Could an enlistment of an archive be guaranteed as an issue of right? Indian Registration Act, 1908, has beneath section17 recommended bound records that are compulsorily enlisted capable and underneath area 18, the archives, the enrollment of that is discretionary. All by itself will anyone claim as an issue of right, enlistment of a report that is required underneath section17 of Indian Registration Act 1908.Vareious States have corrected the most Registration Act and have surrounded principles there beneath.
Karnataka Government has embedded a fresh out of the plastic new segment 22-A, with result from 23.10.1976 that engages the administration to boycott the enrollment of bound records as against open approach, by telling in authority journal, and along these lines the enlisting officers might decline to enlist any such report.
Administration of state through Revenue Secretariat Notification No. RD/141
MUNOMV/2005, date.23/04/2005, has in activity of forces given underneath area 22-An of Registration Act as altered by Karnataka Act 55 of 1976 has proclaimed enlistment of taking after records as against the overall population arrangement. This can be successful from 06/05/2005.
Site with or without building in farming land that isn’t changed over for non-horticultural reason underneath area ninety five of state Land Revenue Act 1964.
Site portrayed as Gramathana site (frame no. 9, 10) or option site proclaimed beneath sort no.19 underneath standards encircled beneath state Municipality Act 1964, however not by any stretch of the imagination recover as site.
3. site on an income area depicted as Gramathana site or option site or a site with an expanding on that no design set up is endorsed and a discharge testament is issued from local concocting power like BDA, BMRDA, BIAAPA, BMIC.
site on an income area spoke to as Gramathana site or option site, pads, modern site, mechanical site, while not essential consent underneath segment 79A and 7B filter with segment 109 of state Land Reforms Act.
Accordingly the exchange of just the accompanying properties is admissible.
a)Properties falling underneath Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike.
b) Properties allotted by BDA
c) Properties in BDA affirmed formats
d) Properties in formats affirmed by option local concocting powers like BMRDA, BlAAPA, BMIC and so forth.
In the introduction the warning, it’s express that a ton of properties are enlisted upheld sham and created reports that don’t leave this world lawfully flawless title to the purchaser. In a few cases, the horticultural area is exchanged by enlistment as non-agrarian area while not so much transforming it to a non-farming reason as per Section ninety five of state Land Revenue Act 1964 and state area stipend Rules 1989. This has prompted heedless development of city and option urban areas.
Advocate SelvakumarSenior AdvocatesProperty Law