeaks, now confirm that Gadhafi’s gold-currency plan was a major factor in the decision to kill him.
In an April 2011 e-mail to Clinton from Sid Blumenthal, a globalist warmonger who has long been close to the Clinton family and served as an aide, Clinton is told that “Qaddafi’s government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver.” The gold, which was accumulated prior to the Obama-backed, al Qaeda-led, UN-approved rebellion in Libya, “was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar,” Blumenthal told Clinton, adding that the precious metals were valued at over $7 billion. “This plan was designed to provide the Francophone [French-speaking] African Countries with an alternative to the French [Central African] franc (CFA).” Blumenthal also told Clinton that this gold currency plan “was one of the factors that influenced [globalist French] President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.” Oil was another motivating factor.
In short, Clinton should be very thankful to the press for covering up her record on Syria, Libya, and beyond. It reveals, among other crimes, flagrant violations of numerous federal laws, illegal support for terror groups and revolutions, responsibility for mass death and destruction, and the inner workings of how two nations were reduced to ruins with leadership from Obama and Clinton. If the public knew the facts, there is little chance that Clinton could run for any office. Much more likely would be nationwide demands for criminal prosecutions all up and down the ranks of the leadership — on both sides of the aisle. Top military officials have already distanced themselves from the potentially treasonous policies involving support for terror groups and overthrowing governments. Now all that remains is to make the American people aware so that justice can be served.
Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.
Related articles:
U.S. Intel: Obama Coalition Supported Islamic State in Syria
Gadhafi’s Gold-money Plan Would Have Devastated Dollar
Libya: Now What?
“Libyan Rebels” Create Central Bank, Oil Company
Benghazi Probe: Obama Officials Refused to Address Gun-running
Clinton Exposed as Liar in Benghazigate Hearings, but Secrets Remain
Clinton: Obama Will Ignore Congress on Libya War
WikiLeaks Confirms North American Integration Scheme
WikiLeaks Offers $100k Bounty for Secret ObamaTrade TPP Scheme
WikiLeaks: IMF Plans New Economic Crisis Before Brexit Vote
Sen. Rand Paul: Is Obama Administration Hiding Arms Trade to Jihadists?
Establishment’s Libya War Lies Unravelling
ISIS: The Best Terror Threat U.S. Tax Money Can Buy
Obama’s “Anti-ISIS” Coalition Built ISIS, Biden Admits
Obama and UN Created Terror State in Libya
Benghazi Report Ignores WH Lies, Obama Gunrunning to Jihadists
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/23772-wikileaks-e-mails-expose-clinton-gun-running-to-terrorists
BOMBSHELL: HILLARY MAY HAVE HELPED RUSSIA HACK U.S.
‘Clinton Cash’ author follows money trail of 17 Clinton Foundation donors to Moscow
Aug 1, 2016 by GREG COROMBOS
Hillary Clinton (Photo: Twitter)
Hillary Clinton and her supporters openly suggest collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign in the hacking of various Democratic Party websites – but a closer look at Clinton’s time as secretary of state not only reveals a cozy relationship but actions that damage U.S. national security and may have even led to her own emails being hacked.
The revelations come in a new report from “Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer, who made headlines last year by outlining several examples of Clinton allegedly using her office at the State Department to benefit big Clinton Foundation donors and those who paid massive sums for Bill Clinton to speak at various events.
Schweizer told WND and Radio America his latest discoveries paint a very troubling picture.
“It has that reeking of kind of an insider cronyism deal, not to mention what we would soon learn about the national security implications of this project,” Schweizer said.
At issue is a massive high-tech project called Skolkovo.
“It was an initiative to get U.S. tech companies to invest both money and technology into a Russian version of Silicon Valley,” Schweizer explained. “That version of Silicon Valley was, of course, a government-directed one, not like the Silicon Valley we have in the United States.”
Why was the Obama administration interested in laying America’s technological advancements bare for Russia to see? Schweizer said it’s the latest version of detente, the Nixon-Kissinger strategy of thawing relations through collaborative efforts.
“The idea is that by helping Russia develop its version of Silicon Valley, we would make them more prosperous and supposedly more stable and more cooperative,” Schweizer explained. “They would be tied to us economically, so it would make them less aggressive. That was the theory.”
As with the previous allegations of pay-to-play, Schweizer said the money trail here is also very curious.
“Many of them had close Clinton links financially. Of the 28 American companies that were invited to participate, 17 of them were major Clinton Foundation donors,” Schweizer said. “On the Russian side, the Russian official directing it was a major Clinton Foundation donor, as were some of the participants.”
However, the Clintons have been very prominent figures for many years. Is it possible they simply have good relationships with the firms most likely to take part in the Skolkovo project?
“It might explain part of the American participation, but it does not mention the Russian participation,” Schweizer said. “There’s no reason why a guy named Viktor Vekselberg, who is the Russian overseeing this initiative, who is a Putin oligarch, there’s reason for him to be a Clinton Foundation donor – or a gentleman who was in charge of the nuclear cluster at Skolkovo.
“There’s no reason for him to donate to the Clinton Foundation absent the fact that she is the secretary of state steering this technology project,” he said.
Schweizer said it took about two years for the U.S. Army to figure out what Russia was really doing through this program designed to build trust and cooperation between the two nations.
