2016-03-23



Colorado State is recruiting well and heading into a new, on-campus stadium in 2017.

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. Taking a big swing

Hughes Stadium's days are numbered. Picturesque and isolated, it has served as the off-campus home of Colorado State football since 1968, when it replaced a tiny, on-campus facility called Colorado Field.

Its 49th season will be its last. The Rams are scheduled to move into a new, large stadium in the southern portion of campus in 2017. Construction is ongoing.

The short version

(Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports)

2016 projected wins: 5.7

Projected S&P+ ranking: 96 (8 in Mountain West)

5-year recruiting ranking: 86 (4 in Mountain West)

Biggest strength: Assuming a potentially iffy passing game doesn't get in the way, the running game will be one of the conference's best.

Biggest question mark: The defensive line features a scary lack of depth.

Biggest 2016 game: Utah State (Oct. 8). A win would put CSU at 4-2 or 5-1 and all but lock up a bowl bid. A fourth loss in five tries against the Aggies might make .500 dicey.

Summary: Colorado State is recruiting well and heading into a new, on-campus stadium in 2017. The Rams seem invested in a happy future, but 2016 might be a transition year of sorts thanks to inexperience in the receiving corps and on the defensive line.

Hughes Stadium is a symbol of Colorado State's past. The Rams have long been a sturdy mid-major program, attending 14 bowls in 26 years and finishing in the AP top 20 three times between 1994-00. But the program grew stale in the 2000s, finishing above .500 only once between 2004-12. In 2013, serious discussions for a new stadium -- a $200 million breath of life, basically -- began.

We can debate whether a project like this is ever really worth it. While on-campus stadiums are easier for students to access (and could therefore generate more of an active, vocal crowd), $200 million is a lot to spend on a bigger stadium before you can actually prove you can fill it. And with CSU likely stuck in the Mountain West for the far foreseeable future, it will probably take a while for the new stadium to truly pay off.

Regardless, the tentatively named Colorado State Stadium is a clear sign of investment, and it is a signal of the future Colorado State wants. Like so many other programs, the Rams would probably love a shot at entry into the Big 12, but they do not appear to be top candidates at the moment. Still, they appear more than interested in attempting to compete with conference heavyweight Boise State in the program-building department.

That the erection of the stadium has coincided with an actual rebuild of the team makes that vision a little clearer and, seemingly, more realistic. Under Jim McElwain, the Rams went 18-9 in 2013-14 and enjoyed their first 10-win season in 13 years. When McElwain took the Florida job, they replaced him with another successful SEC offensive coordinator, Georgia's Mike Bobo.

In 2015, CSU took a step backwards, but not a significant one. After a 2-4 start to the season, Bobo's Rams whipped eventual MWC Mountain champion Air Force, lost to San Diego State, then won four games in a row to finish the regular season 7-5. They finished with a tough, lucky win over Fresno State and a bowl loss to Nevada, but they sustained enough of McElwain's gains to attend a third straight bowl game.

Meanwhile, Bobo was putting together CSU's best recruiting class in a long time. Per the 247Sports Composite, CSU's February class ranked second in the MWC and 70th overall. It was the Rams' best class since 2011; over the previous four recruiting cycles, even while building a solid program, CSU's average class rankings were eighth in the MWC and 103rd overall.

Bobo signed 17 three-star recruits and added a load of junior college transfers to account for turnover at receiver and in the secondary. His receiving corps and defensive line will still be as green as their uniforms this fall, but with as few as two to three senior starters on offense and four to five on defense, the Rams that enter Colorado State Stadium against Abilene Christian on September 9, 2017, will be seasoned and, potentially, quite strong.

2016 is basically an interim year before Colorado State's future begins in 2017. With eight opponents projected 80th or worse in S&P+, the Rams will have a solid chance of reaching the postseason for the fourth straight year, but since they're projected at only 96th themselves, that's not a given. But recruiting is looking good, and the depth chart is young.



