If you suspected that the government, along with social workers, the police and the media were keeping information from you that you really needed to know, would you applaud those who told you the truth?
If you knew that they were outright lying to you, would you applaud the honest investigator who exposed their lies?
You would? Good. I’m sure most of you would agree that the mass rape and prostitution of our little girls by, for the most part, Muslim paedophiles is something that we should have been made aware of long ago. Those who covered it up, belittled and sometimes threatened the victims, were, along with the Muslims themselves, at enormous fault. I doubt that even the PC Crowd, whose anti-human philosophy was ultimately to blame for this tragedy, would dare to speak up for the diversity-is-enriching-or-else model at the present time.
So, can we all agree that the alleged ‘hurt feelings’ of some should no longer trump actual physical and psychological harm done to others? When the criminality of their fellows is exposed, shouldn’t the hypothetical offence taken by a minority be of much less consequence than the actual damage done to the victims of that criminality? For the maintenance of the establishment’s illusory ‘community cohesion,’ wasn’t the price paid by so many vulnerable young girls in Rotherham and elsewhere far too high?
Let’s vote on it.
Should the government censor information that may reflect poorly on a minority community, if it can be shown that such information would benefit the majority?
No
Yes
Sometimes
Not sure
Poll Maker
OK. So most of us would not have done what the PC Crowd in Rotherham and elsewhere did. We wouldn't have airbrushed Muslim criminality out of the picture. For the sake of our loved ones we would have exposed these terrible crimes. In fact, many of us wouldn't have allowed such enormous numbers of people wholly unlike us into our country to commit them in the first place.
The politicians, however, had other ideas.
Allison Pearson captured the spirit of a traitorous age quite nicely in the 27 August 2014 edition of The Telegraph:
When publicity like this threatens to undermine the hold 'democracy' has on the necessary majority 'other ideas' are at a premium. Especially those that may help stifle such devastatingly accurate criticism.
The All Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism published just such a set of 'ideas.'
The 9 February 2015 launch of the inquiry report was hosted at Lambeth Palace by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, who said:
"The All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism… is an extraordinary report… All humanity has been made in the image of God. The blasphemy of anti-Semitism is that it seeks to diminish, to distort and ultimately to destroy that divine gift."
I'm not sure these gentlemen would agree, Justin. I think that they may think God made some in his image but not all. What do you think?
Manis Friedman
Ovadia Yosef
Eli Ben Dahan
Welby continued:
"What other struggle has been going on for hundreds of years and still is of current importance?"
You're absolutely right, Justin. Throughout all history, lots and lots of people have struggled with the 'Jewish Question.' Here are a few examples:
JESUS CHRIST:
“If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth... You belong to your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer... and abode not in the truth." (John: Chapter 8, verse 39-44)
"The scribes and the Pharisees... do not follow their example! For they preach but they do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens and lay them on people’s shoulders but they will not lift a finger to move them... They love places of honour at banquets, seats of honour in synagogues, greetings in marketplaces and the salutation ‘Rabbi'...
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites. You cleanse the outside of cup and dish, but inside they are full of plunder and self-indulgence... You are like whitewashed tombs, which appear beautiful on the outside, but inside are full of dead men’s bones and every kind of filth.
Even so, on the outside you appear righteous, but inside you are filled with hypocrisy and evildoing... You serpents, you brood of vipers!" (Matthew: Chapter 23, verses 3-33)
ST. AUGUSTINE: (354 - 430) Bishop of Hippo and a Father of the Church, characterized the Jews thus:
"The Jews... are undoubtedly our enemies… Long before the coming of the Saviour, Judaism had progressively become corrupt... after the revelation of Christ, it fell completely under Satan's inspiration; formerly the chosen children of God, they became the sons of the devil…
The true image of the Hebrew is Judas Iscariot, who sells the Lord for silver."
He also said:
"Many of the Fathers taught that Antichrist would be a Jew and that the Jews would be his most devoted followers."
ST. THOMAS AQUINAS: (1225-1274) In 'On the Governance of the Jews,' Thomas said this:
"The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious."
In article 8 of 'Summa Logica,' he states:
"Heathens and Jews should not be compelled to believe, but they should be prevented from hindering the faith of others."
