The Pac-12 is so tough, a bad team can get better and still look just as bad. How long until there's no doubt about the rebuild?
Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
1. Two years of improvement (believe it or not)
It's cruel when a rebuilding team gets hit with loads of bad luck at once.
The job is hard enough already. Depth and confidence are fragile, and in the Pac-12, you've got nine conference games to deal with; the slate's full of middleweights and heavyweights, and you could use a few more featherweights.
TL;DR
Kelley L Cox-USA TODAY Sports
Projected S&P+ ranking: 75
5-year recruiting ranking: 58
Biggest strength: Sefo Liufau and the passing game have loads of potential.
Biggest question mark: It's been five years since Colorado had a competent defense, so new coordinator Jim Leavitt might need a couple of years.
Biggest 2015 game: Any faint hopes for bowl eligibility likely require winning at Oregon State (Oct. 24).
In two sentences: Colorado improved for a second straight year under Mike MacIntyre, but injuries and bad bounces prevented us from seeing it. What's the ceiling for a healthier, experienced squad in a brutal Pac-12?
In 2013, Mike MacIntyre left one rebuilding job for another.
At San Jose State, he needed only three years to move from 12 losses to 11 wins. His first season was one giant reset button, but his Spartans showed significant growth by year 2, then surged in year 3, winning double-digit games for the first time in 25 years.
MacIntyre's progress in San Jose was so linear that it wasn't hard to assume he would pull off the same act in Boulder. And he has, whether the win column shows it or not.
The Colorado program was at its nadir when MacIntyre took over. Two years with Jon Embree had resulted in a 4-21 record and, in 2012, the worst team in Colorado history according to the SRS ratings (and this is a program that had quite a few sketchy teams before the 1980s). The Buffaloes had no depth, little talent, and no organization.
Embree, a former CU tight end, was a curious hire, a guy who had never even been a coordinator and whose sales pitch in landing the job seemed to be "Hey, remember how awesome we were in the 1980s? I'm going to get the band back together!" Risks are sometimes rewarded, but this one was not. The defense fell apart in his first year, the offense in his second year, and the 2012 Buffaloes were outscored by an average of 28 points and lost four times by at least 44.
MacIntyre has begun to right the ship. Colorado improved from 122nd to 104th in the F/+ ratings in 2013, then improved again to 83rd. The defense hasn't yet come around, but the offense almost had more exciting moments in 2014 than in the previous three years combined. The Buffs averaged 6.9 yards per play against Utah and 6 against Arizona State, and they scored at least 28 points six times, their most since 2007.
Colorado had a mountain to climb, but in 2014, the Buffs had to deal with a downpour on the trail.
As encouraging as the improvement was, the defense assured that there would be no significant progress overall. Already struggling with youth and depth, the line and secondary were obliterated by injury, and in an offense-friendly conference, this defense was friendlier than most. The Buffs allowed at least 6.1 yards per play eight times and at least 36 points 10 times.
And if the injuries weren't cruel enough, CU also got smacked around by the turnover gods (minus-3.6 points per game in turnovers luck) and close game gods (1-4 record in one-possession games).
The rain has let up, but there's still quite a bit of climbing. Quarterback Sefo Liufau returns three efficient targets (including two sophomores), and there's reason to believe the offense could be pretty good. Plus, MacIntyre welcomes back quite a few potential starters from injury and has brought in well-regarded defensive coordinator Jim Leavitt. If luck turns, the Buffs could start quickly and threaten to reach five wins for the first time in five years.