2015 Schedule & Results

Record: 7-6 | Adj. Record: 5-8 | Final F/+ Rk: 86 | Final S&P+ Rk: 81

Date

Opponent

Opp. F/+ Rk

Score

W-L

Percentile
Performance

Win
Expectancy

vs. S&P+

Performance
vs. Vegas

5-Sep

Savannah State

N/A

65-13

W

93%

100%

+25.6

12-Sep

Minnesota

55

20-23

L

44%

60%

-1.3

+3.0

19-Sep

vs. Colorado

94

24-27

L

35%

53%

-9.7

0.0

26-Sep

at UTSA

111

33-31

W

22%

32%

-9.3

-7.0

3-Oct

at Utah State

53

18-33

L

12%

3%

-16.0

-10.5

10-Oct

Boise State

37

10-41

L

4%

0%

-20.8

-15.5

17-Oct

Air Force

63

38-23

W

87%

99%

+20.3

+18.0

31-Oct

San Diego State

43

17-41

L

34%

16%

-20.8

-20.5

7-Nov

at Wyoming

115

26-7

W

86%

100%

+9.4

+7.5

14-Nov

UNLV

105

49-35

W

69%

98%

+0.9

+6.5

21-Nov

at New Mexico

99

28-21

W

65%

92%

-1.3

+5.0

28-Nov

at Fresno State

103

34-31

W

14%

16%

-7.4

-6.5

29-Dec

vs. Nevada

97

23-28

L

39%

55%

-13.1

-8.0

Category

Offense

Rk

Defense

Rk

S&P+

29.5

60

31.6

88

Points Per Game

29.6

62

27.2

64

2. Clear improvement (in spurts)

Colorado State spent a good portion of 2015 losing games it should have won and winning games it should have lost. Win Expectancy tosses all of the key stats from a given game into the air and says, "With these stats, you would have won this game X percent of the time." CSU's win expectancy against Minnesota was 60 percent, and the Rams lost, 23-20. It was 53 percent in a 27-24 loss to Colorado. And in the bowl loss to Nevada, it was 55 percent.

Meanwhile, win expectancy was just 32 percent in the two-point win over UTSA and a paltry 16 percent in the win over Fresno. That's a lot of contrary results, though in the end, the actual win total of seven was about right.

After a romp over ratings skewer Savannah State in the season opener, CSU trailed off quickly. The tight losses to Minnesota and Colorado were followed by increasingly disappointing performances against UTSA, Utah State, and Boise State. But there was clear growth over the second half of the year.

Average Percentile Performance (games 2-6): 23% (~top 100) | Average score: Opp 31, CSU 21

Average Percentile Performance (games 7-13): 56% (~top 55) | Average score: CSU 32, Opp 26

The offense took a clear step forward with the emergence of freshman running back Izzy Matthews. During the first seven games, he rushed just 24 times for 104 yards (4.3 per carry), but in the final six he rushed 73 times for 486 (6.7). Along with the steady production of Dalyn Dawkins, that helped CSU to improve from 164 rushing yards per game through eight to 251 over the final five.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE

Raw Category

Rk

Opp. Adj. Category

Rk

EXPLOSIVENESS

IsoPPP

1.20

96

IsoPPP+

102.5

57

EFFICIENCY

Succ. Rt.

47.1%

17

Succ. Rt. +

112.0

25

FIELD POSITION

Def. Avg. FP

27.4

21

Def. FP+

28.3

43

FINISHING DRIVES

Pts. Per Scoring Opportunity

4.2

88

Redzone S&P+

110.5

34

TURNOVERS

EXPECTED

25.2

ACTUAL

27

+1.8

Category

Yards/
Game Rk

S&P+ Rk

Success
Rt. Rk

PPP+ Rk

OVERALL

47

43

25

57

RUSHING

33

40

17

63

PASSING

61

50

45

58

Standard Downs

40

25

50

Passing Downs

69

32

83

Q1 Rk

38

1st Down Rk

55

Q2 Rk

73

2nd Down Rk

47

Q3 Rk

42

3rd Down Rk

69

Q4 Rk

45

3. Pragmatism!

By the end of his tenure as Georgia's offensive coordinator, Bobo was one of the best play-callers in the business. He was pragmatic and logical, and while "Fire Bobo!" was an ongoing Internet meme, it became more of a parody as time went on. Georgia established the run, baited defenses into overcommitting, then hit them with a devastating mix of screens and vertical passing. And when the run game wasn't quite as effective, he was able to isolate receivers and defenders and create relatively easy passes on passing downs.

Bobo brought a familiar face with him to Fort Collins. His first offensive coordinator was Georgia's former offensive line coach, Will Friend.

