JOIN MORE THAN 1500 WHITE CONSERVATIVE VOICES FROM AROUND THE WORLD ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
LINK
Statistics compiled by: White Nation Editorial Team.
RELATED LINKS:
THE BBC DISCOVERS WHITE GENOCIDE IN SOUTH AFRICA
VIOLENT ATTACKS AND MURDERS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE IN SOUTH AFRICA- MARCH 2015.
VIOLENT ATTACKS: 67
MURDERS: 18
TOTAL ATTACKS AND MURDERS ON WHITES SO FAR FOR 2015:
BRUTAL ATTACKS: 211
MURDERS: 62
(Please take note that this only reflects the reported cases we could trace on media and social sites that were high-lighted. Many cases do not even get reported due to a vicious onslaught by the ANC regime to silence reports on murders and attacks on whites by blacks.Other again- are reported late.Thus it is quite difficult to determine precisely the amount each month-end. This is the closest we can get to the real figures.Due to murders and attacks committed on a daily basis- these figures keep on adding and changing. Thus no accurate figure could be produced- but this we have- was what our team could trace across tens of websites and newspapers. – White Nation Team)
SOUTH AFRICA- FAILED LAND OF COMMUNIST ANC DECEPTION AND WHITE GENOCIDE.
VIDEO: THE END GAME- FULL WHITE GENOCIDE DOCUMENTARY
NOTORIOUS HONORS
South Africa is ostensibly rated among the top most dangerous countries in the world.In February 2007, the Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation was contracted by the South African government to carry out a study on the nature of crime in South Africa. The study concluded that the country is exposed to high levels of violence as a result of different factors, including” Why South Africa is so violent and what we should be doing about it” – Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. (Link) Among that ghoulish and notorious list of dangerous countries- South Africa tops the list when it comes to genocide against whites- bar none- PERIOD!
SILENCING THE LAMBS- PLAYING DIRTY: HIDE AND DOWNPLAY THE FACTS
The South African ruling despot regime of Zuma is but trying it utmost to silence the facts. The regime pulled out all the stops in various ways of trying to curb the flow of reports on white murders such as setting up a Human Rights Commission to prosecute white activists for so-called “hate speech” if they report this cases- or even show pictures of murdered farmers/whites. (Link) and (Link) Methods like silencing the media on reporting the race were enforced- bogus false Facebook profiles were created with sleaze-bucked nameless and faceless G-Men reporting any white website that report murders- were set up. One such a site can be viewed here: ( Link) . White murders even were de-classified from priority category willful farm murders to “natural causes” on death certificates. According to newspaper reports recently unearthed by several rights groups in South Africa, murders of South African whites are being disguised by issuing death certificates showing that they had died of “natural causes”. At least three such cases have come to light. (Link)
Another method of stemming the flow of reports is attacks on white websites by G-Men hackers, spamming the sites, attacks by viruses, closing down sites- and conspire with Facebook to close such sites under the false pretense of “hate speech”- the most recent addition of anti-white “laws” the ANC communists fabricate and add to their already HUGE arsenal of anti-white weaponry to suppress white genocide reporting. Police stats on farm murders were cooked- and re-classified as “ normal crime ” to prevent the true reflection. Other sinister methods such as meddling with the case, loosing court dockets- and purposefully messing up crime scenes by policemen , disappearing of crucial evidence and are too often reported as well. Then there also is the absolute unnatural reluctance of the police to reveal aspects on certain “mysterious” deaths as well- as with the case of the Stellenbosch Van Breda triple murder- (Link) Then also there is the deliberate attacks launched by the government controlled media against white activists by setting up white liberal operators to act as “ concerned Afrikaners“- and attack/ridicule or demonize activists in the media. (Link)- or the downplay that South African murders and crime is not as “bad “ as some other countries in the world- eg. Britain. (Link) Britain- by the way- has a LONG way to go to even come close to South Africa with respect to crime.
DEATH RATE IN SOUTH AFRICA TOPPING MIDDLE-EAST
In a recent report- The White Human Rights Group-Afriforum – stated that more murders are committed in SA than in the war in Iraq against ISIS . The report states that approximately 300 more murders per month are committed in South Africa in comparison to the death toll as a result of the war against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Iraq. According to AfriForum, about 1 400 murders take place in South Africa every month, while the death toll in Iraq rose steeply during February with more than 1 103 deaths. However, it is still less than the monthly figure in South Africa. The death toll in Iraq for February was announced this past week by Nickolay Mladenov of the United Nations (UN).
“South Africa has a tendency of a war zone when it comes to murder figures. According to the 2013/2014 crime statistics of South Africa, approximately 47 murders are committed on a daily basis in the country, in other words there are about 1 400 per month,” said Ian Cameron, Head of Community Safety at AfriForum.
