rec.sport.football.college@googlegroups.com
Google Groups
Topic digest
View all topics
"New" bowl qualifying procedure - 2 Updates
'I hated this man more than my black rapists': Wigger woman confronts football coach 18 years after alleged gang rape - 3 Updates
'I hated this man more than my black rapists': Wigger woman confronts football coach 18 years after alleged gang rape - 2 Updates
Legal Vegas Heisman Odds - 1 Update
alt.home.repair - 3 Updates
Northern Ireland was just waiting for an excuse to blow shite up - 6 Updates
Republican women organizing to support hillary - 1 Update
Which terrorists are worse? - 1 Update
Conspiracy long-play political memothot - 5 Updates
Love France tommorrow to win in 90' + stoppage time..... - 1 Update
"New" bowl qualifying procedure
The NOTBCS Guy <don.p.del.grande@gmail.com>: Jul 03 08:08AM -0700
The NCAA just "clarified" the bowl eligibility rules to say that all "bowl eligible 6-6 teams" must be chosen before any 5-7 teams.
Okay, I'll ask: how is this different from what they did last year? Besides the fact that the 5-7 teams choose their bowl games rather than the games choosing the teams, that is.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jul 03 04:32PM
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:08:02 -0700 (PDT), The NOTBCS Guy
>The NCAA just "clarified" the bowl eligibility rules to say that all "bowl eligible 6-6 teams" must be chosen before any 5-7 teams.
>Okay, I'll ask: how is this different from what they did last year? Besides the fact that the 5-7 teams choose their bowl games rather than the games choosing the teams, that is.
What if the 8 supposed top teams played in the Sugar, Orange, Cotton
and Rose Bowls with the 2 winners alternating the 4 bowls for the
trophy.
Then any group can attempt to contract the 2 teams they want to play
in their bowl. They "git 'er done" or they don't in time to televise.
Bowls other than the top 4 are for bragging rights and to make money
by having one more game for losers.
How wrong would that be? The logistics could be worked out and you
need fewer interpretations of "what we REALLY meant".
Hugh
Back to top
'I hated this man more than my black rapists': Wigger woman confronts football coach 18 years after alleged gang rape
Attila <<prochoice@here.now>: Jul 03 02:54AM -0400
On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 21:11:48 GMT, Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh
Sullivan) in alt.abortion with message-id
>>That doesn't imply consent for anything. Whether or not it is
>>'acceptable is irrelevant.
>Her probable history and actions did not imply lack of consent either.
Lack of consent would be assumed if there is no evidence to the
contrary.
>People who don't trash themselves get trashed much less often.
That is a risk factor determination.
>>>I await rebuttal from those with only a one-sided standard of decency.
>>>Hugh
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.
Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.
If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Attila <<prochoice@here.now>: Jul 03 09:55AM -0400
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:47:44 GMT, Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh
Sullivan) in alt.abortion with message-id
>>Lack of consent would be assumed if there is no evidence to the
>>contrary.
>If she had two bastards
But that was her choice.
> and got passed out drunk at a party with
>football players. that's not just consent, it's an offer. Maybe she
>had not planned on a Fire Sale.
It is poor judgment but hardly an offer.
>>That is a risk factor determination.
>Exactly. And she chose to risk it because everyone knows football
>players are always low on testosterone.
Irrelevant. It is always her choice.
She does not need to say no, but that is preferable. She does need to
be conscious to say yes.
>I'm not justifying what the men did. I'm saying she apparently was
>trash, acted like trash and got treated like trash.
To an illegal extreme, and it really speaks more to the lack of
character of the football players than to her.
>Hugh
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.
Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.
If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Attila <<prochoice@here.now>: Jul 03 12:29PM -0400
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:17:34 GMT, Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh
Sullivan) in alt.abortion with message-id
>>But that was her choice.
>Choosing to be trash is a choice. I agree. But that means she should
>not whine when she is treated like trash.
No one deserves to be raped.
>If her history is having bastards, and she opens the door of
>opportunity to a group of men by passing out drunk, it was considered
>an offer. But, again not a close-out sale.
I totally disagree. There is no way passing out can be interpreted as
an offer of any kind. Ever.
>>Irrelevant. It is always her choice.
>And it was the guy's choice to kill all the queers at Orlando. People
>often pay a terrible price for a bad choice.
But killing is an illegal act. Passing out may show poor judgment but
it is not illegal.
Rape however . . .
>Then she should not have been passed out drunk with two probable
>bastards she left somewhere while she partied with guys who don't need
>Viagra.
I agree it was poor judgment but that should not be a dangerous
situation.
>>character of the football players than to her.
>I'm not sure how one determines "wrong" and "wronger". Stoopid got all
>et up by stoopid.
Easy when the activity of one is legal if in poor judgment while the
activity of the other is illegal.
>It may not be right, but it is the reality of today. We don't have to
>like it but we have to live with it.
No, we don't. It is long past time we start treating sports figures
like the animals most of them are. Especially by not buying the
products they sponsor and stop paying to see them play.
>Hugh
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.
Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.