While it took a little while, by the end of the season Bobo and Friend had figured some things out. CSU finished 25th in Success Rate+ and 17th in Rushing Success Rate+, and while big plays were a bit of an issue -- the Rams had 63 gains of 20-plus yards, 53rd in FBS -- CSU's offense was actually more efficient than Georgia's.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2016 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player

Ht, Wt

2016
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Comp

Att

Yards

TD

INT

Comp
Rate

Sacks

Sack Rate

Yards/
Att.

Nick Stevens

6'3, 205

Jr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.8356

211

347

2679

21

12

60.8%

15

4.1%

7.1

Coleman Key

21

44

251

3

3

47.7%

2

4.3%

5.1

Faton Bauta

6'2, 220

Sr.

3 stars (5.7)

0.8799

15

33

154

0

4

45.5%

1

2.9%

4.4

J.C. Robles

6'5, 200

RSFr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.8036

Collin Hill

6'5, 225

Fr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8497

Running Back

Player

Pos.

Ht, Wt

2016
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Rushes

Yards

TD

Yards/
Carry

Hlt Yds/
Opp.

Opp.
Rate

Fumbles

Fum.
Lost

Dalyn Dawkins

RB

5'9, 175

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8375

170

867

2

5.1

4.3

43.5%

5

5

Jasen Oden, Jr.

RB

154

746

6

4.8

4.1

34.4%

2

2

Izzy Matthews

RB

6'0, 215

So.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8174

97

590

5

6.1

5.6

46.4%

0

0

Nick Stevens

QB

6'3, 205

Jr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.8356

30

128

3

4.3

2.6

46.7%

4

2

Deionte Gaines

WR

5'8, 180

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8449

12

138

2

11.5

6.8

83.3%

2

0

Craig Leonard

QB

9

43

0

4.8

1.6

55.6%

0

0

Deron Thompson

RB

7

49

0

7.0

5.1

57.1%

0

0

Treyous Jarrells

RB

7

28

0

4.0

6.5

14.3%

0

0

Nu'uvali Fa'apito

FB

4

4

2

1.0

0.0

0.0%

0

0

Danny Nwosu

FB

6'3, 245

Sr.

NR

0.7868

Bryce Peters

RB

5'11, 205

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8000

Johnathan Lewis

RB

5'11, 190

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7893

Rashaad Boddie

RB

6'0, 225

Fr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8256

Marvin Kinsey

RB

6'1, 190

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8100

4. Efficiency despite youth

Quarterback Nick Stevens was a sophomore, Dalyn Dawkins was a sophomore, Izzy Matthews was a freshman, and CSU began the season with a line that featured two sophomores and two juniors. There were upperclassmen involved, too -- the top three receivers (including all-star receiver Rashard Higgins), right tackle Sam Carlson, No. 2 running back Jasen Oden Jr. -- but the offense's slow start was relatively predictable.

The passing game is obviously a concern moving forward; Higgins, Joe Hansley, and tight ends Kivon Cartwright and Steven Walker are gone after accounting for 136 catches and 1,996 yards last year. But the strength of the offense last year was the run, and the main pieces are all back.

Matthews showed star power as a true freshman, and Dawkins rushed for at least 90 yards in five games. (In terms of targets, he was also CSU's No. 4 receiver.) Plus, a line that ranked an incredible 16th in Adj. Line Yards and 17th in Adj. Sack Rate returns four-fifths of its lineup, including all-conference guard Fred Zerblis.

There's a lot to like here, and one just assumes that Bobo and Friend will be able to establish the run once more this fall. But at some point, they'll have to call pass plays. That's when the problems could begin.

Receiving Corps

Player

Pos.

Ht, Wt

2016
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Targets

Catches

Yards

Catch Rate

Target
Rate

Yds/
Target

%SD

Success
Rate

IsoPPP

Rashard Higgins

WR

106

75

1062

70.8%

28.7%

10.0

61.3%

63.2%

1.49

Joe Hansley

WR

56

28

415

50.0%

15.2%

7.4

57.1%

41.1%

1.81

Kivon Cartwright

TE

35

18

279

51.4%

9.5%

8.0

60.0%

45.7%

1.68

Dalyn Dawkins

RB

5'9, 175

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8375

34

24

178

70.6%

9.2%

5.2

47.1%

32.4%

1.43

Xavier Williams

WR

6'4, 215

Jr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.7000

33

19

231

57.6%

8.9%

7.0

57.6%

45.5%

1.49

Steven Walker

TE

22

15

240

68.2%

6.0%

10.9

72.7%

54.5%

1.88

Jordon Vaden

WR

6'3, 195

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.8301

22

11

184

50.0%

6.0%

8.4

77.3%

40.9%

1.81

Deionte Gaines

WR

5'8, 180

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8449

19

13

112

68.4%

5.1%

5.9

78.9%

36.8%

1.47

Sammie Long IV

WR

6'3, 195

Jr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.8410

9

5

60

55.6%

2.4%

6.7

44.4%

44.4%

1.32

Jasen Oden, Jr.

