Obama empowering America’s worst enemiesCarolina Glick warns against pursuing alliance with Iran
Iraq massacre
-U.S. Backed Terror, Inc.
-The threat is blowback
June 20th, 2014
Watching the undoing, in a week, of victories that US forces won in Iraq at great cost over many years, Americans are asking themselves what, if anything, should be done.
What can prevent the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) – the al-Qaida offshoot that President Barack Obama derided just months ago as a bunch of amateurs – from taking over Iraq?
And what is at stake for America – other than national pride – if it does?
Muddying the waters is the fact that the main actor that seems interested in fighting ISIS on the ground in Iraq is Iran. Following ISIS’s takeover of Mosul and Tikrit last week, the Iranian regime deployed elite troops in Iraq from the Quds Force, its foreign operations division.
The Obama administration, along with Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham, views Iran’s deployment of forces in Iraq as an opportunity for the US. The US, they argue should work with Iran to defeat ISIS.
The idea is that since the US and Iran both oppose al-Qaida, Iranian gains against it will redound to the US’s benefit.
There are two basic, fundamental problems with this idea.
First, there is a mountain of evidence that Iran has no beef with al-Qaida and is happy to work with it.
According to the 9/11 Commission’s report, between eight and 10 of the September 11 hijackers traveled through Iran before going to the US. And this was apparently no coincidence.
According to the report, Iran had been providing military training and logistical support for al-Qaida since at least the early 1990s.
After the battle of Tora Bora in December 2001, al-Qaida’s leadership scattered. Many senior commanders – including bin Laden’s son Said, al-Qaida’s chief strategist Saif al-Adel and Suleiman Abu Ghaith – decamped to Iran, where they set up a command center.
From Iran, these men directed the operations of al-Qaida forces in Iraq led by Abu Musab Zarqawi. Zarqawi entered Iraq from Iran and returned to Iran several times during the years he led al-Qaida operations in Iraq.
Iran’s cooperation with al-Qaida continues today in Syria.
According to The Wall Street Journal, in directing the defense of Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria, Iran has opted to leave ISIS and its al-Qaida brethren in the Nusra Front alone. That is why they have been able to expand their power in northern Syria.
Iran and its allies have concentrated their attacks against the more moderate Free Syrian Army, which they view as a threat.
Given Iran’s 20-year record of cooperation with al-Qaida, it is reasonable to assume that it is deploying forces into Iraq to tighten its control over Shi’ite areas, not to fight al-Qaida. The record shows that Iran doesn’t believe that its victories and al-Qaida’s victories are mutually exclusive.
The second problem with the idea of subcontracting America’s fight against al-Qaida to Iran is that it assumes that Iranian success in such a war would benefit America. But again, experience tells a different tale.
The US killed Zarqawi in an air strike in 2006. Reports in the Arab media at the time alleged that Iran had disclosed Zarqawi’s location to the US. While the reports were speculative, shortly after Zarqawi was killed, then-secretary of state Condoleezza Rice floated the idea of opening nuclear talks with Iran for the first time.
The Iranians contemptuously rejected her offer. But Rice’s willingness to discuss Iran’s nuclear weapons program with the regime, even as it was actively engaged in killing US forces in Iraq, ended any serious prospect that the Bush administration would develop a coherent plan for dealing with Iran in a strategic and comprehensive way.
Moreover, Zarqawi was immediately replaced by one of his deputies. And the fight went on.
So if Iran did help the US find Zarqawi, the price the US paid for Iran’s assistance was far higher than the benefit it derived from killing Zarqawi.
This brings us to the real threat that the rise of ISIS – and Iran – in Iraq poses to the US. That threat is blowback.
Both Iran and al-Qaida are sworn enemies of the United States, and both have been empowered by events of the past week.
Because they view the US as their mortal foe, their empowerment poses a danger to the US. But it is hard for people to recognize how events in distant lands can directly impact their lives.
In March 2001, when the Taliban blew up the Bamiyan Buddha statues in Afghanistan, the world condemned the act. But no one realized that the same destruction would be brought to the US six months later when al-Qaida destroyed the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon.
The September 11 attacks were the blowback from the US doing nothing to contain the Taliban and al-Qaida.
