Everyone Loses When Our King Reigneth Not Over Men and Their Nations
SOURCE
NOTE: All opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect TradCatKnight's
Although it was my intention to complete part two of “Jerusalem Belongs to Christ the King and His True Church” today, recent news events demand a bit attention. Also, the big mouth who lives behind the walled Vatican City State has said a few things that require some commentary after this article is completed.
Obama/Soetoro’s Attempt to Undermine, Delegitimize, and Overthrow Donald John Trump
It should be fairly obvious by now that, following the example of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Lyndon Baines Johnson and Richard Milhous Nixon, former President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro had his henchmen and henchwomen at his Ministry of Injustice plotted numerous ways to undermine his duly elected successor, President Donald John Trump, in order to thwart any of his efforts to undo what the caesar emeritus believes is “legacy.” The sheer number of leaks that have been coming out from various quarters of the Federal government indicate that a concerted plan had been laid out to be executed in a Chinese water torture (drip, drip, drip) manner after Trump’s inauguration on Friday, January 20, 2017, the Feast of Saints Fabian and Sebastian.
Readers of this site know that I carry no brief for President Trump, whose State of the Union address on Tuesday, February 28, 2017, Shrove Tuesday, was bereft of any reference to the innocent preborn. Although I will have a bit more to say about this in part two of “Jerusalem Belongs to Christ the King and His True Church” in a few days, suffice it to say that Trump’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, a convert to Talmudism and the evil that is Kabbala, played a hand in writing the speech, and this consistently immodestly dressed woman is not particularly noted for any concern for the innocent preborn.
One does not have to be in the thrall of Donald John Trump, however, to understand that the members of the organized crime family of the naturalist “left” do not believe that the laws of God and men do not apply to them. Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro and his claque of fellow admirers of Fidel Castro and other Marxists hold anyone and everyone who opposes them in complete and utter contempt. They do not believe that anyone has a right to oppose their “enlightened” policies that entrusts power solely to unelected bureaucrats. They also believe that they can rule by executive and/or administrative fiat.
Obama/Soetoro got away with almost everything he desired to do. His hapless opponents in the organized crime family of the naturalist “right” huffed and puffed, but Obama/Soetoro and his crew of lawbreakers destroyed evidence, stonewalled, committed perjury and told numerous half-truths to get away with one crime after another.
That is, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro sought to engage in “transformative” policy-making, and he did so with an iron will as he issued unconstitutional and/or illegal executive orders and presidential directives, chose not to enforce the nation’s just immigration laws, presiding over the doubling of the national debt (see National Debt Grows By Nine Billion Dollars Under Obama), conspired with Congressional Democrats to pass the so-called Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by means of the “reconciliation” process, thereby circumventing both the filibuster rules of the United States Senate and, more importantly, the constitutional requirement (found in Section 8 of Article I) that all bills raising revenue originate in the United States House of Representatives, used the Internal Revenue Service as a means to bludgeon political opponents with tax audits and to harass “conservative” groups applying for tax-exempt status, presided over an administration that misused the Federal government’s regulatory powers, and covered-up such major scandals as the Fast and Furious gun-running scheme, Benghazi, and the Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton’s e-mail server. Mind you, this is only a partial listing of the Caesar Obamus’s successes. A very comprehensive listing of what any reasonable human being would call scandalous violations of the Constitution—but are viewed as “successes” by Obama/Soetoro and his apologists—can be found at A Complete Guide to Obama's Scandals, Gaffes, and Power Grabs.
In other words, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro was a very successful as the most lawless man ever to have served as the nation’s Chief Executive and Commander-in-Chief. He was as successful as he was because he was enabled at every turn by his co-conspirators, those who work in the mainslime media, and by his hapless opponents in the organized crime family of the false opposite of the naturalist “right,” who refused to take any real measures to defend the country against this lawless, power-grabbing president for fear of being called “racist.” While noting that Obama/Soetoro and his first Attorney General, Eric Himpton Holder, ceaselessly used the “race card” to take refuge for their crimes against God and man, the political and moral cowardice of Congressional Republicans made it more possible for the former president to legislate as he pleased from the Oval Office in the West Wing of the White House without regard to any true Congressional oversight.
