2015-04-17

Barriers to Progress and Business Growth

Every business, company or organization goes through cycles in its evolution. At any point, each program or business unit is in a different phase from the others. Every astute organization assesses the status of each branch on its Business Tree™ and orients its management and team members to meet constant changes and fluctuations.

It’s not that some organizations ‘click’ and others do not. Multiple factors cause momentum, or the lack thereof. As companies operate, all make honest and predictable mistakes. Those with a willingness to learn from the mistakes and pursue growth will be successful. Others will remain stuck in frames of mind that set themselves up for the next round of defeat or, at best, partial-success.

The saddest fact is that businesses do not always know that they’re doing anything wrong. They do not realize that a Big Picture must exist or what it could look like. They have not been taught or challenged on how to craft a Big Picture. Managers, by default, see “band-aid surgery” as the only remedy for problems… but only when problems are so evident as to require action.

Is it any wonder that organizations stray off course? Perhaps no course was ever charted. Perhaps the order of business was to put out fires as they arose, rather than practicing preventive safety on the kindling organization. That’s how Business Trees in the forest burn.

This chapter studies obsolete management styles and corporate cultures that exist in the minds of out-of-touch management. Reliance upon many of these management tenets subsequently brought Enron and many others down.

This includes the characteristics of addictive organizations, their processes, promises and forms. It reviews the Addictive System, the company way and the organization as an addict. This chapter studies communications, thinking processes, management processes, self-inflicted crises and structural components of companies that go bad, or maybe never do what it takes to be good. Topics discussed include the society that produced business scandals, accountants and auditors, pedestals upon which CEOs are placed, spin doctoring, compensations and accountability issues with managers.

Companies are collections of individuals who possess fatal flaws of thinking. They come from different backgrounds and are products of a pop culture that puts its priorities and glories in the wrong places…a society that worships flash-and-sizzle over substance.

Characteristics of Corporate Arrogance

Support others who are like-minded to themselves

Scapegoat people who are the messengers of change

Blame others who cannot or will not defend themselves

Find public and vocal ways of placing blame upon others

Shame those people who make them accountable

Neither attends to details nor to pursue a Big Picture

Perpetuate co-dependencies

Selectively forgets the good that occurs

Find three wrongs for every right

Do little or nothing

At all costs, fight change… in every shape, form or concept

Making the wrong choices

Inability to listen. Refusal to hear what is said

Stubbornness

Listening to the wrong people

Failure to change. Fear of change

Comfort level with institutional mediocrity

Setting one’s self up for failure

Pride

Avoidance of responsibilities

Blaming and scapegoating others

People who filter out the truths

Non-risk-taking mode

Inaccessibility to independent thinkers

Calling something a tradition, when it really means refusal to change

Pretense

Worshipping false idols, employing artificial solutions

Preoccupation with deals, rather than running an ongoing business

Arrogant attitudes

Ignorance of modern management styles and societal concerns

Failure to benchmark results and accomplishments

Incorrect Assumptions that People Make

That wealth and success cure all ills

That business runs on data. That data projects the future

That data infrastructure hardware will navigate the business destiny and success

That all athletes are role models. That all well-paid athletes are national heroes

That the CEO can make or break the company single-handedly

That doctors don’t have to be accountable to their customers

That education stops after the last college degree received

That TV newscasters are celebrities and community leaders

That having an E-mail address or a website makes one an expert on technology

That the Internet is primarily an educational resource

That technology is the most important driving force in business and society

That buying the latest software program will cure all social ills and create success

That community stewardship applies to other people and does not require our own investment of time

That white-collar crime pays and that highly paid executives will avoid jail time

That senior corporate managers have all the answers and do not need to seek counsel

That return on shareholder investment is the only true measure of a company’s worth

That all people who grew up in the south are racist

That government bureaucrats are qualified to make decisions about taxpayer money

That activists for one cause are equally open-minded about other issues

That corporate mid-managers with expense accounts are community leaders

That deregulation is always desirable and in the public’s best interest

That home-based businesses are more wealth-producing than holding a job

That professionals can get by without developing public speaking and writing skills

Fatal Quotations Often Voiced to Justify Fatal Thinking

“Might makes right. Take no prisoners. Wear the other side down.”