MARTIN LUTHER: (1483 - 1546) The German Friar was the first and most influential of the founders of the Reformation in Europe and is, without question, the most important figure in the history of the Protestant religion.
He was, at first, on good terms with the 'people of the Book' but, after he had learned to read Hebrew and took a look at what they had to say in the Talmud, his opinion of them changed. Thus, in 1542, Luther published On the Jews and Their Lies. This says:
"Be on your guard against the Jews, knowing that wherever they have their synagogues, nothing is found but a den of devils in which sheer self-glory, conceit, lies, blasphemy, and defaming of God and men are practiced most maliciously... They are nothing but thieves and robbers who daily eat no morsel and wear no thread of clothing which they have not stolen and pilfered from us by means of their accursed usury..,
We let them get rich on our sweat and blood, while we remain poor and they such the marrow from our bones... They remain our daily murderers and bloodthirsty foes in their hearts...
However, they have not acquired a perfect mastery of the art of lying; they lie so clumsily and ineptly that anyone who is just a little observant can easily detect it."
In Luther’s Table Talks, he says this:
"When we read that Judas hanged himself, that his belly burst in pieces, and that his bowels fell out... the Jews ought to have made a mirror of Judas, and have seen therein how they in like manner should be destroyed... The belly signifies the whole kingdom of the Jews, which shall fall away and be destroyed, so that nothing thereof remain."
POPE CLEMENT VIII: (1536-1605) In 1592, Clement said:
"All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor."
"Jews hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancour against the people among whom they live."
VOLTAIRE: (1694-1778) The great French philosopher and man of letters said these things in his 'Dictionnaire philosophique:'
"Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race...
The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous - cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity...
The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which have for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inextinguishable hated of all peoples by whom they are tolerated, and through whom they are enriched".
EDWARD GIBBON: (1737-1794) The English historian said this in his monumental work, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire:'
"We have already described the religious harmony of the ancient world and the facility with which the most different and even hostile nations embraced, or at least respected, each other's superstitions.
A single people refused to join in the common intercourse of mankind. The Jews... The sullen obstinacy with which they maintained their peculiar rites and unsocial manners seemed to mark them out a distinct species of men, who boldly professed, or who faintly disguised, their implacable hatred to the rest of humankind."
WILLIAM BLAKE: (1757 – 1827) In A Memorable Fancy, the poet, artist and mystic says this:
"The vulgar came to think that all nations would at last be subject to the Jews. This… is come to pass, for all nations believe the Jews' code and worship the Jews' God."
NAPOLEON BONAPARTE (1769-1821) said this:
"The Jews have to be treated as a special people. They are a state within the state. It is discouraging for the French nation to end up under the sway of the lowest of peoples.
The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity... They are surely not real citizens.”
THOMAS JEFFERSON: (1743-1826) Third President of America and author of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson said:
"Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in."
"Those who labour in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he had a chosen people."
"The Israelites have but small virtues and most of the faults of all other peoples. They have no point of honour."
WILLIAM COBBETT: (1763 - 1835) In his essay, The Protestant Reformation, the journalist and political reformer tells us this:
"The Reformation changed England from being the happiest country, perhaps, that the world had ever seen into a land the main body of whose people were poor and miserable, with Jews and paper-money makers the real owners of a large part of it. With the foundation of the Bank of England in 1694, there arose loans, funds, banks, bankers, bank notes, and a national debt...
The people looked back with aching hearts to former happy days, and the nobility and gentry began to perceive with shame and fear that already their estates were beginning to pass quietly from them into the hands of the Jews, Quakers and other moneychangers created by the 'no-popery' war."
ULYSSES SIMPSON GRANT: (1822-1885) The American General who won the US Civil War for the North went on to become the 18th President of the USA. In 1862, Grant sent a letter to C. P. Wolcott, the Assistant Secretary of War, which said:
"I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders...
I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it.
The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere."
FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY: (1821-1881) The Russian novelist and poet said this in 'Diary of a Writer:
"Jewry is thriving precisely there where the people are still ignorant, or not free, or economically backward... The Jew, wherever he has settled, has still more humiliated and debauched the people...