RB

8

8

51

100.0%

2.2%

6.4

75.0%

75.0%

0.68

Nu'uvali Fa'apito

FB

6

5

19

83.3%

1.6%

3.2

100.0%

50.0%

0.60

Elroy Masters, Jr.

WR

6'2, 210

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.7933

3

3

35

100.0%

0.8%

11.7

66.7%

66.7%

1.88

Nolan Peralta

TE

6'3, 245

Sr.

NR

0.7000

3

2

26

66.7%

0.8%

8.7

66.7%

33.3%

1.87

Olabisi Johnson

WR

6'0, 185

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8073

3

2

15

66.7%

0.8%

5.0

33.3%

66.7%

0.89

John Freismuth

WR

6'4, 220

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7726

Trey Smith

WR

6'0, 190

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7659

Michael Gallup

WR

6'2, 210

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8428

Dalton Fackrell

TE

6'4, 240

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8231

Darneail Jenkins

TE

6'5, 240

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8315

Isiah Pannunzio

TE

6'2, 215

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8181

Anthony Hawkins

WR

5'11, 185

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8149

5. A reload in the receiving corps

There will at least be some familiar faces for Stevens in the receiving corps. Xavier Williams, Jordon Vaden, and Deionte Gaines were not huge pieces of the passing game in 2015, but they have combined for 109 catches and 1,323 yards in their respective careers. Sammie Long IV and Elroy Masters have combined for 19 more career catches.

Still, in Higgins, CSU must replace one of the nation's most prolific receivers. Over three seasons, Higgins caught 239 passes for 3,649 yards and 31 scores; his transcendent 2014 season was one of the main reasons for CSU's 10-win surge. His opportunities trailed off a bit in 2015's run-first attack, but defenses had to mind him at all times.

Some combination of veterans and incoming JUCOs -- three-star wideout Michael Gallup (one of the more highly-regarded pieces of this past signing class) and tight ends Dalton Fackrell and Darneall Jenkins -- will have to figure out how to punish defenses for getting distracted by the run. The athleticism here seems relatively impressive, but production isn't guaranteed. And Stevens' ability to find some play-makers open will determine whether this is a top-40 offense or a top-75 offense. The run game will be awesome if defenses have to mind the passing game, and while I have the utmost confidence in Bobo and Friend, they can only do so much if receivers don't step up.

Offensive Line

Category

Adj.
Line Yds

Std.
Downs
LY/carry

Pass.
Downs
LY/carry

Opp.
Rate

Power
Success
Rate

Stuff
Rate

Adj.
Sack Rate

Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Team

112

3.34

3.58

42.5%

72.5%

18.2%

170.9

2.3%

5.6%

Rank

16

9

32

24

30

45

17

16

27

Player

Pos.

Ht, Wt

2016
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

2015 Starts

Career Starts

Honors/Notes

Fred Zerblis

RG

6'3, 295

Sr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7000

13

26

2015 2nd All-MWC

Sam Carlson

RT

13

26

Jake Bennett

C

6'3, 295

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7993

13

16

Nick Callender

LT

6'5, 315

Sr.

NR

0.7000

10

13

Zack Golditch

LG

6'6, 290

Jr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7685

12

12

Kevin O'Brien

C

2

12

Trae Moxley

LT

6'5, 320

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7998

2

2

Colby Meeks

LG

6'4, 300

So.

2 stars (5.3)

0.8008

0

0

Tomas Rivera

RG

6'6, 330

Sr.

2 stars (5.2)

NR

0

0

Brett Jordan

RT

6'5, 275

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.7000

0

0

Christian Montes

OL

6'4, 270

Sr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7926

0

0

Nicho Garcia

OL

6'5, 300

Jr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8174

Jeff Taylor

OL

6'3, 295

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8026

SIGN UP FOR OUR COLLEGE FOOTBALL NEWSLETTER

Get all kinds of college football stories, rumors, game coverage, and Jim Harbaugh oddity in your inbox every day.

