Darmokand
← Older revision
Revision as of 02:03, 2 February 2016
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1,092:
Line 1,092:
=== Darmokand's response to the critical question ===
=== Darmokand's response to the critical question ===
per Yair rand: "Support the sister projects. I don't think people are about to stop reading Wikipedia, but if they do, we already have Wikimedia projects set up for different styles of educational content. Wikiversity was built for developing (non-encyclopedic) learning resources, but it was never given the necessary technical support from the Foundation. Give Wikinews the help it desperately needs to be an functioning usable news resource. The Wiktionary communities need a dedicated team of developers to face the myriad of technical challenges ahead. Wikivoyage, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikisource."
per Yair rand: "Support the sister projects. I don't think people are about to stop reading Wikipedia, but if they do, we already have Wikimedia projects set up for different styles of educational content. Wikiversity was built for developing (non-encyclopedic) learning resources, but it was never given the necessary technical support from the Foundation. Give Wikinews the help it desperately needs to be an functioning usable news resource. The Wiktionary communities need a dedicated team of developers to face the myriad of technical challenges ahead. Wikivoyage, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikisource."
+
+
: Considering that resources are limited, which projects would you consider most in need of support? [[User:LilaTretikov (WMF)|LilaTretikov (WMF)]] ([[User talk:LilaTretikov (WMF)|talk]]) 02:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Per Mattflaschen-WMF: "Specific initiatives are important. But so is the big picture of increasing the number of contributors and editors. If we increase this big picture participation level, these new users will come up with ways to contribute that we could never have predicted ahead of time."
Per Mattflaschen-WMF: "Specific initiatives are important. But so is the big picture of increasing the number of contributors and editors. If we increase this big picture participation level, these new users will come up with ways to contribute that we could never have predicted ahead of time."
Line 1,246:
Line 1,248:
=== Wugapodes's response to the critical question ===
=== Wugapodes's response to the critical question ===
GLAMs represent a trove of information that is largely inaccessable to many people. Few have electronic collections, most are prohibitvely far, and yet represent some fo the highest quality information we have. Strategic partnerships with such institutions are not only important but necessary to continue to adapt to changing knowldege needs.
GLAMs represent a trove of information that is largely inaccessable to many people. Few have electronic collections, most are prohibitvely far, and yet represent some fo the highest quality information we have. Strategic partnerships with such institutions are not only important but necessary to continue to adapt to changing knowldege needs.
+
: Can you say more about how to structure such partnerships and where the content should go. How to keep it discoverable? Thank you[[User:LilaTretikov (WMF)|LilaTretikov (WMF)]] ([[User talk:LilaTretikov (WMF)|talk]]) 02:02, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
=== Wugapodes's top 2-3 (or share your own idea) ===
=== Wugapodes's top 2-3 (or share your own idea) ===