2015-10-07


-Guns, Ammo Targeted: N.Y. Cedes Law-enforcement Policy to European Think Tank
-OREGON STUDENT SHOT IN ATTACK OPPOSES GUN CONTROL, FAMILY WANTS ARMED GUARDS IN SCHOOLS
-OREGON SHOOTING VICTIM’S FAMILY TO OBAMA: ‘QUIT’ WITH THE GUN CONTROL AGENDA
-OBAMA ARMS ISIS-LINKED MILITANTS, PUSHES GUN CONTROL ON VERY SAME DAY
-If guerilla warfare were our only viable option to survive a little longer as a nation, these gentlemen underscore the importance of why a nation should never surrender its guns.
-MB Obama Working on More Gun Control Executive Actions

5 Oct, 2015 by Dave Hodges

Many in the know, believe America has two options when it comes to winning a world war against China and Russia. Also, what most agree on is the fact that America cannot win a conventional war against either power, or both.

Coincidence or Conspiracy On the Part of Obama?

Is it just a coincidence that Obama has been outmanuevered by Putin, again? Because of Obama’s ineptitude or spirit of treason, you choose the correct answer, Russia has commenced military operations in the Middle East with its attacks upon ISIS. I, for one, have a very difficult time believing that Obama did not know what the Russians were about to do in Syria, given our sophisticated surveillance capabilities. As a result, Russia has begun killing CIA assets on the ground in Syria and Obama, just like Nero before him, continues to fiddle and does nothing. Many of us have concluded that America cannot win a war against the Russians or the Chinese as long as Obama is President. What are America’s options if it intended to win World War III?

Why the United States Cannot Win a Conventional War Against Russia and China

Every military source I speak with says the same thing when it comes to the United States having any chance to win World War III. First, the war cannot be conventional for reasons that will become clear later in this article. Second, in order for the United States to win such a war, the conflict would have to be a well-coordinated nuclear attack which would combine the United States nuclear fire power derived from the three sources: (1) Deep space platforms; (2) Both hardened silos and mobile misslie launcher that are land based; and, (3) A devastating attack from the entire submarine fleet. There is a fourth factor to consider and that is the hope that America’s nuclear first strike destroyed enough of the enemies ICBM’s and nuclear armed submarines, that our HAARP like defenses can knock down enough incoming ICBM’s to make any real difference. I have learned from my military sources, that they believe that this is possible, but not likely with Obama serving as the Commander-In-Chief.

The coming war, in whatever form it will take, will largely feature what pundits call the BRIC nations and the USA and her allies. Each side of this coming conflict possesses widely divergent military strengths, weaknesses and strategies and this article will explore the relative strengths and weaknesses.

The US Is Dependent On a Devastating First Strike Attack

In addition to a nuclear first strike, the United States and her allies have a decided advantage of quick strike, long range battlefield capabilities because of superior aircraft and carrier strike capabilities. The Chinese have developed and are close to making operation, carrier-busting weapons platforms. A major advantage enjoyed by the US is about to be totally negated by an advancement in Chinese technology.

On the other hand, the BRIC nations have an advantage with manpower, rocket propelled weapons and tanks. The USA and her allies cannot win a sustained battlefield campaign because of the attrition factor. Yes, America enjoys the advantage in the air, yet bombing has always proven to be a means to an end, never to be an offensive strategy. In conventional war, it always comes down to the boots on the ground. At the end of the day, America will be dependent on a successful nuclear first strike if it has any hope of prevailing in a World War III scenario.

The Chinese have demonstrated the ability to negate the United States Navy’s technological advantage through the use of killer satellites. Therefore, the entire US strategy is predicated on a first strike before the Chinese can destroy the majority of the eyes and ears of the US military, namely, its superior satellite capabilities in which the US forces can quickly locate and destroy the enemy with its smart weapons before the enemy knows what hit them.

Nuclear Submarines Are the “X Factor”



America’s “X Factor”.



The BRICS cannot run or hide from this devastating weapon.