Here is an assessment from a former intelligence officer, Bill Binney, who worked for the National Security Agency until 2001:
President Donald Trump is "absolutely right" to claim he was wiretapped and monitored, a former NSA official claimed Monday, adding that the administration risks falling victim to further leaks if it continues to run afoul of the intelligence community.
"I think the president is absolutely right. His phone calls, everything he did electronically, was being monitored," Bill Binney, a 36-year veteran of the National Security Agency who resigned in protest from the organization in 2001, told Fox Business on Monday. Everyone's conversations are being monitored and stored, Binney said.
Binney resigned from NSA shortly after the U.S. approach to intelligence changed following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He "became a whistleblower after discovering that elements of a data-monitoring program he had helped develop -- nicknamed ThinThread -- were being used to spy on Americans," PBS reported.
On Monday he came to the defense of the president, whose allegations on social media over the weekend that outgoing President Barack Obama tapped his phones during the 2016 campaign have rankled Washington.
"How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!" Trump tweeted.
"Is it legal for a sitting President to be 'wire tapping' a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!... I'd bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!," he continued.
Binney seemed to go further than the assessment of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, a George W. Bush administration official, who offered a tacit defense of Trump to ABC on Sunday.
"This is the difference between being correct and right," Mukasey said. "The president was not correct in saying President Obama ordered a tap on a server in Trump Tower. However, I think he's right in that there was surveillance and that it was conducted at the behest of the attorney general – at the Justice Department through the FISA court."
But Binney told Sean Hannity's radio show earlier Monday, "I think the FISA court's basically totally irrelevant."
The judges on the FISA court are "not even concerned, nor are they involved in any way with the Executive Order 12333 collection," Binney said during the radio interview. "That's all done outside of the courts. And outside of the Congress."
inney told Fox the laws that fall under the FISA court's jurisdiction are "simply out there for show" and "trying to show that the government is following the law, and being looked at and overseen by the Senate and House intelligence committees and the courts."
"That's not the main collection program for NSA," Binney said.
What Binney did not delve into, however, was if President Obama directed surveillance on Trump for political purposes during the campaign, a core accusation of Trump's. But Binney did say events such as publication of details of private calls between President Trump and the Australian prime minister, as well as with the Mexican president, are evidence the intelligence community is playing hardball with the White House.
"I think that's what happened here," Binney told Fox. "The evidence of the conversation of the president of the U.S., President Trump, and the [prime minister] of Australia and the president of Mexico. Releasing those conversations. Those are conversations that are picked up by the FAIRVIEW program, primarily, by NSA." (National Security Agency Whistleblower Bill Binney Says Trump is Absolutely Right About Wiretap Claims. Other article disucssing this matter from a purely naturalistic viewpoint include: httpThe Beltway Conspiracy to Break Trump and Trump and Democratic Smokescreens.)
It is entirely reasonable, therefore, to believe that somone in the administration of the former president, possibly the former head of Obama/Soetoro's Ministry of Injustice, Loretta Lynch, went to the super-secret Federal Intelligence and Surveillence Court of Review (FISA) to request the placement of wiretaps in Trump Tower during the campaign last year.
Created by an act of Congress in 1978 during the administration of President James Earl Carter, Jr., was designed to serve as safeguard against various abuses of intelligence agencies since end of World War II in 1945, but its powers have expanded to such an extent that it is considered to be a parallel of the Supreme Court of the United States of America with almost sole jurisdiction over intelligence agencies. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review has approved all but twelve of 35,529 surveillance requests that have submitted to it since it started hearing such requests in 1979.
Even more frightening is the fact that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review is composed of judges selected solely by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Each of the chief justices who have appointed members to this secret court (Warren Burger, William Rehnquist, John Glover Roberts) has been a firm supporter of government surveillence programs.
The acceptance of this court, created in full violation of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America (see Judge Andrew Napolitano's excellent analysis of the unconstitutional nature of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, Is FISA Court Constitutional?, for proof of this contention), has given the intelligence agencies of the Federal government of the United States of America almost total carte blanche power to search, download and maintain all of our e-mails, text messages, phone logs and bank account information. No matter the precautions one takes, the government knows everything about what we do, and this is not going to stop in the incoming Trump administration.