What is propelling the Jew and has been propelling him for centuries? You will receive a unanimous answer: mercilessness. 'He has been prompted so many centuries only by pitilessness to us, only by the thirst for our sweat and blood...
Point to any other tribe from among Russian aliens which could rival the Jew by his dreadful influence... You will find no such tribe."
Dostoyevsky also predicted what might happen to the peasant population of Russia if the Jew gained control:
"What if somehow, for some reason, our rural commune should disintegrate, that commune which is protecting our poor native peasant against so many ills; what if, straightaway, the Jew and his whole kehillah should fall upon that liberated peasant?... Why, of course, instantly this would be his end, his entire property, his whole strength, the very next day would come under the power of the Jew and there would ensue such an era as can be compared not only with the era of serfdom but even with that of the Tartar yoke...
Now, how would it be if in Russia there were not three million Jews, but three million Russians and there were eighty million Jews? Well, into what would they convert the Russians, and how would they treat them? Would they permit them to acquire equal rights? Would they permit them to worship freely in their midst? Wouldn’t they instead convert them into slaves?... Wouldn’t they slaughter the Russians down to the last man?"
Dostoevsky was speaking more prophetically than he would ever know. Only 36 years after his death, when the Tsar’s government was weakened by WWI, the revolutionaries, many of whose leading lights were Jewish, finally succeeded in deposing the Russian government and established in its place a tyranny that lasted for almost seventy years.
Am I making this up, Justin? Did Jews not play a singularly important part in the genesis, development and triumph of the Russian Revolution? No? Let's see if you find it so easy to dismiss this guy.
On 8 February 1920, the article Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People, appeared in The Sunday Herald.
Written by the British Secretary of State for War, this said:
"As bankers and industrialists (master capitalists?) they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources... In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements... In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the international Jews...
This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (USA), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.
It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, THE MAJORITY OF THE LEADING FIGURES ARE JEWS. MOREOVER, THE PRINCIPAL INSPIRATION AND DRIVING POWER COMES FROM THE JEWISH LEADERS...
In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary commissions for combating counter revolution has been take by Jews...
The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany... Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."
Would you dare describe Winston Churchill as an anti-Semite, Justin? Are you guys really that brazen now?
The Times of 12 April 1919 had previously quoted Churchill thus:
"Of all the tyrannies in history, the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive, and the most degrading. It is sheer humbug to pretend that it is not far worse than German militarism. [The atrocities are] incomparably more hideous, on a larger scale, and more numerous than any for which the Kaiser is responsible." (Connaught Rooms, London)
So, according to Churchill, what Trotsky' and 'the international Jews' created in Russia was 'the worst tyranny in history!' Would you argue with Winston, Justin? Are you going to call him nasty names just for telling the plain, unvarnished truth? I mean, he was a bit better placed to know what was going on at the time than you, wasn't he?
How about Martin Luther, the founder of the Protestant religion? Without him you wouldn't have a church to boss, would you? Was he a bad guy? Or was he just a concerned citizen, like all the others cited above, who was, not only in a position to know what his former mentors were up to, but also to warn the majority of it?
Are you a better man than the historical Titans cited above Justin? Do you, somehow, know better than they did? Were they all so terribly misguided? Couldn't a few of them have simply been telling the truth?
What would you say to Jesus Christ, Justin? Was he out of order too?
It's all gone quiet over there.
Justin concluded his summary of the Anti-Semitism report by saying:
"It is our responsibility, now, to respond to this report by acting on its recommendations… From our ongoing commitment to the work of the Council of Christians and Jews, through to the ministry of our churches and church schools, this is something on which we will act."
Former member of the Israeli Knesset, Natan Sharansky is a convicted spy who spent nine years in the Soviet prison system.
Chairman of the Jewish Agency since 2009, he said this at the Lambeth Palace convention:
“National governments and civil society now recognize the gravity of the situation. This recognition is an important step in the struggle against all manifestations of anti-Semitism - in the streets, on the internet, in the media, on university campuses, and in schools… The problem must be addressed at its very roots, through education, legal steps, and social action.
