Posted
Apr 11, 2016 16:43:00
Photo:
In Japan, they’re fluctuating a shinkansen network to Sapporo, a city smaller than any Australian collateral city an easterly seashore discerning sight would serve. (Todd Lappin: Flickr)
There’s a reason a unequivocally discerning sight is a expected pre-election teaser: it’s an positively overwhelming idea. So since don’t we customarily build it already? Dominic Knight writes.
For years, I’ve dreamed of sauntering down to Melbourne’s Southern Cross sinecure and changeable into a gentle chair on residence a glossy new Very Fast or even Extremely Fast Train. I’d lay and work on my laptop, or review a book, or recline my chair to take a snooze while a landscape whizzed by, faster than a Saudi diplomat being followed by a AFP.
Occasionally, kind people would come past with coffee and snacks, and maybe an in-seat massage. And then, rebate than 3 hours later, I’d land during Sydney Central, and get on with my day.
I’ve desired travelling by train, ever given we lived in Europe as a child and got a ambience for a intrigue of long-distance rail. More recently, travelling by shinkansen in Japan has bending me on a convenience. There are so many trains between Tokyo and Kyoto, that during off-peak times we can customarily spin adult during a station, assured you’ll get on one.
But even if it ends adult being slower point-to-point than throwing a plane, we cruise it’s still a softened option. Just cruise of all a faffing around we equivocate when we take an intercity sight – not to discuss a additional shortcoming of a airfield transfers. From Melbourne, there’s a Skybus or cab queue, afterwards queueing to dump container if we have it, afterwards a confidence scan, afterwards a additional screening we seem to attract whenever we have a beard, afterwards schlepping to a gate, afterwards boarding, afterwards we can’t take out your laptop for roughly half a trip, afterwards we wait to get off, afterwards we wait during a container carousel, afterwards we wait for a cab or train.
With a plane, you’re constantly queuing, shifting, and lugging bags around. Trains are perpetually simpler.
Sure, angry about this things is unequivocally a initial universe problem – nonetheless then, many of a rest of a initial universe has discerning intercity trains.
Sure, angry about this things is unequivocally a initial universe problem – nonetheless then, many of a rest of a initial universe has discerning intercity trains. Australia’s a customarily initial universe republic I’ve ever visited where intercity trains, with their dedicated traffic-free corridors, are reliably slower than driving.
Just try travelling from Sydney to Newcastle, a lane that inexplicably starts a outing to Newcastle, that is north-east of Sydney, by travelling due west to Strathfield, and you’ll get a clarity of customarily how absurdly primitive a sight network is.
The Sydney-Melbourne atmosphere mezzanine is one of a world’s busiest – and incidentally, we don’t cruise a discerning sight will kill a airline industry, saying as some of a some-more renouned routes, like Tokyo to Fukuoka, are in Japan.
But with unchanging trains, customarily cruise how many some-more of us would float intercity on a unchanging basis. It would yield foe to airlines, and it’d also yield a proceed around a Sydney Airport curfew. At last, we could leave Melbourne after dinner, and arrive in Sydney after midnight.
And a advantages to informal communities are positively enormous, too. Newcastle and a Southern Highlands would be remade by discerning connectors to Sydney – it would spin detached some-more presumably for people to be formed there and come to Sydney for meetings with clients, for instance.
Brisbane and a Gold Coast have already seen many advantages interjection to being connected by a partially delayed train, that will eventually bond both airports. How many softened would it be for a segment to be connected by a discerning line that continued south to a other easterly seashore capitals?
A discerning sight would also confederate Canberra detached some-more successfully with a many populated mezzanine in a country. The Acela sight that links Washington DC with New York, Boston and Philadelphia is a mythological square of infrastructure, famously caught by Vice-President Joe Biden so he could sojourn formed in Delaware with his family – and yes, even a automobile lovin’ Americans do intercity trains softened than we do.