2014 Schedule & Results
Record: 2-10 | Adj. Record: 5-7 | Final F/+ Rk: 83
Date
Opponent
Opp. F/+ Rk
Score
W-L
Percentile
Performance
Adj. Scoring
Margin
Win
Expectancy
29-Aug
vs. Colorado State
49
17-31
L
56%
3.7
19%
6-Sep
at Massachusetts
120
41-38
W
46%
-2.3
41%
13-Sep
Arizona State
27
24-38
L
35%
-8.9
3%
20-Sep
Hawaii
111
21-12
W
85%
24.2
99%
27-Sep
at California
65
56-59
L
42%
-4.6
24%
4-Oct
Oregon State
74
31-36
L
62%
6.9
62%
18-Oct
at USC
16
28-56
L
10%
-30.5
0%
25-Oct
UCLA
12
37-40
L
57%
3.9
27%
1-Nov
Washington
58
23-38
L
40%
-5.9
13%
8-Nov
at Arizona
28
20-38
L
44%
-3.7
17%
22-Nov
at Oregon
3
10-44
L
14%
-25.5
0%
29-Nov
Utah
29
34-38
L
70%
12.5
58%
Category
Offense
Rk
Defense
Rk
S&P+
32.2
42
34.0
101
Points Per Game
28.5
67
39.0
119
2. Defense travels
If you're a believer in the old "defense travels" truism -- meaning, teams with good defenses are more likely to play well on the road (in part because the home crowd is going to be more disruptive of a visitor's offense) -- Colorado was a pretty good example. In five games outside the state of Colorado, the Buffs scored 10, 20, 28, 41 and 56 points, a wild range. The defense, meanwhile, was more consistent.
Note: consistent isn't always good. CU allowed at least 38 points in all five road games and, thanks to the trip to Berkeley, figured out a way to score 56 and lose.
Average Percentile Performance (in state): 58% (~top 55 | average score: Opp 33, CU 27)
Average Percentile Performance (out of state): 31% (~top 90 | average score: Opp 47, CU 31)
The story of the season took shape from there: interesting and unlucky at home, bad on the road.
CU did manage to avoid an upset loss at UMass, and looking at Win Expectancy (which looks at a game's statistical output and says "based on the stats, you would have won this game X times out of 100)", the Buffs were a bit lucky to do so. But the Buffs played at a 50th-percentile level or higher five times, and all five games -- including near-upsets of UCLA and Utah and an unlucky loss to Oregon State -- were in Colorado.
Perhaps that says good things about potential upset bids this fall; CU plays host to Oregon, Arizona, Stanford, and USC in-conference, and maybe the defense will improve just enough for a surprise win there. But the defense has a lot of improving to do to make the Buffs a good traveling team.
Offense
FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category
Rk
Opp. Adj. Category
Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS
IsoPPP
0.76
108
IsoPPP+
99.4
69
EFFICIENCY
Succ. Rt.
43.4%
52
Succ. Rt. +
104.5
53
FIELD POSITION
Def. Avg. FP
31.8
103
Def. FP+
96.0
108
FINISHING DRIVES
Pts. Per Trip in 40
5.0
17
Redzone S&P+
107.4
46
TURNOVERS
EXPECTED
18.9
ACTUAL
21
+2.1
Category
Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk
Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL
40
56
51
69
RUSHING
77
74
75
76
PASSING
20
55
38
69
Standard Downs
53
58
56
Passing Downs
81
47
98
Q1 Rk
44
1st Down Rk
73
Q2 Rk
52
2nd Down Rk
58
Q3 Rk
51
3rd Down Rk
88
Q4 Rk
114
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
Player
Ht, Wt
2015
Year
Rivals
247 Comp.
Comp
Att
Yards
TD
INT
Comp
Rate
Sacks
Sack Rate
Yards/
Att.
Sefo Liufau
6'4, 230
Jr.
3 stars (5.7)
0.8747
325
498
3200
28
15
65.3%
18
3.5%
6.0
Jordan Gehrke
6'1, 195
Jr.
NR
0.7000
20
44
170
0
0
45.5%
4
8.3%
3.1
Cade Apsay
6'2, 190
RSFr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8447
Steven Montez
6'4, 205
Fr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8470
3. The Sefo Show
Colorado fan HQ
Colorado Buffaloes blog The Ralphie Report
Colorado's run game wasn't very good, which is, in a roundabout way, encouraging. The offense returns almost everybody outside of leading rusher (from a carries perspective) Tony Jones and longtime starting guards Daniel Munyer and Kaiwi Crabb, but it's less scary to replace replaceable players.
