Samantha Power
If Obama had created her, he could not have done better than his anti-American minion Samantha Power. And, if he becomes Secretary-General of the United Nations, he will find a willing ally in Samantha Power to use the UN to destroy America.
Power and Authority at United Nations:
On 5 August 2013, Samantha Power became the 28th United States Ambassador to the United Nations (UN). Power’s nomination was highly criticized and controversial, with a large number of highly placed former Ambassadors and Public Policy Officials opposing her nomination.
One such critic was the former United States (US) Ambassador to the UN, John R. Bolton. In a strange foreshadowing of Barrack Hussein Obama lining up minions in the UN, in a 14 June 2013 interview, Ambassador Bolton told Secure Freedom Radio that:
I think she is a very accurate reflection of Obama’s own views, and as many others have speculated, now that Obama’s free from ever having to go before the American public again, he is much more inclined in a second term to engage in this multilateralism, this search for what his Secretary of State, John Kerry, calls in the 2004 election ‘America submitting to the global test.’ You know, do our foreign policies satisfy the members of the [UN] Security Council, can we get their approval before we do anything.
It goes to the fundamental question of American sovereignty: Do we decide on issues like the death penalty, gun control, the environment, abortion, you name it? All these things we normally consider issues of domestic debate for our constitutionally democratic system. Or, do we throw all this into the international arena for the membership of the UN to decide what our policies are?
So what kind of words would upset the brilliant and honorable Ambassador Bolton? Here is what Power said in her 2003 article in the New Republic:
Instituting a doctrine of the mea culpa would enhance our credibility by showing that American decision-makers do not endorse the sins of their predecessors. When [German Chancellor Willy] Brandt went down on one knee in the Warsaw ghetto [in 1970], his gesture was gratifying to World War II survivors, but it was also ennobling and cathartic for Germany. Would such an approach be futile for the United States?
If Obama had created her, he could not have done better than his anti-American minion Power. And, if he becomes Secretary-General of the United Nations, he will find a willing ally in Samantha Power to use the UN to destroy America.
Short Bio:
Samantha Power was born in Dublin, Ireland. Although her parents immigrated to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania when Power was nine years old, Power did not become a Citizen of the United States until she was 23 years old.
Power attended Yale University and received a Juris Doctor (JD) from Harvard Law School.
—
Hervé Ladsous
Most recently Hervé Ladsous has come to the ardent defense of UN “Peacekeepers” accused of rape and sodomy of vulnerable young children by UN Forces.
Power and Authority at United Nations:
Hervé Ladsous is the United Nations (UN) Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed Ladsous on 2 September 2011. The Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) is the Political and Executive head of UN Peacekeeping operations.
Mr. Ladsous’ significance under a UN Secretary-General Barrack Hussein Obama would be that he “drank the Kool-Aid.” Ladsous deeply believes in UN Peacekeeping Operations in resolving conflicts in sovereign nations. And worse, he will do anything, including annihilating the Press’ freedom of speech to defend the DPKO. Most recently Ladsous has come to the ardent defense of UN “Peacekeepers” accused of rape and sodomy of vulnerable young children by UN Forces.
Much like the excuses given by the far left wing in Europe and Scandinavia for the “Rapefugees,” Ladsous, who is French, has disastrously handled the allegations against French UN “Peacekeeping” Forces. In mid-2015, a UN Aid Worker, Anders Kompass, in what can only be called an act of deep moral courage, leaked a confidential UN document which clearly showed the rape and sodomy of young boys, some only nine years old, by French UN “Peacekeeping” Troops in Bangui, Central African Republic (CAR).
Fresh allegations against the UN Mission in CAR, known as MINUSCA, arose again in January 2016. Part of the problem Ladsous faces is that while it was a French-Command UN Peacekeeping mission, it was not the French troops who are accused of the rapes and sodomy. Rather it was those from the countries of Bangladesh, Morocco, Niger, Senegal and the Democratic Republic of Congo, who are accused. Making this a thorny issue, bringing up un-Politically Correct questions.