In other countries, they don’t seem to dither over a cost of vital infrastructure projects – they customarily build them.
The Very Fast Train (and please, let’s come adult with a softened name – I’m in foster of Ridiculously Rapid Train) rears a conduct with comical rule come selecting time, as Michael Koziol forked out in a Sydney Morning Herald today. Malcolm Turnbull has been floating probable appropriation models, and Labor’s Anthony Albanese has been a long-term upholder of discerning rail.
Traditionally, we dream immeasurable pre-election, and afterwards learn around a post-election investigate that it isn’t viable, so I’m uninformed myself for disappointment.
There’s always a carol of naysayers who infer to a cost – and a estimated costs change so widely, that we simply can’t criticism on presumably it would make mercantile sense. That’s since studies into these things tend to cost millions of dollars themselves.
But I’d infer out that in other countries, they don’t seem to dither over a cost of vital infrastructure projects – they customarily build them. It’s unfit to quantify a intensity upside of a mercantile advantages that would upsurge from a high-speed sight with affordable ticketing, generally for informal areas. Nor can we theory a impact on a roads of detached fewer inter-city drivers – it could revoke output there, potentially – and there’s also intensity for a poignant emissions rebate impact, generally if a trains were powered by renewable energy.
Why is it customarily Australia that seems incompetent to stomach vital investment in rail infrastructure? France is customarily 2.5 times incomparable than Australia in race terms, and nonetheless it’s noticed as a given that they’ll have high speed rail links. (2,000 kilometres of them, that is some-more than we need to integrate Melbourne and Brisbane.)
In Japan, they’re fluctuating a shinkansen network to Sapporo, a city of underneath dual million people – many smaller, in other words, than a 3 state capitals that an East Coast Fast Train would serve. The check will go into a trillions of yen, 76 per cent of a new line will have to be by tunnels, and it won’t open until 2031, nonetheless they’re customarily doing it anyway.
With Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane alone, we use a race of good above 10 million, within a 1700km lane distance. Add in a Gold Coast, Hunter, Canberra and a Southern Highlands and you’re good above half of a population, all in a flattering loyal line. Surely this would have been finished years ago in any other rich republic with a partially flat, seismically discerning continent and these kinds of race patterns?
If we can means $2 billion to horde a Commonwalth Games in a Gold Coast, and can recompense Telstra $1.6 billion to upgrade a network it already sole to taxpayers (and Telstra got $11 billion for offered a HFC and copper wires to NBN Co, incidentally), positively we can means even upwards of $100 billion for a high speed rail network? Especially when, as Peter Martin has forked out, debt is scarcely cheap.
And if we don’t buy into a dream a proceed we do, contemplate this – if a ubiquitous lawyers can figure out a proceed to make Saudi diplomat recompense their speeding fines, that could go a prolonged proceed towards appropriation it.
Dominic Knight is a writer and co-founder of The Chaser. Follow him on Twitter @domknight.
Topics:
government-and-politics,
business-economics-and-finance,
rail-transport
Comments (137)
Add a comment.
Please review a House Rules, FAQ and ABC Online Terms of Use before submitting your comment.
Jim:
11 Apr 2016 4:55:36pm
An nonessential oppulance we don’t need and can’t afford. Fix a Pacific Highway and urge ability during Sydney airport. There, problem solved during a tenth of a price.
Reply
Alert moderator
the yank:
11 Apr 2016 5:06:19pm
“Fix a Pacific Highway” … build a sight complement that indeed moves people so they don’t need to stand into costly people movers call cars.
Reply
Alert moderator
hairy nosed wombat:
11 Apr 2016 8:07:12pm
We are unequivocally good during ignoring a cost of removing around in cars.
NSW alone has been spending a few billion dollars a year on a Pacific Highway. And what, on normal a automobile costs we about $15 000 a year to run.
