rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com
Google Groups
Topic digest
View all topics
OT: cruz endorses trump - 10 Updates
Gotta love Liz Warren - 1 Update
Donald Trump is headed for a win, says professor who always gets it right - 5 Updates
Who are your choice for the most beloved Pro and most hateful Pro? - 9 Updates
OT: cruz endorses trump
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Sep 24 06:31AM -0700
Cruz has no conscience. So technically he has done nothing wrong.
The devil will be doing something wrong only if he does something good right?
Tier3 <yayrlcjn@6paq.com>: Sep 24 07:10AM -0700
>Not voting for his conscience after all... <
Sure he is. He knows that no slights against himself, his wife, whatever are more important than the Supreme Court. Hillary is pure evil, you should just get that through your thick skull.
Trump 2016.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 05:31PM +0300
24.9.2016, 17:10, Tier3 kirjoitti:
>> Not voting for his conscience after all... <
> Sure he is. He knows that no slights against himself, his wife, whatever are more important than the Supreme Court. Hillary is pure evil, you should just get that through your thick skull.
> Trump 2016.
Not a good excuse... Repubs could easily have accepted the conservative
judge Obama nominated.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 05:54PM +0300
24.9.2016, 17:31, TT kirjoitti:
>> Trump 2016.
> Not a good excuse... Repubs could easily have accepted the conservative
> judge Obama nominated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNF4652RKOs
Tier3 <yayrlcjn@6paq.com>: Sep 24 08:01AM -0700
>Not a good excuse... Repubs could easily have accepted the conservative
judge Obama nominated. <
Sure..because Obama has proven to be so trustworthy.
Trump 2016
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 06:07PM +0300
24.9.2016, 18:01, Tier3 kirjoitti:
>> Not a good excuse... Repubs could easily have accepted the conservative
> judge Obama nominated. <
> Sure..because Obama has proven to be so trustworthy.
How is his trustworthiness supposed to be an issue on confirming a
supreme court judge?
> Trump/Putin 2016
Fixed
Tier3 <yayrlcjn@6paq.com>: Sep 24 08:26AM -0700
>- hide quoted text -
24.9.2016, 18:01, Tier3 kirjoitti:
>> Not a good excuse... Repubs could easily have accepted the conservative
> judge Obama nominated. <
> Sure..because Obama has proven to be so trustworthy.
How is his trustworthiness supposed to be an issue on confirming a
supreme court judge? <
We're talking about Obama. I believe they get the dirt on everyone. No need to allow him to appoint at this stage. Too late now.
> Trump/Putin 2016
Fixed <
Fixed? If anything trump will be the one having to overcome election fraud. Dems are all about that. How else to defend the absurdity of not needing an ID to vote. Obama is pulling out the stops now on naturizations just for the election. That was obvious but also comfirmed in an email. Get that OT at INS!
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 06:36PM +0300
24.9.2016, 18:26, Tier3 kirjoitti:
> How is his trustworthiness supposed to be an issue on confirming a
> supreme court judge? <
> We're talking about Obama. I believe they get the dirt on everyone. No need to allow him to appoint at this stage. Too late now.
Seems awfully disingenuous to claim future supreme court judges as
election issue when you're not accepting the current nominee...
> Fixed? If anything trump will be the one having to overcome election fraud. Dems are all about that. How else to defend the absurdity of not needing an ID to vote.
Actually one needs an ID, and the issue was about Republicans trying to
suppress black vote. Get your facts straight.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/north-carolina-voting-rights-law/493649/
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Sep 24 08:38AM -0700
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 8:26:45 AM UTC-7, Tier3 wrote:
> > Trump/Putin 2016
> Fixed <
> Fixed? If anything trump will be the one having to overcome election fraud. Dems are all about that.
Which party popularized the term "hanging chad"?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 08:10PM +0300
24.9.2016, 3:17, Court_1 kirjoitti:
> What are you talking about? CNN has been talking non-stop about two things: 1) the shooting in Charlotte and 2) Cruz's endorsement of Trump. Cruz the hypocrite endorsing the sociopath Trump.
Bob thinks that CNN is biased - I agree!
They're actually biased against the truth... so afraid to look "liberal"
that they ignore a bunch of Trump's lies and scams. This leads to
situation where someone like Bob doesn't even know that Trump profited
from government money, through bribery no less...
Their discussions are designed not to be "biased"... so much that
instead of using experts who tell the truth they give platform to some
really kooky Trump supporters on his payroll whose arguments are
opposite from any truthful or meaningful debate.
They also treat Trump as a serious candidate, which he is not. Give much
more time to his nonsense than Hillary's actually sensible policies.
CNN should cover all Trump's scams. But they don't want to inform the US
public since telling the truth is being "biased" in modern America.
-
Wonder if Lester Holt will fact-check the candidates during debate.