According to Cameron, the comparison is important seeing as it serves as evidence that the police in South Africa is losing the battle against violent crime and that South Africans should start looking after their safety themselves. Cameron further mentioned that according to the Iraq Body Count (IBC) about 17 049 people lost their lives in Iraq during 2014 and according to the 2013/2014 statistics of the South African Police Service (SAPS), 17 068 in South Africa. These figures indicate that it is not too farfetched to compare South Africa with a war-stricken area.
“There where the police is doing its best to combat crime, we must doing everything in our ability to help, but communities should take responsibility themselves with regards to their safety. The state fails in its duty to safeguard citizens,” concluded Cameron.
(Please also visit HERE for more factual information on the white genocide in South Africa)
SOUTH AFRICA- HOW BAD IS THE WHITE GENOCIDE THEN?
More than 70 000 whites have been brutally murdered since the ANC hi-jack of the country in 19994. More than 4000 white farmers paid the ultimate price- and more than 600 000 whites were pushed into squatter camps through racist AA and BEEE laws coming from the communists in the ANC such as Rob Davis. A full list of whites murdered by blacks since 1994 can be viewed here: (Link) Most of these murders is straight forward hate crimes. Robbery is not the motive- but the sheer barbarism involved fueled by misplaced hatred advocated by the likes of Zuma and Malema. Read the accounts of cases at the bottom of the page- and observe the brutality with which these murders are committed against feeble and defenseless old people, women and children. THEN ask yourself the question whether we are dealing here with humans- or ravaging monsters?
If you start to concentrate and investigate the multiple white murders since 1994- you immediately will pick up that “scarlet thread” that runs through the area and time-line. Every month we see about the same amount of attacks, about the same amount of murders- and always more-or-less the same areas like De Wildt, Warmbaths, Standerton and Memel popping up on a continuous basis. Lately most of these attacks involve alien Zimbabweans. There may be just a motive behind this. We suspect Zimbabweans- because of their alien origin and not registered as South Africans- are being used as a “third force” by the regime to “cull” white farmers to accelerate their land restitution program. Zimbabweans are mostly untraceable- and can disappear more easily across the border as with the case of local blacks. We suspect this was the case of the assassination of Eugene Terreblanche by the ANC NI as well- placing the blame on an alien Zimbabwean. He disappeared from the scene since…either got murdered- or sent back to Zimbabwe….but we never heard of him again.
WHAT IS A GENOCIDE THEN- GENOCIDE WATCH STATES:
The Ten Stages of Genocide
By Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide WatchClassification Symbolization Discrimination Dehumanization Organization
Polarization Preparation Persecution Extermination Denial
Genocide is a process that develops in ten stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear. Stages may occur simultaneously. Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process.
1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Catholic church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide.
2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies”, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply the symbols to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia. To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Bulgaria, where the government refused to supply enough yellow badges and at least eighty percent of Jews did not wear them, depriving the yellow star of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.
3. DISCRIMINATION: A dominant group uses law, custom, and political power to deny the rights of other groups. The powerless group may not be accorded full civil rights or even citizenship. Examples include the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 in Nazi Germany, which stripped Jews of their German citizenship, and prohibited their employment by the government and by universities. Denial of citizenship to the Rohingya Muslim minority in Burma is another example. Prevention against discrimination means full political empowerment and citizenship rights for all groups in a society. Discrimination on the basis of nationality, ethnicity, race or religion should be outlawed. Individuals should have the right to sue the state, corporations, and other individuals if their rights are violated.
4. DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. In combating this dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than democracies. Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen. Hate radio stations should be shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.
5. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, often using militias to provide deniability of state responsibility (the Janjaweed in Darfur.) Sometimes organization is informal (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or decentralized (terrorist groups.) Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations, as was done in post-genocide Rwanda.
6. POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.
7. PREPARATION: National or perpetrator group leaders plan the “Final Solution” to the Jewish, Armenian, Tutsi or other targeted group “question.” They often use euphemisms to cloak their intentions, such as referring to their goals as “ethnic cleansing,” “purification,” or “counter-terrorism.” They build armies, buy weapons and train their troops and militias. They indoctrinate the populace with fear of the victim group. Leaders often claim that “if we don’t kill them, they will kill us.” Prevention of preparation may include arms embargos and commissions to enforce them. It should include prosecution of incitement and conspiracy to commit genocide, both crimes under Article 3 of the Genocide Convention.
8. PERSECUTION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. In state sponsored genocide, members of victim groups may be forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is often expropriated. Sometimes they are even segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. Genocidal massacres begin. They are acts of genocide because they intentionally destroy part of a group. At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.
9. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. (An unsafe “safe” area is worse than none at all.) The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade, EU Rapid Response Force, or regional forces — should be authorized to act by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N. should intervene. If the U.N. is paralyzed, regional alliances must act. It is time to recognize that the international responsibility to protect transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If strong nations will not provide troops to intervene directly, they should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene.
10. DENIAL is the final stage that lasts throughout and always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies,
try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses.
They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims.
They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, or an international tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or an International Criminal Court may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice.
(Link)
THE UNITED NATIONS:
THE UNITED NATIONS STAND WITH RESPECT TO THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
Now that Front National is registered with a number of United Nations bodies and looking at the possible ways in which to take the cause of the farm attacks and the question of self determination to the international community, we are shocked by what we find. We often hear: “The rest of the world knows about our situation, but they don’t care.” That is not true. We are finding that our contact people at the UN are very interested in the situation. We need to understand that the UN and its bodies are structured, organized platforms – they can only address issues on the agenda.
What we are therefore saying is: The issues we want the world to know about must be on the agenda. It has never been done! This makes one wonder what happened to all the promises of reports which will be submitted and agenda points tabled. For years and years now pragmatic political parties and civil rights movements have been fooling us about how they are taking the situation to the International Community. The truth is, only four investigations have ever been called for and were conducted. Front National is now preparing a request for an investigation to be sent to look into farm attacks and the situation of poverty and discrimination against our people. The main question which we ask, in a furious temper mind you, is: Why the hell has nobody ever done anything apart from making empty promises!?
(Link)
The United Nations Charter on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
“Article 8:
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.”
—From the preamble to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by the General Assembly Resolution 61/295 on 13 September 2007. By any measure the British people are the indigenous people of Britain.”
HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE DENIAL OF A WHITE GENOCIDE BY THE PERPETRATING GOVERNMENT?:
GENOCIDE WATCH AGAIN STATES:
The 12 Ways to Deny a Genocide
Twelve Ways To Deny A Genocide
The Sudanese government’s response to accusations of genocide has, from the beginning, been a classic example of the strategy of denial that accompanies every genocide. The strategy employs predictable tactics designed to obscure clear perception of criminal conspiracy with an ink-cloud of denial. The objective of denial is to paralyze the political will of those who might take action to stop the genocide and punish the perpetrators. [2005: All of these denial tactics are still the official Sudanese government line.Israel Charny outlines the tactics of denial in “Templates for Gross Denial of a Known Genocide: A Manual,” in The Encyclopedia of Genocide, volume 1, page 168. All of them are being used by the Sudanese government.1. Question and minimize the statistics. Sudan’s Foreign Minister Mustaf Osman Ismail said on 9 September 2004, that no more than 5,000 people have been killed in Darfur since February 2003. [2005: The Sudanese government has not raised its estimate of deaths since.] In contrast, 50,000 [2005: 160,000]deaths is considered a low estimate by the U.N., World Food Program, and the ICRC. The Sudanese Embassy in Washington said the interviews were all conducted with Darfur refugees in Chad, not in Sudan, so were invalid. But refugee accounts are among the most reliable indicators of crimes because witnesses testify freely, without fear. The interviews were conducted in Chad because the Sudanese Embassy refused to grant visas to the investigation team. The U.S. has proposed a Security Council resolution that would send investigators into Darfur to gather evidence of the crimes where they were committed, which Sudan rejects.2. Attack the motivations of the truth-tellers. Dismiss U.S. charges as products of election-year politics in America, or of anti-Islamic imperialists who have demonstrated their hatred of Arabs in Iraq at Abu-Ghraib prison. This ad-hominem “moral disqualification” argument was the red-herring used by the Sudanese Ambassadors at both the U.N. Commission on Human Rights and the U.N. Security Council. It is aimed to appeal to fellow Islamic countries like Algeria and Pakistan.3. Claim that the deaths were inadvertent, as a result of famine, migration, or disease, not because of willful murder. This is the usual line given to relief officials to turn the blame back upon them for not supplying more assistance, hypocritically ignoring the systematic obstruction the Sudanese government has placed in the way of visas for humanitarian workers and delivery of food and medicine.4. Emphasize the strangeness of the victims. Whether they be classified as infidels, primitive tribalists, or of another race and caste, they are unlike us. Thus, the highly influential