Email:

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE

Raw Category

Rk

Opp. Adj. Category

Rk

EXPLOSIVENESS

IsoPPP

1.34

101

IsoPPP+

86.2

110

EFFICIENCY

Succ. Rt.

40.7%

62

Succ. Rt. +

91.0

100

FIELD POSITION

Off. Avg. FP

30.7

48

Off. FP+

29.2

87

FINISHING DRIVES

Pts. Per Scoring Opportunity

4.5

78

Redzone S&P+

100.5

69

TURNOVERS

EXPECTED

15.7

ACTUAL

15.0

-0.7

Category

Yards/
Game Rk

S&P+ Rk

Success
Rt. Rk

PPP+ Rk

OVERALL

55

106

100

110

RUSHING

107

102

98

111

PASSING

9

91

104

81

Standard Downs

88

75

93

Passing Downs

124

126

125

Q1 Rk

92

1st Down Rk

110

Q2 Rk

104

2nd Down Rk

38

Q3 Rk

102

3rd Down Rk

128

Q4 Rk

96

6. One year, one coordinator replacement

You figure Bobo knew he wasn't going to have Tyson Summers for very long. He brought the up-and-coming former UCF defensive coordinator with him in 2015, and after just one season, Summers was named Georgia Southern's head coach.

Bobo didn't search too far for a replacement, simply choosing to promote linebackers coach Marty English. English was Wyoming's defensive coordinator from 2009-11 and has been a linebackers coach at one school or another for much of three decades.

Linebackers were certainly a strength for CSU in 2015 -- the Rams were seventh in the country in Linebacker Havoc Rate-- and that should remain the case with five of six contributors returning. But CSU still ranked just 88th in Def. S&P+ because a dreadful inability to keep opponents from catching back up to the chains. CSU was 124th in Passing Downs S&P+, allowing 62 gains of 20-plus yards (77th in FBS but far worse if you were to adjust for opponent).

English will have a more experienced secondary to work with, and the line does feature five former three-star recruits (per 247). But four are either true or redshirt freshmen, and the fifth, junior Darnell Thompson, has made 0.5 tackles in two seasons. The top four tacklers up front are all gone.

Defensive Line

Category

Adj.
Line Yds

Std.
Downs
LY/carry

Pass.
Downs
LY/carry

Opp.
Rate

Power
Success
Rate

Stuff
Rate

Adj.
Sack Rate

Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Team

94.4

2.82

3.25

40.5%

58.8%

22.7%

92.8

5.7%

7.0%

Rank

89

55

69

89

27

33

78

42

74

Name

Pos

Ht, Wt

2016
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

GP

Tackles

% of Team

TFL

Sacks

Int

PBU

FF

FR

Joe Kawulok

BUCK

13

27.0

3.8%

7.5

4.5

0

2

1

0

SteveO Michel

BUCK

13

25.5

3.6%

9.5

2.5

0

0

0

0

Martavius Foster

DE

13

21.0

3.0%

8.0

5.5

0

3

1

0

Terry Jackson

NT

11

18.0

2.5%

4.0

0.0

0

0

0

0

Josh Lovingood

DE

6'4, 290

Jr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7833

11

11.5

1.6%

1.0

0.0

0

1

0

0

Colton Foster

NT

6'3, 285

So.

2 stars (5.2)

0.7544

7

6.5

0.9%

0.0

0.0

0

0

0

0

Justin Hansen

DT

12

6.0

0.8%

1.0

0.0

0

0

0

0

Jakob Buys

DT

6'4, 265

Jr.

NR

NR

11

5.0

0.7%

0.0

0.0

0

0

0

0

Johnny Schupp

DL

6'5, 275

Sr.

NR

0.7000

12

2.0

0.3%

0.0

0.0

0

0

0

0

Darnell Thompson

DE

6'5, 275

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8316

Richard King

DE

6'5, 260

RSFr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.8200

O'Shea Jackson

DT

6'1, 290

RSFr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7600

Christian Colon

DT

6'3, 310

Fr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8510

Anthony Smith

DE

6'3, 250

Fr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8504

Arjay Dean

DE

6'3, 220

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7994

Toby McBride

DE

6'3, 250

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7893

<!--
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3&appId=133988108997";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore

Show more