“Everyone knows who we are and what we do.”

“Our accountants will catch it and take care of it.”

“It’s none of their business. The public be damned.”

“We’re not paying people to think… just to do. Make them understand.”

“We don’t need outsiders coming in and hogging the credit.”

“If you don’t cooperate with me, I’ll bring you down.”

“We cannot do that right now. Once this crisis is past, we can think about the future.”

“How does this contribute to our bottom line?”

“If it does not contribute directly to the bottom line, we’re not interested.”

“We have more business than we can handle.”

“Too much competition destroys free enterprise. We need to eliminate competition.”

Addictive Organizations

Addictive organizations are predicated upon maintaining a closed system. Alternately, they are marked by such traits as confusion, dishonesty and perfectionism. They are scarcity models, based upon quantity and the illusion of control. Only the high performers get the gold because there are not enough bonuses to go around. Addictive organizations show frozen feelings and ethical deterioration.

Addictive organizations dangle ‘the promise’ to employees, customers, stockholders and others affected. People are lured into doing things that enable the addictive management’s pseudopodic ego.

All that is different is either absorbed or purged. The addictive organization fabricates personality conflicts in order to keep people on the edge all the time. There exists a dualism of identifying the rightness of the choice and a co-dependence upon the rewards of the promise.

In such companies, the key person is an addict. The CEO and his chosen lieutenants have taken addictions with them from other organizations. The organization itself is an addictive substance, as well as being an addict to others. They numb people down and addict them to workaholism.

The addictive system views everything as ‘the company way.’ The entity is outwardly one big happy family. It is big and grandiose. The emphasis is upon the latest slogans of mission but does not look closely at how its systems operate. The term “mission” is a buffer, excuse, putdown and roadblock.

Rather than embrace the kinds of Big Picture strategies advocated in this book, the addictive system seeks artificial fixes to organizational problems, such as bonuses, benefits, slogans and promotions of like-minded executives.

Communications are always indirect, vague, written and confusing. People are purposefully left out of touch or are summarily put down for not co-depending. Secrets, gossip and triangulation persist, as a result. The addictive organization does communicate directly with the news media and often adopts a ‘no comment’ policy. Company officers (who should be accessible to media) are cloistered and unavailable. The addictive organization does not recognize that professional corporate communications are among the best resources in their potential arsenal.

The addictive system does not encourage managers to develop thinking and reasoning processes. The system portrays forgetfulness, selective memory and distorted facts into sweeping generalizations. We are expected to take them at their word, without requesting or demanding facts to justify.

In the addictive organization, those who challenge, blow whistles or suggest that things might be better handled are neither wanted nor tolerated. Addictive managers project externally originated criticism back onto internal scapegoats. There is always a strategy of people to blame and sins to be attributed to them.

Management processes tend to exemplify denial, dishonesty, isolation, self-centeredness, judgmentalism and a false sense of perfectionism. Intelligent people know that perfectionism does not exist and the quest for quality and excellence is the real game of life and business. Addictive organizations do not use terms like ‘quality’ and ‘excellence’ because such terms must be measured, periodically reexamined and communicated… the organization does not want any of that to occur.

There persists a crisis orientation, meaning that everything is down to the wire on deadlines (not to be confused with just-in-time delivery, which is a good concept). Things are kept perennially in turmoil, in order to keep people guessing or confused. Management seduces employees into setting up competing sides in bogus feuds and manipulating consumers.

Structural components include preserving the status quo, fostering political games, taking false measurements and pursuing activities that are incongruent with the organization’s announced mission.

7 Layers of Organizational Addictiveness.

Companies that Go Bad… self-inflicted Crises.

Self Destructive Intelligence. There exists a logic override. Since the company does not believe itself to be smart enough to do the right things, then it creates a web of rationalism. Since the mind often plays tricks on itself, management capitalizes upon that phenomenon with people who may question or criticize.

Hubris. This quality destroys those who possess it. Such executives exhibit stubborn pride, believing their own spin doctoring and surrounding themselves with people who spin quite well on their behalf. They adopt a “nobody does it as well as we can” mentality. Such companies scorn connections, collaborations and partnering with other organizations.

