JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL SITE AND REGISTER FOR FREE TO SEE MUCH. MUCH MORE NEWS.
LINK
Send your e.mails with news and inquiries to: w.nation@mail.com
Article posted by: White Nation correspondent- Tennessee USA – October 20 2016
RELATED ARTICLES
BIMBO HILLARY JUST SHARED THE US NUCLEAR RESPONSE TIME WITH THE ENTIRE WORLD
SYRIA
Russia launched it’s largest military deployment since the Cold War. NATO officials have confirmed that the Russian aircraft carrier Kuznetsov has sailed past Norway and appears to be heading in the direction of Syria.
— Senior Nato Diplomat Says Russia Is Deploying All of Northern Fleet and Part of Baltic Fleet to Reinforce Syria Campaign
— Deployment Is Russia’s Largest Naval Deployment Since End of Cold War – Nato Diplomat
— Deployment Will Increase Number of Russian Fighter Bombers in Syria, Moscow May Launch Final Air Assault on Aleppo in Two Weeks
– Nato Diplomat THE LINES ARE DRAWN It is expected that the aircraft carrier and its cargo will arrive in Syria within a period of two weeks.
The carrier was escorted by seven other Russian ships. This deployment represents the most powerful and largest Russian military issue since the Cold War. According to General Morton Haga Lunde, the head of the Norwegian military intelligence service, it is almost certain that this deployment “will probably play a role in the deciding battle for Aleppo.” The impressive aircraft carrier Kuznetsov can carry more than fifty aircraft at any given time. The carrier is also equipped with state of the art Granit anti-ship cruise missiles. The other vehicles accompanying the carrier include the nuclear-powered battle cruiser, Peter the Great. The deployment also includes two large anti-submarine warships as well as four support vessels.
The Russian Northern Fleet is being stalked by two British warships, while two corvettes heading to Britain through the Bay of Biscay are being tracked by HMS Dragon. Ministry of Defence chiefs are taking no chances and have pledged to keep the flotilla well within their sights. A spokesman said: “When these ships are near our waters we will man-mark them every step of the way. “We will be watching as part of our steadfast commitment to keep Britain safe.” They added: “It is pretty unambiguous that they have set a course to pass through the Dover Strait.” But former head of the Royal Navy Admiral Lord West dismissed it as “just a bit of willy waving”. The naval hero told The Sun: “It’s Putin doing a bit of a willy waving in a sense, saying this is what I can do.”
According to a Norwegian Lockheed P-3 Orion reconnaissance plane, MiG-29 Fulcrum jets and combat helicopters can clearly be seen on the deck of the carrier. It is believed that President Putin and the Russian armed forces intend to bring the battle for the opposition-controlled Aleppo to a close as soon as possible. Russia’s conduct in Aleppo has attracted stinging criticism from liberal leaders across the world who have accused the Russians and their Syrian allies of ” crimes against humanity.”
Talking about accusing Russia of “crimes against humanity”– it has surfaced that Allied French Mirages has bombed a children’s hospital in Syria.
The escalating verbal tussles between Russian and American officials has led some in Russia and Syria to fear that NATO forces may intervene in the Syrian conflict and act at counter-purposes to President Assad and President Putin. Securing Aleppo before any form of NATO intervention occurs is considered to be tactically imperative for Assad and his allies. If this latest deployment is anything to go by the Russians are in earnest when it comes to achieving this goal. Russia has made it clear that ANYONE who attacks Syria or attacks the Syrian government, will be engaged by Russian military forces which are operating inside Syria with the permission of the Syrian government. So the lines are drawn. Will the US and NATO attack Syria or its President and start a war? We will all know within two weeks.
The United States and NATO Are Preparing for a Major War With Russia- A Massive military exercises and a troop buildup on NATO’s eastern flank reflect a dangerous new strategy.