Ladsous saw that Kompass was suspended. Unlike the United States (US), which has strict “Whistleblower Laws,” the US headquartered UN, operates under its own set of rules. While the US remains the largest financial donor to the UN, it has placed no pressure on the organization to address these, or other, horrendous human rights violations committed by French UN Troops in CAR. Instead, the US has praised and lauded Ladsous for his work as Under-Secretary-General.
Why has Ladsous not had more public ridicule? One of the reasons is the UN heads thuggishly, as if they were 3rd World Dictators, squash the free press. Such diverse media outlets as the InnerCity Press, The Washington Times to The New American have reported on Ladsous’ attempts to stop reporters.
Alex Newman in May 2015, reporting in The New American, stated that, “From blacklisting and threatening journalists and whistleblowers around the world, to waging a global war on free speech and seeking control over the Internet, the UN, widely ridiculed as the “dictators club,” has developed a sordid reputation when it comes to press freedom.”
Fortunately, in the age of “The New Media” such back alley, 3rd World Dictator tactics can be brought to light. Reporters have taken to videotaping Ladsous’ behavior and posting videos on the Internet. That will continue to happen, until the UN can begin to take over the Internet and stop those revealing to seek the truth.
Short Bio:
Hervé Ladsous, a French national, was born in 1950. Prior to becoming the UN Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, he served as Ambassador of France to the People’s Republic of China. He has also worked as Chief of Staff (Directeur de Cabinet) for the French Minister of Foreign and European Affairs. Ladsous obtained a Degree in Law and a Diploma in Chinese and Malay Indonesian from the National School of Oriental Studies in Paris, France.
—
Lt. General Maqsood Ahmed
While Obama’s attempts to break the back of the United States military have failed, military troops and police from other nations – under the Blue Beret of the United Nations – who have no loyalty to the Citizens of the United States of America, could be used to do his bidding.
Power and Authority at United Nations:
Lieutenant General Maqsood Ahmed HI(M) is Military Adviser for the Office of Military Affairs at the United Nations (UN). As such he serves at the level of Assistant Secretary-General and reports to the Under-Secretary-General.
The Office of Military Affairs (OMA) at the UN is responsible for deploying the UN Military. As of 31 August 2015, the total number of Police, UN Military Experts and Troops was 106,245. Of that 90,889 were ground Troops; 13,550 were Police; and 1,806 were Military Expert Observers. This does not include the 16,791 UN Civilian Personnel and 1,710 UN “Volunteers” who work under Lt. General Ahmed. The OMA budget for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 was $8.27 Billion USD.
The above figures are highly important if Barrack Hussein Obama is appointed the next Secretary-General of the United Nations. While Obama’s attempts to break the back of the United States Military, combined with his efforts to undermine local Police Authority, failed, Military Troops and Police from other nations – under the Blue Beret of the United Nations – who have no loyalty to the Citizens of the United States of America could be used to do his bidding. If it were deemed necessary for the OMA to send UN Military Forces into the United States, these are the vast recourses, mostly funded by US Taxpayers, which would be at hand.
Short Bio:
Lt. General Ahmed is from Pakistan, the dear friends of the United States of America, who didn’t seem to “know” that Osama Bin Laden was in their country. For over a decade following the Islamic terrorist attacks on the United States, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) seemed to be “unaware” that the person who orchestrated the horrific attacks on September 11, 2001 was residing happily in their country.
Lt. General Ahmed was so integral to Pakistani Armed Forces and Intelligence, that he received the Hilal-i-Imtiaz HI(M). The HI(M) is awarded to both Civilians, and Military Officers of the Pakistani Armed Forces, and is the second highest civilian award given by the Government of Pakistan.
Lt. General Ahmed Maqsood Ahmad took his Commission in the Frontier Force (FF) Regiment in the 61st PMA Long Course in April 1980. The FF Regiment is one of six Infantry Regiments of the Pakistan Army.
While serving as Major General, Maqsood Ahmed commanded the 12th Infantry Division in Muree which holds a key position in Pakistan due to Line Of Control (LOC) with India being under its command. Maqsood Ahmed has served as Deputy Director General of the infamous Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), serving under Lt. General Ahmad Shuja Pasha and later under Lt. General Zahir ul Islam.
