2013-10-03

WE, the 110 undersigned civil society groups, trade unions and organisations are shocked that the government has charged human rights activist Lena Hendry on Sept 19 for being involved in the screening of a documentary No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka at a human rights event in Kuala Lumpur on July 9.

Lena Hendry was charged for an offence under the Film Censorship Act 2002, in connection with the screening of a video which was not vetted and approved by the Film Censorship Board of Malaysia. If convicted, she faces the sentence of a "… fine of not less than RM5,000 and not more than RM30,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both …"

She is charged under Section 6 of the Act that makes it an offence to, among others, produce, manufacture, have in one's possession, circulate, distribute and display such film or film-publicity material which has not been approved by the board. This may include video material ranging from family videos, videos of political and human rights material including recordings of forums and speeches, videos about citizen rights including the right to free and fair elections or worker rights, and even videos about rights violations in other countries including Palestine.

A "… videotape, diskette, laser disc, compact disc, hard disc and other record of a sequence of visual images, being a record capable of being used as a means of showing that sequence as a moving picture, whether or not accompanied by sound …", is also included in the definition of "film" as provided for in Section 3 of the Film Censorship Act. It is absurd that the law requires one to get approval of the Film Censorship Board for all such material.

The Act is also discriminatory as it does not apply, among others, to "... any film sponsored by the Federal Government or the Government of any State...". The government does not need to obtain approval from the board, but everyone else is expected to do so.

The practice of getting approval from the Film Censorship Board usually applies to films screened in cinemas and cineplexes to a paying audience. Even when it comes to television, it is believed that there may be no pre-requirement for getting approval from the board for all that is shown except for feature movies.

The charging of Lena Hendry is seen as an effort to limit access to information and alternative views particularly those highlighting human rights violations and alternative perspectives. This violates individual and civil society and public rights to information, freedom of expression and opinion.

If the screening and usage of such material incites a criminal act, or violates another person's rights, there are laws to address this. There is no requirement for any government approval or "censorship".

In Reporters Without Borders' 2013 World Press Freedom Index, Malaysia has fallen to its lowest-ever position because of the decreasing access to information. Malaysia embarrassingly dropped 23 places, and now ranks 145 out of 179.

Article 1 of the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognised Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms states clearly that "Everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms at national and international levels."

Lena Hendry, has the right to "…freely publish, impart or disseminate to others views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms …", and that should include the right to use films, documentaries and other video material.

To advocate a policy or a law that says that film or video material must be pre-approved by the government before it can be used is a violation of principles of human rights and the UN Human Rights Defender Declaration.

Therefore, we

» Call on the government to immediately and unconditionally drop the criminal charges against Lena Hendry;

» Call for the repeal of provisions in the Film Censorship Act 2002 that obligates persons to seek approval of the government vis-à-vis the Film Censorship Board before a film, videotape, diskette, laser disc, compact disc, hard disc and other record of a sequence of visual images can be used;

» Call on the government to recognise, promote and respect human rights, including those contained in the UN Human Rights Defenders Declaration

Charles Hector
Pranom Somwong
On behalf of 110 organisations

Show more