For the first time in a quarter-century, the prospect of war—real war, war between the major powers—will be on the agenda of Western leaders when they meet at the NATO Summit in Warsaw, Poland, on July 8 and 9. Dominating the agenda in Warsaw (aside, of course, from the “Brexit” vote in the UK) will be discussion of plans to reinforce NATO’s “eastern flank”—the arc of former Soviet partners stretching from the Baltic states to the Black Sea that are now allied with the West but fear military assault by Moscow. Until recently, the prospect of such an attack was given little credence in strategic circles, but now many in NATO believe a major war is possible and that robust defensive measures are required.
In what is likely to be its most significant move, the Warsaw summit is expected to give formal approval to a plan to deploy four multinational battalions along the eastern flank—one each in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. Although not deemed sufficient to stop a determined Russian assault, the four battalions would act as a “tripwire,” thrusting soldiers from numerous NATO countries into the line of fire and so ensuring a full-scale, alliance-wide response. This, it is claimed, will deter Russia from undertaking such a move in the first place or ensure its defeat should it be foolhardy enough to start a war.
The United States, of course, is deeply involved in these initiatives. Not only will it supply many of the troops for the four multinational battalions, but it is also taking many steps of its own to bolster NATO’s Eastern flank. Spending on the Pentagon’s “European Reassurance Initiative” will quadruple, climbing from $789 million in 2016 to $3.4 billion in 2017. Much of this additional funding will go to the deployment, on a rotating basis, of an additional armored-brigade combat team in northern Europe.
As a further indication of US and NATO determination to prepare for a possible war with Russia, the alliance recently conducted the largest war games in Eastern Europe since the end of the Cold War. Known as Anakonda 2016, the exercise involved some 31,000 troops (about half of them Americans) and thousands of combat vehicles from 24 nations in simulated battle maneuvers across the breadth of Poland. A parallel naval exercise, BALTOPS 16, simulated “high-end maritime warfighting” in the Baltic Sea, including in waters near Kaliningrad, a heavily defended Russian enclave wedged between Poland and Lithuania.
All of this—the aggressive exercises, the NATO buildup, the added US troop deployments—reflects a new and dangerous strategic outlook in Washington. Whereas previously the strategic focus had been on terrorism and counterinsurgency, it has now shifted to conventional warfare among the major powers. “Today’s security environment is dramatically different than the one we’ve been engaged in for the last 25 years,” observed Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter on February 2, when unveiling the Pentagon’s $583 billion budget for fiscal year 2017. Until recently, he explained, American forces had largely been primed to defeat insurgent and irregular forces, such as the Taliban in Afghanistan. Now, however, the Pentagon was being readied for “a return to great-power competition,” including the possibility of all-out combat with “high-end enemies” like Russia and China. By preparing for war, Washington and NATO are setting in motion forces that could achieve precisely that outcome.
The budgetary and force-deployment implications of this are enormous in their own right, but so is this embrace of “great-power competition” as a guiding star for US strategy. During the Cold War, it was widely assumed that the principal task of the US military was to prepare for all-out combat with the Soviet Union, and that such preparation must envision the likelihood of nuclear escalation. Since then, American forces have seen much horrible fighting in the Middle East and Afghanistan, but none of that has involved combat with another major power, and none entailed the risk of nuclear escalation—for which we should all be thankful. Now, however, Secretary Carter and his aides are seriously thinking about—and planning for—conflicts that would involve another major power and could escalate to the nuclear realm.
It’s hard to know where to begin when commenting on all this, given the atmosphere of Cold War hysteria. There is, first of all, the question of proportionality: are US and NATO moves on the eastern flank in keeping with the magnitude of the threat posed by Russia? Russian intervention in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine is certainly provocative and repugnant, but cannot unequivocally be deemed a direct threat to NATO. Other Russian moves in the region, such as incursions by Russian ships and planes into the airspace and coastal waters of NATO members, are more worrisome, but appear to be more political messaging than a prelude to invasion. Basically, it’s very hard to imagine a scenario in which Russia would initiate an armed attack on NATO.
