‘Do You Apologize or Not?’: Kerry, Cruz Spar Over What Gold Star Families Should be Told About Iran Sanctions Relief
-Ashton Carter: ‘I See No Reason to Foresee That’ Iran Will Change Its Behavior
-Kerry : ‘I Have No Specific Knowledge of a Plan by Iran to Actually Destroy Us’
This follows up yesterday’s post: VIDEO Kerry: Iran Deal Not a Treaty ‘Because You Can’t Pass a Treaty Anymore’
July 30, 2015 By Patrick Goodenough
(CNSNews.com) – Wednesday’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Iran nuclear agreement witnessed were some dramatic moments, especially as outspoken critics of the deal focused on one of Iran’s most notorious figures and his role in the killing of hundreds of Americans.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) got chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey to explain in stark terms the workings of an “explosively formed penetrator” (EFP), a particularly deadly form of roadside bomb used in Iraq.
Cotton also had Dempsey confirm that Iran’s Qods Force and its commander, Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, were the “main perpetrators” of the use of EFPs in the killing of hundreds of American military personnel there.
Turning to Secretary of State John Kerry, Cotton – himself a veteran with combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan – noted that as a result of the Iran nuclear deal, U.N. and European Union sanctions – although not U.S. ones – against Soleimani and the Qods Force will ultimately be lifted.
Gen. Qassem Soleimani, head of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp’ Qods Force, responsible for terror operations abroad. (AP Photo, File)
“What should we say to the Gold Star moms and dads of the over 500 American troops who were killed by an Iranian ball of fire traveling 6,000 feet per second?” he asked the secretary of state.
“Well, we should tell them, obviously first of all, how extraordinarily grateful we are for the service of their loved ones,” Kerry replied, adding that those families should also be assured that U.S. sanctions against Soleimani will “never” be lifted.
Later, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) returned to the subject of Soleimani – who the 2016 GOP presidential hopeful described as having “more blood of American service members on his hands than any living terrorist.”
“Now Secretary Kerry said to the families of those men and women who gave their lives, who were killed by General Soleimani, we should apologize,” Cruz said.
“I never said we should apologize,” Kerry said quietly as Cruz put questions to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter about the U.S. fatalities in Iraq.
Moments later Kerry tackled Cruz.
“Senator, I never said the word ‘apology,’” he began. “I said we should thank them for their extraordinary service. I never said the word ‘apologize.’ Please don’t distort my words.”
“Secretary Kerry,” Cruz shot back, “it is duly noted that you do not apologize to the families of the service members who were murdered by the Iranian military.”
“Not what I said, senator,” said Kerry.
“Do you apologize or not?” Cruz asked. “Are you – I, I don’t want to put words in your mouth, so which one is it?”
“I thanked them,” Kerry said. “I thanked them for their extraordinary service and I would remind them that the United States of America will never take the sanctions off Qassem Soleimani.”
Cruz asked Kerry once again: “Do you apologize or not? Because you wanted to clarify that point.”
“I said, we thank them for their service,” repeated Kerry, glowering. “But we will not take the sanctions off Qassem Soleimani.”
During Wednesday’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark. displayed a copy of this photo, showing a shrapnel-riddled Humvee after an ‘explosively formed penetrator’ explosion in Iraq.
Cruz also asked Carter to ensure that a list of some 500 Americans killed in Iraq by Iranian roadside bombs – which Cruz said he understood was in the possession of the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency – be declassified and released to members of the Senate Armed Services Committee as well as to the families of those named on the list.
“Let me look into that and I’ll get back to you,” Carter replied.
During questioning by Cotton, Dempsey explained an EFP’s workings.
“A copper cone is melted at super-high temperatures and projected, and essentially burns its way through armor plate,” he said.
Dempsey said “several hundred” Americans had been killed by EFPs in Iraq.
Asked whether Iran was the main supplier of the bombs, and whether Soleimani and the Qods Force were the “main perpetrators,” Dempsey on both counts replied “yes.”