Unhinged by United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions's decison to rescuse himself from a Justice Department investigation into Russian efforts to meddle in the American presidential election last year and into the attorney general's having met on two occasions--once in his Senatorial office in the presence of two military officers and another time at a reception held by the Heritage Foundation attended by over one hundred people--with the Russian Ambassador to the United States of America, Sergey Kislyak, in the Fall of 2016 when Sessions was serving as a campaign surrogate for the man who won the election on November 8, 2016, President Trump fired off a series of tweets on Saturday, March 4, 2016, the Feast of Saint Casimir and the Commemoration of Pope Saint Lucian I, that contained the following charge:
How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017
While it appears that the former president, ever careful to give himself plausible deniability, did not directly order the wiretapping that Trump contends took place, and it will thus be very interesting to see if Congressional investigations into the president's allegation do indeed reveal that someone in the Obama/Soetoro administration went to the FISA Court despite the vociferous denials of several former administration's officials.
Here is one brief commentary that appeared on Saturday, March 4, 2017:
This is the most explosive political allegation in many years, far more explosive than Watergate. Is it true? I assume it has some basis in fact, e.g., Trump’s security people may have told him that they detected a tap on one or more of his phone lines. I have no idea how that works, or why it would only be detected now, or how the presence of a wire tap could be connected to the Obama administration. But it seems unlikely that Trump would make such a dynamite allegation without some kind of support.
I also wonder what Trump means by “turned down by court earlier.” It sounds like the Obama administration applied for a tap on Trump’s phones at some point, and was denied. Is it possible that Obama later succeeded in getting a wire tap order from a partisan judge, and that is what has now come to light? That is hard to imagine, but there are some very bad federal judges. The comment “nothing found” may support this interpretation.
At this point, it is all quite mysterious. But the claim is nuclear, and I can’t believe it is wholly without basis. Stay tuned!
UPDATE: Scott emails:
Someone in the intelligence/law enforcement bureaucracy had applied for a FISA warrant to tap the Trump people in June, It was turned down. Renewed and granted in October, I think. The details are out there. That’s what he’s talking about.
This is astonishing to me, as I have never heard a word about this story. If the Obama administration abused the FISA process to wiretap a political opponent, it is a scandal of the first order–the worst political scandal of my lifetime, easily. And the press has known about it and covered it up? Unbelievable.
But if this is a story that has been out there for a while, why does Trump say he “just found out”? Sounds like at a minimum there are new developments. We will see. (Trump Goes Nuclear.)
Yes, we will see what happens.
The Organized Crime Family of the False Opposite of the Naturalist Left and Its Long Affinity for Bolshevism
One of the most laughable things about all of this is that the Democrats, who are whipped up into a frenzy about alleged Russian interference in last year's presidential election, are the ideological descendants of those who enabled and apologized for the crimes of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics during the administrations of Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry Truman. Soviet agents, including Alger Hiss, whose guilt as a traitor to the United States of America has been proved beyond all guilt, ran amok (see the Appendix below).
Also, one must remember that the so-called "nuclear freeze" movement in the early-1980s whose efforts and massive rallies in the United States and Western Europe were funded by the Soviet Union through a variety of front organizations. Former Vice President Walter F. Mondale, who lost forty-nine states to the supposd "war monger" named President Ronald Wilson Reagan on Tuesday, November 6, 1984, supported the "nuclear freeze" movement. So did numerous Congressional Democrats.
The phenomenon of a feeding frenzy about Russian attempts to conduct espionage during the 2016 American presidential elections, although a very serious matter, to be sure, that is, on the part of Democrats and their comrades in the mainslime media is nothing other than a well-orchestrated and very hyprocritical effort to undermine the Trump president and to lay the groundwork for possible impeachment proceedings at some later date. The the ideological descendants of the "doves" during the Cold War have now become Russophobic hawks, not that they are in the least bit concerned about errors of Russia, which are alive and well in the United States of America as well as in the Russian Federation, that Our Lady herself warned Jacinta and Franciso Martin and their cousin, Lucia dos Santos, about in te Cova da Iria near Fatima, Portugal, one hundred years ago this year.
