2016-11-03

There are 433 DIII women’s volleyball programs, spread all across the USA, and each school has some great volleyball being played there. DIII is the largest component of women’s college volleyball, larger than DI, DII, or NAIA. We are entering the conference tournament phase of DIII women’s volleyball, to be followed by regional tournaments and finally the DIII Women’s National Volleyball Championship, which is only two weeks away.

Event – NCAA DIII Championship

Dates – 11/17– 11/19

Location – Oshkosh, WI

Host Institution – University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh

Here’s the Net Set Rankings for November 2, 2016.

NS Rank

School & Nickname

Conference

Location

2016 W-L

AVCA Poll

Pablo Rank

NS Index

1

Calvin Knights

MIAA

Grand Rapids, Michigan

26-0

1

1

1.00

2

Texas-Dallas Comets

ASC

Dallas, Texas

22-2

3

2

2.50

3

Cal Lutheran Regals

SCIAC

Thousand Oaks, California

23-4

2

5

3.50

4

Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Athenas

SCIAC

Claremont, California

26-1

4

6

5.00

5

Emory Eagles

UAA

Atlanta, Georgia

27-5

8

3

5.50

6

Wittenberg Tigers

NCAC

Springfield, Ohio

18-5

7

9

8.00

7

Hope Flying Dutch

MIAA

Holland, Michigan

25-6

10

7

8.50

8

Colorado College Tigers

SCAC

Colorado Springs, Colorado

25-4

6

13

9.50

9

Southwestern Pirates

SCAC

Georgetown, Texas

29-3

5

15

10.00

10

Juniata Eagles

Landmark

Huntingdon, Pennsylvania

22-6

9

12

10.50

11

Eastern Eagles

MAC

St. Davids, Pennsylvania

21-4

12

10

11.00

12

Ohio Northern Polar Bears

OAC

Ada, Ohio

24-3

23

4

13.50

T13

Trinity Tigers

SCAC

San Antonio, Texas

25-7

16

14

15.00

T13

La Verne Leopards

SCIAC

La Verne, California

22-5

19

11

15.00

T13

Northwestern-St. Paul Eagles

UMAC

St. Paul, Minnesota

28-4

22

8

15.00

16

Wisconsin-Stevens Point “Pointers”

WIAC

Stevens Point, Wisconsin

26-6

17

16

16.50

17

Wisconsin-Oshkosh Titans

WIAC

Oshkosh, Wisconsin

27-6

20

17

18.50

18

Mary Washington Eagles

CAC

Fredericksburg, Virginia

27-5

15

23

19.00

19

Elmhurst Bluejays

CCIW

Elmhurst. Illinois

21-10

18

21

19.50

20

Carnegie-Mellon Tartans

UAA

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

23-6

21

19

20.00

21

Wisconsin-Whitewater Warhawks

WIAC

Whitewater, Wisconsin

20-9

11

30

20.50

22

Wisconsin-La Crosse Eagles

WIAC

La Crosse, Wisconsin

23-5

13

29

21.00

23

Hendrix Warriors

SAA

Conway, Arkansas

21-7

25

19

22.00

24

Washington-St. Louis Bears

UAA

St. Louis, Missouri

26-3

14

32

23.00

25

Millikin Big Blue

CCIW

Decatur, Illinois

24-11

28

23

25.50

Net Set (NS) DII Rankings and the NS Index are an average from the two polls or rankings listed below. The NS Rank is a numerical average based upon the positions of teams in these polls or rankings. In the Net Set Ranking, the team’s position in each poll or ranking is summed and then averaged to create the NS Index. This NS Index is then arranged, or ranked, in ascending order, with the lowest NS Index determining the number 1 team, the second lowest NS index determining the number 2 team, and so forth.

1. The AVCA Coaches Poll (http://www.avca.org/polls/diii-women/index.html).

AVCA, or the American Volleyball Coaches Association, publishes an outstanding weekly poll for each volleyball division from its member coaches in that division. Thus, DII coaches are voting on the teams in the DII poll, and these are the women and men who see these teams in action up close and personal, and undoubtedly one of the best sources on information for polls and ratings. To see the AVCA poll intact, with all 25 teams, first-place votes, adjusted ranking points, and other neat info, go to: (http://www.avca.org/polls/diii-women/11-1-2016.html).

2. The Pablo Rankings (http://www.richkern.com/vb/FreePage.asp).

The Pablo Rankings are an incredibly ingenious ranking system that operates on a probabilistic, algorithmic approach and analyzes and measures the difference in abilities between two teams overall and in a match. In terms of accuracy and predictive analytics, the Pablo Rankings are the most accurate mathematical model available today. You can find a detailed explanation of the Pablo Rankings at this web location: (http://www.richkern.com/vb/rankings/PabloFAQ.asp).

View the Pablo Rankings, the best pure statistical ranking available, at RichKern.com: (http://www.richkern.com/vb/rankings/FreePageRankings.asp).

Also, here’s a quick analysis of the DIII conferences in this rating along with their full conference names and the number of teams each conference has in the rating. The Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (WIAC) has the most teams in the poll (four) with Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Wisconsin-Whitewater, and Wisconsin-La Crosse. The Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (SCAC), the Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SCIAC), and the United Athletic Association (UAA) all have three teams in the Net Set ranking.

Conference Abbreviation

Full Name of Conference

Teams in Ranking

ASC

American Southwest Conference

1

CAC

Capital Athletic Conference

1

CCIW

Collegiate Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin

2

Landmark

Landmark Conference

1

MAC

Middle Atlantic Conferences

1

MIAA

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association

2

NCAC

North Coast Athletic Conference

1

OAC

Ohio Athletic Conference

1

SAA

Southern Athletic Association

1

SCAC

Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference

3

SCIAC

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

3

UAA

United Athletic Association

3

UMAC

Upper Midwest Athletic Conference

1

WIAC

Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

4

What is NCAA Division III, or DIII? Straight from the NCAA website we read the following explanation: “Division III institutions have to sponsor at least five sports for men and five for women, with two team sports for each gender, and each playing season represented by each gender. There are minimum contest and participant minimums for each sport. Division III athletics features student-athletes who receive no financial aid related to their athletic ability and athletic departments are staffed and funded like any other department in the university. Division III athletics departments place special importance on the impact of athletics on the participants rather than on the spectators. The student-athlete’s experience is of paramount concern. Division III athletics encourages participation by maximizing the number and variety of athletics opportunities available to students, placing primary emphasis on regional in-season and conference competition.”

http://www.ncaa.org/about/who-we-are/membership/divisional-differences-and-history-multidivision-classification

LET’S GROW VOLLEYBALL!

Show more