rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com
Google Groups
Topic digest
View all topics
Scheduling question - 8 Updates
OT: Cincinnati Zoo incident - 8 Updates
Murray loses to Gasquet - 2 Updates
Clayray stuck in the muddy trenches - 2 Updates
Sampras: I knew I was done. I knew I was emotionally cooked - 5 Updates
Scheduling question
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: Jun 01 07:11AM -0500
On 5/31/2016 8:01 PM, bob wrote:
>> exchange as innocuous.
> it's my fault, i called her out, but she's so darned good lookin!
> sorry, you lucky bastard!
No problem, this is all in good fun except for Grachus, LOL. We both are
pretty lucky. :)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:49AM -0400
>> I do alright;
>> http://postimg.org/image/gvp5p9qln/
>i won't disagree. Cute girl. :)
whisp a lucky man, jaros a lucky man, i feel i'm a lucky man, even
dipshit like raja a lucky man.
damn, everyone posts pics here but courty!
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:51AM -0400
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 19:56:36 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
>all. What matters is what 'you' think - if you rate your partner 8+
>then who cares what anyone else thinks?
>: )
you've got an attractive wife i'm sure she gets hit on a lot. i like
women (models, movie stars, etc) that have a little edge on them, not
perfect - say scarlett johansson or jennifer connolly.
bob
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Jun 01 06:25AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:43:34 PM UTC+10, Whisper wrote:
> > bob
> I do alright;
> http://postimg.org/image/gvp5p9qln/
Pretty average at best deserve a 1.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jun 01 07:27AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:25:14 AM UTC-5, John Liang wrote:
> > I do alright;
> > http://postimg.org/image/gvp5p9qln/
> Pretty average at best deserve a 1.
Yeah by Caucasian standards, she aint a beauty. I would give her a 5. 1 is just a too mean... haha.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jun 01 07:28AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:51:30 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
> >then who cares what anyone else thinks?
> >: )
> you've got an attractive wife i'm sure she gets hit on a lot.
Okay now I know how Jaros' wife looks like... lol. There is no accounting for taste.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jun 01 07:32AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:49:11 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
> >i won't disagree. Cute girl. :)
> whisp a lucky man, jaros a lucky man, i feel i'm a lucky man, even
> dipshit like raja a lucky man.
She considers herself luckier and considers me the attractive one. You can check with her. She is still looking more or less the same even after a baby and 5 years into marriage. I could posts pics of her but then you will have the Hazelnut types saying bad stuff. So not worth it...
> damn, everyone posts pics here but courty!
You don't wanna see that.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jun 01 07:33AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:51:30 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
> >then who cares what anyone else thinks?
> >: )
> you've got an attractive wife i'm sure she gets hit on a lot.
That pic is from the late 70s or 80s for sure. Look at the hair style. Unless Whisper and his family is living in the 80s...
Back to top
OT: Cincinnati Zoo incident
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:39AM -0400
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:04:15 +0200 (CEST), *skriptis
>1. The kid seems healthy, both mentally and physically wise. Kids
> are not aware of the danger and are eager to play, explore, feel
> the adrenalin etc.
i agree, i don't blame the child at all.
> country discussing the fate of the gorilla with such compassion
> but hardly mentioning your misery? One does not exclude the other
> of course.
i know the USA starts wars, i know the USA has dubious intentions
sometimes, i know the USA is often wrong in conflict. i'm not in lala
land thinking the USA's gov't is "special" and always pure in intent,
or action. however, for me the USA is the "home team" and in conflict
i hope we win.
now, whether islamist militants are justified or not in taking war to
the western world, including USA, UK, france and more, as well as
their israeli or arab neighbors, they may have some very good reasons.
in their own mind, i believe they think they have excellent reasons.
i'm certainly not one of those who thinks the only good muslim is a
dead one.
however, as we are in a conflict at the moment, i wish the USA to do
what it deems necessary to (a) win the conflict and (b) protect its
citizens in the process. there will be collateral damage in all
conflicts, even with accurate drone strikes. i don't like it, however
it'll be there. as far as isis, al qaeda or whatnot, they are not
innocent in this conflict either. they are putting bombs in areas
where innocnets grocery shop, ride trains, planes etc so they are the
same. watched a move last month "eye in the sky" about the drone
stikes in e. africa, and the process involved in the decision to drop
a bomb and cause collateral damage to innocents - not sure how close
to reality the movie was, but if it's close then a lot of thought for
collateral damage goes into the decision.