The genuine advantages of high speed rail are in what they meant for cities. It means we can live a hundred kilometres from work, in a many smaller village with affordable housing, nonetheless be in a bureau in 40 mins door-to-door, while reading or doing a bit of work on a proceed in. My sister is now holding scarcely 75 mins to do a 15km invert twice any day in Sydney (i can float my bike in half a time). In Europe, they account their rail with land releases around new stops, that would be an engaging indication for Sydney and Melbourne.
I can’t see how we can get immeasurable cities like Sydney to work good nonetheless a complement of high speed rail. From memory, trade overload in Sydney alone is estimated to cost a internal economy tighten to $20 billion dollars a year – notwithstanding all a income we spend on roads.
Reply
Alert moderator
The Concerned Citizen:
12 Apr 2016 12:45:59am
Exactly.
With an enlargement of rail networks, generally inter-city rail, we could pattern a following advantages (it’s a prolonged tedious list, that customarily helps to strengthen a point):
1- fewer people need to drive, definition immeasurable rebate in trade jams and highway accidents, and in turn, a ability for highway accidents to forestall people removing to work on time. That includes a Pacific Highway.
2- If a new trains upheld by existent stations on their proceed to their categorical destination, those stations would radically get some-more trains, and therefore fewer people on any train.
3- With easier entrance from some-more remote areas, there is detached rebate vigour and foe for inner-city genuine estate, potentially shortening costs of housing for millions of people.
4- Would coming save costs for people that would differently need to balderdash petrol watchful in traffic, or selling a craft ticket.
5- People can do work or perform themselves on a train. In a car, we demeanour during a automobile in front of you, and in a plane, we spend many of that time removing messed around by confidence clearances.
6- Trains are simply detached some-more gentle to float in than any other form of float (except maybe ferries, if we occur to live circuitously a wharf).
7- You have some-more options over where to put stations and tracks. An airport’s options are singular to a peripheries of a city with lots of lifeless space between it and circuitously buildings, definition you’d have to be ecstatic to it anyway.
8- And customarily since it’s true- some-more environmentally permitted than throwing a plane, sight or car. The energy-efficiency is many aloft (by trait of carrying some-more people per engine), and has some-more intensity to be sourced from a purify appetite source that doesn’t count on imports from a Middle East.
Reply
Alert moderator
brian:
11 Apr 2016 8:11:48pm
Yes, where is a Minister for Cities?
We need to stop stretch and aim for aloft peculiarity high firmness developments, aloft peculiarity open and civic spaces. We need civic farming, increasing open float to a outcome of not requiring a automobile to go shopping, reduced appetite and ecological footprints for us all. We need a many stronger information infrastructure so we can boost capability and communication many some-more readily, we need civic communication that is extraordinary and lifestyles that are affordable nonetheless enriched.
Reply
Alert moderator
saline:
11 Apr 2016 8:29:12pm
yank,
… and planes.
Reply
Alert moderator
MisterMosman:
11 Apr 2016 8:44:12pm
Oh how 20th centrury of you! By all means wheel along from Sydney to Brisbane in your smokey aged jalopy, chomping on your gristly burger, greasy chips and gas-inducing sweetened cola, holding all day to get there and collapsing in a store due to mental depletion and frustration. Me, I’ll be glorious nearing in softened figure in about 4-5 hours after a gentle relaxing tour in my plush seat, listening to music, reading a book, articulate with associate trevellers, dining on a preference of uninformed Aussie satisfactory and maybe a booze to drink, an afterwards slip off a height prepared to do some work. Get a life all we slaves to a car. You’re pushing it, it’s pushing we … mad.
Reply
Alert moderator
enno:
12 Apr 2016 5:32:09am
The customarily people who would even cruise of pushing to Brisbane, instead of flying, are a people who are going to need their cars to get around while they are there.
You can lease a automobile for a integrate of days, if we are going for several weeks, it becomes uneconomic. A sight instead of a craft isn’t going to cgange that issue, during all.
