The anti-Semitism report also states:
"Any theory which relies upon stereotypes of Jewish cunning or wealth and alleged control of media or politicians is anti-Semitic."
Which bald assertion rules me out as a candidate for the chop as I don't deal in theories. Truth, reality, hidden history but very little in the way of 'theory.' And on the rare occasion that I do proffer an opinion, as opposed to a rock hard verifiable fact, I always highlight its equivocal nature.
Nevertheless, as it is folks like me the anti-Semitism gang are really after, let's take a look at what some have said, for example, about 'control of media.'
On 1 July 2012, the essay, Jews DO control the media by Manny Friedman (Elad Nehorai) was published by the Times of Israel web site:
This said:
"We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, Jewish directors. Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, 'Did you know that he was Jewish?' That’s just how we roll.
We’re a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example, AIPAC, which was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about it. Again, it’s just what we do...
Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show… is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish.
Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?"
And thus does the centuries-long disinformation, spin, propaganda and lie predominate. On behalf of an intensely malign ruling clique. To the benefit, supposedly, of that clique. To the detriment, certainly, of the vast majority outside the loop.
I say ‘supposedly’ because, when that majority discovers how profoundly those with the power to shape their opinions, beliefs and world-view have fooled, conned and betrayed them, the vengeful backlash is likely to be considerable.
And they WILL discover these things. When the Jew cannot resist ‘bragging’ about his control of the media; when the stone bl**ding obvious is up close and personal, in your face and, if you don’t want to get done over by the nu-revelatory Hebrew, undeniable; when it isn’t just blokes like us trying to warn the unenlightened as to the real state of affairs; just about everyone is going to find out who’s really in charge and what their agenda is, was and always will be.
At which point, one wonders whether the world might just go bang quite some time before the prophecy-wallahs wanted it to.
Just in case you're a tad sceptical, it has all been said before.
In an essay published in the February/March 1995 issue of Midstream magazine, Professor Steven G. Kellman said this of the motion picture industry:
"Jews have been prominent and predominant in all phases of the business: production, distribution and exhibition...
Of the 100 most powerful people in the industry according to a recent survey by Premiere, most, including the top 12, are Jewish...
Though individual Jews control Hollywood, Jewishness does not."
Hmm. Bit of an old get out clause there, Stevie. Jews are in control but, as they practice this control, they make a conscious decision to set aside their Jewishness in order, presumably, to be as even-handed in the control they exert as possible?
How about some of you Jewish controllers practice a little of the equality you're always banging on about and let a few more of us non-controlling Gentiles have a go? In return for which we promise not to behave in an anti-Semitic fashion when we're in charge? You know, when we're all controlling a slice of the Hollywood cake that precisely represents our incidence in the general population?
It's all gone quiet over there.
On 19 December 2008, Joel Stein said this in his LA Times essay, Who runs Hollywood? C'mon.
“Only 22% of Americans now believe ‘the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,’ down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows HOW DUMB AMERICA HAS GOTTEN. JEWS TOTALLY RUN HOLLYWOOD.
How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have (had) the power to shut down all film production…
The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents)…
The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish…
YES, WE CONTROL HOLLYWOOD…
I called ADL Chairman Abe Foxman... He dismissed my whole proposition, saying that the number of people who think Jews run Hollywood is still too high. The ADL poll, he pointed out, showed that 59% of Americans think Hollywood execs 'do not share the religious and moral values of most Americans,' and 43% think the entertainment industry is waging an organized campaign to 'weaken the influence of religious values in this country.'
‘That's a very dangerous phrase, 'Jews control Hollywood.' What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood,’ he said. Instead of 'control,' Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry 'happen to be Jewish,' as in 'all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.'
But Foxman said he is proud of the accomplishments of American Jews. 'I think Jews are disproportionately represented in the creative industry. They're disproportionate as lawyers and probably medicine here as well,' he said.”
Don't forget banking, Abe! And politics! And education!
They Jew is not, of course, 'disproportionately represented' down the mines, digging ditches, laying bricks, in the factories, cleaning toilets, on the farms or (Israel excepted) at the battlefront.
And never has been.
By the way, in case any of you missed it, whistleblowing the stone bleeding obvious for us here we have Messrs Friedman, Kellman and Stein, all of whom are as Jewish as its possible to be.
Now let's test the anti-Semitism report's 'Jewish... control of... politicians' theory.