Michael Adkins II went crazy against USC and UCLA (30 carries, 216 yards), but when the CU offense was good, it was usually because of Sefo Liufau and the passing game. He completed 46 of 67 passes for 455 yards and seven scores against Cal, and if you discount that because it happened against Cal, he also went 20-for-31 for 317 yards against Utah. He showed symptoms of being a young QB, throwing 15 interceptions (eight in five games against ranked teams), but he did a solid job of operating coordinator Brian Lindgren's quick-passing system; he took few sacks, and he completed nearly two-thirds of his passes.
Liufau had his redshirt torn off about one-third of the way through his freshman season, and he's been CU's man ever since. He showed reasonable progress last year, especially considering half of the members in the receiving corps were freshmen. He's got a more experienced supporting cast, so we should learn quite a bit about his ceiling.
Running Back
Player
Pos.
Ht, Wt
2015
Year
Rivals
247 Comp.
Rushes
Yards
TD
Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Opp.
Opp.
Rate
Fumbles
Fum.
Lost
Tony Jones
TB
94
403
3
4.3
4.0
34.0%
0
0
Christian Powell
TB
6'0, 230
Sr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8620
85
448
4
5.3
8.1
28.2%
0
0
Michael Adkins II
TB
5'10, 195
Jr.
2 stars (5.4)
0.7833
82
398
3
4.9
3.7
42.7%
2
1
Phillip Lindsay
TB
5'8, 175
So.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8341
79
391
0
4.9
4.3
39.2%
3
2
Sefo Liufau
QB
6'4, 230
Jr.
3 stars (5.7)
0.8747
51
246
0
4.8
3.9
41.2%
6
3
Donovan Lee
WR
5'8, 170
So.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8320
8
39
0
4.9
22.0
25.0%
0
0
Jordan Gehrke
QB
6'1, 195
Jr.
NR
0.7000
7
38
1
5.4
3.3
57.1%
0
0
Shay Fields
WR
5'11, 170
So.
4 stars (5.8)
0.8615
6
35
1
5.8
3.7
50.0%
0
0
George Frazier
FB
6'2, 245
So.
2 stars (5.4)
0.8199
5
4
1
0.8
N/A
0.0%
0
0
Malcolm Creer
TB
4
8
0
2.0
1.2
25.0%
0
0
Kyle Evans
TB
5'6, 175
RSFr.
NR
NR
Patrick Carr
TB
5'8, 195
Fr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8591
Donald Gordon
TB
5'11, 205
Fr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8410
Receiving Corps
Player
Pos.
Ht, Wt
2015
Year
Rivals
247 Comp.
Targets
Catches
Yards
Catch Rate
Target
Rate
%SD
Yds/
Target
NEY
Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Nelson Spruce
WR-X
6'1, 195
Sr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8332
153
106
1198
69.3%
29.7%
59.5%
7.8
-66
7.8
138.2
Shay Fields
WR-Z
5'11, 170
So.
4 stars (5.8)
0.8615
80
50
486
62.5%
15.5%
56.3%
6.1
-122
6.1
56.1
D.D. Goodson
WR-H
59
38
382
64.4%
11.5%
69.5%
6.5
-77
6.7
44.0
Tyler McCulloch
WR
48
30
419
62.5%
9.3%
47.9%
8.7
54
8.9
48.3
Bryce Bobo
WR-X
6'2, 190
So.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8337
36
23
215
63.9%
7.0%
58.3%
6.0
-63
6.0
24.8
Tony Jones
TB
31
24
151
77.4%
6.0%
35.5%
4.9
-130
4.7
17.4
Donovan Lee
WR-H
5'8, 170
So.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8320
23
13
78
56.5%
4.5%
60.9%
3.4
-83
3.4
9.0
Christian Powell
TB
6'0, 230
Sr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8620
17
12
64
70.6%
3.3%
29.4%
3.8
-79
3.1
7.4
Phillip Lindsay
TB
5'8, 175
So.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8341
16
14
118
87.5%
3.1%
62.5%
7.4
-43
7.6
13.6
Michael Adkins II
RB
5'10, 195
Jr.