Nuclear submarines are often looked at as the great equalizer. No matter who is winning on the ground, in the air and on the surface of the oceans, the submarine force has the capability to reign down unimaginable destruction upon their enemy. In the case of submarines, the US and her allies are matched by their BRIC counterparts. Most older subs carry eight nuclear missiles, each capable of destroying a major city. The newer submarines can carry a payload of 16 or more missiles. The US, at the moment, has superior evasive techniques and therefore, would presumably survive sub-killer strategies with greater frequency that their BRIC adversaries. Therefore, the BRIC nations might win every land battle, however, the victorious BRIC nations would not have many of its cities left to return to in the case that the war become a nuclear war. The US submarines are, in effect, a formidable doomsday weapon. My military sources state that although Russia has improved its nuclear submarine force, it still has not sufficiently closed the gap to offset this American advantage. However, that is quickly changing with advances in Russian and Chinese technology. For a short time, in particular, the Chinese have not yet been able to fully integrate their advancements into a coordinated and operational manner. That will soon change and time is not on America’s side.

The Trigger Event

I have been writing for three years that the trigger event would occur in Syria and recent events, with Russia engaging in military attacks upon the US backed ISIS and other Syria rebel forces, are moving the world in the ultimate direction of World War III. The absolutely insane John McCain has called for the shooting down of Russian planes in Syria. How long can it be until, we are engaged in full combat with the Russians? Or, how long will it be until Russia and Israel face off in the same geogrpahic area? Thank God for our submarine fleet and our Deep Space Platform weapons. I have come to believe that this is all that separates us from being totally subjugated. And thank God to the submarine fleet that refuses to surrender their nuclear launch codes to Obama no matter how many of its officers are fired.

Devastating first strike capability.

Command and Control of first strike capability.

The Tale of the Tape: The BRICS vs. the USA and Her Allies

BRIC Nations Conventional Military Strength

When one compares the relative strengths of both sides, the BRICS hold a decided advantage in any conventional conflict. And the difference is growing more significant by the day as Obama is reducing the size of the US military to pre-World War II levels while our enemies are increasing both their equipment and troop strength.

Most Likely to Fight

Country Men Planes Tanks Carriers Subs Rockets

Russia 766,000 / 3,082 / 1,550 / 1 / 62 / 3,781

China 2,825,000 / 2,788 / 9,150 / 1 / 69 / 1,770

India 1,325,000 / 1,785 / 3,569 / 2 / 17 / 292

Total 4,916, 000 / 7,655 / 14,269 / 4 / 148 / 5,843

Please note that this does not contain the Latin American contingent of nations that Putin is presently arming to fight the US.

(NOTE: The forces of North Korea would be absorbed by China

Ukraine and Belarus have a combined military strength of 200,000 men. However, because of recent events, the Ukraine forces may be compromised)

Allied Nations Conventional Military Strength

Country Men Planes Tanks Carriers Subs Missiles

US/Allies 3,345, / 20,475 / 8,325 / 13 / 141 / 2,700

This chart assumes NATO will hold together.

Source: Global Fire Power

With the BRICS conventional forces continuing to grow and the allies forces continuing to shrink, it is very clear that the US cannot win a conventional war of attrition.

NUCLEAR WEAPONS: BRIC NATIONS VS USA & ALLIES

The downside of a nuclear first strike by the United States would be that the US would also take a significant beating as Russian and probable Chinese and Indian nuclear forces would have time to retaliate. However, the US submarines could do much of the damage, because of geographical proximity, before our enemies could get many of their missles off the launching pads. If the deep space platform missiles were successful along with the “Rods from God” in targeting Russian and Chinese nuclear submarines, the United States could win a decisive victory. With regard to the “Rods from God”, does anyone think that the recent destruction of the four chemical plants in China was truly an accident?

There is one very disturbing variable to consider, even in an American nuclear first strike, without hardening our power grid infrastructure against an EMP attack, the US could lose its grid and along with it, 90% of the people within two years, according to the Naval War College. Obama, and Bush before him, have left America very vulnerable in this area.

Does Obama show any signs of protecting the power grid? Does he show any signs of standing up to Russian incursions into Syria? It is not likely that a well-coordinated and simultaneous attack could be launched without the leadership of the DOD which is under the control of the President, who shows no sign of mounting a resistance. With this type of leadership, America will be thrust into a World War of attrition which we will lose and lose badly.

Meanwhile, the psychopathic bankers who have perpetuated this scenario will be safely tucked away in the deep underground bunkers.

Likely refuge for the elite psychopathic banksters.

The likely refuge for the elite psychopathic banksters.