Sudanese “Arab Gathering” considers black Africans to be “abd” (male slaves) and “kahdim” (female slaves.) and advocates their exclusion from Sudanese public life. For Americans or Europeans, such de-humanization is expressed as, “They’re Africans. They do these sorts of things to each other.”5. Rationalize the deaths as the result of tribal conflict, coming to the victims out of the inevitability of their history of relationships. Thus, the Sudanese Ambassador to the U.N. in a BBC interview on 11 September 2004 claimed that the deaths were just the result of age-old tribal conflicts between cattle herders (Arabs) and farmers (Africans). In fact, there were no such genocidal raids in Darfur until the Sudanese government armed the Janjaweed in early 2003 and used the Sudanese air-force to support them.6. Blame “out of control” forces for committing the killings, distancing responsibility from the Sudanese government. The success of this tactic was demonstrated in U.N. Security Council Resolution 1556, which blames the killings on the Janjaweed militias and actually demands that the Sudanese government disarm the Janjaweed and bring their leaders to justice. In fact, it was the Sudanese government that armed the Janjaweed in the first place, and continues to protect them. Not one major Janjaweed leader has been arrested. Criminals already in jail for years have simply been renamed “Janjaweed,” and sentenced for crimes they did not commit, punished by amputations under Sharia law.7. Avoid antagonizing the genocidists, who might walk out of “the peace process.” This real politik argument is used to frighten diplomats who fear “upsetting the peace process” in Naivasha for the south, or in Abuja for Darfur. In 2005 the argument has become: “don’t upset the fragile new order in Khartoum since signature on the agreements settling the civil war in the South. Let’s now concentrate on getting the Darfur ‘rebels’ to reach a similar agreement with Khartoum in Abuja, under the African Union.” Meanwhile the ethnic cleansing of Darfur is nearly complete, and genocidal massacres and rapes continue daily. This argument, which diplomats repeatedly and naively espouse, ignores the fact that genocidists are serial killers. Policies toward them based on fear lead only to appeasement and further genocide.8. Justify denial in favor of current economic interests. This is a key reason why Russia opposes an arms embargo on the Sudanese government. It has just sold twelve MIG-29’s to Khartoum, and continues to be a major supplier of other arms. Besides being another arms supplier to Khartoum, China is a primary developer of southern Sudan’s oilfields and imports Sudanese oil. China has threatened to veto U.N. sanctions.
9. Claim that the victims are receiving good treatment, while baldly denying the charges of genocide outright. The Sudanese government claims that the internally displaced are receiving excellent treatment in IDP camps, and will be even better off when they are moved to “safe areas” under complete Sudanese government control. The Sudanese show visitors the same “model” IDP camp, just as the Nazis showed the ICRC Theresienstadt. When Kofi Annan tried to visit another site, the Sudanese quickly evacuated it, leaving him to ask, “Where are the people?” [2005: When Annan interviewed rape survivors in Darfur, the Sudanese responded by arresting his interpreter the next day. The government also arrested the director of Medècins sans Frontières, Sudan the same day for publishing a well-documented report exposing widespread rapes by Sudanese soldiers and Janjaweed in and around IDP camps.
The Special Representative of the Secretary General, Jan Pronk, has recently signed a Sudanese government proposal to create “safe areas” for the black Africans of Darfur, who will be “guarded” by the Sudanese army. Never forget that the U.N. also agreed to a “safe area” plan in Bosnia. Srebenica was a “safe area” where 8000 men were murdered in 1995 while Dutch soldiers stood by. Pronk was the Dutch Development Cooperation Minister in 1995 and he resigned only after a government study of the disaster seven years later. Now Pronk has recommended the same “safe areas solution” for Darfur. What is wrong with this picture?
10. Claim that what is going on doesn’t fit the definition of genocide. “Definitionalist” denial is most common among lawyers and policy makers who want to avoid intervention beyond provision of humanitarian aid. It results in “analysis paralysis.” It is what the State Department investigation and report brilliantly overcame. At the time of writing (September 2004), the European Union, the Secretary General of the United Nations and even Amnesty International still avoid calling the crimes in Darfur by their proper name. It is a pity. There are three reasons for such reluctance:
A. Among journalists, the general public, diplomats, and lawyers who haven’t read the Genocide Convention, there is a common misconception that a finding of genocide would legally require action to suppress it. Under this misconception, having been informed that the U.S. would take no action in Rwanda in 1994, State Department lawyers ordered avoidance of the word. They made their legal conclusion fit the Procrustean bed of U.S. policy. They committed legal malpractice.
Unfortunately, the Genocide Convention carries no such legal compulsion to act. It legally requires only that states-parties pass national laws against genocide and then prosecute or extradite those who commit the crime. Article VIII of the Convention says they also “may call upon the competent organs of the United Nations to take such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide.” But they aren’t legally required to do so. Article I of the Genocide Convention creates a moral obligation to prevent genocide, but it does not dictate military intervention or any other particular measures.
