2015-03-23



The 128-team countdown takes on what's becoming one of the country's most talented mid-majors.

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. The unsafe choice, one year in

Judging by the Owls' performance under [interim coach Brian] Wright [in 2013], it would have been understandable if FAU had just given him the full-time keys. His guidance of the program was better than his guidance of the offense, and with solid returning talent, he could have engineered a strong 2014. Granted, he only had a month of experience as FAU's head coach, but he proved quite a bit.

The Owls took a bigger risk, giving the job to 40-year-old Charlie Partridge. A Plantation, Fla., native, Partridge spent the last six years as a Bret Bielema assistant. He is known as an ace recruiter with all sorts of Florida ties, and he has backed up those claims by already locking down two high-profile commitments.

The odds are good that his recruiting ability will help build the Owls into one of the more purely athletic teams in Conference USA. What we don't know yet is whether he'll be able to coach.

In choosing a successor for Carl Pelini, FAU went after a high-ceiling, unknown-floor guy in Charlie Partridge. Brian Wright had engineered four straight wins and a 6-6 finish for the Owls in 2013, but bringing an ace recruiter to a school in Florida sounded like too much of an opportunity to pass up.

TL;DR

Robert Mayer-USA TODAY Sports

2014 F/+ ranking and record: 100 (3-9)

5-year recruiting ranking: 94

Biggest strength: Quarterback Jaquez Johnson is exciting and increasingly efficient

Biggest question mark: Run defense was a shambles last year

Biggest 2015 game: at Tulsa (Sept. 5)

In one sentence: Head coach Charlie Partridge was hired with his recruiting prowess in mind, and he produced the second-best Conference USA class right out of the gates; can he produce on-field results?

One year in, the jury's still out. The offense took a step forward, but the defense regressed, and the product did not match what the Owls were doing in late 2013. FAU was solid at home, whipping Tulsa, knocking off Western Kentucky and narrowly falling to two .500 teams (UAB, ODU). But the Owls were a horror show on the road and finished 3-9 as a result.

Heading into Year 2, Partridge will field a team that could be even more efficient on offense and even shakier on defense. He did sign the best non-Marshall recruiting class in Conference USA, so he lived up to the hype. And that will buy him plenty of time.

2. Scarlett fever

Conceptually, FAU's class was of particular interest because of a theory that began floating around a year ago. A couple of days after Christmas 2013, running back Jordan Scarlett, one of the premier running backs in the class of 2015, committed to Partridge and FAU. The response from recruiting analysts was two-pronged and nearly unanimous: 1) There's no chance Scarlett remains committed to FAU over the 13 months before Signing Day, and 2) this is still fantastic for FAU because Partridge and his staff now have "momentum" in South Florida. Scarlett's commitment could end up helping to secure other FAU commitments even if he eventually decommits.

To me, this felt dissonant. If recruits are taking FAU more seriously because of Scarlett's commitment, should we assume they will continue to take FAU seriously once he decommits? What kind of momentum are we really looking at if the source of the momentum doesn't end up playing in Boca Raton?

Sure enough, Scarlett didn't sign wih the Owls. He decommitted in June, committed to Miami in July, then flipped to Florida. But before Scarlett flipped, FAU scored commitments from three-star prospects Rodrick Archer (safety from Plantation, Fla.), Daniel Parr (quarterback from Palm Beach Gardens), Jaye Miner (linebacker from Wesley Chapel), Azeez Al-Shaair (linebacker from Tampa), Tavaris Harrison (receiver from North Miami Beach), and Tarrick Thomas (lineman from Tallahassee). They remained committed after Scarlett flipped, and FAU then proceeded to add another eight three-star signees, (according to the 247Sports Composite.

At the least, Scarlett's predictable decommitment didn't hurt FAU's efforts. If nothing else, perhaps Scarlett gave others a reason to take a look at FAU, and when they did, they liked what they saw. Partridge signed 247's No. 79 class in the country, one that ranked second in Conference USA and would have placed in the upper half of AAC. Not bad for a school that averaged 3.7 wins per season since 2015's signees entered junior high.