Nothing "Sacred" About the Dishonest Process called "Elections" in the United States of America
The concern of the "left" for the alleged "integrity" of what Trump calls, quite blasphemously, the "sacred" election process is phenomenal to behold as politicians of both political parties have engaged in vote fraud (deliberate miscounting of votes, burning of ballots, stuffing the ballot box, rigging voting machines, multiple votes cast in different places by individual voters, intimidation of political opponents and their supporters, etc.) to a greater or lesser extent in areas where they have held political dominance.
This was notoriously true of the Cook County, Illinois, political machine of the Democratic Party. The oft-quoted phrase--"Vote Early, Vote Often"--is said to have originated in Cook County, although the phrase applied (and applies) as well to many places through the course of American history up to and including today when it is easier than ever before to manufacture or ease votes by means of various software programs. As is fairly well established over fifty-six years after the fact, vote fraud in Illinois, Texas and West Virginia gave United States Senator John Fitzgerald Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) his margin of "victory" in the Electoral College over Vice President Richard Milhous Nixon on Tuesday, November 8, 1960. I was convinced that this was the case at the time (yes, I followed the election actively while in fourth grade at Saint Aloysius School in Great Neck, New York), and all but the most hard core Kennedy apologists accept that the 1960 election was stolen. Period.
Perhaps one of the most infamous and well-documented examples of vote fraud occurred in the 1948 Democratic Party primary for a seat in the United States Senate in the State of Texas between former United States Representative Lyndon Baines Johnson and former Texas Governor Coke Stevenson:
WASHINGTON, Feb. 10— A study of Lyndon B. Johnson provides new evidence that the 36th President stole his first election to the United States Senate, in 1948.
The book, ''Means of Ascent,'' by Robert A. Caro, is the second volume of a projected four-volume study, ''The Years of Lyndon Johnson.'' With a first printing of 250,000 copies, it is to be published on March 15 by Knopf, and excerpts have appeared in The New Yorker.
Mr. Caro maintains that although ballot fraud was common in the late 1940's in some parts of Texas, the Johnson campaign of 1948 raised it to a new level. Mr. Caro supports his charge with an interview with Luis Salas, an election judge in Jim Wells County who said he acknowledged his role only after all others involved in the theft had died.
Determined to Win at All Costs
It has been alleged for years that Johnson captured his Senate seat through fraud, but Mr. Caro goes into great detail to tell how the future President overcame a 20,000-vote deficit to achieve his famous 87-vote victory in the 1948 Democratic runoff primary against a former Governor, Coke Stevenson. A South Texas political boss, George Parr, had manufactured thousands of votes, Mr. Caro found. Johnson died in 1973, Stevenson and Parr in 1975. Mr. Caro says the election showed Johnson's determination to win at all costs as well as his coolness under fire and his ability to select gifted lieutenants, whom he then manipulated.
''The point is that the 1948 election shed light on Johnson's character,'' Mr. Caro said in an interview. ''People have been saying for 40 years, 'No one knows what really happened in that election,' and 'Everybody does it.' Neither of those statements is true. I don't think that this is the only election that was ever stolen, but there was never such brazen thievery.''
Some Johnson loyalists refuse to accept Mr. Caro's conclusions. For example, Horace Busby, who was a 24-year-old aide to the Johnson Senate campaign, said he agreed with the historian's factual presentation but said it should be put in a broader context.
''I don't disagree with the accuracy of anything Bob has in there,'' said Mr. Busby, now a political analyst. But he went on, ''There was a lot of stealing in that election.''
Mr. Busby said: ''The irregularity in the voting was caused in most instances by the local races - for a county commissioner, sheriff and county judge. It was just incidental that there were also votes stolen for Johnson and Stevenson.''
The Dead, the Halt, the Unaware
''I don't think that either Johnson or Stevenon were directing any of this,'' Mr. Busby said. ''But if there had been no stealing, Johnson would have won that election by 5,000 votes.''
Mr. Caro not only reviewed thousands of pages of court records, but also interviewed Mr. Salas, the election judge of Precinct 13 in Jim Wells County. Under Mr. Salas's supervision, Mr. Caro said, Johnson received the votes of the dead, the halt, the missing and those who were unaware that an election was going on.