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/do-you-apologize-or-not-kerry-cruz-spar-over-what-gold-star-families
—-
Kerry : ‘I Have No Specific Knowledge of a Plan by Iran to Actually Destroy Us’
July 29, 2015 By Patrick Goodenough
(CNSNews.com) – Secretary of State John Kerry says he does not know whether the Iranian regime truly wants to destroy America, but views its policy as one “of opposition to us and of great enmity.”
When Kerry appeared before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday to defend the Iran nuclear agreement, Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas) asked him about Tehran’s policy in the light of the “death to America” chants common at events presided over by supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Hasan Rouhani.
“It is the policy of the ayatollah – if you can answer for him – that Iran wants to destroy the United States?” Poe asked Kerry. “Is that still their policy, as far as you know?”
“I don’t believe they’ve said that. I think they’ve said ‘Death to America’ in their chants, but I have not seen this specific.”
“Well, I kind of take that to mean that they want us dead,” Poe said. “That would seem like that would be their policy. He said that. That – you don’t think that’s their policy?”
“I’m not mincing words,” he continued. “Do you think it’s their policy to destroy us?”
“I think they have a policy of opposition to us and of great enmity, but I have no specific knowledge of a plan by Iran to actually destroy us,” Kerry replied.
“I do know that the rhetoric is uh, is beyond objectionable,” he said. “I know that we, you know, are deeply concerned with Iran’s behavior in the region, deeply concerned with their past activities. Which is why President Obama felt –”
As Poe interrupted to ask a further question, Kerry interjected, “If they did want to destroy us, they’ve got a much better shot of doing it if they had a nuclear weapon.”
The administration contends that the negotiated agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) cuts off the various pathways Iran has to developing a nuclear weapons capability.
Kerry, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew faced a grilling by members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and, last week, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Skeptical lawmakers, Democrats among them, raised numerous concerns about elements of the deal – including the fact it provides what the State Department contends is the world’s foremost terror-sponsoring regime with more than $100 billion in frozen assets early on – and much more in the longer term as sanctions are removed.
Congress has until mid-September to review and potentially vote on the JCPOA.
President Obama has pledged to veto any resolution that rejects the agreement; its opponents would have to garner a two-thirds majority to override such a move.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/kerry-i-have-no-specific-knowledge-plan-iran-actually-destroy-us
—-
Kerry: ‘No Knowledge’ that ‘Death to America’ is ‘Specific Plan’
While selling the nuclear deal to Congress, Kerry testifies that he has no specific knowledge of plans by Iran to destroy the U.S., despite their iconic chant.
July 30, 2015
In his testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee to sell the U.S. administration’s deal between Iran and the world’s superpowers, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was pointedly asked, “Is it the policy of the ayatollah, if you can answer for him, that Iran wants to destroy the United States?”
The question, posed by Congressman Lloyd “Ted” Poe (R-Texas) was a reference to the many times the leaders of the Iranian regime have threatened to annihilate the United States.
In response, Kerry said, “I don’t believe they’ve said that. I think they’ve said ‘Death to America,’ in their chants, but I have not seen this specific.”
Poe countered, “Well, I kind of take that to mean that they want us dead. That would seem like that would be their policy. He said that. You don’t think that’s their policy? I’m not mincing words. Do you think it’s their policy to destroy us?”
“I think they have a policy of opposition to us and a great enmity, but I have no specific knowledge of a plan by Iran to actually destroy us,” Kerry answered.
In response to a further question posing the possibility that Iran would initially hold by the agreement until they had made a nuclear bomb (the construction of which would be facilitated by the $150 billion promised to them in sanctions relief), Kerry said that it wasn’t likely, saying Iran was under domestic pressure to use the money to improve their failing economy.
However, despite the fact economic sanctions have severely damaged Iran’s economy since they were imposed beginning in 1995, Tehran announced earlier this month it would extend a $1 billion credit line to the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad. It is the second such credit line extended by Iran, which previously lent Assad $1 billion in 2013.
In addition, while under economic sanctions, Iran has managed to give the Lebanese terror organization Hezbollah between $60-200 million annually.