Lt. General Ahmed has attended the Command and Staff College Quetta and the National Defense University in Islamabad, Pakistan. Maqsood Ahmad was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant General on 11 January 2013. Later, he was given another key position as the Corps Commander of IV Corps, Lahore, Pakistan. The IV Corps is nicknamed the Lahore Corps, with its important due to its geographic proximity to India.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon announced on 26 August 2013 the appointment of Lt. General Maqsood Ahmad as Military Adviser for Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations.
—
Filippo Grandi
Antonio Guterres helped orchestrate the beginning of the Muslim Invasion, and it appears Filippo Grandi is already showing how he will complete his predecessor’s work.
Power and Authority at United Nations:
On 1 January 2016, Filippo Grandi was elected by the United Nations General Assembly to become 11th United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Grandi will serve a five-year term, until 31 December 2020.
As High Commissioner, Grandi has a staff of nearly 10,000, who work in 126 countries, ready to do his bidding. He controls a budget that is projected in 2016 is to be over $7 Billion USD, a large part of which will be paid for by the taxpayers of the United States of America.
Grandi has taken over the UNHCR at the most critical moment in the world, with Western Civilization facing the worst Muslim Migrant Invasion in history. And, make no mistake, Grandi is already pushing for the continued invasion, and its subsequent destruction of, the West.
Many thought Grandi’s predecessor, Portuguese Socialist politician Antonio Guterres, who even suggested that Japan take in Muslim migrants, was over the deep end. Guterres helped orchestrate the beginning of the Muslim Invasion, and it appears Grandi is already showing how he will complete his predecessor’s work.
With Europe on the brink of collapse, Grandi told the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in January 2016, immediately after taking office, that he believed, “Europe can absorb more genuine refugees if it would be better organised among the different member-states.” Clearly, Grandi didn’t get the Memo about what happened in Cologne, Germany, when his precious “refugees” turned into “Rapefugees,” sexually assaulting and attacking nearly 400 German women.
Short Bio:
Filippo Grandi was born in 1957 in Milan, Italy. He studied in Italy and received a degree in Modern History from the State University in Milan, and a Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree in Philosophy from the Gregorian University in Rome. Grandi was given an Honorary Doctorate from the University of Coventry in England.
Deeply embedded in the Muslim Invasion, Grandi is a Senior Research Fellow at Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs (IFI) at the American University of Beirut (AUB).
And, insuring that he helps indoctrinate the next generation, he is an Honorary Associate of the Department of International Development of the University of Oxford.
Out of his 31 years of employment, 27 have been with the United Nations.
—
Ronny Abraham
Were Barack Hussein Obama, known for his deep hatred of the United States Military and past US Foreign Policy, to become Secretary-General, he could push for the US to rejoin the ICJ. Combined with a Left Wing US President, such as Hillary Rodham Clinton, or even ole Joe Biden, Obama’s agenda to have the UN take control of the United States would be deeply furthered by the US rejoining the ICJ.
Power and Authority at United Nations:
Ronny Abraham currently sits as the President of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) The ICJ is also known as the World Court. Abraham began his tenure in 2009 and was reelected for an additional term, which runs through 2018. Of the six principal organs of the United Nations (UN), the ICJ is the only one not located in United States (US), instead located at The Hague, Netherlands. The ICJ has 15 judges, who are elected for terms of office of nine years by the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council. The ICJ’s official languages are English and French.
The World Court was established in 1945 by the UN Charter. The Court is the successor to the Permanent Court of International Justice. The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the main constitutional document constituting and regulating the Court. In 1986, in the case of Nicaragua v. United States, the ICJ found US actions in Nicaragua violated international law.
As a result, the US withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction. Using Chapter XIV of the United Nations Charter, the US sought and obtained veto of five permanent members of the UN Security Council in the case.