Being unbiased doesn't mean that Trump will be allowed to get away for
his constant lies. Trump of course already said that Holt shouldn't
fact-check the debate - for obvious reasons...
Back to top
Gotta love Liz Warren
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 07:24PM +0300
24.9.2016, 3:39, Court_1 kirjoitti:
> "I watched her entire speech in the airport yesterday,
> she seemed like a ranting angry nutcase."
> Ha ha. You thought Warren was "different" and would never endorse Hillary and when she did (and made you look like an even bigger idiot than you already are) you changed your tune about her pretty quickly. ;)
Pretty awkward that Sanders and Warren are now suddenly corrupt liars
for Bob... meanwhile he wishes press would pay more attention to "Lying"
Ted Cruz's endorsement on Trump...
The guy needs to have a long hard look in the mirror if he has time from
his cherrypicking and denial. Indeed Trump could shoot a man on 5th
avenue and his supporters would still support him...
Back to top
Donald Trump is headed for a win, says professor who always gets it right
justin quiring <me@privacy.net>: Sep 24 12:59PM +0100
On 24/09/2016 10:25, Whisper wrote:
> http://www.canberratimes.com.au/world/us-election/donald-trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-who-always-gets-it-right-20160923-grnjb4.html
I guess that would please a lot of people who hate HC,irrespective of
whether they like DT.
If the professor gets it right it would certainly prove that the average
American is intellectually backwards.
America would be the laughing stock of the Western world. It would be
very hard to take anything it had to say seriously.
Tier3 <yayrlcjn@6paq.com>: Sep 24 07:24AM -0700
I think Trump will win unless he trips himself up badly between now and Election Day. The enthusiasm gap is huge between these two and I believe the polls don't factor suppression of showing support for Trump due to media and left wing assholes destroying property and committing assaults on trump supporters. He will over perform the polling.
Hillary is an awful, awful person and criminal surrounded by criminals. How many lying criminals getting Immunity deals do we need to see? For people who despise Trump, blame the Dems for putting up Hillary the Haggard--ramming her through the whole way. Very Democratic..with Trump I see some hope of things changing for the better in Washington, with Hillary absolutely zero chance. They will get worse and her Supreme Court will be a nightmare.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 05:42PM +0300
24.9.2016, 17:24, Tier3 kirjoitti:
> I think Trump will win unless he trips himself up badly between now and Election Day. The enthusiasm gap is huge between these two and I believe the polls don't factor suppression of showing support for Trump due to media and left wing assholes destroying property and committing assaults on trump supporters. He will over perform the polling.
> Hillary is an awful, awful person and criminal surrounded by criminals. How many lying criminals getting Immunity deals do we need to see? For people who despise Trump, blame the Dems for putting up Hillary the Haggard--ramming her through the whole way. Very Democratic..with Trump I see some hope of things changing for the better in Washington, with Hillary absolutely zero chance. They will get worse and her Supreme Court will be a nightmare.
Yes, Trump is a principled honest man. He'll also pick great judges as
we can see from the people he picked for his campaign...
Too bad he won't face fraud charges in court before the election, but
slightly after...
Mitt Romney: "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as
worthless as a degree from Trump University."
Tier3 <yayrlcjn@6paq.com>: Sep 24 08:19AM -0700
>Yes, Trump is a principled honest man. He'll also pick great judges as
we can see from the people he picked for his campaign... <
Trump put out a list of potential appointees.
>Too bad he won't face fraud charges in court before the election, but
slightly after... <
Too bad all of Hillary's known emails won't be released until after the election.They've only had years to release them. Then again, any rash able person would already have learned enough to disqualify her.
>Mitt Romney: "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as
worthless as a degree from Trump University." <
Mitt Romney was dead to me after he lost to Obama in such fashion as he did. And I I wanted him to win badly. He brought a rubber knife to a gunfight if I can riff on Obama's words about GOP congress. Now mitt is just disgracing himself. He didn't mind taking Trump's cash. Anyone who calls themself a Conservative must work to ensure Hillary loses, and the only way that happens is with a Trump win.
Trump 2016
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Sep 24 06:39PM +0300
24.9.2016, 18:19, Tier3 kirjoitti:
> Anyone who calls themself (sic) a Deplorable must work to ensure Hillary loses
Fixed.
Back to top
Who are your choice for the most beloved Pro and most hateful Pro?
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 03:13AM -0700
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 12:38:35 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
> Yep.
> > What about down-home BBQ food like they have in the South, i.e ribs, pulled pork, the real good gooey stuff?
> Yeah, I like "Bubba food" too. Some of the better BBQ places I've been are Bobby Rubino's in S. Florida. Great baby-back ribs there. Asheville, NC is loaded with excellent BBQ places too.