In his first public speech since the announcement of the nuclear agreement between Iran and the world powers, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated Iran would continue to support its friends in the Middle East, including the Lebanese terrorist organization Hezbollah, the governments of Syria and Iraq, the “oppressed people” in Yemen and Bahrain, and Palestinian oppositions groups (such as Hamas).
http://www.clarionproject.org/news/kerry-no-knowledge-death-america-specific-plan
—-
Ashton Carter: ‘I See No Reason to Foresee That’ Iran Will Change Its Behavior
July 30, 2015 By Susan Jones
(CNSNews.com) – If Iran changes its behavior as a result of the nuclear deal, “that would be a welcome thing,” Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told Congress on Wednesday. But speaking “personally,” Carter said he does not “foresee” it happening.
Nevertheless, Carter said he supports the Iran nuclear deal President Obama is trying so hard to sell to a skeptical Congress. “It’s a good deal,” Carter told Congress.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, asked the question: “Do you, Secretary Carter, believe that Iran will change its behavior as a result if this agreement is finalized? And have you seen any indication of that?”
“I’ve not, Mr. Chairman. And speaking just from my own judgment, I don’t foresee that or have any reason to foresee that,” Carter responded.
“That is why it’s important that the agreement be verifiable, that’s why it’s important that Iran not have a nuclear weapon, and that’s also why it’s important that we keep doing everything that we need to do — defend our friends and allies, remain strong in the Gulf, freedom of navigation, ballistic missile defense — all the things we’re doing, we need to keep doing those things, and the agreement doesn’t limit us in any way.
“Obviously, if Iran changes it’s behavior, that would be a welcome thing, but I see no reason to foresee that, Chairman, personally,” Carter said.
“I see no reason to foresee it,” McCain agreed. He noted that as a result of lifting sanctions on Iran, the Islamic republic will have an extra $50-$60 billion “with which to pursue its “malign activities.”
“And I’ve seen (Treasury) Secretary (Jacob) Lew’s testimony and others that, no worry — they’ll be using it for domestic purposes. They’re doing it now (fomenting terrorism) with the assets they have. One can only imagine what they’ll be doing with $50 or $60 billion additional dollars,” McCain said.
At a news conference two weeks ago, President Obama said the main purpose of the Iran deal is to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. And he said the deal “is not contingent on Iran changing its behavior.”
But Obama also expressed the hope that “building on this deal, we can continue to have conversations with Iran that incentivize them to behave differently in the region, to be less aggressive, less hostile, more cooperative, to operate the way we expect nations in the international community to behave. But we’re not counting on it,” he added.
In his opening statement to the Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, Carter noted that the U.S. will continue to pursue its defense strategy in the Middle East:
“If Iran were to commit aggression, our robust force posture ensures we can rapidly surge an overwhelming array of forces into the region, leveraging our most advanced capabilities, married with sophisticated munitions that put no target out of reach,” Carter testified.
“Iran and its proxies will still present security challenges. Iran supports the Assad regime in Syria, backs Hezballah in Lebanon – whose fighting positions I observed firsthand during a visit to Israel’s northern border last week – and is contributing to disorder in Yemen. And Iran still directs hostility and violence to our closest ally in the region, Israel.
“In the face of that malign activity, we will continue to meet our commitments to our friends and allies in the region, especially Israel, and continue to build on and enhance our cooperation in meaningful ways.”
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) asked Carter on Wednesday if he believes that Iran remains the world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism.
“Ah, let’s see — state sponsor? Probably so,” Carter agreed.
“And there’s a goal and dream that somehow Iran can be rought in from the cold and we can work with them,” Sessions said, quoting a Reagan aide as saying that “revolutionaries don’t go back on the revolution.”
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/ashton-carter-i-see-no-reason-foresee-iran-will-change-its-behavior
—-
Surprise! Iran to Build Two New Nuclear Facilities
30 July 15 by Jordan Schachtel
An Iranian nuclear official announced on Thursday that the country plans to build two new nuclear power plants in the country’s southeast, just two weeks after a nuclear deal was signed between world powers (United States, UK, France, China, Russia) and the Ayatollah’s regime in Tehran.
The Deputy Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Mohammad Ahmadian, said that the two plants will be constructed on the coastline of the Indian Ocean, and that the plants will be at full-working capacity within a few years.
“At present, necessary studies to build the two power plants are being carried out through cooperation with 17 research institutes and consulting engineers companies,” said Ahmadian, who estimated that “the new plants will cost around” $10 billion dollars and that the project will be wrapped up “in the upcoming three or four years.”