Options

As long as Obama, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, et al., are in the Oval Office, America will NEVER launch a nuclear first strike. We cannot win in a conventional world war. Therefore, as I pointed out in part one, Americans can continue their resistance, Viet Cong style, because of the 300 million hand guns at their disposal. This is a logistical nightmare for any occupation force. Flash back to this weekend, why do you supposed Obama is no longer speaking about gun control, in response to the Oregon shooting, he is speaking about the type of gun confiscation done in Australia.

Obama’s point, I have this to say. The University of Hawaii researchers tell us that there were 17 genocides in the 20th century and in everyone of these cases, gun confiscation came first. As distasteful is living in a country that could de-evolve into a decades long guerilla warfare scenario, the thought of being totally unarmed in the face of our future occupiers is unthinkable because of what they could have in store for us, is unthinkable. Any move upon our guns should be considered as an act of war against the American people and the people should react accordingly. I am convinced that this issue has be our collective line in the sand.

Sometimes a picture is worth a 1000 words

Never give up your guns America, because the coming conflict will eventually become a guerilla war.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/10/05/can-america-win-world-war-iii-a-critical-analysis/

—-
MB Obama Working on More Gun Control Executive Actions

05 Oct 2015 By Greg Richter

President Barack Obama is working on more executive actions related to gun control following the shooting on an Oregon college campus last week that left nine dead.

“It’s a high priority and will continue to be until we start to see more progress on this issue in this town,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said during the daily briefing on Monday.

Earnest said Obama was working behind the scenes to find ways to take actions, Breitbart reported.

Obama enacted 23 executive actions in 2013 following the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. He has expressed unhappiness that the Republican-controlled Congress has not taken action itself.

Earnest said he disagrees with anyone claiming that Obama did not offer specific proposals in his press conference about the shooting last week.

“I can tell you that they’re not stumped, they’re continuing to review the law that’s on the books and continuing to consult with legal authorities but also others who may have ideas about what steps that can be taken to keep guns out of the hands of criminals,” he said.

He admitted to not having any details on the administration’s plans, but did criticize the so-called “gun-show loophole” that allows for people to buy guns from private occasional sellers without having to have a background check.

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton on Monday announced her own plans for executive actions if she is elected. Earnest said the White House welcomes her ideas, though he said he hasn’t seen the details.

Clinton would use presidential executive authority to close a “loophole” to ensure people purchasing firearms at gun shows and online face the same background checks and sales taxes as buyers from traditional retailers.

Clinton would push Congress to prohibit domestic abusers, including stalkers, from purchasing guns and close what she called the “Charleston loophole,” referring to a June shooting at a predominantly black church in South Carolina that left nine dead.

If a background check is not completed within three days, a sale can proceed. The alleged Charleston shooter could buy his gun because of this loophole, as did 2,500 people in 2014, Clinton’s campaign said.

Clinton also said she would pursue the repeal of a 2005 law that she voted against as a U.S. senator representing New York. The legislation prevents victims of gun violence from holding negligent manufacturers and dealers accountable for crime committed with their guns.

“Nobody else is getting that immunity – and that just illustrates the extremism that has taken over this debate,” Clinton said.

Demand for firearms surged in the past when consumers feared gun control legislation was coming. On Monday afternoon, Smith & Wesson shares were up 5.1 percent at $17.44, and Sturm Ruger & Co had risen 2.7 percent to $57.99.

Material from Reuters was used in this report.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-gun-control-oregon/2015/10/05/id/694797/

—-
Guns, Ammo Targeted: N.Y. Cedes Law-enforcement Policy to European Think Tank

06 October 2015 by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

New York City is handing over part of is police power to “a new global, terror-busting network to try to combat homegrown extremism,” according to a press statement issued September 29.

In an announcement made at the United Nations, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio proclaimed his city’s intent to join the United Nations and the Justice Department in protecting Gotham from “all forms of violent extremism, whether it’s based in religious, or racial, or nationalistic or ideological intolerance.”

The Justice Department claims that the new law-enforcement partnership program — dubbed “Strong Cities” — is intended to inspire “action on a global scale.”

“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” said Attorney General Loretta Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”

Cities around the world are gladly “integrating” their efforts to “safeguard” citizens.

This globalist approach to international integration of law enforcement was praised recently by the mayor of Oslo, Norway: “To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance,” said Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo. “To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe to pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society,” he added.

According to Attorney General Lynch, the Strong Cities program “will be run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD),” a European think-tank.