The new anti-Semitism… feeds on the delegitimisation, demonisation and double standards applied to Israel… The hotbeds of incitement and the root causes of anti-Israel hatred must be dealt with in order to quell all forms of anti-Semitism and ensure that Jewish life may thrive in safety across Europe."
Criticism of Israel and Jewish misbehaviour is verboten then. In the real world as it is currently constituted, where Hebraic fantasies really do come true and the facts get ‘dealt with’ in order that ‘Jewish life may thrive,’ uppity Russian jailbirds may not have to spend any time at all with a rusty spike up their behinds wishing they hadn’t taken the p*** out of the British with quite so much relish. However, in Wonderland, where I hang out with Dostoyevsky and co., rusty spikes and sore behinds abound.
John Bercow, elevated during the time of Tony to preside over the House of Commons as its first ever Jewish Speaker, informed the gathering that he had changed his mind about anti-Semitism being ‘a dormant volcano’ and added:
“We have to concede that it has fomented and brought its hatred to the surface. I do not want to be alarmist... But I do say that anti-Semitism is intolerable in any decent and civilized society. Combating it is a serious struggle which requires the widest possible constitution.”
Watch out white world! Here come Churchill’s 'international Jews' again and it’s the hair of our heads they’re after gripping this time!
Ladies and gentlemen, we all know that the ISIS types within our world must be contained, they are a danger to all of us. But does anyone out there really think that this pity-the-poor-Jew hoo-ha is about them? About shutting THEM up? Trust me, they’re going to think, say and do what they want no matter what laws are enacted. The only way you can deal with such bloodthirsty fanatics is to boot them out and to stop importing more.
Do you believe the one-world-ruled-by-them-forever folk are about to do such a thing? Do you think they’re going to give up on their melting-pot ambitions when they are as advanced as they are?
They are not and they don’t have to either. It’s never going to be them who get their heads cut off and it won’t be their daughters who get gang-raped and prostituted. When they're not dreaming up new laws to batter us with in Westminster, they're tucked up safe and warm in their ivory towers, their gated communities and castles with moats maintained at the taxpayer's expense.
This is ALL about HALTING THE SPREAD OF INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET! If this was not the case the anti-Semitism report would not have mentioned the phrase 'social media' all of sixty-eight times!
THEY own the newspapers, they own the TV stations, they own Hollywood, the book and recording companies, they even own Facebook. However, they do not, as yet, own cyberspace. That’s where the facts hang out. And the facts, those that they cannot spin to their own advantage, are what they’re after.
We who tell the odd anti-establishment tale on social media are not going to cut your head off and we're not going to rape your children but, if enough people pay attention to the information we dispense, one or two might keep their heads and one or two more might keep their sons and daughters safe because of what they learn.
We warn. THEY do not. We were warning about the threat posed by the Muslim paedophile in working-class areas (and that by a perverted elite in Westminster) decades ago. They told you that we were the bad guys, covered things up and carried on just as they always did. They didn't want you warned then and they don’t want you warned now.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, THEY ARE AT WAR WITH US. Immigrants are their footsoldiers, political correctness and the media brainwash their weapons of mass destruction.
That’s what this anti-Semitism scam is about. Too much light is shining in the dark corners of the corridors of powers. The savages who inhabit those corners are finding it more and more difficult to wreak their savagery unhindered and unnoticed.
Between 2005 and 2012, Zbigniew Brzezinsky, Barack Obama’s former foreign affairs guru, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter and Council on Foreign Relations big shot for many years, has summed up the concern of the 'dark corner' New World Order boys in a variety of fora in recent times.
“For the first time in human history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive", he says. "America needs to face squarely a centrally important new global reality: that the world’s population is experiencing a political awakening unprecedented in scope and intensity…
There are only a few pockets of humanity left in the remotest corners of the world that are not politically alert and engaged with the political turmoil and stirrings that are so widespread today around the world…
The central challenge of our time is posed not by global terrorism, but rather by the intensifying turbulence caused by the phenomenon of global political awakening...
The nearly universal access to radio, television and increasingly the Internet… transcend sovereign borders and pose a challenge both to existing states as well as to the existing global hierarchy, on top of which America still perches."