On primary night, a Saturday, the first tallies of the Democratic primary showed Johnson trailing his opponent by 20,000 votes. Still unreported, however, were the votes from San Antonio, where Stevenson had defeated Johnson 2 to 1 in the first primary. When those votes finally came in, Johnson had won a stunning victory, carrying San Antonio by 10,000 votes.
Later that evening, the rural counties in the Rio Grande Valley further eroded the Stevenson lead, which was reduced to 854 votes.
A Precinct Is 'Discovered'
The next day, county officials ''discovered'' that the returns from one precinct had not yet been counted, Mr. Caro said, and those votes went overwhelmingly to Johnson. On Monday, there were more new returns from the Rio Grande Valley.
But on Tuesday, the state's Election Bureau announced that complete returns had given Stevenson a 349-vote victory, with 40 votes still uncounted.
There were no significant changes Wednesday, and Stevenson still led on Thursday. On Friday, the Rio Grande Valley precincts made ''corrections'' in their election returns, cutting Stevenson's lead to 157.
Also on Friday, Jim Wells County telephoned in its amended return, ''and suddenly, with virtually all the counting in the election over, Coke Stevenson was no longer ahead,'' Mr. Caro said. Johnson had won by 87 votes. Challenge and Affirmation Mr. Caro confirmed the charges made at the time by Stevenson supporters that county officials had cast the votes of absent voters and had changed the numbers on the tallies. For example, he said, Jim Wells County provided an extra 200 votes for Johnson merely by changing the 7 in ''765'' to a 9.
Johnson's victory was upheld by a 29-to-28 vote of the Texas Democratic Party's executive committee, and he went on to defeat Jack Porter, the Republican candidate, in the general election. And although a Federal District Court had ordered his name off the ballot pending an investigation, the order was voided by Associate Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on a petition from Abe Fortas, who was Johnson's chief lawyer.
Mr. Caro's book also belies Johnson's contention that he played no role in buying and managing KTBC, a radio station purchased by his wife, Lady Bird, that flourished after the purchase. Months later, the Federal Communications Commission approved Mrs. Johnson's request to operate 24 hours a day on a more desirable frequency. Subsequently, the F.C.C. increased the station's wattage and profitability and KTBC became a CBS affiliate.
Cornerstone of an Empire
''Lyndon Johnson was always to maintain that his wife's radio interests were totally divorced from politics and that he, the politician in the family, had absolutely nothing to do either with acquiring KTBC's license or, once it was licensed, with its operations,'' Mr. Caro wrote.
He cites documents that contradict Johnson. Johnson is seen as involved in virtually every aspect of the enterprise, from payroll to frequencies to sales of commercials. The radio station formed the cornerstone of his financial empire.
''It was a case study of political influence,'' Mr. Caro said in the interview. (How Lyndon Baines ohnson Won The Election He Lost.)
Then again, political skulduggery and thievery is part and parcel of the entirety of American history. Contrary to the words of President Donald John Trump, there has never been anything "sacred" about the American election process. Never.
As Pope Pius IX noted in 1874 when speaking to a French ambassador:
To allow the masses, invariably uninformed and impulsive, to make decisions on the most serious matters, is this not to hand oneself over to chance and deliberately run towards the abyss? Yes, it would be more appropriate to call universal suffrage universal madness and, when the secret societies have taken control of it as is all too often the case, universal falsehood." (Pope Pius IX, Statement to French pilgrims, May 5, 1874, cited by Abbe Georges de Nantes, CCR # 333, p. 24.)
To to call man the words of the late Irving Lahrheim, "Ain't it the truth? Ain't it the truth?" (Bert Lahr was a Talmudist, but Raymond Wallace Bolger and John Joseph Haley, Sr., were devout Catholics. It is very sad that they did not understand that The Wizard of Oz was a mockery of the Faith as it was the work of the Theosophist, L. Frank Baum.)
Why should men who are either assured of their salvation or utterly indifferent to it care how they obtain and retain political power? Nations shaped by the ethos of Protestantism and Judeo-Masonry are bound to wind up in a state of rival gangsters who vie for power and influence. All must fall apart absent Christ the King and His true Church.