B. Another misconception is the “all or none” concept of genocide. The all-or-none school considers killings to be genocide only if their intent is to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group “in whole.” Their model is the Holocaust. They ignore the “in part” in the definition in the Genocide Convention, which they often haven’t read.
C. Since the 1990’s, a new obstacle to calling genocide by its proper name has been the distinction between genocide and “ethnic cleansing,” a term originally invented as a euphemism for genocide in the Balkans. Genocide and “ethnic cleansing” are sometimes portrayed as mutually exclusive crimes, but they are not. Prof. Schabas, for example, says that the intent of “ethnic cleansing” is expulsion of a group, whereas the intent of “genocide” is its destruction, in whole or in part. He illustrates with a simplistic distinction: in “ethnic cleansing,” borders are left open and a group is driven out; in “genocide,” borders are closed and a group is killed. The fallacy of the distinction is evident in Darfur, where the intent of the Sudanese government and their Janjaweed militias is to drive Fur, Massaleit, and Zaghawa black African farmers off of their ancestral lands (ethnic cleansing,) using terror caused by systematic acts of genocide, including mass murder, mass rape, mass starvation, and concentration camps run by Janjaweed and Sudanese army guards, where murder and rape are standing orders. Both ethnic cleansing and genocide are underway in Darfur.
D. Claim that the “intent” of the perpetrator is merely “ethnic cleansing” not “genocide,” which requires the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. The U.N. Commission of Experts report of 2005 took this way out. It confused motive with intent. (Ironically, the U.N. Commission report even included a paragraph saying motive and intent should not be confused, an exhortation the Commission promptly violated, itself.) Even if the motive of a perpetrator is to drive a group off its land (“ethnic cleansing”), killing members of the group and other acts enumerated in the Genocide Convention may still have the specific intent to destroy the group, in whole or in part. That’s genocide.
11. Blame the victims. Claim that the Sudanese government is simply fighting an insurrection by a rebel movement comprised of bandits who themselves commit war crimes. By portraying the situation as civil war rather than genocide, the Sudanese appeal to the common misunderstanding that the two are mutually exclusive, when in fact, as Robert Melson, Barbara Harff, Helen Fein, and others have shown, civil war is very often a predictor and correlate of genocide. Genocide occurs especially during civil wars because war is legalized killing, when even women and children of an adversary group may be seen as enemies of the state.
12. Say that peace and reconciliation are more important than blaming people for genocide, especially if the genocide happened in the past. This is the justification for amnesties for mass murderers as part of peace agreements, and for opposition to post-conflict tribunals. But peace and reconciliation are not alternatives to justice. Lasting peace requires justice. Without prosecution of those who commit genocide, an expectation of impunity is created. As Fein and Harff have shown, one of the best predictors of future genocide is previous genocide that has gone unpunished. Without trials, denial becomes permanent.
A brutal civil war is underway in Darfur, and the ceasefire and settlement being negotiated in Abuja might save lives. But the talks could take years. Meanwhile there will be peace in Darfur only with a powerful African Union force, supported logistically and financially by the West, to enforce it, much as NATO has enforced the peace in Bosnia. If the African Union force cannot stop the genocide, the U.N., NATO, European Union, and their member nations should send in troops under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter.
(Link)
LIST OF ATTACKS AND MURDERS IN SOUTH AFRICA AGAINST WHITES: MARCH 2015