2014 Schedule & Results

Record: 3-9 | Adj. Record: 2-10 | Final F/+ Rk: 100

Date

Opponent

Opp. F/+ Rk

Score

W-L

Percentile
Performance

Adj. Scoring
Margin

Win
Expectancy

30-Aug

at Nebraska

30

7-55

L

6%

-35.4

0%

6-Sep

at Alabama

2

0-41

L

3%

-43.3

0%

13-Sep

Tulsa

117

50-21

W

87%

26.5

100%

20-Sep

at Wyoming

113

19-20

L

31%

-11.7

49%

27-Sep

UTSA

109

41-37

W

33%

-10.5

38%

2-Oct

at Florida International

96

10-38

L

13%

-25.8

4%

18-Oct

Western Kentucky

50

45-38

W

70%

12.4

78%

25-Oct

at Marshall

17

16-35

L

29%

-12.7

0%

1-Nov

UAB

79

28-31

L

49%

-0.7

43%

8-Nov

at North Texas

125

10-31

L

6%

-36.2

0%

22-Nov

at Middle Tennessee

87

34-35

L

42%

-4.5

37%

29-Nov

Old Dominion

108

28-31

L

46%

-2.6

52%

Category

Offense

Rk

Defense

Rk

S&P+

25.8

86

34.9

107

Points Per Game

24.0

97

34.4

110

3. No place like Boca Raton

In this year's UMass and Ohio previews, I talked about home-road splits as it pertains to percentile performances. This is still a new concept for me, something I created for this year's series. But it's been interesting to track. Some teams, like UMass (which played some of its games in mostly empty Gillette Stadium) had almost no split between home and road performances. Others, like Ohio, had enormous splits.

FAU's split was even larger than Ohio's.

Average Percentile Performance (away): 19% (record: 0-7)

Average Percentile Performance (home): 57% (record: 3-2)

At home, FAU played like one of the better teams in Conference USA. Against Tulsa, UTSA, WKU, UAB, and ODU, the Owls averaged 6.6 yards per play and allowed 5.4. They averaged 38.4 points per game and were a bit unlucky to allow 31.6.

On the road, FAU averaged 4.6 yards per play and allowed 6.9. Part of that disparity comes from the schedule, which featured by far the season's three best opponents (Nebraska, Alabama, Marshall) on the road. But the schedule-adjusted percentiles show us FAU was vastly inferior away from Boca Raton.

Maybe this is a sign of youth and a new coaching staff. I plan on diving further into these percentiles at some point, and maybe we'll see correlations among the teams with huge splits. Regardless, FAU was both young and awful outside of its own area code.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE

Raw Category

Rk

Opp. Adj. Category

Rk

EXPLOSIVENESS

IsoPPP

0.85

66

IsoPPP+

93.1

85

EFFICIENCY

Succ. Rt.

42.0%

59

Succ. Rt. +

98.7

73

FIELD POSITION

Def. Avg. FP

30.5

79

Def. FP+

101.0

53

FINISHING DRIVES

Pts. Per Trip in 40

3.9

97

Redzone S&P+

92.6

88

TURNOVERS

EXPECTED

18.6

ACTUAL

18

-0.6

Category

Yards/
Game Rk

S&P+ Rk

Success
Rt. Rk

PPP+ Rk

OVERALL

103

83

73

85

RUSHING

62

81

80

77

PASSING

92

77

59

84

Standard Downs

72

71

71

Passing Downs

101

79

103

Q1 Rk

94

1st Down Rk

97

Q2 Rk

109

2nd Down Rk

76

Q3 Rk

99

3rd Down Rk

100

Q4 Rk

40

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Comp

Att

Yards

TD

INT

Comp
Rate

Sacks

Sack Rate

Yards/
Att.

Jaquez Johnson

6'1, 225

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

NR

182

315

2215

17

5

57.8%

15

4.5%

6.5

Greg Hankerson

6'0, 185

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7826

23

48

163

1

0

47.9%

6

11.1%

2.1

Jason Driskel

6'2, 210

RSFr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8129

Daniel Parr

6'3, 190

Fr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8364

4. Jaquez vs. consistency

Click for C-USA

Underdog Dynasty blog Underdog Dynasty

In 2013, Jaquez Johnson seized control of the quarterback job, rushed for 870 non-sack yards and completing 57 percent at an explosive 14.8 yards per completion. FAU's offense was increasingly vertical, and in the Owls' season-ending four-game win streak, they averaged 38 points despite a slow tempo.

Wright remained at FAU as offensive coordinator when Partridge was hired, but the big plays dried up. Explosive stars Jay Warren and William Dukes were held in check, leaving Johnson to move the ball with efficiency. At times he did this.

He got hurt against Nebraska and missed the Alabama game, but in his first three home games he completed 62 of 88 passes (70 percent) for 938 yards, nine touchdowns, and no picks. Against WKU, he threw for 325 yards and rushed for 95. Like the rest of the team, he was mostly awful away from home, but despite an overall lack of big plays, he still increased his per-attempt passing average (from 6.4 to 6.5) while cutting down his sack and interception rates and still rushing efficiently.