2 stars (5.4)
0.7833
16
11
60
68.8%
3.1%
56.3%
3.8
-71
3.7
6.9
Kyle Slavin
TE
14
11
111
78.6%
2.7%
64.3%
7.9
-17
8.0
12.8
Devin Ross (2013)
WR-Z
5'9, 170
So.
3 stars (5.7)
0.8463
13
6
24
46.2%
3.4%
100.0%
1.8
-63
1.0
3.5
Sean Irwin
TE
6'3, 245
Jr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8495
11
7
67
63.6%
2.1%
81.8%
6.1
-18
5.6
7.7
Elijah Dunston
WR-X
6'0, 185
So.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8025
Joseph Hall
WR-H
5'9, 165
So.
NR
NR
Lee Walker
WR-Z
6'0, 175
RSFr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8256
Jay MacIntyre
WR-H
5'10, 185
RSFr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.7000
Dylan Keeney
TE
6'6, 220
RSFr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8442
Hayden Jones
TE
6'6, 245
RSFr.
2 stars (5.4)
0.7757
Justin Jan
WR
6'3, 205
Fr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8479
4. Wanted: a few more options
CU was in the top 40 in Passing Success Rate+ (efficiency) and in the top-50 in Passing Downs Success Rate+. The Buffs were decent at finishing drives with points, as well. This was promising, considering the number of underclassmen, but if you look at the numbers above, you see two areas for improvement:
Big plays. Running back Christian Powell had some explosive moments in the open field, and receiver Tyler McCulloch had a few -- four catches for 76 yards against Oregon State, four for 101 against Utah -- but the Buffs were lacking. Liufau averaged only 9.8 yards per completion, and the top four backs averaged a combined 4.8 yards per carry.
The fourth quarter. CU ranked between 44th and 52nd in Q1, Q2, and Q3 S&P+ ... and 114th in Q4 S&P+. This hints at a lack of options: defenses weren't stressed, and when it came time for close games to be decided, the Buffs had nothing in the tank.
These two issues go hand in hand. Big plays mask weaknesses and prevent you from having to string together 10 decent plays to score. The more snaps you need to score, the fewer cards you need to play. If you've got a precision option offense, that's fine. CU's offense is promising, but it isn't that.
Can this change? Depends on the value of experience -- CU has more, even if there's little proven big-play ability. Senior Nelson Spruce is one of the nation's best possession receivers, but he is what he is; he has averaged between 10.1 and 11.8 yards per catch each year in his career. There's value in a good possession man, but he becomes even more valuable if others can stretch the field. Shay Fields was easily the most well-touted member of CU's receiving corps, but he was used primarily as a possession man as well.
That three of last year's top six wideouts (Fields, Bryce Bobo, Donovan Lee) were freshmen could be beneficial in a couple of ways. First, they are more likely to run full-speed and play without thinking as they get more experienced. Second, they could become more experienced as blockers. This quick-passing attack puts a lot of blocking responsibility on fellow receivers in attempting to turn three-yard passes into 50-yard gains.
It's hard to guarantee big plays will emerge, but there's no reason to think efficiency will lessen.
Offensive Line
Category
Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team
94.1
2.74
3.4
36.5%
56.9%
20.2%
162.2
3.5%
3.8%
Rank
95
92
54
91
117
77
11
33
11
Player
Pos.
Ht, Wt
2015
Year
Rivals
247 Comp.
Career Starts
Honors/Notes
Daniel Munyer
RG
40
Stephane Nembot
RT
6'7, 295
Sr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8410
32
Kaiwi Crabb
LG
24
Alex Kelley
C
6'2, 305
Jr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8363
12
Jeromy Irwin
LT
6'5, 295
Jr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8460
11
Gerrad Kough
LG
6'4, 295
So.
