2014-09-16

Rescuing colourful news metaphors: From diversionary politics to reformist agendas?

Denis Bright invites readers to take note of the communication roles played by colourful news metaphors in Australian politics.

The capacity of exotic news metaphors in pictures, graphics and colourful texts to explain complex issues is balanced by an awareness of their potential as agencies of political persuasion.

Hypotehtical exclusive news scoop – from the Prime Minister’s flight deck.



From Philosophers for Change (Google Images)

Warning from Captain Abbott: Rough landing ahead at New Australia

Veer right after the debt sign. Your Captain will take advantage of the head-winds generated by our recent unpopular budget to make a difficult landing. Which policy metaphor lever should I use, Crew to divert attention away from this electorate’s real issues of concern?

In the disciplined world of mainstream politics, leaders and their advisers routinely make use of colourful news metaphors to simplify domestic and international policy issues.

Spontaneous political metaphors from door-stop interviews have quite determined links to thoughtful policy radar assessments of the issues of the week.

Eyewitness news services soon want to be involved in the political game.

Readers of this hypothetical cartoon from a regional paper in New Australia would have been familiar with the recent news feed about Barnaby Joyce’s explanation of a self-perceived Australian public debt problem:

“If you’re trying to turn the finances of our nation around, there are going to be hard decisions that are made. And if we don’t, we go broke,” Mr Joyce said on ABC radio.

“This is our first budget, I understand the concerns people have, I fully understand them, but what is our alternative? We either accept that we’ve got a debt problem and we’ve got to turn it around or we basically we say ‘no, this is only a small melanoma on our arm, and if we just wait long enough it’ll go away’. (From The Australian, 25 August 2014).

Political diversion strategies were successfully applied on the Prime Minister’s hypothetical visit to the regional city of New Australia.

In the true genre of strong LNP leaders, metaphors were rattled off about the choice of the correct flight path for hard-times now and in the troubled times ahead for the global economy.



Winners are always grinners: On both sides of the political divide (Source: Namoi Valley Independent)

Reassuring commitments to market forces abounded as media releases talked-up the bright future ahead if more legislative barriers to dry economic agendas could be reduced.

Entrenched privilege was protected by the Prime Minister’s failure to open up debate about the need for a simpler and fairer taxation system that can deliver essential services and new infrastructure without ongoing budget deficits.

The cheer squad for the Prime Minister in New Australia included many local elites who have routinely benefited from the current taxation loop-holes relating to negative gearing on rental properties and payments of cash wages to casual employees.

A more exclusive circle included representatives of mining entrepreneurs and other corporations from the mining sector. This sector has a long tradition of siphoning off potential Australian Taxation Office revenue through payments to commercial associates in overseas tax havens.

Colourful news metaphors in mainstream political processes as diversionary political strategies

Populist communication strategies have worked well on both sides of Australian politics. The election of Kevin Rudd in 2007 with the assistance of the Your Rights at Work Campaign is the most recent example.



Prime Minister Curtin as news metaphor hero (Source: Time Magazine)

Historically, the federal ALP has scored well in developing news metaphors with strong links to popular consensus-building policies.

Prime Minister John Curtin became an Australian and international icon as shown by this cover from Time Magazine on 24 April 1944 in recognition of his efforts are wartime leader.

With the guns silent, Ben Chifley won the 1946 elections to achieve the federal ALP’s last majority in both houses of parliament from the positive spin from domestic reform agendas and an active commitment to peace and disarmament.

Prime Minister Chifley’s agenda was far less left wing than his news metaphors suggested. Federal Labor faced a challenge from the support base of the Communist Party in some heartland electorates and it was appropriate to keep industrial unions onside with the ALP.

More recently, Opposition Leader, Bill Shorten, has gained impressive traction in generating head-winds against the recent LNP budget. The federal ALP has been up to ten points ahead of the government in post-budget polling after the allocation of preferences.

Prime Minister Abbott has sought diversions in switching news metaphors from financial austerity to foreign policy, defence and terrorism concerns with some successes in recent polling.

Federal Labor: Marketing a successful reform agenda for Prime Minister Ben Chifley (image from News Corporation)

However, the summary of the opinion polls to 11 September 2014, suggests the federal ALP still maintains a firm vote on the back of additional support for the Greens which the current foreign crises have generated.