If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Back to top
'I hated this man more than my black rapists': Wigger woman confronts football coach 18 years after alleged gang rape
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jul 03 01:47PM
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 02:54:18 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
wrote:
>>Her probable history and actions did not imply lack of consent either.
>Lack of consent would be assumed if there is no evidence to the
>contrary.
If she had two bastards and got passed out drunk at a party with
football players. that's not just consent, it's an offer. Maybe she
had not planned on a Fire Sale.
Or, maybe both children were Immaculate Conceptions she left at the
Church School and she thought it was lemonade.
>>People who don't trash themselves get trashed much less often.
>That is a risk factor determination.
Exactly. And she chose to risk it because everyone knows football
players are always low on testosterone.
I'm not justifying what the men did. I'm saying she apparently was
trash, acted like trash and got treated like trash.
Hugh
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jul 03 04:17PM
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 09:55:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now>
wrote:
>Sullivan) in alt.abortion with message-id
>>If she had two bastards
>But that was her choice.
Choosing to be trash is a choice. I agree. But that means she should
not whine when she is treated like trash.
>>football players. that's not just consent, it's an offer. Maybe she
>>had not planned on a Fire Sale.
>It is poor judgment but hardly an offer.
If her history is having bastards, and she opens the door of
opportunity to a group of men by passing out drunk, it was considered
an offer. But, again not a close-out sale.
>>Exactly. And she chose to risk it because everyone knows football
>>players are always low on testosterone.
>Irrelevant. It is always her choice.
And it was the guy's choice to kill all the queers at Orlando. People
often pay a terrible price for a bad choice.
Irresponsible choices often cause irresponsible actions. That makes
BOTH wrong, not just the one you choose.
>She does not need to say no, but that is preferable. She does need to
>be conscious to say yes.
Then she should not have been passed out drunk with two probable
bastards she left somewhere while she partied with guys who don't need
Viagra.
>>trash, acted like trash and got treated like trash.
>To an illegal extreme, and it really speaks more to the lack of
>character of the football players than to her.
I'm not sure how one determines "wrong" and "wronger". Stoopid got all
et up by stoopid.
It may not be right, but it is the reality of today. We don't have to
like it but we have to live with it.
Hugh
Back to top
Legal Vegas Heisman Odds
The NOTBCS Guy <don.p.del.grande@gmail.com>: Jul 03 08:04AM -0700
On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 9:25:34 AM UTC-7, tobydrake wrote:
> I should place a bet on Texas Tech's QB.
You mean Mahomes? He's 20-1 at Caesar's and Mandalay Bay, and in the 10-1 field bet at Green Valley.
Speaking of Caesar's and Mandalay Bay, they both have Watson as the 4-1 favorite at the moment.
Note to Mia: the best odds on Alabama winning the CFP championship are 13-2, and you can get +120 on Alabama going 11-1 or better in the regular season (or -140 on 9-3 or worse...that doesn't sound right, but that's what it says on the form)
Back to top
alt.home.repair
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: Jul 02 08:20PM -0700
In article <dcf58ae3-3cb1-45ce-8952-851310ef3c08@googlegroups.com>,
> I was flagged for abuse and can't post there anymore.
Fuck 'em if they can't take joke.
--
Michael Press
Mercellus Bohren <mercellusb@yahoo.com>: Jul 03 07:10AM -0700
On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 10:20:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Press wrote:
> Fuck 'em if they can't take joke.
> --
> Michael Press
No wait, it was just 8 hours of punishment!
Most of those guys are dicks anyway.
Mercellus Bohren <mercellusb@yahoo.com>: Jul 03 07:43AM -0700
On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 10:20:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Press wrote:
> Fuck 'em if they can't take joke.
> --
> Michael Press
I just looked at alt.home.repair again this morning.
I was joking about me being banned.
However, some other fucker has lost his mind.
Back to top
Northern Ireland was just waiting for an excuse to blow shite up
Mercellus Bohren <mercellusb@yahoo.com>: Jul 03 02:52AM -0700
https://www.buzzfeed.com/lukebailey/the-crisis-explained-maybe
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: Jul 03 12:39PM
> https://www.buzzfeed.com/lukebailey/the-crisis-explained-maybe
That was pretty good. And amusing
"Con Reeder, unhyphenated American" <constance@duxmail.com>: Jul 03 08:41AM -0500
> Mercellus Bohren <mercellusb@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> https://www.buzzfeed.com/lukebailey/the-crisis-explained-maybe
> That was pretty good. And amusing
"Like Texas leaving the United States"? Nice of him to make it clear
he knows nothing of history or politics right up front. Then you can
pretty much ignore all conclusions he tries to lead you to right
from the start.
--
An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro
practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: Jul 03 01:52PM
> he knows nothing of history or politics right up front. Then you can
> pretty much ignore all conclusions he tries to lead you to right
> from the start.
Don't take it so seriously. It's a buzzfeed fluff piece. Mainly good not
because of what it says but because of the funny tweets and other
references it rounds up.
"Con Reeder, unhyphenated American" <constance@duxmail.com>: Jul 03 09:04AM -0500
> Don't take it so seriously. It's a buzzfeed fluff piece. Mainly good not
> because of what it says but because of the funny tweets and other
> references it rounds up.
