Genetic mutation increases risk of Parkinson’s disease from pesticides
Image: Courtesy of Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute at La Jolla
November 27, 2013
LA JOLLA, Calif., and CAMBRIDGE, Mass., – A team of researchers has brought new clarity to the picture of how gene-environmental interactions can kill nerve cells that make dopamine. Dopamine is the neurotransmitter that sends messages to the part of the brain that controls movement and coordination. Their discoveries, described in a paper published online today in Cell, include identification of a molecule that protects neurons from pesticide damage.
“For the first time, we have used human stem cells derived from Parkinson’s disease patients to show that a genetic mutation combined with exposure to pesticides creates a ‘double hit’ scenario, producing free radicals in neurons that disable specific molecular pathways that cause nerve-cell death,” says Stuart Lipton, professor and director of Sanford-Burnham’s Del E. Webb Center for Neuroscience, Aging, and Stem Cell Research and senior author of the study.
Until now, the link between pesticides and Parkinson’s disease was based mainly on animal studies and epidemiological research that demonstrated an increased risk of disease among farmers, rural populations, and others exposed to agricultural chemicals.
In the new study, Lipton, along with Rajesh Ambasudhan, research assistant professor in the Del E. Webb Center, and Rudolf Jaenisch, Founding Member of Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), used skin cells from Parkinson’s patients that had a mutation in the gene encoding a protein called alpha-synuclein. Alpha-synuclein is the primary protein found in Lewy bodies—protein clumps that are the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease.
Using patient skin cells, the researchers created human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) containing the mutation, and then “corrected” the alpha-synuclein mutation in other cells. Next, they reprogrammed all of these cells to become the specific type of nerve cell that is damaged in Parkinson’s disease, called A9 dopamine-containing neurons—thus creating two sets of neurons—identical in every respect except for the alpha-synuclein mutation.
“Exposing both normal and mutant neurons to pesticides—including paraquat, maneb, or rotenone—created excessive free radicals in cells with the mutation, causing damage to dopamine-containing neurons that led to cell death,” said Frank Soldner, research scientist in Jaenisch’s lab and co-author of the study.
“In fact, we observed the detrimental effects of these pesticides with short exposures to doses well below EPA-accepted levels,” said Scott Ryan, researcher in the Del E. Webb Center and lead author of the paper.
Having access to genetically matched neurons with the exception of a single mutation simplified the interpretation of the genetic contribution to pesticide-induced neuronal death. In this case, the researchers were able to pinpoint how cells with the mutation, when exposed to pesticides, disrupt a key mitochondrial pathway—called MEF2C-PGC1alpha—that normally protects neurons that contain dopamine. The free radicals attacked the MEF2C protein, leading to the loss of function of this pathway that would otherwise have protected the nerve cells from the pesticides.
“Once we understood the pathway and the molecules that were altered by the pesticides, we used high-throughput screening to identify molecules that could inhibit the effect of free radicals on the pathway,” said Ambasudhan. “One molecule we identified was isoxazole, which protected mutant neurons from cell death induced by the tested pesticides. Since several FDA-approved drugs contain derivatives of isoxazole, our findings may have potential clinical implications for repurposing these drugs to treat Parkinson’s.”
While the study clearly shows the relationship between a mutation, the environment, and the damage done to dopamine-containing neurons, it does not exclude other mutations and pathways from being important as well. The team plans to explore additional molecular mechanisms that demonstrate how genes and the environment interact to contribute to Parkinson’s and other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
“In the future, we anticipate using the knowledge of mutations that predispose an individual to these diseases in order to predict who should avoid a particular environmental exposure. Moreover, we will be able to screen for patients who may benefit from a specific therapy that can prevent, treat, or possibly cure these diseases,” Lipton said.
The research was funded in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants P01 HD29587, P01 ES016738, and P30 NS076411, R37 CA084198, United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation (UMDF), and the Parkinson Society of Canada.
Written by Susan Gammon of Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute at La Jolla
* * *
Rudolf Jaenisch's primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also a professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
* * *
Burnham Medical Research Institute is dedicated to discovering the fundamental molecular causes of disease and devising the innovative therapies of tomorrow. Sanford-Burnham takes a collaborative approach to medical research with major programs in cancer, neurodegeneration, diabetes, and infectious, inflammatory, and childhood diseases.
* * *
Full Citation:
"Isogenic human iPSC Parkinson’s model shows nitrosative stress-induced dysfunction in MEF2-PGC1a transcription"
Cell, December 5, 2013.
Scott D. Ryan (1,*) Nima Dolatabadi (1,*), Shing Fai Chan (1), Xiaofei Zhang (1), Mohd Waseem Akhtar (1), James Parker (1), Frank Soldner (2), Carmen R. Sunico (1), Saumya Nagar (1), Maria Talantova (1), Brian Lee (1), Kevin Lopez (1), Anthony Nutter (1), Bing Shan (3), Elena Molokanova (1), Yaoyang Zhang (3), Xuemei Han (3), Tomohiro Nakamura (1), Eliezer Masliah (5), John R. Yates III (3), Nobuki Nakanishi (1), Aleksander Y. Andreyev (4), Shu-ichi Okamoto (1), Rudolf Jaenisch (2), Rajesh Ambasudhan (1), and Stuart A. Lipton (1,5).
1. Del E. Web Center for Neuroscience, Aging, and Stem Cell Research, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
2. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
3. Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, SR-11, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
4. Department of Pharmacology, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92039, USA
5. Department of Neurosciences, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92039, USA
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
CONTACT
Communications and Public Affairs
Phone: 617-258-6851
Email: newsroom@wi.mit.edu
RELATED LINKS
Whitehead scientists bring new efficiency to stem cell reprogramming
Scientists create germ cell-supporting embryonic Sertoli-like cells from skin cells
Not all cellular reprogramming is created equal
Novel surface triples stem-cell growth in culture
Jaenisch LabStem Cells + Therapeutic CloningNervous SystemWhitehead Institute is a world-renowned non-profit research institution dedicated to improving human health through basic biomedical research. Wholly independent in its governance, finances, and research programs, Whitehead shares a close affiliation with Massachusetts Institute of Technology through its faculty, who hold joint MIT appointments.