North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic-missile tests, as well as North Korean proliferation of both nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles to rogue regimes, like Iran, that threaten the US, are the beginnings of the blowback from the US decision to reach a nuclear deal with Pyongyang in the 1990s that allowed the regime to keep its nuclear installations.
The blowback from Iran’s emergence as a nuclear power is certain to dwarf what the world has seen from North Korea so far.
Yet rather than act in a manner that would reduce the threat of blowback from Iraq’s disintegration and takeover by America’s worst enemies, the Obama administration gives every indication that it is doubling down on the disastrous policies that led the US to this precarious juncture.
The only strategy that the US can safely adopt today is one of double containment. The aim of double containment is to minimize the capacity of Iran and al-Qaida to harm the US and its interests.
But to contain your enemies, you need to understand them. You need to understand their nature, their aims, their support networks and their capabilities.
Unfortunately, in keeping with what has been the general practice of the US government since the September 11 attacks, the US today continues to ignore or misunderstand all of these critical considerations.
Regarding al-Qaida specifically, the US has failed to understand that al-Qaida is a natural progression from the political/religious milieu of Salafist/Wahabist or Islamist Islam, from whence it sprang. As a consequence, anyone who identifies with Islamist religious and political organizations is a potential supporter and recruit for al-Qaida and its sister organizations.
There were two reasons that George W. Bush refused to base US strategy for combating al-Qaida on any cultural context broader than the Taliban.
Bush didn’t want to sacrifice the US’s close ties with Saudi Arabia, which finances the propagation and spread of Islamism. And he feared being attacked as a bigot by Islamist organizations in the US like the Council on American Islamic Relations and its supporters on the Left.
As for Obama, his speech in Cairo to the Muslim world in June 2009 and his subsequent apology tour through Islamic capitals indicated that, unlike Bush, Obama understands that al-Qaida is not a deviation from otherwise peaceful Islamist culture.
But unlike Bush, Obama blames America for its hostility. Obama’s radical sensibilities tell him that America pushed the Islamists to oppose it. As he sees it, he can appease the Islamists into ending their war against America.
To this end, Obama has prohibited federal employees from conducting any discussion or investigation of Islamist doctrine, terrorism, strategy and methods and the threat all pose to the US.
These prohibitions were directly responsible for the FBI’s failure to question or arrest the Tsarnaev brothers in 2012 despite the fact that Russian intelligence tipped it off to the fact that the 2013 Boston Marathon bombers were jihadists.
They were also responsible for the army’s refusal to notice any of the black flags that Maj. Nidal Hassan raised in the months before his massacre of his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, or to take any remedial action after the massacre to prevent such atrocities from recurring.
The Muslim Brotherhood is the progenitor of Islamism. It is the organizational, social, political and religious swamp from whence the likes of al-Qaida, Hamas and other terror groups emerged. Whereas Bush pretended the Brotherhood away, Obama embraced it as a strategic partner.
Then there is Iran.
Bush opted to ignore the 9/11 Commission’s revelations regarding Iranian collaboration with al-Qaida. Instead, particularly in the later years of his administration, Bush sought to appease Iran both in Iraq and in relation to its illicit nuclear weapons program.
In large part, Bush did not acknowledge, or act on the sure knowledge that Iran was the man behind the curtain in Iraq, because he believed that the American people would oppose the expansion of the US operations in the war against terror.
Obama’s actions toward Iran indicate that he knows that Iran stands behind al-Qaida and that the greatest threat the US faces is Iran’s nuclear weapons program. But here as well, Obama opted to follow a policy of appeasement. Rather than prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, or stem its advance in Syria and Iraq, Obama treats Iran as though it poses no threat and is indeed a natural ally. He blames Iran’s belligerence on the supposedly unjust policies of his predecessors and the US’s regional allies.
For a dual-containment strategy to have any chance of working, the US needs to reverse course. No, it needn’t deploy troops to Iraq. But it does need to seal its border to minimize the chance that jihadists will cross over from Mexico.
It doesn’t need to clamp down on Muslims in America. But it needs to investigate and take action where necessary against al-Qaida’s ideological fellow travelers in Islamist mosques, organizations and the US government. To this end, it needs to end the prohibition on discussion of the Islamist threat by federal government employees.