Were Barack Hussein Obama, known for his deep hatred of the United States Military and past US Foreign Policy, to become Secretary-General, he could push for the US to rejoin the ICJ. Combined with a Left Wing US President, such as Hillary Rodham Clinton, or even ole Joe Biden, Obama’s agenda to have the UN take control of the United States would be deeply furthered by the US rejoining the ICJ.
Short Bio:
Ronny Abraham was born in Alexandria, Egypt on 5 September 1951. He earned his degree in Advanced Studies in Public Law at the Pantheon-Sorbonne University, also known as “La Sorbonne” or “Paris I.” Abraham is an alumnus of École nationale d’administration (ENA). ENA is one of the symbols of the French Republic meritocracy, which, along with École normale supérieure and Ecole polytechnique (“X”), offers its alumni/alumnae access to the highest positions within the State.
—
Stephen O’Brien
Regardless of who gets the White House in 2016, whoever anoints Obama Secretary-General of the UN will reap the massive benefits of his control over the billions in US Taxpayer money given without question to the UN each year.
Power and Authority at United Nations:
Stephen O’Brien was appointed Under-Secretary-General and Emergency Relief Coordinator (USG/ERC) on 1 June 2015. The term appointment is for five years. He succeeded the highly controversial Valerie Amos, who had served from September 2010 through May 2015.
Because many liberals felt the United Nations wasn’t bloated enough, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) was formed in December 1991 by General Assembly Resolution 46/182. Under its current manifestation the OCHA sees itself as having five primary roles in Humanitarian Affairs. Those roles are: Coordination, Policy, Advocacy, Information Management and Humanitarian Financing.
Like any other bureaucracy without any true checks or oversights on its spending, OCHA’s 2016 Budget is $309 Million USD. As of the beginning of 2016, OCHA’s staff numbers were at 2,271, but most likely to increase as OCHA seeks additional funds, citing the pressures placed in the UN Agency under the current war in Syria.
And, while those with Liberal Left Wing agendas always like to point to those who benefit from war, such as weapons manufacturers, they prefer to bury how much the United Nations is making during this current “Refugee” crisis. Imagine what Barrack Hussein Obama could do as Secretary-General with all the money directly under his control. As soon as it was speculated that Obama was seeking the position of UN Secretary-General, rumors started among the Political Elite Class. One of the rumors suggested that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s The Clinton Foundation, was perfectly poised, as a nonprofit 501c3, for prized contracts from the United Nations.
Regardless of who gets the White House in 2016, whoever anoints Obama Secretary-General of the UN will reap the massive benefits of his control over the billions in US Taxpayer money given without question to the UN each year.
Short Bio:
Stephen Rothwell O’Brien was born 1 April 1957 into the British Empire in Mtwara, Tanganyika Territory. Tanganyika Territory is what would become modern day Tanzania. O’Brien was first educated in East Africa at the Loretto School in Mombasa, Kenya. He then went to the Handbridge School (Chester), the Heronwater School (Abergele), Sedbergh School. In college he attended Emmanuel College, Cambridge University.
At Cambridge he received a Master of Arts (MA) in Law in 1979. He went on to receive an MA from the College of Law in Chester in 1980. Following his education, O’Brien began a long career as a lawyer and politician, among a few other short-stint jobs, finally finding the perfect Liberal resting place as the UN Under-Secretary-General and Emergency Relief Coordinator.
H/T Futuret
http://conservativeamerica-online.com/6-un-officials-who-want-to-take-over-america-samantha-power/
—–
NERVOUS’ JEB DEFENDS POPPY BUSH’S ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’
‘It might mean something different to you than it means to me’
Feb 5, 2016 LEO HOHMANN
George Herbert Walker Bush was the first president to popularize the idea of creating a multinational ‘new world order’ following the first invasion of Iraq in 1991.
Jeb Bush found himself in the awkward position of having to answer for his father’s legendary statements on the need to create a “new world order.”
The topic was raised by a questioner at a town-hall meeting in Laconia, New Hampshire, Wednesday where Bush was campaigning for next week’s GOP primary.
A man stood up and asked the former Florida governor: “Your father spoke of a new world order. If elected, specifically, how will you continue to move the country toward this goal?”