Reply
Alert moderator
Andrew Thomas:
11 Apr 2016 9:30:43pm
Hi a Yank
Culturally, Australians are conservative. And this is not a good thing. It leads to stagnation. Nothing exemplifies this like a high speed rail fiasco. Dominic Knight creates a unequivocally good infer about a volume of income we spend on a Commonwealth Games that are an mercantile fun during best, providing a tiny strike for a few weeks a singular city’s economy, nonetheless we don’t build game-changing infrastructure (pun intended). Sports we get, since they don’t change. Innovation we are frightened of, so we put a heads in a sand.
To put it into a conflicting perspective, tellurian beings are a tip of a food sequence for one reason, and one reason only. Our ability to innovate. Sadly, Australians are too regressive (generally speaking) to see a unsteadiness of doing what you’ve always done. This regressive anticipation has been propped adult by a mining bang that is now over, a boost of that could have been used for infrastructure like high speed rail. But instead it went to baby bonuses, utes, TVs and off-shoring of boost due to a disfigured beliefs of private section over open seductiveness (conservative beliefs that a private section knows best, that it does, nonetheless customarily for private interests, not Australia’s).
So, accurately how foolish are we? As foolish as those who trust that a latest “floating” of a idea, now by Malcolm, is going to go anywhere. Because notwithstanding Turnbull’s personal success in business, he will, in a good tradition of Australian business people, find a reason since it can’t be done. The genuine tip to Malcolm’s success was his thoroughness of a regressive business person’s model, i.e. cut costs, emanate brief tenure profits, and get out before a genuine costs of such short-term meditative come home to roost. Meanwhile, countries like South Korea and those in a Nordic Bloc assign ahead, withdrawal us neanderthals scratching around for relevance. and buyers for a dirt.
And as for we Jim, how unequivocally lifeless that notwithstanding all a evidence, and Vancouver’s vital example, we cruise car’s are a solution. They aren’t. More roads simply meant some-more trade jams, not to discuss a perfect inefficiency of resources spent on appetite and materials that go into tiny eccentric vehicles like cars rather than immeasurable scale vehicles like trains. In a short-term, a high speed rail is unequivocally expensive. In a prolonged term, it’s cost effective. Pity Australian’s don’t cruise to lift a heads and stop looking during their shoes.
Reply
Alert moderator
Losimpson:
11 Apr 2016 10:40:44pm
I too do find it joyless that we can no longer customarily get on and do things. The series of people on this site anticipating reasons since it can’t be finished provides a good example.
One of a impediments is a consistent fussy from a politicians including Turnbull that we contingency engage private partners. Recipe for disaster. That offer presupposes that a financier will get a lapse on collateral or be reimbursed underneath some arrange of formula. It can’t be done. The collateral cost needs to be spent and afterwards combined off. It’s what governments do when they yield services.
So customarily go out and steal a income during 2% and start building out from any of a capitals. The pieces will join adult after a few years. In a meantime there will be income from a shorter feed-in routes and a amenity of a republic will be severely improved.
Reply
Alert moderator
Kym:
11 Apr 2016 5:07:55pm
Is that an evident correct or a prolonged tenure fix?
The problem is that as a cities grow, all those bodies will need to get in and out of a cities. The doubt is should we boost a highway networks consistently, to a infer where it is customarily not probable to put anymore lanes in, that can customarily use a automobile bucket of between 1-6 people or do we safeguard we have a discerning rail complement that can pierce in dozens if not hundred of passengers all during once? If we make a rails a some-more attractive, fit choice afterwards a overload on a roads will palliate and we won’t need to ascent a highway constantly.
Your resolution will customarily save income in a brief term, it doesn’t residence a prolonged tenure consequences of carrying a flourishing race and a delayed rail network.
Reply
Alert moderator
enno:
12 Apr 2016 5:30:13am
What we unequivocally need are some-more jobs in places like Newcastle, since it is absurd to have immeasurable numbers of people travelling 400 km a day, presumably it is fast, or not.