On 5 April 2014, former Irgun and Knesset member, Uri Avnery, said this at the Gush Shalom web site:
"If anyone had any illusions about American politics, they were dispelled this week. The casino mogul, Sheldon Adelson, organized a public display of his power. He summoned to his Las Vegas betting paradise the four most probable Republican candidates for the next presidential elections, in order to choose one of them. All the invitees heeded the summons, of course.
It was a shameless exhibition. The politicians grovelled before the casino lord. Mighty governors of important states did their best to sell themselves like applicants at a job interview. Each of them tried to trump the others in promising to do the Mogul’s bidding.
Flanked by Israeli bodyguards, Adelson grilled the American hopefuls. And what was he demanding from the future president of the United States? First of all and above everything else, blind and unconditional obedience to the government of another state: Israel.
Adelson is one of the richest Jews in the world. He is also a fanatical rightist, not only an American rightist, but also an Israeli one. While he is now looking for the best American president money can buy, he has already chosen his Israeli stooge. He has done something unprecedented in Israeli history: created an instrument to impose his ultra-right views on the Israeli people.
For this purpose he has invested large sums of money in a daily newspaper of his creation. It is called “Israel Hayom” (Israel today), and is literally priceless: it is distributed for nothing all over the country. Its readership is now the largest in the country, threatening the existence of the former No. 1, 'Yedioth Ahronoth' and killing the next one, 'Maariv.'
The sole purpose of Adelson’s paper is to serve Binyamin Netanyahu, personally and politically, unconditionally and unreservedly. This is such a blatant intervention in Israeli politics by a foreign billionaire that it is causing a reaction: all Knesset factions, both rightist and leftist (except the Likud, of course) have signed a demand to put an end to this corruption of democracy...
Everything Adelson does is done openly, proudly, shamelessly. I wonder how ordinary Americans react to this spectacle of one billionaire, especially a Jewish one, choosing their next president for them. We are told that anti-Semitism is on the rise in Europe and and across the globe. In the crazy mental world of the anti-Semites, Jews control the cosmos. And here we have a Jew, straight out of the pages of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, trying to appoint the ruler of the mightiest country on the planet...
The basic problem is that the American political process is totally corrupt. There is no other way to put it. In order to become the nominee of one major party, and then to be elected president, one needs enormous sums of money. Since the major battlefield is TV, and candidates have to pay for it, these sums get bigger and bigger...
A billionaire does not donate a fortune for a presidential candidate for nothing. That’s not how he became a billionaire in the first place. Once he gets his man elected, he demands his pound of flesh, many pounds... If he succeeds in installing his favourite in the White House, the US will become totally subservient to the extreme right-wing in Israel. He might as well put Netanyahu in the Oval Office...
If Adelson could dictate our future, it would spell disaster for our country... There is no way to roll back the corruption of the political process in the US, or here, without completely changing the electoral system. As long as huge sums are needed to get elected, corruption will reign supreme."
More here...
If there's anyone out there under any illusion about what kind of a world we'd be living in if Sheldon Adelson's chosen Goy should come to power, well, think Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Egypt (Obama), Iraq (Bush) and Afghanistan (Bush, Clinton and, before them, Reagan).
Better still, check out what the biggest donor to the Republican Party had to say at the Yeshiva University in New York on 22 October 2013:
"The United States should drop a nuclear bomb on Iran to spur the country to end its nuclear program," said Adelson.
Harry Truman, the President who recognised Israel in 1948, (he was the first world leader to offer such recognition) was the first and only President to attack another country with nuclear weapons.
If the Adelsons and their pet politicians aren't reigned in very shortly, he won't be the last.
Closer to home we have the influence of the Israel lobby. In a groundbreakingly courageous Channel 4 Dispatches documentary first aired on 16 November 2009, Peter Oborne told us this:
"Shortly before Blair became party leader in 1994, he met Michael Levy the pop music millionaire at a social even arranged by the Israeli Embassy. They became friends, playing tennis together and Levy became Blair's chief fundraiser. It's estimated that he raised over £15 million for Labour before the row over cash-for-peerages.
When Tony Blair became Prime Minster in 1997, He awarded Michael Levy a life peerage and made him his Special Envoy to the Middle East... What he negotiated between Israel and its Arab neighbours, on behalf of Britain, was kept secret.
