The Left hates freedom.
For nearly five decades, the Supreme Court has put strict limits on the government’s ability to prosecute people based on speech that is vile but not likely to cause direct harm.
A law professor at the University of Utah wants to “revisit” how 1969’s Brandenburg decision is applied, specifically because Donald Trump won the election.
Amos Guiora writes in the Salt Lake Tribune that two recent examples show why it’s dangerous to protect speech that doesn’t rise to Brandenburg‘s conditions (intended and “likely” to incite “imminent lawless action”): a Jewish professor getting a note at home that read “Gas Jews Die,” and another professor getting a postcard that read “Juden raus!” (Jews out).
Read the rest of the article on The College Fix (Photo Credit: The College Fix)