As for Iran, according to The New York Times, Iran is signaling that the price of cooperation with the Americans in Iraq is American acquiescence to Iran’s conditions for signing a nuclear deal. In other words, the Iranians will fight al-Qaida in Iraq in exchange for American facilitation of its nuclear weapons program.
The first step the US must take to minimize the Iranian threat is to walk away from the table and renounce the talks. The next step is to take active measures to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
Unfortunately, the Obama administration appears prepared to do none of these things. To the contrary, its pursuit of an alliance with Iran in Iraq indicates that it is doubling down on the most dangerous aspects of its policy of empowering America’s worst enemies.
It only took the Taliban six months to move from the Bamiyan Buddhas to the World Trade Center.
Al-Qaida is stronger now than ever before. And Iran is on the threshold of a nuclear arsenal.
Originally published in The Jerusalem Post.
http://carolineglick.com/the-threat-is-blowback/
—-
Can a President Who Has Promised to Stand with the Muslims Protect Americans?
(Note the Date) April 23, 2013 By Lauri B. Regan
In Obama’s Audacity of Hope, he insinuated that he would stand with Muslim Americans should the political winds shift in any ugly direction.” He also asserted in Bob Woodward’s Obama’s Wars, “We can absorb [another] terrorist attack.” These are two straightforward statements that raise the question of whether a man who has been seemingly obsessed with reaching out to “the Muslim world” since taking office is capable of fulfilling his duty as commander-in-chief to keep America safe and secure.
The negative implications of Obama’s time in office will be felt for decades, but one thing is clear. The U.S. President who does not recognize America’s exceptionalism and who has promised to stand with Muslims has been unable to keep Americans safe from Islamic terror — both at home and abroad. Asserting that “The Obama Years are Synonymous with Terrorism,” a recent IBD editorial chronicled the terrorist attacks, both failed and successful, during Obama’s term. From Little Rock and Ft. Hood to Benghazi and Boston, terrorism directed at Americans is far from waning despite Obama’s never-ending claims of al-Qaeda’s decimation. And unless Obama’s policies of appeasement, political correctness, government dependency, leading from behind, and willful ignorance regarding the Islamic threat to the West will lead to further terrorism.
Obama did not create the Islamist ideology that has fed the fervor of modern-day terrorism. But from his Cairo speech through his speech Monday night just after the Boston bombings, in which he refused to call the attacks terrorism (he conceded the point the following day), he has made it clear that he does not believe that terrorism is a continuing threat to the lives and safety of Americans. His refusal to use the terms “War on Terror” and “Islamic fundamentalism” are just examples of a belief either that he can wish away evil or that evil simply does not exist. But what the country needs is a president who understands Islamic jihad for what it is — the totalitarian, fundamentalist dogma that drives the violence perpetrated by those who have waged holy war on the West. And Obama has yet to give us any indication that he understands these very real threats, or that he is interested in, and capable of, protecting us from them.
Based on the fact that, in response to information provided by a foreign government (presumably Russia), the FBI questioned one of the Boston terrorists two years ago and a 2009 domestic violence arrest that should have led to his deportation but did not, Tuesday morning quarterbacks are focusing on Obama’s questionable immigration policies, including administrative amnesty that “apparently directs ICE to wait until an illegal alien commits a serious crime or two before considering deportation.”i And while most people think of Hispanics crossing our southern border illegally, few realize that Hezb’allah has operatives working throughout Latin America. Unfortunately, securing our borders for national security purposes is taking a back-seat to Obama’s politicking and demonization of the GOP as anti-immigrant.
Alas, would that it were simply Obama’s indifference to our immigration problem that led to the successful terrorist attack last week. Unfortunately, Obama seems driven by a desire to befriend Muslims and demonize those who recognize that, while not all Muslims are terrorists, most terrorists are Muslimsii and that radical Islam is a clear, present, and dangerous threat. Martha Raddatz observed, “The president has been so worried about offending non-jihadist Muslims that he’s tried to take the ideology out of our enemy, which is nuts considering our enemy is the violent ideology.”