It takes a immeasurable volume of energy, that has to come from somewhere.
Reply
Alert moderator
Richard:
11 Apr 2016 5:29:35pm
The Fast Train joining a Eastern Capital and presumably Adelaide is prolonged overdue. Our roads burden as shortly as upgraded – we need to offer an choice to a highway grub as other modernized countries have done. Time squandered watchful during airports, and haze firm earnings and cancellations (as for instance in a Canberra integrate and some regionals) uncover it is not a viable alternative.
Reply
Alert moderator
Wanderer:
11 Apr 2016 6:10:43pm
The issues with a city roads is clogging. Our highways have time and motorist exhaustion.
A discerning rail line along a easterly seashore could be frequency profitable for people and maybe even cargo.
It would contest with a airlines whom broach products and peoplevat good expense.
Reply
Alert moderator
John:
11 Apr 2016 5:49:09pm
No, Jim, as I’ve lauded prolonged and loud, a IMC is a answer.
This proposes a unequivocally discerning sight from Melbourne to Darwin, and goes around Parkes. From Parkes high speed rail links will put both Sydney and Brisbane within a one hour trip. And all that will be giveaway and not cost a taxpayer a cent.
Then ascent Parkes airport, a partially teenager and cost effective transformation as it already has prolonged runways and a ability to hoop immeasurable aircraft, and it will afterwards offer as Sydney’s second airport, doing divided with all a agonise and intrusion of a Badgery’s Creek proposal.
Result? Less overload during and around Kingsford Smith, quicker and easier estimate of passengers, discerning and careful sight travel, a sepulchral internal centre apportionment decentralisation needs, no need for resumptions and home dispersion and reduced airfield charges for burden and newcomer traffic.
Reply
Alert moderator
Wanderer:
11 Apr 2016 6:08:31pm
Probably true. All to distinction one private company. Whilst high speed rail should not be ruled out, lets put it from satelite cities to a cbds first. Its a customarily cost effective proceed of removing employees to places where they cant means to live remotely circuitously by.
Babysteps. Not a outrageous line and afterwards wish it works. And greatfully no privvatizations. The sydney airfield rail cost is absurd enough.
Reply
Alert moderator
Terry Murnane:
11 Apr 2016 6:19:26pm
There are customarily 2 ways to urge ability during Sydney airport. 1. build another 3 runways. 2. mislay a curfew. If we cruise that presumably choice is politically probable afterwards by all means go for it.
Reply
Alert moderator
saline:
11 Apr 2016 9:06:43pm
Make a airfield and a craft use recompense all their possess costs, starting with Civ Av and atmosphere use communications.
Reply
Alert moderator
David Arthur:
11 Apr 2016 10:01:40pm
“There are customarily 2 ways to urge ability during Sydney airport.
1. ….
2. ….”
Err, no; there’s a third proceed to urge ability during Sydney Airport.
3. VFT to Canberra Airport, and use that as Sydney Airport’s additional runways … and for a crowds who fly Sydney to Canberra, make it mandatory that they get their flights from Canberra – to fly to Canberra.
My theory is, they won’t even worry engagement a craft ticket, they’ll customarily get a sight to Canberra.
Reply
Alert moderator
enno:
12 Apr 2016 5:27:40am
There is zero interlude them from regulating bigger planes.
Reply
Alert moderator
harvey:
11 Apr 2016 6:30:29pm
We can means hint courtesy subsidies. We can means immeasurable superannuation subsidies to a wealthy. We can means outrageous subsidies to landlords by disastrous gearing.
All a creation seems to be about innovating new taxation breaks to a good off. And vouchsafing all a multinational online and mining monopolies, and we all know who they are, recompense no tax.
Thats a disproportion between Australia and nations that are innovating and have decent unequivocally discerning trains. Asia is withdrawal us in a dust. We are streamer towards being a third universe country.