Arrogance. Omnipotent fantasies cause management to go too far. The feeling is that nothing is beyond their capacity to succeed (defined in their minds as crushing all other competition).

Narcissism. Company executives possess excessive conceit. They are disconnected from outside forces, self-centered and show a cruel indifference to others. The view is that the world must gratify them.

Unconscious Need to Fail. These companies try too hard to keep on winning. With victory as the only possible end game, all others must be defeated along the way. In reality, these people and, thus, their organizations, possess low self-esteem. Inevitably, they get beaten at their own games.

Feeling of Entitlement. Walls and filters have been established which insulate top management from criticism (which is viewed as harming the chain of armor, rather than as potentially constructive). Anger stimulates many of their decisions. The feeling is that they deserve it all. Power satisfies appetites. These executives have poor human relations skills. They believe that excesses are always justified.

Collective Dumbness. Such organizations have totally reshaped reality to their own viewpoints. The emperor really has no clothes, but everyone overlooks the obvious and avoids addressing it forthrightly. The organization dumbs down the overall intelligence level, so that people are in the dark and cannot readily make judgment calls. Cults of expertise function in vacuums within the company. Neurotic departmental units do not interface often with others. Employees are slaves of the system. There exists total justification for what is done and an ostrich effect toward calls for accountability.

Techpitfalls.com

Reasons why companies fail.

Roadblocks to growth, opportunities missed.

Companies come and go. Not every start-up is destined to make it. Yet, in this era of super-hype about tech and dot.com companies, unrealistic expectations precluded most of their successes from the beginning.

The hype now is that the bubble burst. Former dot.com owners are crying that they were stripped of their entitled riches. Employees who were promised stock options came away without still knowing what it takes to build a real business.

The e-commerce and dot.com wars have more than their share of casualties because their players never had the artillery and mindset to play seriously in the first place. Overt marketing hype led to an unwatchful marketplace… which always wakes up to the realities of business eventually.

Technology companies must now learn the lessons that steady-growth companies in other industries absorbed. Actually, most companies still have not truly learned the lessons. Thus, most businesses are at frequent ‘crossroads,’ where turns have deep implications and far-reaching.

I advised several technology companies during their gravy years. I tried to warn them about the things that would get them into trouble:

Focusing upon technology… not upon running a business

Maintaining too much of an entrepreneur and family business mindset

Branding before being a real company

Their system’s inability to deal with any kind of disruption

Each side picks their favorite numbers for ‘success’ because they really do not know

Not comprehending the business you’re really in

Venturing too far from your areas of expertise

Thinking that the rules of corporate protocol did not apply to them

Misplaced priorities and timelines

Making financial yardsticks the only barometers

Wrong relationships with investors… letting angels call too many shots

Getting bad advice from the wrong people, mainly other tech professionals

Rationalizing excuses, ‘the rules have changed’

Feeling entitled to success and exemptions from business realities

Copycats of others’ perceived successes

Working long and hard, but not necessarily smart

Failure to contextualize the product, business, marketplace and bigger picture

Inability to plan

Refusal to change

Most of these pitfalls are common to so many industries. They simply were focused upon tech companies from 1994-2000 because they were the latest flavor. Some heeded the advice of myself and others… many did not avail themselves.

Reasons why some want to grow beyond their current boundaries:

Prove to someone else that they can do it

Strong quest for revenue and profits

Corporate arrogance and ego, based upon power and influence (as well as money)

Sincere desire to put expertise into new arena

Really have talents, resources and adaptabilities beyond what they’re known for

Diversifying as part of a plan of expansion, selling off and re-growing subsidiaries

The marketplace dictates change as part of the company’s global being

Circumstances under which they expand include:

Advantageous location became available

Someone wanted to sell out… a great deal was tough to pass up

Can’t sit still… must conquer new horizons

Think they can make more money, amass more power

Desire to edge out a competitor or dominate another industry

Create jobs for existing employees (new challenges, new opportunities)

Part of their growth strategy to go public, offering stock as a diversified company

This is what often happens as a result of unplanned growth:

The original business gets shoved to the back burner

The new business thrust gets proportionately more than its share of attention

Capitalization is stretched beyond limits, and operations advance in a cash-poor mode