> just compared that with what is usually considered a collateral
> damage by US standards, to make a point that gorilla is an
> acceptable collateral victim. He should be.
i get your pt. gorilla was a side issue, larger issue to me, about
treatment of animals in zoos to begin with. i didn't argue against
that he needed to be shot.
bob
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>: Jun 01 09:00PM +1000
On 1/06/2016 6:38 AM, TT wrote:
> the water... but ultimately put him gently on his feet - at which point
> they started shooting. I think a bit cruel to kill it because of
> POSSIBILITY of gorilla harming the kid.
If it were your family member?
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:41AM -0400
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 21:29:40 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
>I think Court1 can handle a gorilla pretty well. Indeed they might have
>to tazer her to protect the guerilla.
>: )
she'd look at it, roll her eyes, and say "that all you got?"
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:46AM -0400
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 21:00:36 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
>> they started shooting. I think a bit cruel to kill it because of
>> POSSIBILITY of gorilla harming the kid.
>If it were your family member?
i don't think anyone is disputing the decision to shoot the gorilla
(well, a few are), but IMO this topic is that people in usa are just
tired of irresponsibility.
it was a freak accident, and i bet thousands of responsible and
irresponsible parents do things every day that don't result in an
accident, but a "near miss," and nobody knows or cares. this one had a
consequence.
bob
undecided <costasz@gmail.com>: Jun 01 05:50AM -0700
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 6:40:49 PM UTC-4, Court_1 wrote:
> There were other witnesses who said the kid ran off quickly and it was an accident and the parents were not negligent. They also said there wasn't much separating them from the gorillas. No 4 year old kid should be able to get through the security measures and fall into a gorilla pit.
> The case will probably not make it to court and the zoo will probably settle for an undisclosed amount. Just watch.
> It's amazing to me that public opinion is heavily against the parents and for some wild unpredictable beast who was dragging the kid around like a rag doll. Some people are nuts IMO.
The parent(s) may or may not be negligent but the reason kids like that one did what they did is because these days parents (in the USA) are not firm with their kids. They let them do whatever they want. I am kind of tired of dealing with their kids. They need to deal with them whenever I encounter such situations (mostly airports). They just don't want to deal with their own kids so they let them do whatever they want.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 09:01AM -0400
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:50:45 -0700 (PDT), undecided <costasz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> The case will probably not make it to court and the zoo will probably settle for an undisclosed amount. Just watch.
>> It's amazing to me that public opinion is heavily against the parents and for some wild unpredictable beast who was dragging the kid around like a rag doll. Some people are nuts IMO.
>The parent(s) may or may not be negligent but the reason kids like that one did what they did is because these days parents (in the USA) are not firm with their kids. They let them do whatever they want. I am kind of tired of dealing with their kids. They need to deal with them whenever I encounter such situations (mostly airports). They just don't want to deal with their own kids so they let them do whatever they want.
on plane last month kid behind me kept kicking my seat. turned around,
dad sitting next to him, i smiled, said "can he stop?" parent told him
to stop. 2 mins later same. 2 mins later same. i said politely "you
wanna switch seats with me?" to the dad - to which the 50yo lady next
to me said "you must not have kids." WTF?
bob
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>: Jun 01 09:29PM +1000
On 1/06/2016 12:24 PM, bob wrote:
> if it's a 40something adult, like you for instance, i'd be inclined to
> heat up some popcorn and see how it plays out.
