The SABC’s caused quite a stir on Twitter and people are not happy. Protests are people’s voices, so basically the SABC is saying, screw that, we’re not listening to any of you.
Dear #SABC: pic.twitter.com/YxlPq3HRYs
— Jay (@JayGibbs_) May 27, 2016
Hebanna?! Its bad enough they were doing this incognito now this is not Sensorship, its Dictatorship https://t.co/DQhajW9JQi
— A_Pimp_Named MaK_G (@Da_MaK_G) May 27, 2016
According to the #SABC these people aren’t protesting. They’re just smiling, happy people dancing. #Nothingtoseehere https://t.co/OkVJbIzjWo
— Waldo van der Waal (@wal_bal) May 27, 2016
Twitter is more concerned with relationship issues and baby daddy drama & not #SABC censorship?
See why I’m very enough of ya’ll?
— Ỉmn-ḥtp kȝ km.t (@MajestyKagiso) May 27, 2016
No-more service delivery protests on #SABC channels.They must also stop showing us Zuma ‘s face.We don’t want young ppl to be corrupt.
— Charlie Langa (@CharlieLanga) May 27, 2016
#Hlaudi thinks #SABC is the only broadcast worthy of bringing us uncut news. It’s not like we’ve been relying on it. https://t.co/maT7SRZyFN
— #ConsciousBlackGuy (@MatlhomolaX) May 27, 2016
If we, the people, protest #SABC not covering protests, but the #SABC doesn’t cover it, did the protest really happen?
— Jodi Allemeier (@urbanjodi) May 27, 2016
#SABC is practicing PROPAGANDA at it’s best with our TV licence fees.
So basically we paying for PROPAGANDA.
<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/72x72/1f612.png" alt="