The administration’s assertions that the Muslim Brotherhood is moderate epitomize the administration’s cluelessness. Notwithstanding the MB doctrine — “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Koran is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” — the administration’s assertions of secularism and moderation rather than Islamism and sharia domination are indicative of willful ignorance on the part of those formulating foreign policy. As Barry Rubin stated:
[T]he ability to critique precisely what is radical in Islam and what is wrong with Islamism is handicapped by the successful effort to brand any attempts at making such distinctions as “Islamophobia” instead of a sensible fear of revolutionary Islamism[.]
But is it really ignorance, or is there a dangerous ideology that drives Obama policy in this regard? In an in-depth essay on the MB’s penetration of the government,” Clare Lopez observed:
Under the Muslim Brotherhood-influenced Obama administration, U.S. policy has undergone such a drastic shift in the direction of outright support for these jihadist movements — from al-Qa’eda militias in Libya, to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and both al-Qa’eda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked rebels in Syria — that it is scarcely recognizable as American any more.
This mentality likely led to Obama’s Justice Department dropping the charges against unindicted co-conspirators CAIR, ISNA, and other Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations in the Holy Land Foundation terror-funding trial. It also helped bring the MB to power in Egypt as Obama threw Mubarak under the proverbial bus despite a decades-long history of a peaceful alliance among Egypt, America, and Israel. And with numerous MB operatives working with or in the administration, it is no wonder that an Egyptian cleric recently stated, “Trust me, very soon we will see the flag of ‘There is no god but Allah’ flying over the White House. They are already holding [Muslim] prayers in the White House.”
This worldview coupled with the need to ensure some elitists’ perceived politically correct discourse is leading to troubling policy decisions. Succumbing to pressure by MB-affiliated organizations, the FBI was forced to rewrite counter-terrorism training manuals instructing agents on the religion of Islam. Allen West responded to the fiasco, stating, “We have to understand when tolerance becomes a one-way street, it will lead to cultural suicide[.] … [W]e should not allow the Muslim Brotherhood-associated groups to be influencing our national security strategy.”
One has to wonder whether this played a role in the FBI’s failure to discover the Boston terrorists and stop them before they killed. Rep. Pete King stated on Fox News Sunday:
[T]his is the latest in a series of cases like this. Anwar Awlaki, Major Hasan, Carlos Bledsoe, Robert Headley [sic], and now, this case with the older brother, where the FBI is given information about someone as being potential terrorists, they look at them, and then they don’t take action. And they go out and carry out murders after this. So, again, I’m wondering, again, is there something deficient here? What was wrong?
Whether due to efforts to be politically correct or efforts to hide reality from the public, Obama’s refusal to call terrorism what it is is distressing — and dangerous. Major Hasan’s terrorist attack at Ft. Hood is labeled “workplace violence” despite clear evidence (including screams of “Allahu Akbar”) to the contrary. And a filmmaker accused by the administration of producing a video that led to the Benghazi attacks remains in jail while our new secretary of state echoes Hillary “what difference does it make” Clinton and pronounces, “We got a lot more important things to move on to[.]” This willful ignorance will lead Kerry, along with Obama’s other similarly incompetent appointees, to serve as indirect and unintentional co-conspirators in future terrorist attacks on Americans.
The administration’s refusal to discuss what motivated last week’s terrorist attack (recall that David Axelrod surmised that Obama was thinking that it was due to “Tax Day”) is leading to left-wing apologists and our enemies blaming America. Until Obama admits that Islamism is a failed ideology and proudly asserts the wisdom of Americanism, how can we expect to end the growing appeal of violence among the Islamic faithful?
In a speech after the Boston attack, Obama referred to himself as “Reverend Obama.” If only he would take on that role in the context of preaching to the Muslim world what a privilege it is to live in our great country. But it is this refusal to recognize the evils of Islamic fundamentalism that have neutered the administration’s ability to confront the problem. And while the administration declares that the War on Terror is over and Janet Napolitano declares that the Boston attacks were not part of a “broader plot,” the terrorists’ War on America and its values rages on (a recent story explains that the only reason the terrorists did not kill the carjacking victim was because he was not an American). Andrew McCarthy explained:
Islamic supremacism is a mainstream Islamic ideology – held by tens of millions of Muslims, not just a few thousand al Qaeda members and collaborators. Thus, if the administration were to admit that this ideology and agenda catalyze terrorism, they would logically have to admit the problem is much bigger than al Qaeda.