Oxford University Middle East specialist Expert, Avi Schlaim, believes that Levy's role was actually damaging to Britain."
Professor Schlaim said:
"Something became skewed in British politics when an unelected friend of the Prime Minister had so much influence over British policy towards the Middle East."
He added:
"The Israel lobby does represent a narrow right-wing agenda… Calling critics of Israel ‘anti-Semitic’ has become a deliberate tactic among some of Israel's more strident lobby groups."
As regards the CFI 'donations' mentioned by Oborne, Sir Richard Dalton, a former UK Ambassador to Iran, commented thus:
"I don't believe, and I don't think anybody else would believe, that these contributions come with no strings attached."
He added:
“What's unique about the pro-Israeli lobbies is that they have such good access to politicians, they often operate behind the scenes and they have primary regard, even though they may come from Britain, not to the interests of the British people... But the interests of another country…
The Israeli lobbies appeared to censor British politicians… they appeared to be willing to use financial pressures."
Oborne continueded:
“How does the lobby work? Money plays a big part. Millions of pounds in donations from businessmen and others into the bank accounts of politicians and political parties... The Conservative Friends of Israel is one of Westminster's most active lobbying groups. IT CLAIMS AS ITS MEMBERS 80 PER CENT OF ALL CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT...
It was under Tony Blair that the Israel lobby first acquired real influence in government. Former Chairman of the Labour Friends of Israel, John Mendelssohn, boasted: ‘ZIONISM IS PERVASIVE IN NEW LABOUR. It's automatic that Blair will come to Labour Friends of Israel meetings'.
Today Mendelssohn is Labour's chief fundraiser and Labour Friends of Israel have sent even more MPs to Israel than has the CFI!"
Baron Mendelsohn of Finchley, whose wife is Facebook's Vice-President for Europe, is a trustee of the Holocaust Educational Trust and the UK arm of the New Israel Fund and is the Chairman of both the Finchley United Synagogue and the Union of Jewish Students.
He is also member of the committee that produced the anti-Semitism report.
In the introductory note to Peter Oborne's documentary, this is said:
"The Conservative Friends of Israel was founded in 1974 by the Conservative MP Michael Fidler. Since then it has emerged as a powerful lobby group. By 1984... Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher had been prevailed upon to become Chairman of the CFI branch at her local Finchley constituency...
The LFI was founded in 1957... at that year’s Labour Party Conference... It has very close ties with the Israeli Labour Party."
Britain's politicians have been in thrall to the whim, the will, the power and the money of Zionism's top table for many decades now.
For the anti-Semitism report's authors to suggest otherwise signals their desire to maintain a status quo whose partiality for Israel and the movers and shakers of World Jewry is already mind-bogglingly self-evident.
The fact that they think that they can still get away with pretending that this is not so should surprise no one. The Masters of the Universe and their hyperactive factotums have had it all their own way for so long they seem oblivious to the fact that the fiction they seek to maintain left the building long ago.
That mainstream journalists were daring to tell it as it really is, without fear of the consequences, back in 2009 should have clued them in to the new reality.
And, you know, maybe it did. Maybe all of this huff and puff and blow the house down is somewhere near the last desperate roll of the dice in a rigged game of chance where there was never any chance of those who rigged it losing.
Well, the odds have been stacked against the good guys for far too long. We've had enough, ladies.
'Cunning' is up for debate but the 'wealth' and the 'control' of our 'media and politicians' is about as 'alleged' as Israel's capacity to nuke Iran.
In the first paragraph of 'An Overview of Anti-Semitism,' the anti-Semitism report instructs us thus:
"Anti-Semitism is a scourge of civilised society... As the Community Security Trust explains, anti-Semitism at its heart is hostility, phobia or bias against Judaism or individual Jews as a group."
If we take a few liberties with the above, we get:
"Judaism is a scourge... at its heart it is hostility, phobia or bias against civilised society."
On 7 October 2009 a video was introduced at YouTube where we see Dr Douglas Rushkoff, who is Jewish himself, explain 'Judaism' similarly.
"The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation-state. We don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people. These are all artificial constructions and Judaism really teaches us how to see that.
In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real. And that’s very upsetting to people."
On page 179 of his 2007 book, 'An Ethical Tradition Betrayed – The End of Judaism,' Dr. Hajo Myer crystallised the notion that this 'corrosive force' is now so powerful that anyone who displeases the Jew is liable to be targeted, when he said:
"An anti-Semite used to be a person who disliked Jews. Now it is a person who Jews dislike."