MAKOPANE- Februarie 29 2015: Philip Keet, ‘n boer van Mokopane in Limpopo, is Sondag etlike minute nadat hy op sy plaas deur ? groep swart kriminele oorval en ontvoer is, ongedeerd uit hul kloue gered. Keet (39) het Maandag aan Maroela Media vertel hy was by sy plaashuis toe twee mans hom omstreeks 15:10 by die tuinhek geroep het en gesê het hulle wil beeste koop. Hy is toe saam met hulle na ? tweede hek, sowat 40 meter van huis af, waar sowat 12 onbekende swart kriminele mans in twee voertuie, ? wit VW-bakkie en swart Toyota Corolla, hom skielik omsingel en begin rondstamp het. “Een van die kriminele het sy vinger na my gewys. Hy het my daarvan beskuldig dat ek êrens saam met hom beeste gesteel het,” het Keet gesê. Sy vrou, Robyne, het van die huis af gesien wat gebeur het, hul vuurwapen gaan haal en twee waarskuwingskote in die lug in geskiet. Die kriminele het Keet daarna “soos ? sak meel” agter op die bakkie gegooi en in albei voertuie van die plaas af weggejaag. Robyne het dadelik hulp ontbied. Keet was intussen sowat 5km van sy plaas af toe hy ? aankomende voertuig sien. Hy het van die agterkant van die bakkie af vir die aankomende voertuig gewys hy het hulp nodig. “Die bestuurder is ? boer van die gemeenskap en het my darem gesien en omgedraai. Hy het die bakkie ingehaal en van die pad af getrek, waarna ek afgespring het.” Keet en die boer het met die groep mans begin praat, waarna die groep weereens vir Keet beskuldig het dat hy beeste gesteel het. Hulle het uiteindelik saamgestem om saam na die naaste polisiestasie toe te gaan sodat die polisie die saak kan hanteer. “Ek het saam met die boer in sy bakkie na die polisiestasie gery. Ons was nog op pad daarheen toe die groep in hul twee voertuie weggedraai en in die rigting van die Zebediela-informele nedersetting verdwyn het,” het Keet bygevoeg. Keet het ? saak van ontvoering by die polisie aanhangig gemaak. Keet het nie ernstige beserings tydens die voorval opgedoen nie. Hy het almal bedank wat hom en sy vrou tydens en ná die voorval bygestaan en vir hulle gebid het. “? Mens besef as jy deur so iets gaan hoeveel jou medemens vir jou omgee,” het hy gesê. Robyne het na die voorval op Facebook geskryf: “Ons is so innig dankbaar vir vriende en familie. Binne twintig minute het ons lewens verander. Ons is so nederig vanaand. Dankie aan almal op die vlakte, die mense by die Vollies, my familie wat naby en ver is, ons vriende en onbekendes vir hul gebede, bystand en optrede. Heel meeste aan ons Hemelse Vader vir kalmte, en sy ongelooflike genade. Hy is so getrou.”
BRON
CAPE TOWN- March 01 2015: A white assistant pharmacist – Leroy- was fatally wounded on a commuter train near Belville station when black thugs jumped the train and start robbing passengers. According to witnesses- the black thugs jumped the train- branding firearms- and started to take money and valuables from passengers. As the train pulled away again- they jumped out while shooting randomly at passengers in the train. The victim was struck by a bullet and died on the scene. Earlier the day black tugs also harassed and robbed passengers between the Lynedoch and Eersterivier stations – which resulted in one victim stabbed with a knife.
SOURCE: THE SUN
LOUIS TRICHARD- 01 Maart 2015: ‘n Bejaarde blanke egpaar op die dorp is deur swart kriminele aangerand en van hulle juwele beroof. Die bejaarde dame se gesig aan eenkant erg beseer en van haar juwele beroof. Geen verdere inligting is beskikbaar nie.
BRON
PRETORIA NOORD- 01 Maart 2015: Anthony Pinto (19) van Pretoria-Noord veg vir sy lewe nadat hy verskeie kere met ’n mes gesteek is tydens ’n straataanval deur ‘n swart krimineel. Pinto is in Eugene Marais hospitaal se hoësorgeenheid en verloor kort-kort sy bewussyn, maar kan sy aanvaller goed beskryf. Hy kan ook onthou wat gebeur het. Volgens Lindi Smit, Pinto se tante, het hy gistermiddag vir sy meisie naby Rachel de Beerstraat gaan kuier. Ná die kuier het hy teruggestap na sy ouers se huis in Rietfontein. “Terwyl hy deur ’n duikweg in Rachel de Beerstraat gestap het, is hy deur ’n swart man voorgekeer wat vir ’n sigaret gevra het. Anthony het vir die man gesê hy het nie sigarette nie en dat hy nog op skool is. Die ou het toe sy selfoon in Anthony se sak gesien en sy hand in Anthony se sak gedruk. Anthony het weggeruk,” sê Smit. Smit sê toe Pinto wegruk, het die krimineel ’n groot mes uitgeruk. “Hy het toe vir Anthony regoor sy lyf gesteek en twee keer sy longe getref.” Pinto het toe probeer wegkom, maar gesukkel. Hy het met ’n bebloede bolyf in Rachel de Beerstraat afgestrompel. “Anthony sê hy het probeer om mense in karre se aandag te trek, maar niemand wou stop nie. Uiteindelik, toe hy oor die pad probeer stap, het hy in die middel van die pad geval. Gelukkig was daar ’n wonderlike paartjie wat toe gestop het en Anthony hospitaal toe geneem en sy ma gebel het.” Pinto word nog in Eugene Marais hospitaal se hoësorgeenheid behandel. Volgens Smit sou Pinto 14:00 geopereer word. “Ons is net so dankbaar vir die mense wat hom gehelp het, en vir almal wat vir hom bid,” het Smit gesê.