… This leads the administration to the absurd conclusions that…a mass-murder attack committed by Muslims, no matter how obviously it is terrorism, should not be acknowledged as terrorism unless it has been committed by either a member of al Qaeda or a group that can be portrayed as “inspired” by al Qaeda (meaning, inspired by “violent extremism,” not by Islam).
And Stephen Hayes observed:
This is not, of course, the first time we’ve seen an apparent eagerness from the Obama administration to minimize or dismiss the possibility of broader ties to international terrorism after attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. interests. Three days after the attempted bombing of an airplane on Christmas Day 2009, President Obama suggested that the attempted attack was the work of “an isolated extremist.” He made the claim despite the fact that the bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, told interrogators in interviews shortly after his capture that he’d worked with al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Five months later, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano called the attempted bombing of Times Square by Faisal Shahzad a “one off” attack. Other administration officials downplayed the likelihood of ties to foreign jihadists.
In the coming days and weeks, we will learn more about the influences that led to the radicalization of the Boston terrorists. What we do know is that the imam from the mosque that the terrorists attended is affiliated with a MB front-group and that he sermonized about violence. And while the NYPD was vilified for recognizing that there is an incitement problem in America’s mosques, the federal government should mirror those anti-terror surveillance programs but likely will not.iii
Exacerbating the problem is Obama’s domestic spending sickness that is leaving our military capability in shambles and our homeland security seriously wanting. In an article discussing the military’s “State of Unreadiness” in the context of an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Col J.E. Dyer observed:
Even during the penurious Carter years, things weren’t this bad. It really isn’t possible to overstate the seriousness of it…
Burned readiness for the Air Force and Navy — the services that would execute a strike on the Iranian nuclear program — means forces that can’t be called on when they are needed. Think of “burning readiness” as driving until your gas is gone without a means of refilling the tank. That’s what America is doing right now with our armed forces.
While many may argue that the cuts to the military budget are due to partisan congressional dysfunction, it is important to note that the sequester was the brilliant idea of our current commander-in-chief. Furthermore, it was recently reported that the administration cut the budget for domestic bomb prevention by 45%. This is the portion of the DHS budget that is allocated to prevent the exact type of terrorist attack that occurred in Boston last week. And over the past several years, programs that provided millions to schools for training, security, police, and mass tragedies were terminated.
Obama entered office promising to close Gitmo, treating the war on terror as an everyday criminal matter (despite the urging of lawmakers, the administration will not designate the Boston terrorist as an enemy combatantiv), and outlawing enhanced interrogation that leads to life-saving intelligence. While Obama is largely praised for drone attacks that have killed al-Qaeda terrorists, the inevitable result is a dearth of leads that could prevent future attacks. The premature pullout from Iraq and Afghanistan and resulting void in American influence and strength are resulting in newly emboldened Taliban, al-Qaeda, and Islamic jihadists across the entire region. Leading from behind has resulted in the weaponization of Islamists. And the administration has granted Global Entry Status to Saudi Arabian citizens (before those from Great Britain, France, and Israel) and now permits knives, baseball bats, and other potential weapons on airplanes.
Many analysts are now questioning whether the atrocity that befell the citizens of Boston will become the “new normal.” It is clear that future attacks are inevitable as long as our government and the president in particular do not call a spade a spade and begin to take all necessary measures to protect American citizens from the evil deeds of Islamists.
Now is not a time to “stand with Muslims.” It is a time to call for Muslims to leave behind centuries of violence and join the civilized race of the 21st century. And if they do not, they should know that we will fight the War on Terror until the evil is destroyed.
iMore recently, a group of ICE agents sued the administration, claiming that it is dictating how immigration laws are or are not enforced. Quoting Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, Andrew Stiles reported that the administration appears “to be giving a lot of fee passes to people who are a public-safety problem, beyond the fact that they are here illegally.”
ii According to The Religion of Peace website, there have been over 20,000 lethal Muslim terrorist attacks since, 9/11 with approximately 1,800 occurring annually, about 150 per month, and 5 each day.
iii A Wall Street Journal editorial reports that due, in part, to bureaucratic competition, FBI officials were major sources for the AP stories on the NYPD program. They also “wish the NYPD had been in charge” in the case of the Boston attack.
iv The importance in naming Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and others as enemy combatants cannot be stressed enough. This designation would permit extensive interrogation that could possibly lead to information that could prevent future attacks and vital intelligence on terror cells, weapons training, and related matters. Treating terrorists as common criminals shuts the door to obtaining critical intelligence much like a drone strike terminates any ability to learn from the subject.