Johnson wasn't efficient enough for FAU to put up big numbers when the big plays weren't flowing in. His completion rate was at 64 percent or higher in four of 11 games, but it was 51 percent or lower in five. His senior season will be graded by how well he can maintain form.

Warren returns to the backfield, and there are recent star signees who could do damage at the skill positions. But his receiving corps will be awfully green, and that might make it difficult to improve.

Running Back

Player

Pos.

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Rushes

Yards

TD

Yards/
Carry

Hlt Yds/
Opp.

Opp.
Rate

Fumbles

Fum.
Lost

Jay Warren

RB

6'0, 195

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8356

121

571

2

4.7

4.8

35.5%

4

2

Jaquez Johnson

QB

6'1, 225

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

NR

105

599

7

5.7

4.8

44.8%

4

3

Tony Moore

RB

75

299

3

4.0

2.8

33.3%

1

1

Greg Howell

RB

6'1, 205

So.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8233

50

253

1

5.1

3.3

44.0%

2

1

Lucky Whitehead

WR

21

210

1

10.0

16.5

42.9%

5

4

Jeremy Gaskins

RB

5'10, 190

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7564

19

55

0

2.9

2.5

31.6%

0

0

Martese Jackson

RB

14

29

0

2.1

1.7

21.4%

0

0

Greg Hankerson

QB

6'0, 185

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7826

7

41

0

5.9

4.9

42.9%

0

0

Henry Bussey

RB

5'9, 180

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7556

7

29

0

4.1

1.1

71.4%

1

0

Trey Rodriguez

RB

5'10, 185

Fr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8566

Receiving Corps

Player

Pos.

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Targets

Catches

Yards

Catch Rate

Target
Rate

%SD

Yds/
Target

NEY

Real Yds/
Target

RYPR

Lucky Whitehead

WR-W

106

76

709

71.7%

29.8%

58.5%

6.7

-192

6.7

92.1

Jenson Stoshak

WR-X

6'1, 195

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

NR

65

38

511

58.5%

18.3%

76.9%

7.9

43

8.5

66.4

Alex Deleon

TE

46

23

295

50.0%

12.9%

65.2%

6.4

2

6.9

38.3

William Dukes

WR-Z

38

15

259

39.5%

10.7%

68.4%

6.8

56

6.6

33.7

Kalib Woods

WR-Z

6'3, 182

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8300

31

16

223

51.6%

8.7%

67.7%

7.2

21

6.6

28.9

Derek Moise

WR

6'2, 195

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7600

21

10

74

47.6%

5.9%

52.4%

3.5

-55

3.8

9.6

Nate Terry

TE

6'6, 210

So.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7000

9

3

55

33.3%

2.5%

33.3%

6.1

12

8.1

7.1

Jay Warren

RB

6'0, 195

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8356

8

4

26

50.0%

2.2%

25.0%

3.3

-25

2.5

3.4

Henry Bussey

RB

5'9, 180

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7556

6

4

88

66.7%

1.7%

16.7%

14.7

40

7.0

11.4

Tony Moore

RB

5

3

43

60.0%

1.4%

0.0%

8.6

6

N/A

5.6

Kamrin Solomon

WR

6'2, 196

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7882

3

2

28

66.7%

0.8%

66.7%

9.3

4

9.7

3.6

Michael Harrop

TE

6'3, 220

Sr.

NR

NR

2

1

12

50.0%

0.6%

50.0%

6.0

-1

6.9

1.6

Dustin Bowens

TE

6'5, 255

So.

2 stars (5.2)

0.7900

Bobby Mitchell

WR

6'2, 175

RSFr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8156

Chandler Dexter

TE

6'5, 255

Jr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.7600

Ralph Leonard

WR

6'2, 182

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8256

Tavaris Harrison

WR

6'3, 166

Fr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.8169

Ladante Harris

WR

5'10, 160

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7932

5. Find some receivers (and hold onto the damn ball)

Because of sacks, most quarterbacks end up fumbling at least four or five times per season. So Johnson's four gaffes weren't too bad. But Jay Warren fumbled once every 30 carries, and leading receiver Lucky Whitehead managed to fumble five times in 97 catches/carries. And they didn't back those mistakes up with nearly enough big plays.

Whitehead will still be missed after a stellar season as a possession man; he caught 19 passes for 227 yards against WKU and Marshall, and he provided a needed efficiency option: while his catch rate was a lovely 72 percent, the next seven targets combined for a catch rate of 50.0 percent, and that includes two tight ends and a running back.