Although unscrupulous behavior was rampant in many kingdoms during the time of Christendom, many civil potentates who abused their powers were reconciled to Holy Mother Church by means of making a good confession. Indeed, the utterly amoral King Louis XV of France was warned by his bishop to make a public abjuration of his sins before he could go to confession and then receive the Sacrament of Extreme Unction as he was dying on May 10, 1774. There is no such thought given to First and Last Things by men who believe they they and their ambitions come first and last in every consideration of their lives Such must be the case when men and their nations are not duly submissive to Christ the King and the authority of His Catholic Church in all that pertains to the good of souls, upon which rests the right ordering of nations and of world peace itself.
Amorality must be the order of the day in a country where men are bereft of any true knowledge of their Divine Redeemer as He has revealed Himself to us exclusively through His true Catholic Church.
A Long History of Interfering in the Affairs and Elections of Other Nations
Time does not permit anything resembling a full recitation of the long, long history of American interference in the affairs and elections of other nations. Suffice it to say for the moment that the "leftist" and "neoconservative" Republican angst about possible Russian efforts to spy on the American election process (Russians are pretty good at spying, whether under the czars or the commissars) and/or interfere with its operation is just a little disingenuous. Indeed, the history of American meddling in the internal affairs and elections of other nations reflects a spirit of bipartisanship as it has been practiced by Republican and Democratic caesars.
The administrations of Presidents Thomas Woodrow Wilson, a statist Democrat, and John Calvin Coolidge, a "conservative" Republican, interfered in the internal affairs of Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, The Dominican Republic, Honduras, Colombia, and Nicaraugua between 1901 and 1934, admitting that American imperialism began with the needless and unjust Spanish-American War in 1898 that resulted in a veritable invasion of Protestantism and Freemasony in Catholic lands such as The Philippines (see the appendix in Public Life Is Stained With Crime) and Cuba. For a review of Wilson's and Coolidge's interventions in Mexico, please see: Then, Now and Always: Viva Cristo Rey!, part one, Then, Now and Always: Viva Cristo Rey!, part two, Then, Now and Always: Viva Cristo Rey!, part three, Then, Now And Always: Viva Cristo Rey!, part four and Then, Now And Always: Viva Cristo Rey!, part five. This series contains documentation of the first American effort to destablize newly independent Mexico by means of the introduction of Freemasonry in Our Lady's country as early as 1821 at the behest of American Ambassor Joel Poinsett.
One does not have to reach back that far into history, however, for more contemporary examples. While not minimizing the horrors of the "regime change" effected as a result of the unjust, immoral and unconstitutional invasion and occupation of Iraq on March 20, 2003, by the administration of President George Walker Bush and his "neoconservative" gangsters, one need look only to the example of the man whose administration officials may have sought to gather evidence to keep Donald John Trump out of the White House for several examples of how Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro sought to interfere in the election process of other nations.
First, tt was, if you will recall, only nine months ago now that then President Obama/Soetoro traveled to the United Kingdom to campaign for a "no" vote what in the referendum on the British exit from the statist monstrosity known as the European Union (see The Real "Brexit" Occurred In 1534.)
Second, it was the policy of President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro his first Secretary of State, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, to effect "regime change" in Libya, an effort that wound up costing American lives as the former president and his subordinates simply lied about the details of the premeditated terrorist attack upon the American compound in Benghazi, Libya, on Tuesday, September 11, 2012. Obama/Soetoro and his second Secretary of State, the pro-abortion, pro-perversity Catholic named John F. Kerry, worked assiduously to effect the ouster of Syrian President Bashir Assad, a goal that was also sought under the Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton watch at Foggy Bottom, which itself has quite a Bloody Tradition all of its very own.