You will note that Brzezinsky is not impressed by our 'political awakening.' He sees it as a 'challenge,' a threat to the 'global hierarchy' and America's dominant position within it. He continues:
The resulting widespread rise in worldwide populist activism is proving inimical to external domination of the kind that prevailed in the age of colonialism and imperialism. Persistent and highly motivated populist resistance of politically awakened and historically resentful peoples to external control has proven to be increasingly difficult to suppress…
Diversified global leadership and politically awakened masses make a much more difficult context for any major power including, currently, the leading world power: the United States.”
So, it would appear that Brzezinsky is advocating the need for more 'control' in order to 'suppress' any 'challenge' by 'resentful people' to major power... domination.' In order to achieve this would necessitate a lot less 'political awakening,' one presumes.
And what does he suggest poses the greatest 'challenge?' 'Universal access to radio, television and increasingly the Internet.' Access, in other words, to information. For 'increasingly the internet' read 'the internet is our greatest challenge.'
P.S. Here's Bzezinsky in 1979, doing his global bit for the Mujahideen, Taliban, Osama et al.
Oh yes, this guy has been 'engaged with political turmoil' for quite some time.
So, as regards the 'political awakening' that seems to have ruffled the feathers of Archbishops, Jewish Agency Chairpersons, former National Security Advisors and the anti-Semitism gang, are you awake yet?
The 10 February 2015 edition of The Times of Israel reported thus:
"Welby said the Church of England had a particular responsibility 'to be accountable and to hold others to account. This is something on which we will act, and I hope those gathered here will do the same with passion and commitment.'
Some observers took the Archbishop’s remarks to refer to a stinging rebuke given to the vicar of Virginia Water, in Surrey, the Rt Rev Stephen Sizer... The latest row emanates from Sizer’s posting on his Facebook page of a Wikispooks article entitled '9/11 Israel did it'."
Unfortunately for Welby and co., the gentleman referred to here, the one who tells us that 'Israel did it,' is not some sad internet weirdo. A civilian director of Studies at the US Army War College for 5.5 years and a Marine Corps veteran, Dr Alan Sabrosky, Ph. D, was interviewed by Mark Glenn on 15 March 2010 for the Ugly Truth's Liberty Hour podcast.
This is an edition of what was said on that occasion:
Glenn: “One of things that I have noted about the problem that we're dealing with - in terms of Zionism, the power of the Jewish lobby… let's face it: it got away with attacking a United States ship for close to two hours killing 34 men - this was an act of war, they got away with it…
When we look at the two wars that the United States finds herself in, and on the cusp of at least two others, and all of this for the benefit of a certain foreign country sitting on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea - they have been wildly successful at bringing all of this about… You have people that try to make this claim that they are loyal to America and, at the same time, loyal to a foreign government, it is a lie.”
Sabrosky: "It is, and it's more than that, Mark. What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation...
9/11 has led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded, God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we've killed or wounded or made homeless, and it's an on-going sore… What Americans need to understand is that they did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel's going to disappear. Israel will flat-ass disappear from this Earth…
The Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done...
If you pick up the Army Times, or the Navy Times, or any of the journals of any of the services you've got a very different view than you get looking at the Congress and the White House. And the military has not been bought. The military is loyal but it has not been bought. And if it ever understands this, really, really, deeply understands this… these people are history...
Three buildings went down; the third was not hit by a plane, it was wired for controlled demolition, therefore, all of them were wired for controlled demolition. And at that point the reaction is rage. First disbelief, and then rage...
A large majority of American Jews give their allegiance to a foreign country. They may have American citizenship, but their allegiance is to Israel… I don't care if we're called anti-Semites or not, if we don't stand up and say, ‘Truth is truth, their allegiance is to a foreign country, they are traitors,’ then we're dishonest to ourselves…
I don't think either one of you has any Jewish ancestry. I do. You know, I have one grandparent who's Jewish... And if this explodes, I'm gonna go down with the rest of them. And I know this. I flat-out know this. But if that was the price for making America whole again."
Dr Sabrosky may also be seen elaborating on the above theme in the 2011 interview with Press TV seen below:
I don't know whether Mr Sabrosky has it right about 9/11 but he and Mark Glenn weren't kidding about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. Does that little incident appear in any US schoolbook? Have the children of America ever learned about it in class? They don't teach what they don't want you to know, that's the bottom line.