Reply
Alert moderator
David Arthur:
11 Apr 2016 10:02:41pm
You’d be right about that.
I wish we never elect a PM for “just contend nyet” ever again.
Reply
Alert moderator
Shane 2:
11 Apr 2016 7:56:07pm
Is it economically viable? Do a study. What would a cost of a sheet between Sydney and Melbourne be given 30 year financing during coming seductiveness rates and coming ridership?
Reply
Alert moderator
hairy nosed wombat:
11 Apr 2016 8:33:26pm
But that’s not a indication for how it would work. Have a demeanour during how a Europeans use it and account it. Part of a business competence be relocating business people between Sydney and Melbourne, nonetheless many of a business would customarily be people travelling to work from smaller, some-more fit and some-more affordable satellite cities. In Europe they account it with land releases around new stations.
Reply
Alert moderator
BM:
11 Apr 2016 11:34:51pm
Yes a viable. Please impute to BZE’s (Beyond Zero Emission) High Speed Rail (HSR) wholly costed devise released in 2015. (BZE is an eccentric cruise tank).To run Melbourne to Brisbane (Cost $40bn Melb- Sydney, $44bn Syd to Brisbane), connectors into Canberra and 3 other vital cities, 11 informal centres with a sum of 21 stops. Fleet of 87 trains, tour time of 3hrs Melb-Syd, and trains any 10 mins during rise hours. Of a $84bn cost, $18bn customarily for entrance into pivotal cities. Revenue during $7bn per year when wholly operational in 2030, so paid behind over 40 years. Could be wholly implemented by 2025. Would revoke atmosphere trade journeys by 25mil from 2010’s 55mil number, and revoke CO emissions by 150mil tonnes from BAU if run by renewable energy. Take a demeanour during their site www.bze.org.au. Full devise can be downloaded from their site. we trust Malcolm Turnbull competence have already seen this plan. There is another HSR devise released for Dept of infrastructure and Regional Development by consortium led by AECOM on a department’s site. We customarily need some vicious bipartisan domestic will behind it, nonetheless we suspect a airlines, a automobile companies and others with vested seductiveness in a standing quo will be lobbying tough conflicting it.
Reply
Alert moderator
Cyn:
12 Apr 2016 1:00:42am
Trains are many cheaper to float people partially discerning on a per chairman per km basis. I’ll go one step offer too, trains are also many cheaper to float bucket on a per ton per km basement too, nonetheless we also still have prolonged stretch trucks transporting burden interstate. Building a decent rail complement will finish adult saving Australia immeasurable sums of money, and a immeasurable cube of those saving will be since of rebate highway upkeep costs (a cost a state and sovereign government’s mostly subsidise).
Reply
Alert moderator
Jean Oliver:
11 Apr 2016 4:57:44pm
That’s a best contention square I’ve review on this discerning sight business.
Reply
Alert moderator
lionel lhurst:
11 Apr 2016 6:02:10pm
I determine a evidence is good put, nonetheless fails to cruise that any sight float will destroy economically unless prices are as low as or revoke than atmosphere travel. If stream prolonged stretch trains were all one class, with all recumbent seats and labelled during economy atmosphere float levels, they would be full and means to run some-more often, and during a profit. Upgrading to high speed would definition formulation new routes, softened rail systems, and a complement of entrance roads for emergencies. Instead of trains, maybe a suggested 1200kph
vacuum tube plug complement would be a softened gamble if we have to start from stratch.
Reply
Alert moderator
mhpnet:
11 Apr 2016 10:36:28pm
Yes i have to determine that maybe we are deliberation aged record before it’s even installed. The problem, and a vital disproportion with Australia compared to all other grown nations is a distances endangered and a conflicting environmental hurdles faced in this country. We are singular and we would need a singular and hopefully cutting-edge solution. I’m certain Elon could give us some ideas, rather than customarily laying 19th century rails everywhere.