Not to mention the implied disaster one can Cassandra about....
--
Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed. -- Francis Bacon
Mercellus Bohren <mercellusb@yahoo.com>: Jul 03 07:18AM -0700
On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 7:39:54 AM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
> Mercellus Bohren <mercellusb@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > https://www.buzzfeed.com/lukebailey/the-crisis-explained-maybe
> That was pretty good. And amusing
"By this point, actual British political news was basically indistinguishable from a random word generator."
Amusing!
Back to top
Republican women organizing to support hillary
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jul 03 01:57PM
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 00:10:35 -0400, RoddyMcCorley
> Yet she is quite capable of ruining the country.
I corrected your typo.
Hugh
Back to top
Which terrorists are worse?
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jul 03 01:33PM
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:17:37 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
>I'm just happy you resolved your homosexual tendencies after your self destructive phase. I'm proud of you good job!
You won the Son of a Bitch Award so many times they retired your
number. It was 69.
Hugh
Back to top
Conspiracy long-play political memothot
plaidmoon@gmail.com: Jul 02 10:23PM -0700
I know someone who worked for the State Department some years ago and they told me one time that the State Department email server was so unreliable that many of the staff were using free email accounts like hotmail to conduct business. At least they did until they were told it was not secure and to cut it out. I'm not sure if the State Dept. email server has been straighten out, but if not, Clinton may have decided to use the Clinton Foundation email server because it worked. That's probably not a reason she would want to admit to though. Before we get all partisan, I'll mention that my friend worked in the State Department during the Bush years and was long gone before Obama took office.
"wolfie" <bgbdwolf@gte.net>: Jul 03 02:19AM -0400
dotslashderek@gmail.com wrote
> Now it's back to she didn't properly secure her private server.
The funniest thing is the implicit assumption that
highly-classified information was transmitted
over public network email (which includes state.us.gov
addresses as well as clintonemail.)
Hell, I've worked in the private sector where any
highly confidential information was transmitted
only over the internal network and emails that
needed to be sent concerning it would only include
the (non-confidential) summary and a reference to
the reports location on the internal, secure network.
"the_andrew_smith@yahoo.com" <agavinsmith@gmail.com>: Jul 03 04:19AM -0700
Who are you?
Some dued <theodoreward@gmail.com>: Jul 03 04:24AM -0700
Until Snowdon, most if not all major email servers exchanged email unencrypted so unless govt employees were ahead of the curve or using pgp or something equivalent on their clients it would have been an inappropriate medium for classified discussions.
Even with encryption its kind of like sending classified communication via the postal service since there is no way to really know who is reading it on the other side.
Irish Ranger <ace317@att.net>: Jul 03 05:59AM -0700
On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 11:51:45 AM UTC-4, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> Lynch's meeting with Bill is not vanishing - and the optics are not good.
Keep in mind that Lynch did not disclose this meeting and her security people ordered no pictures were to be taken. A reporter for a local TV station found out about the meeting and broke the story.
This was "soft intimidation" by Slick Willie. Remember he is the one who gave Lynch her first big
career break.
Two days after the meeting Lynch's "Justice" Department asked for a 23 month delay in Hillary's
investigation. Well after the Presidential election. Same way Obama ordered the Beau Bergdal
trial moved back until after the election.
> Apparently the FBI is pissed about this - esp since Bill might have been a material witness.
Yeah, if you are an honest FBI agent who has spent a year working on this criminal investigation
you'd be pissed off too if Obama's AG and the defendant's husband just wiped out your
credibility. Also, Slick Willie is not only a potential witness, he will also be a defendant if any
one ever grows the balls to investigate the massive fraud, bribery and corruption in
the Clinton foundation.
> What if......this meeting was a deliberate attempt by Obama to sabotage Hillary?
Slick Willie delayed his flight, sat on his plane and waited for Lynch's plane to land. This was
just sleazy, scummy Clinton business as usual.
> Remember, there's no love lost between the two factions dating back to at least the 2008 race.
Obama doesn't like Hillary (hell, who does?) but she has promised to carry on Obama's disastrous
policies to preserve his "legacy". In return Obama has promised to campaign for her and help
turn out the black vote.
> And something like this could lead to a massive leakfest from the FBI/DOJ
Leak what? Hillary has already been caught in more lies than you can count - not to mention
destroying 30,000+ e-mails on her private unsecured server.
> Or maybe I'm just really bored on a very slow Friday
No accident that the FBI interviewed Hillary over the 4th of July weekend when most Americans are
cooking on the grill and celebrating the holiday.
Bottom-line the fix is in for Hillary and has been from the beginning. And it just proves what we've
known for years. The laws what apply to we common folk bot not apply to the Clintons.
Irish Mike
Back to top
Love France tommorrow to win in 90' + stoppage time.....
RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.McCorley@verizon.net>: Jul 03 12:23AM -0400
> Now you're a Euro soccer expert. Is there anything you don't know?
"Shit from shinola."
--
False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul
with evil.
Pennsylvania - Tá sé difriúil anseo.
Back to top
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.football.college+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.