And by the way, as I stress throughout, it's not just the non-Jew telling tales these days. Not only has Alan Sabrosky, whose grandfather was Jewish, made his feelings plain about 9/11, check out the graphic below.
As Justin Welby informed us that anti-Semitism was 'hundreds of years' old, so the anti-Semitism report, itself, said this:
"If we are to continue to play a leadership role, we must continually review and update our approach to and methods for fighting this ancient prejudice."
So, the UK will NOT ‘continue to play a leadership role’ if this ‘ancient prejudice’ isn’t defeated?
Here’s a thought, have any of those who compiled this report ever wondered why the prejudice is so ancient? Have they never wondered why all manner of different peoples, in all manner of different counties and states, have, from antiquity to the present, feared and disliked the Jew?
Have they never, for instance, wondered why Jews were, so often, (check the link) expelled from the countries in which they settled?
It doesn’t appear to have occurred to any of our parliamentary inquisitors that such expulsions might have come about because of Jewish misbehaviour. Were the Jews never at fault? Were they always the victims of small-mindedness and irrational hatred? Was such hatred not, once in a while, entirely rational?
I'm afraid such 'anti-Semitic' considerations do not appear anywhere in the cited report. That word, however, along with 'anti-Semite,' 'anti-Semitism' and 'Holocaust,' is mentioned no less than 763 times!
Not taking any chances, are they?
At least they think they're not. You see, the problem for the report's authors, and those who wish to make law on the back of it, is profound. HUGE numbers of people are now aware of the secret history and the hidden present.
No matter what laws are created to shut these up, the truth will continue to emerge.
As it does here:
On 14 August 2002, former Israeli minister, Shulamit Aloni, said this on the US news programme, Democracy Now:
"It is a trick we always use it. When, from Europe, someone is criticising Israel WE BRING UP THE HOLOCAUST. When, in this country (USA), people are criticising Israel THEN THEY ARE ANTI-SEMITIC.
And the organisation is strong and has a lot of money and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong and THEY ARE STRONG IN THIS COUNTRY...
THEY HAVE POWER, MONEY, MEDIA and other things and their attitude is ISRAEL MY COUNTRY RIGHT OR WRONG... THEY ARE NOT READY TO HEAR CRITICISM. It is very easy to blame people who criticise certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic and to bring up the Holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people and THAT JUSTIFIES EVERYTHING WE DO TO THE PALESTINIANS."
763 or Shulamit?
You decide.
It's not difficult to understand why Bercow and Sharansky would say what they say but don't you find it fascinating that latter-day pipsqueaks like Welby and co. would presume, oh-so sanctimoniously, to know better than the great historical figures quoted above? Having said that, I suppose our foremost churchman has a bit of an excuse.
You see, not only was he a oil executive before he took to the cloth, making pots of dosh out of a corporate world that, by and large, owns the western politician, his father was Jewish also.
In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo and kosher grocery killings, David Cameron said this in 14 January 2015 edition of The Jewish Chronicle:
"Last weekend I joined the march on the streets of Paris surrounded by placards saying: ‘je suis Juif’. In the aftermath of one of the darkest moments in Europe in recent times, people of all ages and backgrounds came together to show solidarity with those who had suffered. In the face of those who tried to suppress our values, the voice of free speech responded ever louder."
'Free speech?' That'll be the day. David Cameron's 'voice of free speech' may resonate when Jews are suffering at the hands of militant Islam but it is entirely silent when 'Holocaust' mythology is questioned. Across Europe, honest men and women languish in jail for challenging the six million figure with their diligently researched findings.
Such folk would, I'm sure, be 'anti-Semites' in Dave World. Just as they are in France, Germany, Austria and a host of other on-message European countries where truth comes a long way last to a myth-driven status quo.
Interesting how he should favour the 'Je suis Juif' meme over that of 'Je suis Charlie', don't you think? Seeing as how Amedy Coulibaly was responsible for four dead and four injured at the grocery whilst twelve were killed and eleven injured by the Kouachi bothers at the Hebdo office.
