Roxane, Samsung, Technibilt and others in
24 New Patent Complaints for November 27, 2013
News:
1. Amicus Briefs Filed with Supreme Court Support Certiorari…
2. Patriot Scientific Granted Review By International Trade Commission
3. Microsoft Files Lawsuit Against Acacia
Keep looking for more coverage on NPEs in our newsletter and blog.
All defendants:
Does;
Kyle Aguilar;
Wham-O Marketing Inc;
Wham-O Holdings Ltd;
Cheng Hsieh;
Applied Ballistics, LLC;
Applied Ballistics, Inc.;
Roxane Laborator ies Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors of Jax, Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors of Venice, Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors, Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors of Orlando, Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors of Lake City, Inc;
D & D Garage Doors of The Treasure Coast, Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors;
D & D Garage Doors of Tampa, Inc;
D & D Garage Doors of Port St. Lucie, Inc.;
D & D Garage Doors of Daytona, Inc.;
Samsung Telecommunications America;
Sears Holdings Management;
Sony Electronics;
Staples;
Symantec;
Wal-Mart Stores;
Trademark Games;
Hearst Communications, Inc. d/b/a Seventeen Magazine;
Bravo Media LLC (Division of NBC Universal Media, LLC;
Meredith;
Time;
Orchid Retail Services USA, Inc.;
Rubbermaid;
Capsa Solutions, LLC;
Enovate Medical;
Ergotron;
Howard Industries;
Nichia Corporation;
Nichia America Corporation;
G3 Genuine Guide Gear, Inc.;
Fail-Safe LLC.
Our sponsors:
1. Agit Global et. al. v. Wham-O Marketing et. al.
Filed on : Nov. 19, 2013
Type: Complaint
Court : U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presided by: Philip S. Gutierrez
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-08557-PSG-CW
Defendant(s) :
1. Does
2. Kyle Aguilar
3. Wham-O Marketing Inc
4. Wham-O Holdings Ltd
5. Cheng Hsieh
Plaintiff(s) :
Tzong In Yeh — represented by
Robert Johnson Law Corporation; Fuldatal, HE
Attorneys: Andrew C. Callari & Robert A. Johnson
Robert D Rowlett Law Corporation; Surwurderdeich, NI
Attorneys: Robert D. Rowlett
2. Horus Vision v. Applied Ballistics et. al.
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint
Court : U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 3:13-cv-05460
Defendant(s) :
1. Applied Ballistics, LLC
2. Applied Ballistics, Inc.
Plaintiff(s) :
Horus Vision, LLC — represented by
Cooley Godward Kronish LLP; Palo Alto, CA
Attorneys: Daniel Jedediah Knauss
3. Xilidev v. Boku et. al.
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Presided by: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Civil Action No: 3:13-cv-02793-BTM-NLS
Defendant(s) :
1. Applied Ballistics, LLC
2. Applied Ballistics, Inc.
Plaintiff(s) :
Horus Vision, LLC — represented by
Cooley Godward Kronish LLP; Palo Alto, CA
Attorneys: Daniel Jedediah Knauss
Patent(s) in Suit :
7,273,168
Point-of-sale billing via hand-held devices
by Linlor
4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals et. al. v. Roxane Laboratories
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-01973-UNA
Defendant(s) :
1. Roxane Laborator ies Inc.
Plaintiff(s) :
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation — represented by
McCarter & English, LLP; Wilmington, DE
Attorneys: Daniel M. Silver
Patent(s) in Suit :
5,364,866
Heteroarylpiperidines, pyrrolidines and piperazines and their use as antipsychotics and by Strupczewski et. al.