BRON
DELVILLE- March 01 2015: A Saturday evening drive home turned into a nightmarish experience for two white Delville pensioners, when they were attacked on the highway. William (69) and Woolbridge (70) Gilbert were traveling home on the N3 highway, at about 9.15pm, last Saturday. They had just passed the Van Buuren Road off-ramp and were heading towards the Cydonia Road bridge when they noticed a car on the left side of the road and then hit a rock. “The rock had deflected off the man’s vehicle into our lane and my wife couldn’t avoid it; there were cars in the lane next to us, so we couldn’t move,” said William. The rock smashed their car’s sump and damaged other parts of the vehicle. The airbags deployed and the car was filled with gas and powder from them. “I told my wife to pull over and we got out of the car to let out all the fumes,” William explained. “Woolbridge was using her cellphone to call someone for assistance, and I went to have a look at all the oil that was spilling from the car. “All of a sudden there was a black man in dark clothing next to me. “He produced a gun and told me to give him all our money.”
William did not take kindly to this request and told the man to get lost. “At this point things got a bit crazy,” he said. “The thug pointed the pistol at my chest and fired, but it just clicked; he then repeated this two more times, but both times the gun just clicked.” The thug then went for Woolbridge and tried to wrestle her cellphone from her. She pushed him and William began to chase him. The thug grabbed Woolbridge’s handbag from the car and ran off across the highway. William gave chase, but he couldn’t climb over the barrier over which the thug had jumped. “I returned to my wife and she pointed out black people with torches in the trees on the opposite side of the highway,” he said. “They were obviously going through her handbag.” A few moments later a police car stopped next to the couple and William dashed to the vehicle, to tell the black policemen what had happened. “I told them we had been attacked and that the thug had tried to shoot me,” William said. “I also pointed out the torches in the trees and told them that that was where the thug was.” William was shocked and disappointed by the SAPS’s response. “They said nothing, they didn’t get out of their vehicle and they didn’t call for back-up or anything,” he said. “I couldn’t believe that the police were not going to do anything at all to assist us.” When a tow truck arrived on the scene shortly afterwards, to assist the man who had originally hit the rock, the police just drove away. “They just disappeared into the night, leaving us to fend for ourselves,” William said. William then spoke to the man who had originally hit the rock and he said that the thug had tried to rob him, too. During the course of the pensioners’ ordeal a young man driving a silver car also stopped. “We want to thank this young gentleman for his great act of kindness,” William said. “He stood with my wife and ‘guarded’ her until we could tow the car away. “He was very brave and we thank him from the bottom of our hearts.”
The couple arranged for their car to be towed home and then they went to Pretoria to stay with family for the night. The next day William and his step-son-in-law, Wynand Britz, returned to the scene where they had seen the torches the night before, and found Woolbridge’s handbag. The only thing missing from it was her ID book. “I am very angry with the police for not helping us that evening,” William said. “I think this type of service is beyond bad. “We should rather have security companies patrolling the highways; at least we know they would do something to assist. “This is not a police force; they do not have a calling to their work.” Both William and Woolbridge have decided to go for counseling after their ordeal.
SOURCE
BOKSBURG-March 01 2015: Two white shoppers were attacked by a group of approximately 15 black people in East Rand Galleria at around 5pm on Sunday, March 1. Daniel (26) and Nadine (28) were done with their shopping when the attack occurred inside the mall. An altercation between the victims and another co-shopper started at a pay point queue at a Galleria store. Daniel and Nadine claim they were first verbally abused, which was racial in nature. They then decided to defuse the situation by leaving the store. “The next moment we were physically attacked by a group of black thugs,” said the shoppers. Nadine sustained a minor concussion while her forehead was split open which required six stitches. She also suffered a swollen eye and bruises all over her body. Daniel suffered fractured ribs, a swollen head and bruises over his body. A criminal case has been opened at the Boksburg North SAPS. The East Rand Galleria manager, Lee-Anne van der Nest, refrained to comment on the incident.
SOURCE
NELSPRUIT- Brondal: 01 Maart 2015: My niggie en haar familie is gisteraand op hul plaas aangeval deur 6 swartes, haar man Koos Kruger 2 keer in die bors geskiet en in kritieke toestand in hospitaal. Niggie (Lee Kruger) is erg aangerand maar is ok, nog geen nuus van kinders of tannie nie.