Bush seemed taken aback, stumbling over his words and, at first, refusing to answer the question.
“I don’t know. I don’t have any intention to, uh, lead… I don’t know what that means to you so I’m not going to answer it. It makes me nervous to… It might mean something different to you than it means to me.”
But he quickly found his footing and provided a long, rambling explanation of national security and the importance of the United States staying “engaged” in the world.
“I believe that the priority of the president of the United States is to keep us safe. Period. Over and out,” he said. “And the way you do that is by leading in the world, by engaging the world.”
Watch Jeb Bush answer a New Hampshire voter’s question about the “new world order’:
“We can’t build walls around to protect us from all the goings on around the world,” he continued. “We have to engage. And today in America, today in the world, our friends no longer think we have their back. And our enemies no longer fear us. And so we have more insecurity than we had before. I think if you look at the lessons of history, when the United States is engaged, building alliances, like NATO, building the support through the OCEAN countries for example. Making sure people know that it’s in our security interests, for our engagement, that we’re doing this for our security but we’re going to be there consistently.
“If that’s the new world order, I’m all for it. I don’t know. Tell me what you mean by it.”
The man restated his question about Bush’s father but his words cannot be heard on the video because he was not given a microphone.
Jeb Bush responded:
“Well what he (the first President Bush) said was the end of, the fall of, the Soviet Union, which he managed magnificently, created this new world order where the United States needed to stay engaged, needed to stay involved. And when we’re involved we create more security. I’m for that. That means, for example, that the next president needs to re-establish the iron-clad relationship with Israel. Iron clad. Take it to the bank. No gap between us. Shoulder to shoulder. Why is that important for us? It’s important because Israel is our strongest ally of course, in the Middle East. It’s also important because the Arab world, when they see the disruption of the Israel-U.S. relationship, they say, ‘We’re not going to be able to get a deal. If Israel can’t get a deal, you know, with the U.S., how can we do it?'”
But a closer look at the first President Bush’s famous “new world order” speech seems to go well beyond his son’s understanding of the term, or at least his recollection or willingness to repeat the terms of this new international order.
So, what exactly did Jeb’s father say about this controversial topic?
Here is President George Herbert Walker Bush speaking from the Oval Office on Jan. 16, 1991, about his now-famous “new world order.”
“We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations, a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order. An order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.”
Watch video of President George H.W. Bush defining his vision of the coveted “new world order.”
President Clinton also spoke repeatedly of the new world order, and even Jeb’s brother, President George W. Bush, referred to it. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has talked incessantly of creating a new world order.
But for Jeb Bush, the term made him “nervous” and he proceeded to give a long-winded answer that avoided difficult issues like how much sway the United Nations should be given over U.S. foreign and domestic policy.
He focused instead on the need to cultivate close relations with allies and to rebuke enemies like Iran but avoided the sticky issue of which entity should serve as the primary mechanism for implementing the new world order – the U.S., the U.N. or some other body?
Jeb never mentioned the U.N., its founders or financial backers. If he had, it would have required him to talk about some questionable characters, such as the globalist Rockefeller family that donated the real estate for the United Nations in New York City, or British eugenicist and Planned Parenthood supporter Julian Huxley, who was instrumental in the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization or UNESCO.
It is this organization, UNESCO, that provided the bedrock principles for the Common Core educational standards that Jeb Bush has enthusiastically supported.
He might have also mentioned the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 manifesto that was approved by world leaders in September. This document goes into great detail on the importance of open borders and the rights of migrants, which Jeb has also enthusiastically supported.
The Agenda 2030 document lists 17 goals that are to be met by 2030.
Goal No. 10 is to “reduce inequality within and among countries,” with the buzzword “inequality” being a euphemism for wealth redistribution.
The document states that one of the ways to achieve the U.N.’s desired equality is to, “Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies.”
In other words, every impoverished person living in an undeveloped Third World country has the right under this U.N. document to migrate to a developed country.
Goal No. 16 goes a step further calling for “peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development” and providing access to justice for all. One of the methods listed as critical for the achievement of this goal is to “provide legal identity for all, including birth registration” of all babies.
