Smashinglife.co.uk

Skeptical editing of Wikipedia has gotten some attention in the media lately. I covered part of it in my piece on skeptic complaints. I am working on a longer post that digs into the entire history of how Rupert Sheldrake and a handful of paranormal...

I wasn’t planning on doing another post about picking editors, but a couple of great comments and questions brought up a few more issues I want to touch on. *smile* Last week, we talked about the different kinds of editing and editors. Whether or not...

On controversial issues Wikipedia can only be expected to lag behind rather than lead public discussion.  On issues like the origin of Aids debate, Wikipedia can only be expected to reflect those institutional interests.  Any headway against those interests...

‎Komentar: typos ← Older revision Revision as of 13:42, 2 November 2013 Line 78: Line 78:   :::Btw. ja se vraćam doma, a vi nastavite ovdje po starom! Cpećno ca sh.wiki! --[[User:Jure Grm|<font color="Gold">'''Jure'''</font...

Expanding ← Older revision Revision as of 02:41, 11 November 2012 Line 1: Line 1: == Proposal of Application Process == == Proposal of Application Process == − Hey guys - since the beginning of Nookipedia, staff members have been promoted based...