Americans of a constitutionalist bent, knowing how the Department of Homeland Security looks at patriots, might be interested to read one of the ISD’s primary points of emphasis. From the group’s 2014 report entitled “Old Threat, New Approach: Tackling the Far Right Across Europe”: “The project will also develop an online tool to provide practical training for practitioners, and will seed a long-term network of experts and practitioners working to counter far-right extremism.”

Echoing the globalist sentiment expressed by de Blasio and Lynch, the ISD promotes a pan-national approach to fighting the right-wing:

Though often rooted in its local context, far-right extremism has impacts across borders. Groups and methods in one country are often mirrored elsewhere, and online connectivity is making this more common. There is also evidence of cooperation between national groups and the pooling of knowledge and expertise.

One can only imagine how the Justice Department and the ISD will interpret the following mandate set out in the white paper:

National governments need to put in place legal recognition for victims groups across all prerequisites of discrimination. These prerequisites need to be based on historical and current evidence, as well as anticipate future targeted identities.

As is so often the case, the group identifies right-wing extremism with ownership of guns and ammunition.

Now that the Justice Department and the ISD have been handed a significant role in settling law-enforcement policy for the largest city in the United States, gun owners should consider fleeing New York in advance of the enforcement of the following ISD observation: “Worryingly, Europol confirms that many members of the extreme right-wing scene have been found in possession of a significant amount of firearms, ammunition” and these “extremists” have even been known to participate in “target practice.”

Remember, the mayor of New York City has ceded his citizens’ control over their police to a group of globalist gun grabbers who truly believe that owning guns and ammo and taking target practice make one an extremist worthy of imprisonment.

This move toward international integration of global law-enforcement agencies is antithetical to the locally controlled police that are a part of and accountable to the community they serve. The Strong Cities initiative will prove to likely be another brick in the wall of enmity between police and people that grows higher with every encounter.

Self-serving bureaucrats inside the U.S. government are tirelessly trying to obliterate local police forces answerable to local citizens and promote the consolidation movement as a step toward federalization of law enforcement. These proponents of regional and national police forces desire nothing less than the eradication of all local police departments and sheriffs’ offices, the surrender of state and municipal sovereignty, and the conversion of local law-enforcement officers into federal security agents sworn not to protect and to serve their neighbors, but to protect the prerogatives of politicians.

Take for example the information contained in a White Paper presented in 2012 to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. In that report, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is encouraged to embark on an “evolving mission” away from its ostensible purpose of fighting terrorism, toward becoming the administrators of an enormous domestic intelligence agency resulting from an integration of the country’s local and state law-enforcement agencies.

This report was written by the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group, co-chaired by former DHS chief Michael Chertoff. The blueprint promoted in the White Paper pushes Congress toward green-lighting the growth of DHS and the dissolution of local police and sheriffs.

The organization described in the paper, entitled “Homeland Security and Intelligence: Next Steps in Evolving the Mission,” is reminiscent of more draconian governments. For example, one section of the report calls for a transition in the mission of DHS away from protecting the country from the “terrorism” of foreign militants and toward “more specific homeward focused areas.” Additional sections of the report lay out the plans for building a DHS/police hybrid agency that can monitor Americans in any town and prevent threats from fellow citizens.

In order to achieve their ultimate aim, the globalists demand that DHS or some other federal agency take control of the personnel decisions currently made by local police chiefs and county sheriffs. “As the threat grows more localized,” the report claims, “the federal government’s need to train, and even staff, local agencies, such as major city police departments, will grow.” Put another way: The federal government will run your local police department and sheriff’s office.

With the creation of the Strong Cities Network, we see that now that the Obama administration has granted control of the consolidation of law enforcement to the ISD, the policies will not only be determined in Washington, D.C., but in Europe (and by extension the United Nations), as well.

As of September 30, 23 cities around the world have joined the Strong Cities Network, including New York, Atlanta, Denver, and Minneapolis in the United States.

Americans living in those cities must realize the powerful anti-Second Amendment, anti-religious bent of the Strong Cities Network, and they must immediately begin pressing police and civic leaders to leave this globalist gang and return control of law enforcement to the people it is meant to serve and protect, rather than disarming them and serving and protecting the international forces of civilian disarmament.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/21702-guns-ammo-targeted-n-y-atlanta-cede-law-enforcement-policy-to-european-think-tank

—-
OREGON STUDENT SHOT IN ATTACK OPPOSES GUN CONTROL, FAMILY WANTS ARMED GUARDS IN SCHOOLS

16-year-old recovering after losing a kidney

OCTOBER 6, 2015 by STEVE WATSON

The family of one of the students wounded in the Oregon school shooting last week has spoken out against gun control, saying that what is needed are more armed guards in schools.