The head of the AEOI, and former Foreign Minister of Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi, added that he plans to hire 15,000 technicians to complete the project.
Thanks to the nuclear accord, which the Obama administration has trumped as a victory for diplomacy, Iran is slated to receive an estimated $150 billion dollars in frozen assets, which will easily cover the cost of the future nuclear plants. It does not appear as if the nuclear deal prohibits Iran from building additional reactors.
The United States has limited means to vet the new nuke plants, as Iranian officials have prohibited American or Canadian officials from inspecting any of their nuclear sites.
According to state-controlled Fars News:
Iran plans to produce at least 190,000 SWUs (Separative Work Units) of nuclear fuel at industrial scale, while it also thinks of producing about 1,000,000 SWUs later in future, which will be needed to fuel 5 power plants like Bushehr nuclear power plant.
Additionally, the regime in Tehran “has inked an agreement with the Russians to construct two nuclear power plants for the generation of electricity, and is also in talks with the Chinese for the construction of two more such power facilities,” the state-news service reported on Thursday.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/07/30/surprise-iran-to-build-two-new-nuclear-facilities/
—-
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) questions on Iran Nuclear Deal (C-SPAN)
Jul 29, 2015
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) questions Secretaries John Kerry, Ashton Carter, Ernest Moniz, Jack Lew and General Martin Dempsey on the Iran Nuclear Deal. Watch the complete Senate Armed Services Committee hearing here: http://cs.pn/1I1lUsk
Kerry turned Red, loudly talked over Sen Cruz, and denied Kerry’s own statement that the Iran Deal is not a treaty ‘Because You Can’t Pass a Treaty Anymore’. Yesterday’s post has the conversation that Kerry did not want to address.
RINO McCain cuts off Sen Cruz and saves Kerry from answering his was out of the mess he himself made.
John Kerry: “Congressman, I don’t need any lessons from you about who I represent.” (C-SPAN)
Jul 28, 2015
“Congressman, I don’t need any lessons from you about who I represent. I’ve represented and fought for our country since I was out of college. So, don’t give me any lessons about that, okay? Secretary of State John Kerry responds to questions from Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA). Watch the complete House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing here: http://cs.pn/1OyFXzW
In light of John Kerry’s history, especially with respect to anti Vietnam activities, see videos below and his affiliations I think it is a fair statement to Kerry to remember who he represents.
Kerry like Clinton and MB Obama believe We The People work for them.
From yesterday’s post:
VIDEO Kerry: Iran Deal Not a Treaty ‘Because You Can’t Pass a Treaty Anymore’
July 29, 2015 By Patrick Goodenough
(CNSNews.com) – The White House did not pursue the nuclear agreement with Iran as an international treaty, because getting U.S. Senate advice and consent for a treaty has “become physically impossible,” Secretary of State John Kerry told lawmakers on Tuesday.
At a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on the agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Kerry was asked about the administration’s approach of seeking a political accord between governments rather than an international treaty.
Rep. Reid Ribble (R-Wisc.) recalled Kerry saying earlier in the hearing that if Congress rejects the JCPOA, other countries will in the future not trust the U.S. since rather than negotiating with an administration they will in effect be doing so with 535 members of Congress.
“For 228 years the Constitution provided a way out of that mess by allowing treaties to be with the advice and consent of 67 U.S. Senators,” he said. “Why is this [Iran deal] not considered a treaty?”
“Well Congressman, I spent quite a few years ago trying to get a lot of treaties through the United States Senate,” Kerry replied. “And frankly, it’s become physically impossible. That’s why.”
“Because you can’t pass a treaty anymore,” he continued. “And it’s become impossible to, you know, schedule, it’s become impossible to pass. And I sat there leading the charge on the Disabilities Treaty which fell to, basically, ideology and politics. So I think that’s the reason why.”
In response to subsequent questioning by Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), Kerry said there were many other reasons for not seeking a treaty with Iran over its nuclear program.
“We don’t have diplomatic relations with Iran. It’s very complicated with six other countries,” he said, referring to Iran and the other P5+1 negotiating partners – Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany.