Johnson will be without Whitehead, leading tight end Alex Deleon, and all-or-nothing receiver William Dukes. He does get back last year's most successful per-target receiver, Jenson Stoshak. But after Stoshak comes a cavalcade of high-ceiling guys who have yet to prove much: sophomore Kalib Woods, redshirt freshman Bobby Mitchell, true freshmen Ralph Leonard and Tavaris Harrison.

Athleticism won't be an issue, and if those touching the ball can hold onto it, that would be great.

Offensive Line

Category

Adj.
Line Yds

Std.
Downs
LY/carry

Pass.
Downs
LY/carry

Opp.
Rate

Power
Success
Rate

Stuff
Rate

Adj.
Sack Rate

Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Team

103.3

3.11

3.55

38.9%

63.4%

17.1%

150.1

3.5%

5.3%

Rank

60

42

40

71

96

36

18

33

32

Player

Pos.

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

Career Starts

Honors/Notes

Braden Lyons

RT

24

Dillon DeBoer

RG

6'6, 295

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7000

18

Mikingson Marsaille

LG

6'6, 320

Sr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7600

14

Reggie Bain

LT

6'4, 286

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7856

12

Joe Gold

C

6'3, 270

So.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8056

6

Eric Minemyer

RT

6

Jakobi Smith

RG

6'3, 300

So.

NR

0.7500

1

Arthur Crouse

LT

6'6, 250

Jr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.7000

0

Roman Fernandez

LG

6'0, 305

So.

NR

NR

0

Antonyo Woods

RG

6'3, 285

So.

NR

NR

0

Austin Bland

OL

6'3, 265

So.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8407

0

Siffo Pierre

OL

6'4, 325

RSFr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7000

Kelly Parfitt (UCF)

OL

6'6, 313

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8044

Tarrick Thomas

OL

6'4, 270

Fr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8503

Bryan Beck

OL

6'5, 275

Fr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7583

6. An underrated front

The running game didn't produce nearly as many big plays in 2014 (12 rushes of 20-plus yards, 96th in FBS) as 2013 (20, 45th). But it was able to consistently gain four to five yards. The line played a role, and it helped in keeping Johnson's sack rates pretty low despite his dual-threat nature. (Dual-threats tend to have higher sack rates because they trust their legs to make too many plays.)

The return of five players with starting experience (51 career starts) is unquestionably a good thing. The line did its job despite three freshmen getting starting experience, and adding UCF transfer Kelly Parfitt to the rotation, along with (perhaps) star recruit Tarrick Thomas, should create one of the conference's best lines. And if you have a good line, an exciting quarterback, and an experienced starting running back, you can move the ball.

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE

Raw Category

Rk

Opp. Adj. Category

Rk

EXPLOSIVENESS

IsoPPP

0.88

86

IsoPPP+

92.3

91

EFFICIENCY

Succ. Rt.

45.9%

109

Succ. Rt. +

92.3

101

FIELD POSITION

Off. Avg. FP

29.7

77

Off. FP+

98.0

88

FINISHING DRIVES

Pts. Per Trip in 40

4.9

114

Redzone S&P+

88.1

112

TURNOVERS

EXPECTED

17.3

ACTUAL

15.0

-2.3

Category

Yards/
Game Rk

S&P+ Rk

Success
Rt. Rk

PPP+ Rk

OVERALL

113

99

99

91

RUSHING

114

114

117

113

PASSING

87

54

52

50

Standard Downs

97

100

92

Passing Downs

91

83

88

Q1 Rk

119

1st Down Rk

94

Q2 Rk

89

2nd Down Rk

102

Q3 Rk

68

3rd Down Rk

105

Q4 Rk

82

Defensive Line

Category

Adj.
Line Yds

Std.
Downs
LY/carry

Pass.
Downs
LY/carry

Opp.
Rate

Power
Success
Rate

Stuff
Rate

Adj.
Sack Rate

Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.

Team

87.8

3.34

3.96

42.4%

63.5%

12.5%

91.1

3.5%

8.6%

Rank

113

116

122

102

44

127

85

91

43

Name

Pos

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

GP

Tackles

% of Team

TFL

Sacks

Int

PBU

FF

FR

Trevon Coley

DT

6'2, 300

Sr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8125

12

37.0

5.3%

6.5

4.0

1

1

0

0

Trey Hendrickson

DE

6'4, 250

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7956

12

24.5

3.5%

8.5

5.0

0

1

1

0

Robinson Eugene

DE

6'5, 266

Sr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.7000

12

18.5

2.7%

3.0

2.0

0

0

0

0

Haiden Nagel

DE

6'4, 230

So.