BRON
NELSPRUIT – March 01 2015: What was supposed to be a relaxed stroll turned into a night of horror for a local white couple when they were attacked in Sonheuwel on Sunday. The woman was brutally raped. Around 19:00 security official Mr Jacques Meiring of Bossies Community Justice received a call from a devastated mother, who informed him that her son and his girlfriend had been victims of a vicious attack by black thugs in Brenda Street. This was the fourth incident Meiring had attended in this particular area on the same day. It was alleged that they were on their way back home from town when two black thugs overpowered them. Upon arrival, Meiring came across the distressed and traumatized white male victim, but there was no sign of his partner. He explained to Meiring that she had forcefully dragged into the nearby bush and that he feared the worst. Meiring phoned for backup and officials of Hi-Tech Security Nelspruit arrived at the scene soon after. The traumatized victim then showed officials where exactly the suspects fled to and where he believed they would find his partner. Within minutes, the police also arrived and a crowd of bystanders started to gather. The first thing officials found was the woman’s shoes, shortly after which they discovered the 29-year-old white female victim. Sgt Gerald Sedibe, provincial police spokesman, confirmed that she had been raped by both black thugs. Medical personnel took her to Rob Ferreira Hospital where she was treated. A group called Nelspruit Concerned Citizens was also on the scene. The area in which the incident occurred was cordoned off in an effort to try and apprehend thethugs. A black man was apprehended but he couldn’t be positively linked to the case. No arrests had been made at the time of going to press.
SOURCE
PRETORIA- 02 Maart 2015: n blanke Pa van ’n tweejarige dogtertjie is omstreeks 09:00 Maandagoggend koelbloedig voor die Pretoria Chicken & Meat-slaghuis in Pretoria-Wes doodgeskiet. Louis du Toit (29) was glo op pad om van die winkel se geld by ’n bank te gaan deponeer toe twee swart kriminele hom buite die slaghuis oorval het. Hulle het na bewering nie ’n woord gesê nie, hulle het hom glo net geskiet. Diekriminele het met R140 000 in ’n groen Volkswagen Golf gevlug. Die polisie het hulle agternagesit en op die kriminele geskiet, maar dit was teen vroegmiddag Maandag nog onduidelik of diekriminele gevang is. Volgens Pieter Swanepoel, ’n direkteur van die slaghuis, is Du Toit dadelik dood. ’n Aantal geskokte werknemers van die slaghuis was op die toneel. Du Toit se vrou, Antoinette, het histeries begin huil toe sy haar man se lyk op die sypaadjie voor die slaghuis sien. Van sy kollegas het haar verhinder om nader te beweeg en het haar weggedra. Volgens Swanepoel was sy in erge skok. Die Tshwane-metropolisie, die polisie en die ADT-veiligheidsagentskap was ook op die toneel.
BRON
BRITS – 02 Maart 2015: Majakaneng – ‘n Blanke man wat vroeg Dinsdagoggend op pad na sy werk by een van die myne in Mooinooi was, is by ‘n stopstraat in Majakaneng oorval, erg aangerand en daarna ontvoer.Ben de Jager (70), ‘n werknemer van Norkim Kontrakteurs by ‘n myn op Mooinooi, was die oggend met die R104 op pad na sy werk. Hy het omstreeks 04:00 by ‘n stopstraat in Majakaneng stilgehou toe drie swart kriminele uit die niet verskyn en hom oorval.
BRON
PRETORIA- March 02 2015: Three black male thugs also hit the Toyco Motor Spares shop- and kept the cashier at ransom with pointing guns- demanding cash. The owner of the Motor Spares shop- Jury Hayes- got sniff in the nose that something just was not right. He was outside the shop- and proceeded to the front of the shop where he noticed the three thugs inside with firearms. He decided to appear not interested and just walk by as-if he did not even notice what’s going on inside. BUT as he passed the front- one of the thugs noticed him – and fired on him. He was fatally wounded in the back- and died on the scene. The thugs then fled in a 2005 model Toyota Corolla.
SOURCE
RANDFONTEIN- 02 Maart 2015: Op 2 Maart is ‘n 29-jarige blanke man in die kop geskiet tydens ‘n gewapende roof deur swart kriminele by sy huis in Semestraat in Randfontein.Verdere besonderhede is nie beskikbaar nie.
BRON
SWARTWATER-03 Maart 2015: n Wildboer van Swartwater in Limpopo se erg verminkte lyk is Maandagoggend op sy luukse wildplaas gekry nadat hy vermoedelik Saterdag al vermoor is. Die lyk van dr. Louis-John Botha (64) van die plaas Gwelo Safaris sowat 12?km buite Swartwater is in ’n watervoor op die plaas gekry. Hy het jare lank in Swartwater gepraktiseer. Botha is die tweede boer in die Waterberg-distrik van Limpopo wat sedert begin vanjaar vermoor is: In Januarie is Susan Kotze (76) met ’n draadhanger op haar plaas buite Lephalale (Ellisras) verwurg. Kol. Ronél Otto, polisiewoordvoerder in Limpopo, het gesê dit is nog onbekend presies hoe Botha vermoor is. Die polisie se spoorsnyers, honde-eenheid en ’n taakspan speurders is besig om die gebied te fynkam op