Cheyeanne Fitzgerald had to undergo surgery to remove one of her kidneys after being lucky to escape the massacre alive Thursday.

Speaking with The Daily Mail, her brother said that Cheyeanne and her entire family are supporters of the Second Amendment and remain steadfast in opposition to gun control.

“We’re pro second amendment, pro guns,” said Jesse Fitzgerald, sporting a pro-second amendment shirt.

Oregon shooting victim STILL opposes gun control and wants armed guards in schools: Jesse Fitzgerald (left) sp… http://t.co/6MvKhEQqcI

— milenio 2052 (@Milenio2052) October 5, 2015

“My sister, my mother, my whole family are all in favor. We were talking about it in the hospital and none of us have changed our minds.” he added.

“We should have teachers trained in non-lethal ways to take people down,” he noted when asked what potential solutions to schools being targeted by mentally troubled individuals.

“There is surely a way to defend kids at school. Armed guards on campuses maybe.” Fitzgerald said.

Fitzgerald revealed that his sister survived the ordeal by playing dead, and having to literally hide under the body of a classmate.

Cheyeanne’s mother, Bonnie Schaan, echoed the words of her son in an interview with NBC Nightly News, telling viewers “America we need to pack guns–if this is what it’s coming to–to have to protect ourselves.”

The family have set up a GoFundMe page, in the hope of raising $10,000 to cover Cheyeanne’s medical costs.

The family’s views are also shared by that of another victim’s relatives. The family of Quinn Cooper, who was tragically shot dead in the attack, told media while they are distraught, they do not want their son’s death to be used as an excuse to push further gun control laws.

“We are hearing so many people talk about gun control and taking people’s guns away,” the family said in a statement.

“If the public couldn’t have guns it wouldn’t help since sick people like this will always be able to get their hands on a gun. We need to be able to protect ourselves as a community and as a nation. Please don’t let this horrible act of insanity become about who should or shouldn’t have a gun.” the statement read.

Meanwhile, politicians, like Hillary Clinton continue to use the tragedy to advocate just that. Clinton has vowed to take executive action on the matter if elected president. Minions, such as Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, have echoed the call.

Murphy said on MSNBC News that “Congress is effectively quietly endorsing these mass murders” by not passing stricter gun control laws.

http://www.infowars.com/oregon-student-shot-in-attack-opposes-gun-control-family-wants-armed-guards-in-schools/

—–
OREGON SHOOTING VICTIM’S FAMILY TO OBAMA: ‘QUIT’ WITH THE GUN CONTROL AGENDA

6 Oct 2015 by AWR HAWKINS

In the October 5 airing of CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 (AC360) the family of Umpqua Community College shooting victim Cheyenne Fitzgerald said they wish Obama would “look where the problem really lies and quit running the gun [control] agenda.”

Breitbart News previously reported that Fitzgerald’s mother, Bonnie Schaan, emerged from time at daughter’s hospital bed saying her daughter should have been allowed to arm for self-defense and suggested Americans everywhere should arm themselves so they are ready to protect their lives and the lives of their families.

Schaan said, “America we need to pack guns–if this is what it’s coming to–to have to protect ourselves.”

On AC360, Schaan was joined by Fitzgerald’s brother Jessie, and they spoke with Anderson Cooper about guns and the way forward from here. Cooper asked Jessie what he would say if given the chance to talk with President Obama, and Jessie said, “I would tell him to look where the problem really lies and quit running the gun [control] agenda.” Jessie said that guns are not the problem in America, mental illness is. He said, “All of us talk about and I don’t know why we are hiding from it.” He said that focusing on guns instead of mental illness is putting “so much money and…resources where they shouldn’t be.”

Jessie was measured but critical of the way Obama spends money overseas, and he said that that money should be spent stateside, bettering our mental health system so people can get treatment.

Fitzgerald’s mother then talked to Cooper about how wonderful her daughter is. She added, “I feel like our children ought to be able to protect themselves, somehow.”

