2016-03-24



As the House of Representatives moved the motion on the

need for the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board,

JAMB, to revert to Paper Pencil Test, it is imperative as

stakeholders to recapitulate the pains and gains of

Computer Based Test, CBT and Paper Pencil Test, PPT.

Between 1978 to 2012, JAMB had conducted yearly, its

national examinations on a single Saturday using paper

pencil. Thus, for 34 years, the records were there for

stakeholders to cross-check the good, the bad and the ugly

of JAMB.

However, in 2013, the Professor Dibu Ojerinde’s

administration introduced the computer based test,

explaining that it will correct the deficiency of the paper

pencil test. Having experimented the CBT for just four years,

the result is also out for all to see.

Paper examination

It would be recall that last Thursday, the House of

Representatives urged the Federal Government to direct

JAMB to suspend the computer based 2016 Unified Tertiary

Matriculation Examination test.

The lawmaker while moving the motion said there is need

for JAMB to revert to the paper examination until the board

is ready to conduct a hitch-free Computer Based Test (CBT).

It was reported that while some candidates were getting

conflicting scores in the 2016 JAMB, others were

complaining of malfunctioning computers, double-option

answers and sudden short down of systems causing

absurdities that placed some candidates at a disadvantaged

position.

Curbing malpractice: However, before reverting to the

paper pencil test, some stakeholders who are calling for

patience with the Board, urged Nigerians to consider the

advantages and disadvantages PPT and CBT.

In his reactions, Mr. Abayomi Moody, a retired teacher who

once taught at Federal Government College, Lagos said, he

has experienced both PPT and CBT, as a teacher and as a

parent.

“When I took my son to write JAMB at Tolu Complex in

Ajegunle, about 5 years ago, it was Herculean. We were

there before seven but the exams did not commence till

about 10.

“While I waited for my son to finish I saw young men outside

sending answers as text messages to students inside. I didn’t

understand what was going on at first, till some of the

students finished, came out and were complaining to the

men that the answers were not correct or not for their type.

It shocked me.’’

He continued: “Now I have brought my twins for CBT and I

am most impressed that nothing of that nature is taking

place. The students are on their own in there, left to rely on

their abilities.

‘’With this CBT, students will sit up and study hard knowing

that there would be no short cut to success.’’

On his part, Dr. Shina Akintolure, an education consultant,

and lecturer at the Department of Science and Technology

Education, Lagos State University said: “Before now, the pen

and paper was super,but in the last 10 to 12 years, the rate

of examination malpractice in Nigeria has been on the

increase, as such it is the main reason why JAMB introduced

CBT.’’

He, however, noted that the awareness campaign of CBT is

not enough because students have not been well trained.

”If JAMB can go back to the drawing board and get it right, I

believe CBT will delve in the right direction,” he added.

Meanwhile, a specialist in Higher Education, Science,

Computer and Environmental Education, Professor Peter

Okebukola in his submission said that the inertia to change

is part of life, adding that over time, human systems adjust

to change as the forces of homeostasis kick in.

According to him, the CBT of UTME is a classic example of

this inertia, noting that in the he last two weeks, public

comments have underlined the merits and demerits of the

innovation which the Ojerinde-led JAMB recently introduced.

He, however, argued that Professor Dibu Ojerinde and his

staff should be commended for the far-sighted innovation.

Far-sighted innovation

The former NUC Scribe said: “The demerits of a full-scale

CBT have been loudly canvassed to include weak

technological infrastructure to support CBT on a large scale

in Nigeria at this time, and the low level of ICT literacy of

potential UTME candidates.

Irregular power supply: “Irregular power supply is another

important element in the arsenal of people shooting down

the idea of a full-blast CBT. Coincidentally, the worsening

state of power supply met with the lament of President

Buhari during the just-concluded retreat of the National

Economic Council.”

According to him, in spite of these handicaps, Nigerians

need to be far-sighted in our approach and pitch our

position on a number of emerging scenarios.

“We are training undergraduates for an ICT-dominated 21st

century, hence they should encourage all those who wish to

take advantage of university education in Nigeria to be

prepared for such a world through improving their

computer-literacy skills before they obtain the form for the

UTME.

“The second scenario is that the Nigerian university system

has capacity for only about a third of eligible candidates. It

has more than enough to absorb hence it makes intuitive

sense to select only the very best with ability to take the

selection examination via the platform of a computer being

a selection criterion.

“The third scenario is that not less than half of those who

claim they cannot use the computer during the CBT, use

devices such as smart phones and are fluent in the use of

these devices which require just a little tweaking to upgrade

their computer skills. They complain when they score

abysmally in the UTME and find a scapegoat to blame-

Ojerinde’s CBT.

“I queue up stoutly behind those who want the CBT to stay.

There are two key advantages of not going back on the CBT

mode of conducting UTME.

Advantages

“First, it will catalyse the attainment of a higher degree of

computer literacy by potential undergraduates of Nigerian

universities. “Secondly, it will reduce to the barest minimum,

cases of examination malpractice in the conduct of the

UTME.

“With all the glitches which popped up during the conduct of

the 2016 UTME, my recommendation is for JAMB to regard

the deadline of 2016 for stopping the paper-and-pencil

mode of UTME as the “yellow card” and set 2018 for the “red

card” when there will not be any form of paper-and-pencil

testing.

“The two-year grace period will allow JAMB to dot its “I”s and

cross its “t”s. It will allow JAMB to do an accurate census of

centres that can conduct near hitch-free CBT and clean up all

the bugs (errors) in the software for the CBT delivery

system.”

go back to paper and pencil – reps tells jamb

Reps Wants JAMB To Return To Pencil- Paper UTME

JAMB CBT exam will get beter- jamb official

fed government should scrap NUC for non performance of duty — DVC

JAMB registration Closing Date 2016/17

JAMB CBT: Education Minister Expresses Concern Over Candidates Who Are Not Computer Literate

NECO adopts CBT for objective examinations

Update on Unizik post utme form and requirement 2016/2017

Show more