Federal Labor must now go beyond its own successful opportunistic rhetoric to link its protest messages to alternative policy frames which offer some relief from financial austerity and constant involvement in foreign conflicts.

One shaky LNP myth is the notion that the level of government in Australia is indeed excessive.

Tilting at LNP news metaphors about excessive levels of government in Australia

While still being identified with calls for financial austerity and cut-backs in government spending, Prime Minister Abbott is not carried away by the literal meaning of his own populist political communication.

Technical advisers have attended to shortfalls in the federal government’s own revenue base.

The federal budget revenue, as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), is projected to increase to 25.5% by 2017-18 from 23.6% in Wayne Swan’s last budget.

Without this increase, federal and state governments would be financially unsustainable.

In economic management, Prime Minister Abbott is not quite as ideologically driven as his government’s news metaphors suggest.

Synopsis of Budget Aggregates

Australian Budget 2014-15. Appendix A

This budget repair initiative by the LNP could provide the rationale for similar major initiatives by federal Labor through tax reform measures.

Such progressive initiatives could be justified by greater honesty about Australia’s lean public sector when comparisons are made with other OECD countries.

On the latest comparative OECD data for revenue as a percentage of GDP for 2011, Australia is thirtieth on the list of thirty-four member states.

Hardliners in the federal LNP would like to move Australia down the list to compete with the neo-conservative countries at the bottom of the barrel.

However, the LNP’s love of military commitments makes this literally impossible.

The news metaphor of the high tax Australian state

Can alternative news metaphors be constructed?

Overseas experience suggests that most corporately driven societies cannot hold the line against a growing wealth divide.

In more competitive societies, the wealth divide usually increases as the remnants of social democracy are eroded by privatization as well as cut-backs in services and industrial awards.

The LNP’s silence about the need for tax reform in Australia actually protects wealthy families and corporations from making an appropriate contribution to an improvement in the government’s revenue base.

The notion that everyone benefits from economic rationalist strategies, as advocated by the LNP, is not evident in data from Oxfam.

None of the developed economies listed has achieved a more equitable income distribution since 1990 with the exception of a slight improvement in the USA, thanks to the presence of President Obama’s domestic initiatives.

Ironically, the US remains one of the most unequal societies in the developed world and the Abbott Government is committed to moving Australia in this direction.

The return of the wealth divide

Oxfam 2012. Left Behind by the G20?

The challenge of the wealth divide demands more than a piecemeal rejection of just some of the Abbott Government’s commitments to more middle class welfare.

Federal Labor can construct defiant metaphors which are linked to viable policy alternatives to the current near hegemony of dry economic agendas by LNP federal and state governments.

The Murdoch press is of course no friend of the federal ALP. Even the biased headlines in The Australian could not hold the line against the depth of post-budget reactions from across the community.

Reporting the Address in Reply: With editorial metaphors embedded in the headlines

The Australian Online.16 May 2014

Perhaps the next conviction of a prominent wealthy tax evader or errant corporation could be the trigger for a real debate about the need for a simpler and fairer taxation system in Australia.

Addressing the profound levels of inappropriate taxation leakages that benefit wealthy families, entrepreneurs and corporations is an essential priority for all reasonable federal governments.

In every country town and regional districts, constituents are well aware of the extent of tax leakages through payment of cash wages as well as the conspicuous display of wealth from the misuse of family trusts and family companies to achieve legal avenues for systematic tax avoidance.

Laundering of money through overseas-based management funds and diversion of company profits to offshore tax havens is less obvious. It is well reported in news and current affairs programmes.

Cost estimates of the extent of these leakages should be part of the national public debate.

Progressive representatives on parliamentary committees have the capacity to request appropriate estimates of tax leakages from the Australian Tax Office, the Australian Crime Commission, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) as well as other relevant agencies.

As recommended by Taxpayers Australia, some new anti-avoidance legislation is also required to manage rorts by some of Australia’s wealthiest entrepreneurs, families and companies.

Anti-avoidance strategies are recommended by Taxpayers Australia:

trading in franking credits (buying and selling shares just to claim the franking credits without holding on to them long enough to bear ownership risk)

personal services income (diverting income that is earned through your efforts into another entity with a lower tax rate)

foreign income deferral (accumulating income in a country with lower tax rates)

employee share schemes (receiving shares as remuneration and delaying the ‘taxing point’)

company tax losses (companies cannot claim prior year losses unless the majority of the ownership has not changed hands or unless the same business activities are being carried on)

trust tax losses (trusts cannot claim prior year losses unless certain tests are passed)

taxation of minors (punitive tax rates apply to minors under 18 years of age to prevent streaming income to children on lower tax rates than the rest of the family).