2 stars (5.4)
0.8026
2
Brad Cotner
RG
1
Marc Mustoe
RT
0
Sully Wiefels
LG
6'3, 300
Sr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.7667
0
Shane Callahan
RG
6'6, 300
Jr.
4 stars (5.8)
0.9135
0
Ed Caldwell
RT
6'5, 300
Jr.
NR
NR
0
Jonathan Huckins
RG
6'3, 305
So.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8339
0
Sam Kronshage
LT
6'5, 285
So.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8175
0
Colin Sutton
RG
6'4, 290
So.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8366
0
John Lisella II
LG
6'4, 265
RSFr.
2 stars (5.4)
0.7907
Josh Kaiser
LT
6'5, 270
RSFr.
2 stars (5.3)
0.7700
Tim Lynott, Jr.
OL
6'2, 295
Fr.
3 stars (5.7)
0.8913
Isaac Miller
OL
6'7, 265
Fr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8492
Dillon Middlemiss
RT
6'5, 290
Fr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8382
5. An exciting future up front
Quick passing helped Colorado's sack rates; when the ball's coming out of the quarterback's hand almost instantly, it's hard to sack him.
The run-blocking numbers were pretty awful, though. The Buffs were decent at keeping defenders out of the backfield, but they generated next to no push when they needed to. Of course, a lot of the carries went to a freshman (Philip Lindsay) and a sophomore (Michael Adkins II). That's going to hurt your efficiency, as would the fact that the only explosive back (Christian Powell) was the least efficient.
There were a lot of good vibes regarding redshirt freshman running back Kyle Evans. But assuming the trio of Powell, Adkins, and Lindsay see most of the carries, it will be interesting to see if a less experienced line -- both tackles return, but neither guards do -- will be able to help this experienced trio out.
MacIntyre isn't posting incredible recruiting rankings, but a few of his best recruits thus far have been linemen. That could mean there's hope for the future, especially considering the two-deep won't have more than two seniors. But don't expect immense improvement in 2015.
SIGN UP FOR OUR COLLEGE FOOTBALL NEWSLETTER
Get all kinds of college football stories, rumors, game coverage, and Jim Harbaugh oddity in your inbox every day.
Email:
Defense
FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category
Rk
Opp. Adj. Category
Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS
IsoPPP
1.01
122
IsoPPP+
90.0
99
EFFICIENCY
Succ. Rt.
43.7%
92
Succ. Rt. +
99.3
69
FIELD POSITION
Off. Avg. FP
27.7
114
Off. FP+
100.9
64
FINISHING DRIVES
Pts. Per Trip in 40
5.1
123
Redzone S&P+
90.9
100
TURNOVERS
EXPECTED
17.5
ACTUAL
11.0
-6.5
Category
Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk
Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL
114
86
67
99
RUSHING
104
99
68
108
PASSING
103
72
66
82
Standard Downs
101
81
112
Passing Downs
49
43
55
Q1 Rk
102
1st Down Rk
63
Q2 Rk
78
2nd Down Rk
114
Q3 Rk
88
3rd Down Rk
95
Q4 Rk
27
6. Good on passing downs, couldn't force passing downs
It's a tease when you are able to shut drives down well on second- or third-and-long but rarely get to do it.
Colorado's thin, young, banged-up defense was pretty good at attacking offenses that were leveraged into awkward situations but had one of the worst power-five defenses in the country on standard downs. They also allowed a nearly automatic touchdown once opponents had created scoring opportunities.
It's easier to be optimistic about this defense than it was a year ago. Quite a few players who missed 2014 are back: senior safety Jered Bell, junior end Samson Kafovalu, sophomore tackle Tyler Henington, junior DB Marques Mosley. Plus, a lot more players than expected got experience last year, because seemingly every starter missed at least a couple of games. Only three of seven primary linebackers and two of 10 defensive backs played in all 12 games.