> bob
I think Court1 can handle a gorilla pretty well. Indeed they might have
to tazer her to protect the guerilla.
: )
"Thomas R. Kettler" <tkettler@blownfuse.net>: Jun 01 10:25AM -0400
In article <nill9g$llk$1@dont-email.me>,
> > i don't believe in animal testing either, especially for cosmetic
> > reasons. i don't buy anything w/out the "not tested on animals" label.
> It's enough to test it on you.
Hey to Flint, Michigan and lead pipes on the poor amongst other
locations.
--
Remove blown from email address to reply.
Back to top
Murray loses to Gasquet
firemonkey <firemonkey@gatty.me.uk>: Jun 01 03:21PM +0100
Forthcoming headline.
--
http://paper.li/f-1299495251
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
justin quiring <me@privacy.net>: Jun 01 03:25PM +0100
Tonight's headline .
Back to top
Clayray stuck in the muddy trenches
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.los>: Jun 01 04:25PM +0300
Petain takes the first set.
justin quiring <me@privacy.net>: Jun 01 03:04PM +0100
On 01/06/2016 14:25, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> Petain takes the first set.
Murray- stick a fork in him .
Back to top
Sampras: I knew I was done. I knew I was emotionally cooked
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>: Jun 01 09:34PM +1000
On 1/06/2016 2:30 PM, John Liang wrote:
>> anywhere else u feel like it.
>> bob
> bob, I think it is far more difficult to discuss anything with liars like you. I challeng yuo to find where I posted 15 times in the last year, if you can I will organize your trip to Australia and so you can meet up your personal RST hero whisper and if not you give me a two way ticket to US I will punch the shit out of you for lying.
Touchy
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Jun 01 05:04AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 9:35:00 PM UTC+10, Whisper wrote:
> >> bob
> > bob, I think it is far more difficult to discuss anything with liars like you. I challeng yuo to find where I posted 15 times in the last year, if you can I will organize your trip to Australia and so you can meet up your personal RST hero whisper and if not you give me a two way ticket to US I will punch the shit out of you for lying.
> Touchy
A fair bet if he can find 15 posts made by me that I post 'Sampras sucks on clay' for the past year then I gave him a two way air ticket even pay for his accommodation in Australia. It should not be so hard since he claim every one of my post is saying 'Sampras suck on clay'.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:55AM -0400
On Tue, 31 May 2016 21:53:26 -0700 (PDT), Gracchus
>On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 9:30:22 PM UTC-7, John Liang wrote:
>> bob, I think it is far more difficult to discuss anything with liars like you. I challeng yuo to find where I posted 15 times in the last year, if you can I will organize your trip to Australia and so you can meet up your personal RST hero whisper and if not you give me a two way ticket to US I will punch the shit out of you for lying.
>If you want to fly to Australia to get justice for Whisper's dogs, RST can probably crowdfund your travel.
or we could fund john liang to come here and i'll use him as a
practice dummy next time at juijitsu, we always run out of those.
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 01 08:56AM -0400
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 21:34:57 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
>>> bob
>> bob, I think it is far more difficult to discuss anything with liars like you. I challeng yuo to find where I posted 15 times in the last year, if you can I will organize your trip to Australia and so you can meet up your personal RST hero whisper and if not you give me a two way ticket to US I will punch the shit out of you for lying.
>Touchy
i know, i don't respnd to john and he responds to me twice on same
post. do i hear 3 anyone? going one, twice...
bob
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Jun 01 06:18AM -0700
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 10:55:13 PM UTC+10, bob wrote:
> or we could fund john liang to come here and i'll use him as a
> practice dummy next time at juijitsu, we always run out of those.
> bob
You don't need to fund anything just need to post 15 posts where I said Sampras suck on clay for all to see. Knowing you as a little twat I doubt you can find that many.
Is this why your learn martial art. With that sort of mind I doubt you are in any advance class of Juijitsu. Shall we meet I will make certain you won't have any teeth in your mouth.
Back to top
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.