Third, the new Wikileaks dump reveals that the same intelligence community that is seeking to undermine President Donald John Trump at this time worked hard to prevent the election of Marie Le Pen, among others, as the President of the French Republic in 2012:
All major French political parties were targeted for infiltration by the CIA's human ("HUMINT") and electronic ("SIGINT") spies in the seven months leading up to France's 2012 presidential election. The revelations are contained within three CIA tasking orders published today by WikiLeaks as context for its forth coming CIA Vault 7 series. Named specifically as targets are the French Socialist Party (PS), the National Front (FN) and Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) together with current President Francois Hollande, then President Nicolas Sarkozy, current round one presidential front runner Marine Le Pen, and former presidential candidates Martine Aubry and Dominique Strauss-Khan.
The CIA assessed that President Sarkozy's party was not assured re-election. Specific tasking concerning his party included obtaining the "Strategic Election Plans" of the Union for a Popular Movement (UMP); schisms or alliances developing in the UMP elite; private UMP reactions to Sarkozy's campaign stratagies; discussions within the UMP on any "perceived vulnerabilities to maintaining power" after the election; efforts to change the party's ideological mission; and discussions about Sarkozy's support for the UMP and "the value he places on the continuation of the party's dominance". Specific instructions tasked CIA officers to discover Sarkozy's private deliberations "on the other candidates" as well as how he interacted with his advisors. Sarkozy's earlier self-identification as "Sarkozy the American" did not protect him from US espionage in the 2012 election or during his presidency.
The espionage order for "Non Ruling Political Parties and Candidates Strategic Election Plans" which targeted Francois Holland, Marine Le Pen and other opposition figures requires obtaining opposition parties' strategies for the election; information on internal party dynamics and rising leaders; efforts to influence and implement political decisions; support from local government officials, government elites or business elites; views of the United States; efforts to reach out to other countries, including Germany, U.K., Libya, Israel, Palestine, Syria & Cote d'Ivoire; as well as information about party and candidate funding.
Significantly, two CIA opposition espionage tasks, "What policies do they promote to help boost France's economic growth prospects?" and "What are their opinions on the German model of export-led growth?" resonate with a U.S. economic espionage order from the same year. That order requires obtaining details of every prospective French export contract or deal valued at $200m or more.
The opposition espionage order also places weight on obtaining the candidates' attitudes to the E.U's economic crisis, centering around their position on the Greek debt crisis; the role of France and Germany in the management of the Greek debt crisis; the vulnerability of French government and French banks to a Greek default; and "specific proposals and recommendations" to deal with "the euro-zone crisis".
The CIA espionage orders published today are classified and restricted to U.S. eyes only ("NOFORN") due to "Friends-on-Friends sensitivities". The orders state that the collected information is to "support" the activities of the CIA, the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)'s E.U section, and the U.S. State Department's Intelligence and Research Branch.
The CIA operation ran for ten months from 21 Nov 2011 to 29 Sep 2012, crossing the April-May 2012 French presidential election and several months into the formation of the new government. (Wikileaks: CIA and French Elections 2012.)
Fourth, the Obama/Soetoro administration worked to defeat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2014, and it is not to indemnify this hater of the Holy Cross of the Divine Redeemer and racialist who has contempt for the very people who were forcibly removed from their homes in 1948 and then sent to "relocation camps" (more on this in part two of Jerusalem Belongs To Christ the King, part one/Sober Up, part six) to note the simple fact of American interference in the Israeli election process:
According to the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), the State Department gave $349,276 in U.S. taxpayer-funded grants to a political group in Israel to build a campaign operation, which subsequently was used to try to influence Israelis to vote against conservative Benjamin Netanyahu in the March 2015 election for prime minister.
In the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report about the State Department’s action, Chairman Bob Portman (R-Ohio) said, “It is completely unacceptable that U.S. taxpayer dollars were used to build a political campaign infrastructure that was deployed — immediately after the grant ended — against the leader [Netanyahu] of our closest ally in the Middle East. American resources should be used to help our allies in the region, not undermine them.”
“The State Department ignored warning signs and funded a politically active group in a politically sensitive environment with inadequate safeguards,” said Portman in a July 12, 2016 press release.
The State Department had funded a series of grants in 2013-2014, totaling $349,276, which went to the One Voice Movement, which has Israeli and Palestinian branches: One Voice Israel and One Voice Palestine. (The grant period ended in November 2014.) These groups support peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine, and a two-state solution based on the borders of 1967.
<div sty