“In 2011-2012, the U.S. Army does a study and comes to the conclusion that a lot of what’s going on in Skolkovo has military application, that, in fact, there’s a hyper-sonic cruise missile and other weapons being developed at what is supposed to be a civilian technology city,” Schweizer said.
It didn’t stop there.
“Then you had the FBI come a year later, which sends a letter to companies involved in this and said you should know that the ultimate purpose of this is for them to get access to classified technologies that can be applied for military purposes,” Schweizer said.
Related columns (story continues below):
Party platforms offer stark choice by Phyllis Schlafly
Is Trump the peace candidate? by Pat Buchanan
Schweizer said he’s less concerned about Russia directly using U.S. technology against America than he is about the Russians being willing to sell what they have to rogue nations and terrorist groups, just as it has assisted Iran and North Korea with nuclear programs.
In addition to the military intelligence gathered, Schweizer said Skolkovo has developed a sinister reputation for something else.
“Skolkovo was identified, beginning back in 2011 by cyber security experts as a main area of cyber attack by Russia, that they were launching cyber attacks and engaging in cyber crimes directed at Ukraine and other targets,” Schweizer said.
He said if Russia is involved in the hacking of Democratic Party institutions, it’s possible it’s origins lie in Hillary Clinton’s reset strategy.
“It is not inconceivable at all that a tech initiative that Hillary Clinton launched and oversaw as secretary of state is now the location of hackers who are hacking into sites in the United States,” Schweizer said.
Related articles
Bombshell: Hillary may have helped Russia hack DNC
Trump signs promise to fight sex exploitation of children
Hillary rejects FBI’s email findings
CNN anchor unloads on live TV: Trump ‘a bullsh—artist’
Republicans pile on Trump in Khan fracas
http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/bombshell-hillary-may-have-helped-russia-hack-u-s/
Hillary’s Hotline to Moscow Clinton Cash
As Democrats try to link Trump to Putin, new Clinton connections to Kremlin emerge
1 Aug 2016 by Kathryn Blackhurst
Just as the Democrats closed out their convention week by painting Donald Trump as firmly intertwined with Russian President Vladimir Putin, new details emerged exposing Hillary Clinton’s actual cozy Russian relationship.
During her tenure as secretary of state, Clinton was charged with helping to oversee a major “reset” of relations with Russia, primarily by exchanging technological information.
The takeaway is Clinton intentionally opened up access to U.S. technology and secrets to Russian actors and made herself the fulcrum of the transaction.
The highly trumpeted shift in policy was manifest in the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission in 2009 that made Clinton the chief American representative, alongside Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. The commission’s mission was to identify “areas of cooperation and [pursue] joint projects” between Silicon Valley and its Russian counterpart in Skolkovo.
“Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel, and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion,” Peter Schweizer, the author of “Clinton Cash,” wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday. “By 2012 the vice president of the Skolkovo Foundation, Conor Lenihan — who had previously partnered with the Clinton Foundation — recorded that Skolkovo had assembled 28 Russian, American, and European ‘Key Partners.’ Of the 28 ‘partners,’ 17, or 60 percent, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton.”
But it wasn’t only U.S. firms who benefited from the official policy that contributed to the Clinton Foundation.
Russians involved in the Skolkovo thaw also sent in whopping donations to the Clinton catch-all depository for wealth and influence.
Security experts raised alarms that the transfer jeopardized national security in favor of temporary global financial interests.
Research from the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at For Leavenworth stated Skolkovo is a “vehicle for worldwide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.”
“The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies,” Lucia Ziobro, an assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office, wrote in an op-ed in 2014. “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application.”
The takeaway is Clinton intentionally opened up access to U.S. technology and secrets to Russian actors and made herself the fulcrum of the transaction — while American-based global corporations and the Russians contributed to her family’s foundation. Yet the media has allowed her allies to link unknown hackers, possibly of Russian nationality, to some myth that Donald Trump is Putin’s pick for president.
Of course the self-preserving spin isn’t surprising from the Democrats since so much damning material was contained in the over 19,000 emails leaked from the Democratic National Committee.
“We know that Russian intelligence services, which is part of the Russian government which is under the firm control of Vladimir Putin, hacked into the DNC. And we know that he arranged for a lot of those emails to be released,” Clinton told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace over the weekend, adding that “we know that Donald Trump has shown a very troubling willingness to back up Putin, to support Putin.”
When Wallace pressed Clinton over whether or not she thought Putin and the Russians theoretically acted on behalf of Trump’s presidential campaign, the former secretary of state balked a bit – but only a tiny bit.
“Well, I’m not going to jump to that conclusion, but I think laying out the facts raises issues about Russian interference in our elections, in our democracy,” Clinton responded. “And for Trump to both encourage that and to praise Putin despite what appears to be a deliberate effort to try to affect the election I think raises national security issues.”
We’re All In This Together
Bill Clinton Defends Clinton Foundation’s Foreign Money | NBC Nightly News
CLINTON CASH OFFICIAL DOCUMENTARY MOVIE ( FULL )
“Evita” & The Clinton Foundation | Exclusive “Hillary’s America” Clip
Related Content
PoliZette
Democrats Russian to Conclusions
Clinton allies and the media use boogeyman Russia to distract from massive DNC scandal
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/hillarys-hotline-moscow/
The Washington Post calls out #CrookedHillary for what she REALLY is. A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR! Watch that nose grow! pic.twitter.com/FsrUGByuuD
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 2, 2016
Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, ISIS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Trump, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House