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/06/oregon-shooting-victims-family-obama-quit-gun-control-agenda/

—–
OBAMA ARMS ISIS-LINKED MILITANTS, PUSHES GUN CONTROL ON VERY SAME DAY

Obama authorizes resupplying “Syrian opposition” on same day he demanded gun control

OCTOBER 6, 2015 by KIT DANIELS

President Obama authorized a shipment of guns to the Syrian opposition, a.k.a. ISIS-linked militants, on the exact same day he demanded more gun control in response to the Oregon shooting.

Even more shocking, Obama did the very same thing after the 2013 D.C. Navy Yard shooting.

The president approved the re-arming of the Syrian opposition, which predominantly consists of ISIS and its affiliates, on Oct. 1, the same day Obama suggested the U.S. should start banning guns after the Umpqua Community College shooting.

“The approval came at a National Security Council meeting on Thursday,” CNN reported. “…The President also emphasized to his team that the U.S. would continue to support the Syrian opposition as Russia enters the war-torn country.”

Virtually all of the rebels in Syria have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State since at least 2013.

.@BarackObama Arms ISIS-Linked Militants, Then Pushes #GunControl On Very Same Day http://t.co/4rKnexLU9v #tcot #2a pic.twitter.com/SerYKSRmFx

— Kit Daniels (@KitDaniels1776) October 6, 2015

“The Free Syrian Army and the Syrian National Council, the vaunted bulwarks of the moderate opposition, only really exist in hotel lobbies and the minds of Western diplomats,” journalist Ben Reynolds wrote in November. “There is simply no real separation between ‘moderate’ rebel groups and hardline Salafists allied with al-Qaeda.”

The New York Times made a similar statement.

“Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of,” the newspaper reported in 2013.

Recently a group of Pentagon-trained “moderate rebels” known as Division 30 handed their weapons over to the Syrian al-Qaeda affiliate Jahbat al-Nusra.

The Pentagon had trained the group as part of a PR stunt to counter the fact that nearly all Syrian rebels are affiliated with ISIS.

“[Division 30] handed over a very large amount of ammunition and medium weaponry and a number of pick-ups,” a tweet from al-Nusra member Abu Fahd al-Tunisi stated.

And while Obama is arming these Islamic extremists who are beheading Christians and throwing gays off of buildings, he’s trying to disarm peaceful, law-abiding Americans.

“Each time this happens [a mass shooting] I am going to say that we can actually do something about it, but we’re going to have to change our laws,” he said Oct. 1.

However, it’s unlikely the Obama administration is requiring the ISIS-linked Syrian opposition to face the same restrictions and undergo the same background checks as gun owners in America.

In 2013, Obama waived a provision in federal law specifically designed to keep the U.S. government from supplying firearms to terrorist groups, according to the Washington Examiner.

On the very same day he waived the provision, he announced he was drafting executive orders for more gun control in response to the D.C. Navy Yard shooting.

http://www.infowars.com/obama-arms-isis-linked-militants-pushes-gun-control-on-very-same-day/

—–
Oregon Shooting Victim’s Family to Obama: ‘Quit’ with the Gun Control Agenda

Pro Gun Sheriff Investigating Oregon Shooting Refuses To Talk About Gun Control

Obama calls for changes to gun laws after Oregon college shooting

Oct 1, 2015

Former NYPD Detective Bo Dietl, Global Security Group CEO David Katz and Fox News Political Contributor Tammy Bruce on President Obama’s comments on the shooting at Umpqua Community College.

—–
Related

http://cnsnews.com/blog/mark-judge/actor-james-woods-i-was-right-obama-would-ignore-christian-hate-crime-element-oregon

http://cnsnews.com/commentary/david-limbaugh/facts-dont-work-gun-control-so-obama-uses-emotion

http://www.infowars.com/cnn-confiscate-guns-make-it-illegal-to-own-them/

—–
Related previous posts on this blog

https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2015/10/04/video-sandy-hook-2-militarized-oregon-police-put-students-in-prisoner-formations-confiscation-sandy-hook-actor-in-oregon/

https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2015/10/05/video-trump-defends-2nd-amendment-will-defend-himself-if-attacked-hillary-calls-for-movement-to-eradicate-2nd-amendment/

https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/26/video-un-posts-usa-gun-grab-ddr-jobs-for-disarmament-global-gun-confiscation-after-collapse/

https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/12/31/the-third-wave-of-obama-eo-us-martial-law-mass-detentions/

https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/02/08/46-senators-voted-for-u-n-resolution-2117-call-for-weapons-collection-and-disarmament/

Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, Ebola, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, ISIS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House

Show more