2 stars (5.3)

NR

11

16.0

2.3%

2.0

2.0

0

1

0

0

Shalom Ogbonda

DE

6'4, 290

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.8157

11

14.0

2.0%

0.5

0.0

0

1

0

0

Joe Henry

DE

7

12.0

1.7%

3.0

2.0

0

0

0

0

Denzel Whitfield

DT

6'5, 260

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7000

12

12.0

1.7%

1.0

0.0

0

0

0

0

Ray Ellis

DT

6'1, 260

So.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7444

6

11.0

1.6%

1.0

1.0

0

0

0

0

Brandin Bryant

DT

6'3, 290

Sr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.7000

5

9.5

1.4%

2.5

2.0

0

0

1

0

Derek Butcher

DT

11

6.0

0.9%

2.0

1.0

0

1

0

0

Josh Ballesteros

DE

6'2, 210

Jr.

2 stars (5.3)

0.7751

5

5.0

0.7%

1.0

1.0

0

0

0

0

Josh Kendall

DT

6'2, 269

Jr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7593

7. Dreadful against the run

A shaky front seven can threaten even the best secondary; if there's a minimal pass rush, or if the front is getting gashed for seven yards per carry, the defensive backs won't get many opportunities to dominate. But with competence up front, the FAU secondary could be just as effective as it was in 2013 in this 4-2-5 structure. [...]

This is one of the best defensive backfields in mid-major football. It might be the best.

To say the least, I was bullish on FAU's secondary last year, and I had reason for it. Despite horrific rush defense and a mediocre pass rush, FAU managed a No. 54 ranking in Passing S&P+. That says wonderful things about the defensive backs.

But my caveat -- "with competence up front..." -- rang true. FAU ranked 114th in Rushing S&P+, 113th in Adj. Line Yards, and 127th in Stuff Rate (run stops at or behind the line). A good pass defense only matters if you can pretend to stop the run.

Because experience so frequently leads to good play, it is frequently the case that teams return players from weak units while replacing key pieces from good units. Such is life for FAU: eight of the top nine tacklers from last year's line return, while three of the top five in the secondary are gone.

Outside of Trevon Coley, FAU couldn't figure out its tackle situation, so if another year helps to set a rotation, that can only help. But the Owls had only one disruptive presence against the run (linebacker Andrae Kirk), and he's the player FAU has to replace. Improvement isn't guaranteed.

Linebackers

Name

Pos

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

GP

Tackles

% of Team

TFL

Sacks

Int

PBU

FF

FR

Andrae Kirk

LB

12

77.5

11.1%

10.5

2.0

2

8

1

0

Robert Relf

LB

6'3, 220

Jr.

3 stars (5.5)

0.7991

11

44.5

6.4%

1.5

0.0

0

0

0

0

Jerrad Ward

LB

6'0, 215

So.

2 stars (5.2)

NR

10

20.5

2.9%

1.0

0.0

0

1

0

0

David Lozandier

LB

6

13.5

1.9%

1.0

1.0

0

1

0

0

Nate Ozdemir

LB

6'2, 230

So.

2 stars (5.4)

NR

10

11.0

1.6%

0.5

0.0

0

0

0

0

Freedom Whitfield

LB

6'2, 200

Sr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.7600

9

9.0

1.3%

1.5

0.0

0

0

0

0

Kris Harris

LB

6'0, 225

RSFr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8322

Jaye Miner

LB

6'3, 190

Fr.

3 stars (5.6)

0.8438

Azeez Al-Shaair

LB

6'1, 215

Fr.

2 stars (5.2)

0.8005

Secondary

Name

Pos

Ht, Wt

2015
Year

Rivals

247 Comp.

GP

Tackles

% of Team

TFL

Sacks

Int

PBU

FF

FR

Damian Parms

SS

12

67.0

9.6%

3

0

0

1

1

0

Cre'von LeBlanc

CB

5'11, 175

Sr.

2 stars (5.4)

0.8157

12

63.0

9.1%

1

0

2

6

0

0

Christian Milstead

FS

12

47.5

6.8%

1

0

0

7

0

0

Sharrod Neasman

NB

6'0, 198

Sr.

NR

NR

12

46.0

6.6%

3

0

2

3

1

0

D'Joun Smith

CB

11

43.5

6.3%

Show more