The text has been corrected to remove an apocryphal direct quote that Obama would “stand with Muslims”, when in fact he referenced “Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example,” when he said “I will stand with them.” We apologize for the error.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/can_a_president_who_has_promised_to_stand_with_the_muslims_protect_americans.html
—
Sen Ted Cruz Did MB Obama Armed The ISIS Terrorists He Now Wants To Fight?
—
Ted Cruz: Has Obama Armed ISIS Terrorists?
June 18, 2014 By Matthew Burke
Senator Ted Cruz, debating (yes, debating, it was not an interview) CNN’s Erin Burnett, who sounded more like a member of the Obama-Hillary Clinton defense team than a journalist (no surprise), said that the real question that the media should be focused on is whether Obama has been arming the ISIS (the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) terrorist organization (WATCH VIDEO BELOW).
Cruz told Burnett on Tuesday, when he wasn’t rudely interrupted by her constant blurbs supporting Obama and Hillary (emphasis added):
“The most consistent error of the Clinton-Obama foreign policy is the failure to understand the nature of our enemies. It is striking that neither President Obama nor Hillary Clinton in this discussion tonight are willing to utter the words ‘radical Islamic terrorists.’ They do not understand the radical religious extremism of individuals committed to Jihad who had pledged to murder Americans and it leads them to keep making mistakes over and over again, whether it is releasing five senior Taliban terrorists without understanding that these individuals will likely return to active warfare against the United States, whether it is in the case of Iraq, not understanding the threat posed by ISIS.
I’ll tell you a great question we ought to be asking right now is whether the Obama administration has armed ISIS, these radical Islamic terrorists, whether they’ve armed them in Syria. We know they’ve armed some of the rebels. We haven’t had an answer about which ones they’re arming and which ones they’re not. You cannot win a battle against radical Islamic terrorism if you’re unwilling to utter the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism.’”
WATCH BELOW:
http://www.tpnn.com/2014/06/18/video-ted-cruz-has-obama-armed-isis-terrorists/
—-
Insider Reveals U.S. Training Of ISIS In Jordan
—-
U.S. Backed Terror, Inc.The most advanced and murderously ruthless Mafia terror organization in the world
June 20, 2014 by Kurt Nimmo
Joe Biggs breaks down how the United States government and military have supported terrorism and drug dealing around the world.
Recent revelations, reported by the alternative media including Infowars.com, show how the U.S. and its CIA operate as Terror, Inc., the largest, most advanced and murderously ruthless Mafia terror organization in the world.
The Mockingbird establishment media – long ago converted into a slick propaganda Mighty Wurlitzer by the CIA’s Frank Wisner, a Wall Street lawyer – continues to report on the over the top terror of ISIS and al-Qaeda while ignoring the fact both of these organizations are Frankenstein monsters spawned by the CIA and the Pentagon along with their partners in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey.
Biggs highlights previous operations – from the U.S. trained Zetas in Mexico to sundry authoritarian regimes in Central America and their School of the Americas trained death squads – in his report.
He also takes a look at another topic off limits to the establishment media – the CIA’s opium operation protected by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
http://www.infowars.com/u-s-backed-terror-inc/
—-
Related
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/05/the_man_behind_the_benghazi_cover-up.html
http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/jihadists-seize-saddams-chemical-weapons-stockpile/?
http://www.infowars.com/obama-considers-air-strikes-in-syria-on-terrorists-he-previously-supported/
—-
COMMENT
Remember Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and Obama’s family is in the terrorism business and Obama’s ‘wedding ring’ says Obama serves Allah. The Muslim Brotherhood wants to kill all non-Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus, and others. The Muslim Brotherhood wants to install Sharia Law as the supreme law world wide. The Muslim Brotherhood wants to rule a world wide Caliphate. Obama must be happy to see the Caliphate taking form.