Jeb Bush did mention Russia’s “invasion of Ukraine” and the allowing of ISIS to create a caliphate as events that would have been dealt with “quietly” with a “big stick,” under his leadership, as opposed to with Obama’s “grandiose language” and then doing nothing.
“When we don’t confront the ambitions of Iran but give the perception that we’re changing teams and now are supportive more of Iran than we are of the Sunni Arab nations, that creates massive instability in the world,” Jeb Bush said in New Hampshire Wednesday. “We need to get back in the game to say, ‘We have your back. We’re not the world’s policemen but we have your back, because it’s in our security interests that you have stability.’ ”
http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/nervous-jeb-defends-poppy-bushs-new-world-order/
—-
Clinton: I Cannot Be Part Of The “Establishment” As A Woman Running For President
February 5, 2016 by Jonathan Turley
I have found the Democratic debates really interesting to watch. For the first time in my lifetime, these debates actually have some substance and drama. There was a couple of interesting moments last night, including the suggestion by Hillary Clinton that it is out of bounds for Sanders to raise the money that she has taken from Wall Street as a “smear.”
I thought that Clinton did a good job on various points with strong responses, including the progressive label issue. However, one of the most intriguing moments was Clinton saying that it was ridiculous to call her the “establishment” candidate because she is a woman. For many, the Clintons are the personification of the establishment with huge donors, PACs, control of the DNC, and a massive political machine. Yet, Clinton’s point is that she is also the trying to become the first woman president and thus must be considered an outsider candidate. It seemed to resonate with the crowd, though Sanders appears to have tied Clinton in a national poll despite an concerted campaign from Democratic leaders and politicians aligned with Clinton. I thought it would make for an interesting discussion on the blog.
Here is the exchange:
Sanders: “I will absolutely admit that Secretary Clinton has the support of far more Governors, Senators, Mayors, members of the House. She has the entire establishment or almost the entire establishment behind her. That’s a fact. I don’t deny it. I’m pretty proud that we have over a million people who have contributed to our campaign averaging 27 bucks a piece.”
Clinton: “I’ve got to just jump in here because, honestly, Senator Sanders is the only person who would characterize me a woman running to be the first woman president as exemplifying the establishment.”
While I certainly understand her point and that women remain underrepresented in politics, it is also true that many of the most powerful folks in Washington are women. Indeed around the world, women are the increasingly prominent like Angela Merkel, Melinda Gates, Janet Yellen, Mary Barra, Christine Lagarde, Dilma Rousseff, Sheryl Sandberg, Susan Wojcicki, Park Geun-hye, Oprah Winfrey, Ginni Rometty, Meg Whitman, Indra Nooyi, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, Irene Rosenfeld, Ana Patricia Botín, Abigail Johnson, Marillyn Hewson and others. In Congress, there were ranked by CQ:
PARTY POWER
Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.)
Rep. Kay Granger (R-Tex.)
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif)
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.)
MEDIA SAVVY
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.)
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)
DEBATE SHAPERS AND SWING VOTES
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)
Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.)
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska)
Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.)
POLICY DEALMAKERS
Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.)
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Was.)
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.)
Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.)
POLICY WORKHORSES
Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)
Rep. Nita M. Lowey (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Cynthia M. Lummis (R-Wyo.)
BREAKING OUT
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.V.)
Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.)
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii)
Rep. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.)
FRESHMEN ON THE RISE
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Ia.)
Rep. Gwen Graham (D-Fla.)
Rep. Mia Love (R-Utah)
Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.)
Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.)
Again, none of this means that women are adequately represented. Moreover, I think that there remains sexism in how some people view women in power, particularly in seeking the highest office in the land. However, is it still far game to say that Clinton cannot be the symbol of the establishment because she is a woman? It may turn on the meaning of what the “establishment” is in politics.
What do you think?
Clinton: I Cannot Be Part Of The “Establishment” As A Woman Running For President
—-
Related
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/02/05/newsmax-ceo-give-jeb-a-second-look/
Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, Ebola, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, ISIS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House