Reply
Alert moderator
gnome:
11 Apr 2016 7:44:25pm
The line about France being customarily 2.5 times Australia population-wise shows customarily what a sum nonsense it is. France is about threequarters a stretch of NSW. Which statistic do we cruise rates some-more significance in contention of railway construction?
Reply
Alert moderator
Gordon:
11 Apr 2016 8:25:53pm
There were some reasonable points made, nonetheless it neglected a singular many applicable infer in Australian infrastructure delivery: extrinsic electorates don’t tumble in a loyal line. Looping by all of them will blow out a float times and a cost.
Reply
Alert moderator
Steven:
11 Apr 2016 4:59:51pm
I adore a judgment of an easterly seashore discerning train, nonetheless looking during a mercantile opening of France and Japan doesn’t remonstrate me that a choice creates mercantile sense.
Reply
Alert moderator
Wanderer:
11 Apr 2016 6:13:54pm
It substantially dosnt. No where circuitously a race and many some-more space.
What would be engaging is a discerning sight with a stop any 50km building new outdoor city hubs. Skip a hours of pushing and take 10min to go from city cbd to city cbd. A probable resolution to sydney and melbournes skill cost crisis.
And if preapproved before expansion severely subsidized by investors.
Reply
Alert moderator
BS Detector:
11 Apr 2016 8:57:21pm
If a sight stops any 50km, it can’t presumably be fast.
Reply
Alert moderator
Mijow:
11 Apr 2016 10:54:29pm
BS Detector,
Of march it can. Even a all-stops shinkansen trains in Japan are impossibly fast. we infrequently take one from Osaka and Kyoto, customarily one stop. Cuts a 30 notation tour in half, to 15 minutes.
Reply
Alert moderator
pilotyoda:
11 Apr 2016 8:15:16pm
“Economic Sense” is a rubbery thing. What is good about airlines in Australia transferring billions of dollars invariably to unfamiliar companies, year after year, to squeeze planes that we can't build here.
This becomes unfamiliar debt and a taxation dodge.
To recompense by a nose to park during a airport, or for a sight or cab from a CBD to a airfield (no sight use in Victoria). To be searched in delayed fact everytime we need to float (even a physique scanners that uncover my steel prosthetic knee lead to a hunt for that my gastro dilettante would be proud).
A craft outing Melbourne to Sydney indeed takes longer than 3 hours CBD to CBD, with all a nuisance of changing float modes several times. By high speed rail it would be quicker overall, not to discuss cheaper!
The categorical reason we didn’t get high speed rail in a late 70s was Peter Ables from Ansett who knew it would explode his business – and it was quicker CBD to CBD afterwards along with rebate brazen inspections.
Reply
Alert moderator
briony:
11 Apr 2016 5:00:15pm
Why? For a same reason it’s taken for ever to build a second Sydney airport.
Why? For a same reason rebuilding a Gold Coast sight line petered out kilometres brief of a GC airfield and there’s now ad hoc rail/light rail/lack of buses.
Because Australians can’t get off their backsides and do things for a common good.
But if immeasurable income talks–say certain developments in, Sydney, for example, it’s full steam brazen and never mind a tiny guy.
Reply
Alert moderator
andy:
11 Apr 2016 5:01:12pm
And taxpayers of Adelaide and Perth are plumbed for a share of taxation funds, nonetheless advantage how?
Reply
Alert moderator
Forrest Gardener:
11 Apr 2016 6:06:03pm
Taxpayers of Adelaide and Perth? They get to feel good that they helped recompense for a whole thing.
AND they can go for a float on a sight when they revisit a easterly coast.
Reply
<a href="http://www2b.abc.net.au/tmb/View/AlertModerator.aspx?b=69m=2058225tpa=r=%2Ftmb%2FView%2FMessage.aspx%3Fb%3D69%26t%3D14372%26a%3D0%26ps%3D50%26tpa%3D%2