Just wanted to share with you he he he, see below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d4oLHH1ZnM
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 03:26AM -0700
On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 11:10:09 PM UTC-4, Shakes wrote:
> > > Don't kill yourself. :) It's not a Satyajit Ray quality movie like "The Big City." I thought that film was very good.
> > You misunderstand me. I settle for movies that relax me, not those arty slow-moving stuff that usually bore me to death.
> I think so too, but I think you might be surprised about Ray's movies. They aren't artsy at all. They are actually quite engaging. I also loved Ray's "Charulata" and "Jalsaghar" ("The Music Room").
Thanks Courtie and Shakes for the Ray movies. Have a lot of catching up to do. Not until mid-November though, what with pressing (and stress-inducing too) deadlines and all that kind of stuff!
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 03:39AM -0700
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 12:23:51 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
> I tried every kind I could in Kuala Lumpur, but honestly was just enjoying it all without being that conscious of the differences. I did notice that some restaurants were purely vegetarian and heard that these were run by Indians who converted to Islam (and forget what that's called). I intend seek out some South Indian food in the future.
Muslims and vegetarian food is an interesting combo! Always associated them with Biryani, which is rice mixed in a meat item. In TamilNadu (the state that is in the southern most part of India) they are called "bhai" and the expectation is that those who cook food serve Biryani. Most South Indians enjoy idli (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idli) for breakfast and the spectacle that you see in the link that I sent for lunch. For South Indian fare in the US, go to the Bay area.
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 03:46AM -0700
On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 9:11:15 PM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
> > I've been to Kuala Lumpur a couple of times, and in the area called The Brickfields, there are a huge number of Indian restaurants with varied cuisine concentrated within a few blocks. I'd try a different one every day. Delicious!
> > I love Indian food and am open to trying different interpretations of it. Just don't give me dog or rat or something like that. We just had Indian food tonight! I had this pan fried halibut marinated in some tomato masala sauce and that naan bread is so good I could cry tears of joy thinking about it. :)
> My favorite cuisines are probably Italian, Indian, Thai, and Mexican (living in Tucson was Mexican food heaven). My least favorite is Japanese and their "edible origami."
Love veggie pizza with coke, veggie subway, Olive Garden veg pasta with minestrone (awesome) :)
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 04:05AM -0700
> > Yeah, I like "Bubba food" too. Some of the better BBQ places I've been are Bobby Rubino's in S. Florida. Great baby-back ribs there. Asheville, NC is loaded with excellent BBQ places too.
> I'm going to have a nice Krakauer Wurst in our Borussiapark later in the day. Plus a beer in a plastic cup.
> Max
I'm going to have rice with spinach gravy and green plantain roast; then do math!
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.los>: Sep 24 02:41PM +0300
>>> What about down-home BBQ food like they have in the South, i.e ribs, pulled pork, the real good gooey stuff?
>> Yeah, I like "Bubba food" too. Some of the better BBQ places I've been are Bobby Rubino's in S. Florida. Great baby-back ribs there. Asheville, NC is loaded with excellent BBQ places too.
> I'm going to have a nice Krakauer Wurst in our Borussiapark later in the day. Plus a beer in a plastic cup.
I'm going to make my favourite vegan dinner tonight.
Take a bunch of tomatoes and peel them. Raise a pot of water to a boil.
Toss the tomatoes in, let cook for about 30 min. When cooked, correct
the taste. A bit of salt, pepper, lemon juice and maybe sugar. You'll
know when it's good. If you want it Frenchy, in goes a some rosemary and
thyme. If Italian is your thing, basil is a must.
Pour the juice through a sieve and into a glass. Then sprinkle in some
Vodka. Be liberal.
Bon Appetit!
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>: Sep 25 12:05AM +1000
On 24/09/2016 9:41 PM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> thyme. If Italian is your thing, basil is a must.
> Pour the juice through a sieve and into a glass. Then sprinkle in some
> Vodka. Be liberal.
Judging by your posts in rst you do more than 'sprinkle' some vodka in.
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 07:56AM -0700
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 7:41:09 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> Pour the juice through a sieve and into a glass. Then sprinkle in some
> Vodka. Be liberal.
> Bon Appetit!
It sounds lovely, but one must fortify himself or herself with a hearty lunch to subsist with this kind of dinner item :) To prepare the SI-ian equivalent, I would eschew sugar, lemon juice, and the vodka, but instead throw in some chopped coriander leaves and some green-chilly bits. I also avoid the sieve bit, readily consuming even the tomato residues :)
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Sep 24 07:58AM -0700
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 10:05:53 AM UTC-4, Whisper wrote:
> > Pour the juice through a sieve and into a glass. Then sprinkle in some
> > Vodka. Be liberal.
> Judging by your posts in rst you do more than 'sprinkle' some vodka in.
Here is the narcissist wanting some attention ;)
Back to top
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.