As the report's unquestioning philo-Semitism fundamentally epitomises this definition, its authors would naturally disagree with it. However, one imagines a 'holocaust survivor' like Myer might have a bit more of an understanding of such things than they do, seeing as only one of them, the aforementioned John Mendelssohn, is Jewish.
As for Douglas Rushkoff's damning indictment of Judaism, well, how many Jewish witnesses must we assemble before the anti-Semitism gang cries enough?
Most would surely now 'agree that the alleged hurt feelings of some should no longer trump actual physical and psychological harm done to others.'
However, would you still 'applaud those who told you the truth' with such unreserved enthusiasm if, despite everything I've told you so far, truth is told that doesn't reflect well upon the Jews?
With the exception of Israel's ongoing depredations in Palestine, I think many would be a lot less prepared to condemn Jewish misbehaviour, no matter how heinous it happened to be. The power of the Jewish lobby in politics and the almighty Jewish presence in the media has ensured that most of us remain blissfully unaware of any impropriety. And, of course, when we DO find out about it and attempt to pass on what we have discovered, we have the usual suspects to contend with.
How many of you are aware of the role played by Jews in the 1933 Holodomor? How many actually know what that term signifies? If what happened back then means little to most, I can assure you that any who would dismiss the Ukrainian 'Holocaust,' would not dismiss the 1939-45 version similarly.
Zvi Gitelman, Professor of Political Science at the University of Michigan, described the Cheka, the original incarnation of the KGB, thus in a 1972 history:
“The high visibility of Jews in the Bolshevik regime was dramatized by the large numbers of Jews in the Cheka ... From the Jewish point of view it was no doubt the lure of immediate physical power which attracted many Jewish youths… Whatever the reasons, Jews were heavily represented in the secret police…
Since the Cheka was most hated and feared organ of the Bolshevik government, anti-Jewish feelings increased in direct proportion to Cheka terror.”
In the 26 July 2008 edition of The Daily Mail, historian Simon Sebag Montefiore shed a little light on the great famines of 1921 and 1933:
"So terrible was the famine that... as many as nine million may have died... The Great Famine of 1932/3... was a deliberate policy aimed at the entire Soviet peasant population...
To understand the origins of the famine, we have to go back to the October 1917 Revolution when the Bolsheviks, led by a ruthless clique of Marxist revolutionaries including Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, seized power in the name of the workers and peasants of the Russian Empire to create a Marxist paradise, using terror, murder and repression...
Lenin's hatred of the peasantry became clear when a famine occurred in Ukraine and southern Russia in 1921... With his bloodthirsty loathing for all enemies of the Revolution, he said 'Let the peasants starve' and wrote ranting notes ordering the better-off peasants to be hanged in their thousands...
Stalin created a draconian law that any hungry peasant who stole even a husk of grain was to be shot...
Lazar Kaganovich, a close associate of Stalin, crushed the Kuban and Siberia regions where famine was also rife."
On 21 December 2006, in an edition of Ynetnews.com, the online arm of Yedioth Aharonotan, the top selling Israeli daily, Sever Plocker, the paper's Chief Economic Editor, confirmed the above thus:
“We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million…
Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined ‘terror officials,’ cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate...
And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name ‘Genrikh Yagoda,’ the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system…
Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity… Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator… was a particularly cruel sadist.
In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin...
Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history... We cannot escape the Jewishness of ‘our hangmen,’ who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.”
Not if John Mann and co. get their way, we won't.
Sever Plocker's article was subtitled: 'We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.' Sadly, ever since the 'Red Terror' first manifested itself in Russia, the school curricula of the Western world has done its best to ensure that there would be nothing to forget.
Our children have been bombarded with 'Holocaust' propaganda ad infinitum but the part played by the Jews in the construction and savage implementation of Soviet Communism will, if the censors manage to force the necessary legislation upon us, remain forgotten forever.
REAL history that gives us a bit of a clue as to why the Germans, Hungarians and Romanians, along with some Croatians, Italians and French folk felt the way they did about Jews, must NEVER see the light of day.
The powers-that-be have been keeping this essential knowledge to themselves for almost one hundred years. That Jewry has been able to wield such extraordinary control over such damning information for so long attests to the enormous power they, actually, possess.