Politicians have their priorities, I guess. The priority was confirmed by other high-ranking Cabinet members.
Cameron continued:
"We have banned extremist preachers... and we are getting extremist material taken down from the internet."
I'm with you on 'extremist preachers,' Dave. In fact, I'm way ahead of you. People like me were exposing those who preach hate in our country when you were still a PR man at Carlton TV. On the other hand, has any happy-clappy, diversity-spouting politician ever said they should be booted out or, even better, banned from setting foot on our soil?
The 7/7 bombings and the Rotherhams would never have happened if the globalists and the PC zealots in Westminster had listened to us. They were all too busy calling us nasty names. You know, 'racist,' 'Fascist,' 'Nazi,' 'bigot,' things like that.
Dave also said this:
"No disagreements on politics or policy will ever be allowed to justify racism, prejudice or extremism in our society. Over generations we have built something incredible in our country: a multi-ethnic, multi-faith democracy – and we are not going to let anti-Semitism destroy it."
What you and others like you 'built' has seen huge numbers of British girls gang-raped by Muslim paedophiles, Dave. Can you please explain to me what you find 'incredible' about that?
Frank Field, a uniquely honest Labour MP, has informed us of many politically embarrassing truths along the way. A couple are cited below:
Incredible would be right, Dave. On so many levels.
We never wanted the 'multi-ethnic, multi-faith' diversity that shiny-eyed social engineers like you forced upon us. As Trevor Phillips, former head of the Commission on Racial Equality, points out in his gloating tome, ‘The Windrush,’ ninety percent of the British people wanted all immigration stopped way back in the nineteen fifties. So we really can’t can’t be blamed for any anxiety that Charlie Hebdo, the kosher grocery, Brussels museum and synagogue killings in Paris, Brussels and Copenhagen have engendered in this country, can we?
Oh no, you can't blame us ninety percenters. However, a good deal of responsibility for the terrorist presence in our world can certainly be attributed to the self righteous 'engineers' who beckoned in the multitudes.
Cameron adds:
"I want us to do more to educate people in our country about fighting prejudice and hatred. That is one of the reasons why I set up the Holocaust Commission which will be reporting on Holocaust Memorial Day later this month. I think it is vital that all our young people understand not just what happened in the Holocaust but also how it happened."
Ever heard of 'Holocaust' overload, Dave? No? You do surprise me.
I like the 'how it happened' bit though. Does this mean that, via your good offices, our kids are going to find out what led up to the Holocuast? You know, the Russian and Hungarian revolutions, the Spartakist Rising in Germany and the great famines in 1922 and 1933 that shuffled off twelve million people? I don't think the Jewish involvement in these events has ever been formally explained to our youngsters, Dave. This could be a first!
Oh, and Dave, whilst we're on the subject, until 1990 there was a memorial stone at Auschwitz that said four million people died at Auschwitz.
For 45 years, if you dared to disagree with that figure you'd get called all manner of nasty names. Nowadays, the Auschwitz museum says 'approx. 1.1 million'died. Not four million. Thing is, when the Auschwitz total was reduced by 2.9 million, the overall 6 million total stayed the same. At least that's the figure that's always trotted out by the various know-it-alls in the mainstream media.
Throughout the concentration camp system the death totals have been coming down consistently. When the Majdanek (Lublin)camp was liberated in July 1944, the Soviets said that 1.7 million people had been murdered there. By the time the Nuremberg Trials began in November 1945, they had revised this figure down to 1.5 million. In 1948, the Main Commission for the Investigation of Nazi Crimes in Poland were saying that 360,000 had died and, as late as 1998, the Madjanek museum guidebook was saying more than 234,000 had died.
In December 2005, however, the same museum announced that Tomasz Kranz had established that 78,000 people had lost their lives at Majdanek.
On p. 288 of the 1963 edition (vol. 18) of the Encyclopaedia Britiannica, this is said:
"At Mathausen... close to 2,000,000 people, mostly Jews, were exterminated between 1941 and 1945."
The U.S. Holocaust museum now says:
"At least 95,000 died there. More than 14,000 were Jewish."
Dachau used to have a sign up that said 240,000 Jews died there, gassed in 'ovens' by th