Taxpayers Australia 2014

Associate Professor of Taxation Law at the Australian School of Business at the University of NSW, Dale Boccabella, has made a number of technical submissions to control the inappropriate leakage of taxation revenue through the misuse of family trusts.

Speaking on The Drum, Dale Boccabella makes the following recommendations:

On the other hand, the generous tax treatment of discretionary trusts (family trusts) is not included in the tax expenditure statement – but there are good reasons why it should be. The negative gearing loss on rental properties and share investments is not included either. For 2012-13, the Commonwealth has around 280 tax expenditures under the income tax, worth around $100 billion. This is around 6 per cent of GDP. Direct expenditure of the Commonwealth for the same period was around $360 billion, which is around 24 per cent of GDP. (ABC.The Drum 12 March 2014).

If the current deficit problem is considered in this context, a different interpretation of The Age of Entitlement soon emerges.

Every billion that is leaked from the federal treasury through inappropriate tax avoidance has a flow-on effect to the deficit problems of the states and territories where tied grants are the key variable in budget processes.

Opposition parties have nothing to lose by broadening the debate about the continued Age of Entitlement.

Playing the news metaphor game: The silence of most state and territory leaders

Failure to act on federal taxation reform has inevitable negative effects on the deficit problems of the various states and territories.

The election of Prime Minister Abbott has not really assisted Premier Campbell Newman’s debt reduction strategies in Queensland.

Like the other states and territories, Queensland is increasingly dependent on the Commonwealth for its revenue base.

Queensland Budget 2014. Paper 2:6,107

The Queensland Budget Papers for 2014-15 show that 46 cents in every dollar of state revenue (44.2 cents in all states and territories) are derived from the Commonwealth through both GST revenue ($11.736 billion) and specific grants ($11.313 billion).

Queensland is still the beneficiary of tied grants negotiated with the former federal Labor Government which delivered an additional windfall of almost $3 billion during 2013-14.

This financial glow will deteriorate as the financial austerity of the Abbott Years takes its toll on future levels of grants to the states and territories.

The news metaphors invariably project Queensland budget deficit as a purely local problem to justify the austerity measures imposed by Premier Campbell Newman.

In the absence of federal tax reform initiatives, the delivery of essential services and infrastructure at state and territory levels will become more challenging.

Queensland Budget 2014-15. Paper 2:6,121

Progressive representatives at both state and federal levels have little to lose by talking up strategies for real solutions to budget deficits.

Towards alternative news metaphors embedded in bold policy frames

In economic policies, progressive parliamentary representatives could unite in constructing news metaphors about the value of a simpler and fairer taxation system which protects the leadership role of the Commonwealth in revenue collection.

The electorate can then balance the social costs of more financial austerity with the value of more middle class welfare and tax anomalies that protect wealthy families, rich entrepreneurs and many of Australia’s leading financial corporations.

The politics of cynical diversion

The most potent policy frame for progressive representatives in state and federal parliaments is of course the persuasive power of reasonable alternatives.

Source: Herald Sun

One place to start is the parliamentary finance committees at both state and federal levels to expose the real injustices of current taxation arrangements which make commitments to essential services a luxury.

Professor John Quiggin of the Economics School at the University of Queensland explained to a supportive audience at the Brisbane Workers’ Club on 26 August 2014 that commitment to taxation reform as a way out of current deficit problems would be a real challenge.

Exotic news metaphors from the LNP to divert attention away from dry economic and foreign policy agendas definitely exert powerful social controls on political debate.

The sustainability of this spirit of protest will be vastly extended if the federal ALP Policy Review Committee can use alternative metaphors to support new pragmatic consensus-building policies that talk-up Labor’s economic management credentials.

The sheer complexity and injustices of the current Australian taxation system justifies more news metaphors which promote a real reform agenda to end the diversionary politics of Prime Minister Abbott at the end of his first term in office.

Denis Bright is a member of the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA). He is a registered teacher with post-retirement studies in journalism, public policy and international relations.

Denis Bright

The post Politics of the debt crisis appeared first on The AIM Network.

Show more