2015-01-12

-Government Prepares Internet Speech Crackdown Following Paris Attacks
-Can America stop Paris-style terror from coming here?

Alex Jones Predicted Western-Backed ISIS Would Attack West,Went on to predict terror attacks would be used to dismantle what’s left of Western freedom

11 Jan 2015

Editor’s Note: This article is one of many on Infowars.com that explains how U.S.-funded Islamic militants would ultimately attack Western countries, and the government would exploit the crisis by enacting a police state at the expense of personal liberties.

Obama Now Global Head of Al-Qaeda

Will President order drone strike on White House?

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones

Infowars.com

March 21, 2013

President Barack Obama is now the global head of Al-Qaeda – bankrolling, arming and equipping terrorists around the world in order to achieve his administration’s geopolitical objectives – while simultaneously invoking the threat of terrorists domestically to destroy the bill of rights.

Since it has now been established that those merely suspected of engaging in terrorism, including US citizens, are subject to targeted drone strikes, under the terms of his own prosecution of the fake war on terror, Obama must immediately order a drone strike on the White House because the facts documented below incontrovertibly demonstrate that it represents the headquarters of Al-Qaeda operations worldwide.

The fact that Al-Qaeda was created by western intelligence and has always been controlled by these interests demonstrates that the Al-Qaeda threat is one of the greatest ongoing hoaxes in world history.

The administration has sent nearly half a billion dollars ($365 million plus another $60 million) and is now using US Special Forces to train militants in Syria who have pledged allegiance to Al-Qaeda and who continue to carry out grisly beheadings, terrorist bombings targeting innocent civilians and chemical weapons attacks against women and children.

These same militants, backed not only by the US but by every major NATO power, have repeatedly voiced their hatred for and intention to destroy America, as they ransack Christian churches, burn US flags, chant anti-American slogans and sing the praises of Osama Bin Laden while glorifying the 9/11 attacks.

As the New York Times reported, these very same terrorists killed U.S. troops in Iraq and yet western backing for the insurgency against Bashar Al-Assad has enabled violent extremists to seize power in Syria.

As multiple reports now confirm, Jabhat al-Nusra, the main Al-Qaeda group in Syria, is now commanding rebels and is engaged in “the heaviest frontline fighting” in Syria. As the London Guardian reported, rebels in Syria are admittedly being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists, who meet with them “every day” and train them how to make bombs. The top 29 Syrian opposition groups have all sworn allegiance to Jabhat al-Nusra. Sheik Moaz al Khatib, head of the Syrian National Coalition of Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, has also publicly affirmed his support for the terrorist group.

These same terrorists have also vowed to attack the United States once they are finished in Syria, while proclaiming their desire to see the Al-Qaeda flag flying over the White House.

In addition, while Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” have been characterized as terrorists by their own government, US citizens who openly take up arms to join with terrorists in Libya and Syria are allowed to fly around the world with total impunity.

In supporting Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria as part of the effort to impose regime change, the Obama administration is following the same disastrous policy it pursued in Libya, backing the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which also killed U.S. troops in Iraq, to overthrow Gaddafi.

That led to a country ruled by thugs who have rounded up, tortured and executed thousands of black Libyans. It also led to the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, which was carried out by some of the very same LIFG terrorists the United States had backed just a year previously.

After the overthrow of Gaddafi, NATO powers aided in airlifting LIFG militants into Syria to continue the fight to impose Sharia law across the region.

Given all this, it’s abundantly clear that the Obama administration has easily outstripped other targets of drone strikes in its zeal to support terrorism around the world.

American citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki was killed by a drone strike simply for producing propaganda videos and communicating with accused terrorists. His 16-year-old son was similarly slaughtered for merely sharing his father’s surname. Other American citizens like John Walker Lindh were imprisoned and tortured in Guantanamo Bay for fighting with the Taliban.

And yet, as Afghan President Hamid Karzai made clear last week, the Obama administration is now colluding with the Taliban while the group carries out suicide bombings in the “service of America.”

By backing terrorists in Afghanistan, Libya and now Syria, Barack Obama has carved out a role as the global head of Al-Qaeda. Wherever on the map his administration wants to dominate geopolitically, Al-Qaeda terrorists flood in to to the dirty work – and it’s all paid for with your tax dollars.

By ordering a drone strike on the White House, Obama would be targeting the primary source now responsible for most of the world’s global terrorism – his own administration.

In closing, it’s important to note that President Barack Obama himself is nothing more than a global crime syndicate mercenary front man for criminal interests that have seized control of the national security apparatus. This article is intended to call Obama and his controllers out as the real progenitors of Al-Qaeda and the synthetic war on terror.