“So we thought that the easiest way to get something that had the leverage, had the accountability, could achieve our goal was through a political agreement,” Kerry added. “And that’s what we have.”
In another striking exchange, this time involving a Democrat, Kerry sidestepped the question of whether the administration, in the event Congress rejects the JCPOA and overrides a presidential veto of that rejection, would comply with U.S. law even if it believed doing so would violate the Iran deal.
“Let’s say Congress doesn’t take your advice, and we override a veto,” Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) put to Kerry. “And the law that’s triggered then imposes certain sanctions. Will you follow the law, even though you think it violates this agreement clearly, and even if you think it’s absolutely terrible policy?”
Kerry said he would need to consult with President Obama before answering such a question.
“So you’re not committed to following the law?” Sherman asked.
“No, no, I said I’m not going to deal with a hypothetical, that’s all,” Kerry retorted.
‘Reasons of expedience’
Under the Constitution, treaty ratification needs support from two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Kerry referred to, was signed in 2009 but voted down by the Senate in 2012, falling five votes short of the required two-thirds majority.
Administrations have long struggled to get Senate consent for several other negotiated treaties, including the U.N. Law of the Sea, which due to Republican opposition has been awaiting Senate ratification since 1982; the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, signed by President Carter in 1980; the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), signed by President Clinton in 1995; and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), signed by Clinton in 1996.
Commenting on Kerry’s remarks on the difficulties of getting Senate approval for a treaty, Heritage Foundation research fellow Steven Groves wrote Tuesday, “So a historically important nonproliferation agreement was created as a measly executive agreement not based on principle or standard practice – but solely for reasons of expedience.”
“This is not a good reason to avoid Senate scrutiny on important international agreements, particularly deeply flawed agreements such as the Iran nuclear deal.”
Groves noted that administrations have managed to get the Senate to ratify treaties – including on more than 160 occasions during the George W. Bush administration.
Kerry himself, as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had succeeded in getting the Senate to approve the New START arms reduction treaty with Russia in 2010.
“Therefore the Senate is clearly capable of passing treaties,” Groves concluded, “just not unpopular ones like the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, or apparently the Iran nuclear deal.”
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/video-kerry-iran-deal-not-a-treaty-because-you-cant-pass-a-treaty-anymore/
—
Vietnam War Hearing: John Kerry Testimony – Vietnam Veterans Against the War (1971)
May 12, 2013
John Forbes Kerry (born December 11, 1943) is an American politician who is the 68th and current United States Secretary of State. He served as a United States Senator from Massachusetts from 1985 to 2013, and was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Kerry was the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party in the 2004 Presidential Election but lost to incumbent George W. Bush.
The son of an Army Air Corps veteran, Kerry was born in Aurora, Colorado. He attended boarding school in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and went on to graduate from Yale University class of 1966, where he majored in political science and became a member of the influential Skull and Bones secret society. He enlisted in the Naval Reserve in 1966, and during 1968–1969 served an abbreviated four-month tour of duty in South Vietnam as officer-in-charge (OIC) of a Swift Boat. Securing an early return to the United States, Kerry joined the Vietnam Veterans Against the War in which he served as a nationally recognized spokesman and as an outspoken opponent of the Vietnam War. He appeared before the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs where he deemed United States war policy in Vietnam to be the cause of “war crimes.”
After returning to the United States, Kerry joined the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). Then numbering about 20,000, VVAW was considered by some to be an effective, some thought is was Communist, component of the antiwar movement. Nixon Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird declined two requests from the Navy to court martial Reserve Lieutenant Kerry over his antiwar activity.
On April 22, 1971, Kerry became the first Vietnam veteran to testify before Congress about the war, when he appeared before a Senate committee hearing on proposals relating to ending the war. He was still a member of the United States Navy Reserve, holding the rank of Lieutenant Junior Grade. Wearing green fatigues and service ribbons, he spoke for nearly two hours with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in what has been named the Fulbright Hearings, after the Chairman of the proceedings, Senator J. W. Fulbright. Kerry began with a prepared speech, in which he presented the conclusions of the Winter Soldier Investigation, and then went on to address larger policy issues.