It's also easier to be optimistic because of the new coordinator. Leavitt has spent some time out of the college game, and he comes with some alleged character issues, but his track record is sterling.
A member of the Bill Snyder branch of the Hayden Fry coaching tree, Leavitt was head coach of the USF startup from 1996-2009, winning at least seven games 10 times and taking the Bulls to five consecutive bowls. His Bulls ranked sixth in Def. S&P+ in 2007 and were in the top 40 each year from 2005-09. He spent the last four years coaching for Jim Harbaugh's San Francisco 49ers, and if he has horsepower at his disposal, he'll make the most of it.
We might give Leavitt a mulligan for 2015, however. The Buffs haven't ranked better than 98th in Def. S&P+ since 2010, and while he inherits a unit far more experienced than what CU had last year, issues up front might harm his efforts in installing his 3-4 system.
Defensive Line
Category
Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team
94.6
3.48
3.32
43.1%
62.5%
18.1%
73.6
4.1%
6.3%
Rank
89
121
71
113
35
87
105
81
83
Name
Pos
Ht, Wt
2015
Year
Rivals
247 Comp.
GP
Tackles
% of Team
TFL
Sacks
Int
PBU
FF
FR
Josh Tupou
NT
6'3, 325
Sr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8322
12
26.0
4.0%
4.0
3.0
0
0
0
0
Justin Solis
NT
6'1, 305
Sr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8460
12
17.5
2.7%
1.5
1.0
0
0
0
0
Juda Parker
DT
12
16.0
2.4%
1.5
1.5
0
0
0
0
Samson Kafovalu (2013)
DE
6'5, 245
Jr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8417
7
10.5
1.4%
5.5
3.0
0
0
0
0
Christian Shaver
DE
6'3, 235
So.
2 stars (5.4)
0.7889
12
8.5
1.3%
1.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
George Frazier
DE
6'2, 245
So.
2 stars (5.4)
0.8199
10
7.5
1.1%
1.0
0.0
0
1
0
0
Tyler Henington (2013)
DT
6'2, 245
Jr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8684
12
7.0
1.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
Eddy Lopez
NT
6'4, 300
So.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8020
11
5.0
0.8%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
Clay Norgard
DT
6'0, 240
Jr.
3 stars (5.6)
0.8510
11
2.0
0.3%
1.0
1.0
0
0
0
0
Jase Franke
DE
6'4, 270
RSFr.
2 stars (5.4)
0.8382
Jordan Carrell
DT
6'3, 275
Jr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8398
Blake Robbins
DE
6'5, 265
Jr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8159
Linebackers
Name
Pos
Ht, Wt
2015
Year
Rivals
247 Comp.
GP
Tackles
% of Team
TFL
Sacks
Int
PBU
FF
FR
Kenneth Olugbode
ILB
6'0, 210
Jr.
2 stars (5.3)
0.7885
12
63.5
9.7%
1.0
0.0
0
3
0
0
Addison Gillam
ILB
6'3, 225
Jr.
2 stars (5.2)
0.7200
11
50.5
7.7%
9.0
3.5
0
1
0
0
Brady Daigh
ILB
10
36.0
5.5%
6.0
1.0
0
0
0
0
Jimmie Gilbert
OLB
6'4, 230
Jr.
3 stars (5.5)
0.8423
12
23.5
3.6%
5.5
2.5
0
0
1
0
Derek McCartney
OLB
6'3, 240
So.
2 stars (5.2)
0.7511
12
21.0
3.2%
6.0
4.5
0
1
2
0
Woodson Greer III
OLB
7
13.5
2.1%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
Ryan Severson
ILB
5'10, 200
Jr.
2 stars (5.3)
0.7901
6
13.0
2.0%
1.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
Timothy Coleman
OLB
6'2, 250
So.
2 stars (5.3)
0.7752
11
7.5
1.1%
2.0
2.0
0
1
0
0
De'Jon Wilson
OLB
6'3, 250
<