Then there is the matter of self-fulfilling prophecies. By announcing the return of great-power competition and preparing for a war with Russia, the United States and NATO are setting in motion forces that could, in the end, achieve precisely that outcome. This is not to say that Moscow is guiltless regarding the troubled environment along the eastern front, but surely Vladimir Putin has reason to claim that the NATO initiatives pose a substantially heightened threat to Russian security and so justify a corresponding Russian buildup. Any such moves will, of course, invite yet additional NATO deployments, followed by complementary Russian moves, and so on—until we’re right back in a Cold War–like situation.
Finally, there is the risk of accident, miscalculation, and escalation. This arises with particular severity in the case of US/NATO exercises on the edge of Russian territory, especially Kaliningrad. In all such actions, there is a constant danger that one side or the other will overreact to a perceived threat and take steps leading to combat and, conceivably, all-out war. When two Russian fighters flew within 30 feet of a US destroyer sailing in the Baltic Sea this past April, Secretary of State John Kerry told CNN that under US rules of engagement, the planes could have been shot down. Imagine where that could have led. Fortunately, the captain of the destroyer chose to exercise restraint and a serious incident was averted. But as more US and NATO forces are deployed on the edge of Russian territory and both sides engage in provocative military maneuvers, dangerous encounters of this sort are sure to increase in frequency, and the risk of their ending badly will only grow.
No doubt the NATO summit in Warsaw will be overshadowed to some degree by the UK’s Brexit vote and ensuing political turmoil in Europe. But as Western leaders settle down to business, they must not allow their inclination to “demonstrate unity” and “act resolutely” lead them to approve military moves that are inherently destabilizing. Surely it is possible to reassure the Baltic states and Poland without deploying many thousands of additional troops there and inviting an additional military buildup on the Russian side.
SOURCE
SOURCE
EDITOR’S FOOTNOTE:
( Money is to be made- the Jew oligarchs and US warmongers are ready to start the war- and they will not stop until they got one! However- something that facinates me is just how the Americans are screwed-up. No SERIOUS! I mean- look at WW2-look at the Vietnam war- look at the Middle East- just HOW many innocent young Americans have lost their lives ? And for WHAT– for a bunch of scrupulous Jews and warmongers that on the end of the day- will be the only victors? You think the Bush cartel, Bidens, Obamas , Kerry’s and who the hell else standing behind the supply chain will send THEIR sons and daughters to the front-line? Think again. BUT still American parents keep on sending their sons and daughters into a war created by the Illuminati- just to receive a coffin and a folded flag in return. Then they still want to cry about it? What motivates people to do stupid things like that? Is it because Americans love to be “heroes?” Do they like to be slaughtered like sheep for a few shiny medals and to brag about being a “red beret” after they have been gassed, poisoned, shot up and neglected as war veterans by the same evil powers that sent them to fight a war to enrich the supply-liners? Is it for the “adventure”- IF you can refer to ducking bullets, napalm and missiles as an “adventure?” Americans appear to love being exploited as Jew cannon fodder.THAT Russian- THAT Chinese you are going to try to shoot…do you know him? Did he do you some harm? Did he offend you? NO? Now why do you want to shoot a total stranger you never met before because Jack Kerry or Obama told you to do so? You’e a monkey- strewth!! You ever been in a conflict with two of the most dangerous super powers in the world? I don’t think the American populace REALLY know what Obama and his thugs are drawing the American people into.BUT that is the sordid American tale- they just LOVE to venture on regular ” lives for medals” adventures. They do not even realize this war is yet another way of the Illuminati to ‘cull” the world population- and weaken the American home defense for a police state take-over. NO young men to fight Obama’s rampaging security forces- no weapons- and rapidly comes the dawn of a one world order to America. If Obama tells me I must send MY children to go and get shot to pieces for HIS wars- I will tell him to f*ck-off and rather sent that tranny girlfriend of his!! WHO started the Middle East conflict and ISIS in the first place? THEY did! THEY have been looking for shit from Russia and China. So let THEM go and fight their own wars! AND then most Americans still go and vote for the black widow- Hillary Clinton! I dunno- Americans REALLY are wired-up back-wards? I sometimes wonder just HOW they survived as a nation this long? -Ed)
WHITE NATION– WE DO NOT SUPPORT COMMUNISM
C’MON- SHARE OUR LINK