And here is the key – just as WMDs were a fraudulent pretext for the Iraq war, the Al-Qaeda cut out threat is 100 per cent manufactured to destroy western free societies and convert the entire planet into a totalitarian world government.

http://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-predicted-western-backed-isis-would-attack-west/


Obama to Hold ‘Global Security Summit’

President who empowered al-Qaeda now wants to take your liberties

January 11, 2015 by Reuters

U.S. President Barack Obama will invite allies to a Feb. 18 security summit in Washington to try and prevent violent extremism, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said on Sunday after meeting his European counterparts in Paris.

The gathering of justice and interior chiefs came as France mourned 17 victims of Islamist gunmen this week in the worst assault on its homeland security in decades.

“We will bring together all of our allies to discuss ways in which we can counteract this violent extremism that exists around the world,” Holder told reporters.

read more at

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/11/us-france-shooting-security-idUSKBN0KK0DR20150111


Feinstein: Terrorist Sleeper Cells Are in U.S.

Feds will use them to justify police state

January 11, 2015 by The Washington Times

A key senator said Sunday she believes there are terrorist sleeper cells in the U.S. that could carry out attacks similar to the ones in France that left 17 people dead last week.

Sen Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat and vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, did not comment on specific threats against America but said other attacks are possible.

“I think there are sleeper cells not only in France but certainly in other countries and, yes, in our own,” she said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “This calls for vigilance. … Hopefully, we can be even more active in terms of doing those things which enable us to find terrorists, see who they’re communicating with and to track that.”

read more at

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/11/dianne-feinstein-terrorist-sleeper-cells-are-us/


Government Prepares Internet Speech Crackdown Following Paris Attacks


Western governments to coordinate attack on free speech

January 11, 2015 by Kurt Nimmo

The Charlie Hebdo unity march in Paris served as a backdrop on Sunday for interior ministers who demand more internet surveillance.

“We forcefully noted the need for greater cooperation with Internet companies to guarantee the reporting and removal of illegal content, particularly content that makes apologies for terrorism or promotes violence or hate,” said French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve.

US and EU bureaucrats gathered at the French interior ministry to formulate a response to the Islamic State, al-Qaeda and other jihadist groups, many supported, trained and financed by the Gulf emirates, Turkey, western intelligence and the U.S. military.

The meeting in France will be followed by a “security summit” to be held in Washington next month.

“We will bring together all of our allies to discuss ways in which we can counteract this violent extremism that exists around the world,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.

The Paris attack will be used to impose new and more draconian legislation over free speech and the right to communicate without interference by the state.

“France’s police state apparatus is one of the continent’s toughest. Article 13 of its 2014-19 defense appropriation legislation permits monitoring, collecting and maintaining Internet user data,” writes Stephen Lendman.

The legislation requires ISPs and web sites to provide government with information on users’ activities and authorizes surveillance by the state.

Britain, often cited as the incubator for police state activity in the West, leads the way.

In 2005 it imposed the Prevention of Terrorism Act which did away with long standing legal protections. The legislation permits arbitrary house arrest, prohibitions against free association, and bans on electronic communication.

In September, the British Home Secretary Theresa May criticized Parliament the “torpedoing” of a so-called snooper’s charter communications data bill that would outlaw speech the state considers “poisonous hatred.” May specifically cited the Islamic State when she argued in favor of the the legislation.

In addition to addressing the purported threat of Islamic speech, the law would also confront “all forms of extremism‚ including neo-Nazism,” according to The Guardian, and focus on the “culture of bullying and intimidation” in British schools.

http://www.infowars.com/government-prepares-internet-speech-crackdown-following-paris-attacks/


Can America stop Paris-style terror from coming here?


French mourners following the attack on the Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris
Pamela Geller proclaims, ‘We are the soldiers in this war to defend freedom’

Jan 10, 2015

As France reels from two bloody terrorist attacks in as many days, Pamela Geller warns this is just the beginning and unless Americans take action, “Such attacks are coming here.”

In an exclusive interview with WND, the author of “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance” painted a dire picture of the Western future. Even after the most devastating terrorist attacks in French history, Geller judged that “no European nations are doing anything against Islamization at this time, and I don’t see any indication that any will in the near future.”

The attacks were sparked by caricatures of the Islamic prophet Muhammad deemed offensive by many Muslims. As WND has reported, Islamic nations have been trying for years to impose a worldwide prohibition on criticism of their religion and their prophet through the United Nations.

With so many people so deeply invested in the goal of a global ban on criticism of Islam, Geller says the murder of the satirists at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo will not halt the drive to end free speech.