Take a look at the quotations cited in the graphics below and respond to the questions asked in the polls beneath them.
Brother Nathanael
Ari Shavit
Henry Makow
John Kampfner
Richard Goldstone
Noam Chomsky
If what is said above is true, do the commentators have the right to say these things?
Yes
No
Not sure
Poll Maker
Should such facts be censored if it is thought they may incite anti-Semitism?
No
Yes
Not sure
Poll Maker
True or not, are those who broadcast such statements anti-Semitic?
No
Yes
Possibly
Not sure
Poll Maker
Do you think the anti-Semitism inquiry's finest would take issue with the above statements and those who made them?
They really ought to be 'held to account,' ought they not? Seeing as the things they say are patently 'anti-Semitic,' according to the 'deeply concerning,' 'appalling,' and ‘totally unacceptable’ 'virus of anti-Semitism' lingo of the gang.
Trouble is Brother Nathanael, Ari Shavit, Henry Makow, Richard Goldstone, Noam Chomsky, Simon Sebag Monefiore and Zvi Gitelman are all Jewish themselves and John Kampfner's father was a Jew. Which makes condemnation a bit tricky.
Oh yes, non-Jewish criticism of a Jew in this day and age is a risky business. Indeed, the culprit might well fall foul of the anti-Semitism accusation himself! Especially as what the gentlemen above are saying happens to be true.
And if the usual suspects actually dared to confront the Jewish gentlemen cited above and someone whom they really wish to silence, the 'goy' who dares to broadcast similar anti-establishment realities, for example, was to rally to their defence, how on earth could they then accuse him of anti-Semitism?
Trust me, ladies and gents, if a way can be found, those who convinced the ethical ancestors of Cameron, May, Cooper, Alexander, Pickles, Berger and Mann to criminalise us will find it.
In 1998 another raft of race law was introduced. This legislation quietly upped the ante so that the maximum penalty for 'incitement to racial hatred' was raised from two to seven years.
In a report titled: Response of the Board of Deputies of British Jews to proposals to amend the Race Relations Act, 1976, the Deputies issued the following triumphal communiqué:
"The Board has been at the forefront of the development of proposals for race relations legislation in the UK…
The Defence Policy and Group Relations Division, which monitors the activities of political extremists and racists, has urged successive governments to enact and strengthen race relations legislation… It has also sought allies and made common cause with other religious and minority groups.
The Board played a fundamental part in urging upon government the first Race Relations Act which was based, in part, on reports prepared for the Board by Professor Geoffrey Bindman and Lord Lester of Herne Hill. Subsequently the Board has provided written and oral evidence to enquiries which preceded the passage of the Public Order Act 1986, the Criminal Justice Act 1994 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998...
There remains some scope for improvement... We would support the extension of the Race Relations Act to all government and public bodies. These organisations play a leading role in forming public opinion on social issues…
The Board can also see the case for new legislation to combat discrimination and incitement on religious grounds… We are also shortly to respond to the Government’s request that it might consider introducing specific legislation to outlaw Holocaust Denial."
The lawyer, Eldred Tabachnick, was the Chairman of the Jewish Board of British Deputies at time the statement above was published.
He is a South African immigrant. And Jewish of course.
And a close friend of Tony Blair.
In 1994, during yet another Commons debate, which had been contrived to facilitate the passage of even more race relations legislation into law, Harry Cohen said this:
"In 1985, I introduced the Racial Harassment Bill under the ten-minute rule. It was the first Bill presented to Parliament to make racial attack a criminal offence... The state, especially, must make its anti-racist position absolutely clear in the law… One other reason for such a law is the rise of the British National Party… It is a threat to democracy and I would not be opposed to banning it. Neo-Nazi organisations have been banned in Germany, for example.
If the Government say that there would be civil liberties problems in banning the BNP, they need to make its activities illegal… That is why a new law is so important… racial attacks in this country or the holocaust of Nazi Germany, racism equals death.
It is in multicultural, multiracial societies where people live together that one has harmony; those societies equal life. We need a law ; we need the state to come out firmly to say that racism will not be tolerated."
Apart from his desire to have an organisation banned which was and still is entirely legal, above board, does not commit mass murder on London buses or within the Underground system, has not made a habit of gang raping and prostituting little girls, has never marched unhindered through the streets of England waving placards