—
VIDEO Freedom is NOT FREE! – Heroes v Coward – Battle of the Bulge
Posted on May 26, 2014
The Coward
Our Constitution provides that Dopes like this can become Secretary of State. He should be tried for treason as he keeps trying to start a war with various countries. How many Combat Vets do you know requested to leave the combat area in their fourth month of their tour and were sent home?
John Kerry, 27-year-old former navy lieutenant who heads the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), receives support from a gallery of peace demonstrators and tourists as he testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington, D.C., April 22, 1971. (AP Photo/Henry)
Remember this speech when looking at the current issues Veterans have with the VA
Soldiers who were with John Kerry in Vietnam: he’s a traitor
Vietnam John Kerry vs Syria John Kerry “Criminal Hypocrisy”
Hannity’s Then and Now Comparison of John Kerry’s speeches on Vietnam and Syria
more at…
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/26/video-freedom-is-not-free-heroes-v-coward-battle-of-the-bulge/
—
Does John Kerry know right from wrong?
Posted on May 9, 2014 by ror1774
Joseph Farah sifts through secretary’s ‘incoherent’ statement about societies
May 7, 2014
Secretary of State John Kerry made a revealing observation on his trip to Africa this week.
Here’s what he said: “This is a time here in Africa where there are a number of different cross-currents of modernity that are coming together to make things even more challenging. Some people believe that people ought to be able to only do what they say they ought to do, or to believe what they say they ought to believe, or live by their interpretation of something that was written down a thousand plus, two thousand years ago. That’s not the way I think most people want to live.”
I know. It’s obtuse. Hard to follow. Not very poetic. Stilted and awkward. Not what you would expect from someone with his educational background.
But, remember who John Kerry is.
He came to fame in the 1970s by labeling U.S. soldiers in Vietnam as war criminals, comparing them to Genghis Khan, which he pronounced “Jenghis.”
more at
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/09/does-john-kerry-know-right-from-wrong/
—
From
John McCain’s Vietnam Vet Buddy
Posted on April 20, 2013 by ror1774
Apr 18, 2013 Michael Becker
… strikes a blow for stupidity.
Let me be clear. John Kerry committed treason when, as a member of the US Naval Reserve, he met with representatives of North Vietnam in Paris. He should have been, and still should be, arrested and tried before a military tribunal and if found guilty he should be hung. I’ll donate the rope.
Now that that is out of the way, our Secretary of State is on top of the Benghazi fiasco. Keep in mind that the Congressional committee investigating what happened has never managed to get a straight answer from anybody in either the administration or at State. In addition, somebody stashed the survivors of Benghazi somewhere and they’ve been “unavailable” since the attack and as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said before a House Committee, “What difference will it make?”
More at….
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/john-mccains-vietnam-vet-buddy/
—-
Vietnam John Kerry vs Syria John Kerry “Criminal Hypocrisy”
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/video-five-things-politico-didnt-tell-you-in-dove-attack-against-gop-watch-biden-kerry-v-kerry/
—
COMMENT
This is the same John Kerry who was part of the ADMITTED Soros/MB Obama/Kerry/Nuland Coup in Kiev.
—-
Related
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ted-cruz-fires-back-mitt-163107460.html
—-
Related previous posts on this blog
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/video-kerry-iran-deal-not-a-treaty-because-you-cant-pass-a-treaty-anymore/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2015/04/01/video-kerry-flashback-give-iran-nuclear-fuel-iran-deal-lodestar-mb-obama-foreign-policy-defector-jade-helm/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/26/video-freedom-is-not-free-heroes-v-coward-battle-of-the-bulge/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/09/does-john-kerry-know-right-from-wrong/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/video-five-things-politico-didnt-tell-you-in-dove-attack-against-gop-watch-biden-kerry-v-kerry/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/06/flip-flopping-obamakerry-want-a-war-putin-says-kerry-is-lying-putin-warns-russia-to-aid-syria/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/video-sen-rand-paul-savages-john-kerry-using-his-own-anti-war-quote/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/john-mccains-vietnam-vet-buddy/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/11/11/usas-top-un-diplomat-has-high-praise-for-hanoi-jane/
https://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/video-vietnam-war-survivor-thanks-america-for-his-freedom/
Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, Ebola, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, ISIS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House