“There is absolutely no evidence that they’re backing away from efforts to impose ‘hate speech’ laws,” Geller told WND. “In fact, just [earlier this week] a Canadian imam called for the criminalization of satirical cartoons of religious leaders.”

Geller declares in her book that “the gravest threat this Islamization poses is the restriction of the freedom of speech.” While European countries and Canada already have laws against criticism of Islam under the guise of “hate speech,” President Barack Obama has shown a willingness for years to expand such laws to the United States and other nations around the world.

According to Professor Jonathan Turley of George Washington University, “The Obama administration shockingly supported Muslim allies trying to establish a new international blasphemy standard” in 2009.

Following the terrorist attacks on an American facility in Libya and the murder of the American ambassador on Sept. 11, 2012, President Obama intoned that the “U.S rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.”

At the time, Geller argued Obama effectively was “sanctioning Islam’s blasphemy laws, which forbid criticism of Islam.”

As WND reported, only two weeks later, President Obama told the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 25, 2012, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

And after the latest attacks in Paris, President Obama carefully tailored his speech so as not use the words “Islam,” “radical Islam,” “Muslim,” “jihad” “or “Shariah” when condemning the shootings.

Shariah expert Joy Brighton called President Obama’s speech “Shariah compliment.”

As WND reported, the United Nations followed President Obama’s lead and refused to link the attacks to Islam.

Geller warns that free speech restrictions are only a matter of time in the United States: “If things don’t change, [radical Muslims] will succeed in imposing them here, because the mainstream media is already doing their bidding – not showing the [Charlie Hebdo] cartoons, etc.”

Americans haven’t yet seen the same kind of street-level Islamic terrorism or widespread political intimidation that exists in France, but the “only significant difference is that the Muslim population of France is so much bigger than the Muslim population of the U.S.,” Geller claims.

That may not remain true for much longer, as a recent study from the Center for Immigration Studies shows that immigration from Islamic nations has dramatically increased during Obama’s time in office even as immigration from Europe and Israel has declined. A 2011 study from the Pew Research Center shows the Muslim population in the United States is expected to more than double over the next two decades.

This larger Islamic population will add new strength and resources to the already powerful Muslim lobby in the United States. Geller’s “Stop the Islamization of America” contains a detailed history of the background, funding and activities of many of the “mainstream” Muslim groups operating in the United States, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, the Muslim Students Association and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Geller believes that these and other Islamic organizations have a lot to answer for in the aftermath of the attacks. Instead of forthrightly condemning the murders, Geller charges “they’re doing what they’ve always done: deflecting attention away from the attacks to a fictional ‘Islamophobic backlash’ and defaming and discrediting anyone and everyone who stands up and opposes jihad terror.”

In the aftermath of the attacks, American government officials told reporters that “eliminating the threat is impossible” and that the potential for Paris-style attacks in the United States “is the new normal.”

In contrast, Geller has recommendations about what needs to be done if the United States is to defend itself from the threat of Islamic terrorism.

“We should monitor the mosques and demand that Muslim groups renounce the aspects of Islam and Sharia that are violent and supremacist and in conflict with Western principles of freedom and human rights,” Geller says. “This has to be backed up by honest, transparent and inspectable programs teaching young Muslims to reject this understanding of Islam. The French government should do the same.”

Geller is a leading organizer against Islamic supremacism through her group the American Freedom Defense Initiative. Following the Islamic terrorist attacks on the Boston Marathon in 2013, AFDI issued a “Platform of Defending Freedom” aimed to prevent terrorist attacks, including surveillance of mosques, a ban on the foreign funding of mosques and a moratorium on Muslim immigration into non-Muslim nations.

Geller is largely pessimistic about the ability of European nations to respond to the terrorist threat.

After all, she says, “There were several jihad attacks in France in the last few weeks, all of which were dismissed by French authorities as manifestations of ‘mental illness.’ ‘Mental illness’ is becoming epidemic in France.”

One possible exception is the rise of Marine Le Pen’s National Front, a party invariably described as “far right” in the mainstream media. The National Front takes a strong stand against mass immigration and is perceived as an opponent of Islamization.

Geller notes, “The National Front may benefit from these attacks if they can articulate to the French people what the jihad threat is and why it must be combatted. It must also effectively counter the leftist smear that all opposition to jihad terror is really just ‘racism.’”

Ultimately however, Geller believes it will be the attitude of ordinary Westerners that will determine whether “jihad terror” can be defeated and free speech can be preserved.

As she told WND, “We are the soldiers in this war to defend freedom. The real fight for freedom isn’t a military struggle. It’s a war to defend our free societies. All of us must fight in this war, or we will certainly lose.”

http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/can-america-stop-paris-style-terror-from-coming-here/

Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, Ebola, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House

Show more