Morale wavers and becomes uneven, per operating unit and division

Attempts to bring consistency and uniformity drive further wedges into the operation

Something has to give: people, financial resources, competitive edge, company vision

The company expands and subsequently contracts without strategic planning

7 Defeating Signs for Growth Companies

Systems are not in place to handle rapid growth, perhaps never were

Their only interest is in booking more new business, rather than taking care of what they’ve already got

Management is relying upon financial people as the primary source of advice, while ignoring the rest of the picture (90 percent)

Team empowerment suffers. Morale is low or uneven. Commitment from workers drops because no corporate culture was created or sustained

Customer service suffers during fast-growth periods. They have to back-pedal and recover customer confidence by doing surveys. Even with results of deteriorating customer service, growth-track companies pay lip service to really fixing their own problems

People do not have the same Vision as the company founder… who has likely not taken enough time to fully develop a Vision and obtain buy-in from others

Company founder remains arrogant and complacent, losing touch with marketplace realities and changing conditions

Everything we are in business stems from what we’ve been taught or not taught to date. A career is all about devoting resources to amplifying talents and abilities, with relevancy toward a viable end result.

Business evolution is an amalgamation of thoughts, technologies, approaches and commitment of the people, asking such tough questions as:

What would you like for you and your organization to become?

How important is it to build an organization well, rather than constantly spend time in managing conflict?

Who are the customers?

Do successful corporations operate without a strategy-vision?

Do you and your organization presently have a strategy-vision?

Are businesses really looking for creative ideas? Why?

If no change occurs, is the research and self-reflection worth anything?

Failure to prepare for the future spells certain death for businesses and industries in which they function. The same analogies apply to personal lives, careers and Body of Work. Greater business awareness and heightened self-awareness are compatible and part of a holistic journey of growth.

Business is in transition… with unclear anchoring of where they’ve been and where they could head. Young and mid-level workers do not really know what it takes to succeed long-term and been.

About the Author

Power Stars to Light the Business Flame, by Hank Moore, encompasses a full-scope business perspective, invaluable for the corporate and small business markets. It is a compendium book, containing quotes and extrapolations into business culture, arranged in 76 business categories.

Hank’s latest book functions as a ‘PDR of business,’ a view of Big Picture strategies, methodologies and recommendations. This is a creative way of re-treading old knowledge to enable executives to master change rather than feel as they’re victims of it.

Power Stars to Light the Business Flame is now out in all three e-book formats: iTunes, Kindle, and Nook.

FREE StrategyDriven Trial Membership

Start your FREE trial membership* and receive:

FULL ACCESS to StrategyDriven’s premium content for 14 days

FREE COPY of a StrategyDriven Expert Contributor book†

EVALUATE how StrategyDriven gives you a competitive advantage



* Free 14 day trial included with a monthly membership registration. A monthly recurring subscription of $9.95 will begin after the initial 14 day trial period. Memberships can be cancelled at any time. Premium Member access will continue until the free/paid subscription expires.

† Available only to those living within the United States after the first monthly membership payment is received. Name and address information required. Books typically valued from $14.95 – $29.95 USD. Book value is not guaranteed.

You just finished reading The Big Picture of Business - The Fatal Flaws of Corporate Thinking! Consider leaving a comment!

If you enjoyed this article, let us keep you up-to-date on other newly published insights by signing up for our complimentary
StrategyDriven Newsletter

Copyright 2007-2015 by StrategyDriven Enterprises, LLC. This content is intended for personal and non-commercial use only. All rights reserved.

Please consider the environment before and after printing this article.

The post The Big Picture of Business – The Fatal Flaws of Corporate Thinking appeared first on StrategyDriven.

Relate Articles:

The Big Picture of Business: Business Strategy – Quotes on Business

The Big Picture of Business – Developing The Talent for Business to Succeed

The Big Picture of Business – Achieving the Best by Preparing for the Worst: Lessons Learned from High-Profile Crises, part 1 of 4

The Big Picture of Business – Avoid the Tired, Trite Terms: Encourage Original Thought, Focus on Priorities and Strategy

The Big Picture of Business – Diversity is Important for Business

Show more