—-
Related previous posts on this blog
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/key-previous-posts/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/our-christian-president-wears-muslim-wedding-band/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/video-obamas-scandals-and-saul-alinsky-six-alinsky-rules-that-explain-obamas-words-deeds-and-goals-fundamentally-transform-america-including-creating-racial-unrest/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/10/29/obamacare-website-co-ties-to-obama-fundraising-michelle-obama-why-am-i-losing-my-health-insurance/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/29/mike-rogers-deep-in-benghazi-cover-up-keynote-honoring-pro-sharia-ground-zero-imam-us-troops-off-libyas-coast/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/09/benghazi-cover-up-blowing-up-mb-benghazi-truths-being-hidden-by-mike-rogers/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/video-mb-obama-and-congressman-mike-rogers-caught-in-war-crimes-coverup-liberal-journalist/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/video-its-official-rep-trey-gowdy-to-lead-benghazi-select-committee/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/benghazi-victims-families-conservative-leaders-to-boehner-install-select-committee-now/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/11/06/congressman-steve-stockman-calls-for-select-committee-to-investigate-obama/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/dems-block-resolution-to-create-joint-select-committee-to-investigate-benghazi/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/01/video-proven-lier-butcher-of-benghazi-bad-choices-failed-fact-check-hidden-thesis-if-you-want-hillary-select-jeb/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/13/video-trey-gowdy-blasts-dems-for-selective-amnesia-dem-amb-stevens-wasnt-murdered-in-benghazi/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/finally-boehner-caves-will-appoint-special-committee-on-benghazi/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/18/video-qa-what-you-need-to-know-about-isis-in-iraq-turn-their-guns-on-usa/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/18/video-the-stage-is-being-set-for-world-war-iii-senators-call-for-military-action-public-says-no/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/18/video-mb-obama-butcher-of-benghazi-need-to-answer-not-hide-behind-ahmed-abu-khattala-trial/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/07/07/video-ironclad-egypt-involved-in-benghazi-attacks/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/video-amb-pickering-asked-if-benghazi-a-botched-kidnapping-plot/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/01/17/senate-committee-confirms-egyptian-tie-to-benghazi/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/complaint-involving-hillary-collaborating-with-terrorism-has-been-escalated/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/video-hillary-clinton-collaborated-with-terrorism-it-does-make-a-difference/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/video-benghazi-anniversary-known-benghazi-liar-susan-rice-to-brief-congress-on-syria/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/video-unlikely-figure-outs-obama-as-muslim-brotherhood-member/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/video-pat-caddell-john-boehner-has-been-purposely-suppressing-anything-on-benghazi/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/17/video-caliphate-isis-judge-jeanine-michael-morell-mb-obama/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/video-mb-obamas-star-witness-abu-khattala-another-proven-scandal-obamacare-and-8-members-of-congress/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/video-war-between-christians-and-muslims-butcher-forty-eight-christians-one-by-one/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/here-is-the-proof-they-are-after-your-guns/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/video-not-just-vets-nuke-workers-govt-waiting-for-us-to-die-to-avoid-medical-costs/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/classified-documents-reveal-mb-obama-admins-close-ties-with-muslim-brotherhood-terrorists-in-libya-and-egypt/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/video-the-6th-caliphate-on-its-way-megyn-kelly-liz-dick-cheney-glenn-beck-redskins-watch-the-other-hand/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/video-cloward-piven-in-action-illegals-at-the-border-and-beyond-end-of-america-imploding-presidency/
http://reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/uk-china-signs-100-b-deal-pledge-greater-cooperation/
Tagged: abortion, al-Qaida, “Muslim Mafia, benghazi, Caliphate, Chemical Weapons, Christian, collapse of America, Constitution, dictator, foreclosure, Hamas, immigration, IRS, Islam, Islamist, Israel, jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, Nazi, NSA, Obama, obamacare, radical Islam, rights, Second Amendment, Syria, Tea Party, Tyrannical Government, voter fraud, White House 