5. Advanced Screenworks v. D & D Garage Doors et. al.
Filed on : Nov. 21, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presided by: John E. Steele
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-00818-JES-DNF
Defendant(s):
1. D & D Garage Doors of Jax, Inc.
2. D & D Garage Doors of Venice, Inc.
3. D & D Garage Doors, Inc.
4. D & D Garage Doors of Orlando, Inc.
5. D & D Garage Doors of Lake City, Inc
6. D & D Garage Doors of The Treasure Coast, Inc.
7. D & D Garage Doors
8. D & D Garage Doors of Tampa, Inc
9. D & D Garage Doors of Port St. Lucie, Inc.
10. D & D Garage Doors of Daytona, Inc.
Plaintiff(s) :
Advanced Screenworks, LLC — represented by
Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver, PLLC; Naples, FL
Attorneys: Jeffrey W. Weaver
Dunlap Weaver PLLC; Leesburg, VA
Attorneys: Dunlap Thomas M
Morison Holden Derewetzky & Prough, LLP; Richmond, VA
Attorneys: Cortland C. Putbrese
Unknown Firm; Leesburg, VA
Attorneys: David Ludwig
Patent(s) in Suit :
8,151,858
Garage screen door system by Hughes et. al.
6. eDekka v. Samsung Telecommunications America
Filed on : Nov. 20, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-00980
Defendant(s) :
1. Samsung Telecommunications America
Plaintiff(s) :
eDekka LLC — represented by
Tadlock Law Firm; Plano, TX
Attorneys: Charles Craig Tadlock
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,266,674
Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels by Hejna
7. eDekka v. Sears, Roebuck et. al.
Filed on : Nov. 20, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-00981
Defendant(s) :
1. Sears, Roebuck
2. Sears Holdings Management
Plaintiff(s) :
eDekka LLC — represented by
Tadlock Law Firm; Plano, TX
Attorneys: Charles Craig Tadlock
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,266,674
Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels by Hejna
8. eDekka v. Sony Electronics
Filed on : Nov. 20, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-00982
Defendant(s) :
1. Sony Electronics
Plaintiff(s) :
eDekka LLC — represented by
Tadlock Law Firm; Plano, TX
Attorneys: Charles Craig Tadlock
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,266,674
Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels by Hejna
9. eDekka v. Staples
Filed on : Nov. 20, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-00983
Defendant(s) :
1. Staples
Plaintiff(s) :
eDekka LLC — represented by
Tadlock Law Firm; Plano, TX
Attorneys: Charles Craig Tadlock
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,266,674
Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels by Hejna
10. eDekka v. Symantec
Filed on : Nov. 20, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presided by: no judge yet assigned
Civil Action No: 2:13-cv-00984
Defendant(s) :
1. Symantec
Plaintiff(s) :
eDekka LLC — represented by
Tadlock Law Firm; Plano, TX
Attorneys: Charles Craig Tadlock
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,266,674
Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels by Hejna
11. Cole et. al. v. Trademark Games et. al.
Filed on : Nov. 20, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presided by: P. Kevin Castel
Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-08272-PKC
Defendant(s) :
1. Wal-Mart Stores
2. Trademark Games
Plaintiff(s) :
Larry Cole — represented by
Epstein Drangel LLP; New York, NY
Attorneys: Jason M. Drangel & Robert L. Epstein
Integrated Merchandise Group International, Ltd.
Patent(s) in Suit :
D492533
Side posture pillow by Cole
12. DietGoal Innovations v. Hearst Communications, Inc. d/b/a Seventeen Magazine
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint
Court : U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presided by: Robert W. Sweet
Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-08379-RWS
Defendant(s) :
1. Hearst Communications, Inc. d/b/a Seventeen Magazine — represented by
The Hearst Corporation; New York, NY
Attorneys: Ravi V. Sitwala
Hunton & Williams; Norfolk, VA
Attorneys: Sonja Garrelts
Wendy Cohen McGraw
Robert Martin Tata
Brent Lee VanNorman
Plaintiff(s) :
DietGoal Innovations — represented by
McNeely Hare & War LLP; Washington, DC
Attorneys: Steven War
Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC; Dallas, TX
Attorneys: Eric William Buether
Niknaz Forughi Bukovcan
Christopher Michael Joe
Michael David Ricketts
13. DietGoal Innovations v. Bravo Media
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presided by: Edgardo Ramos
Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-08391-ER
Defendant(s) :
1. Bravo Media LLC (Division of NBC Universal Media, LLC — represented by
Troutman Sanders LLP; Richmond, VA
Attorneys: Robert Armistead Angle, Dabney Jefferson Carr & Harrison Scott Kelly
Klarquist Sparkman LLP; Portland, OR
Attorneys: John Christopher Carraway
Plaintiff(s) :
DietGoal Innovations LLC — represented by
McNeely Hare & War LLP; Washington, DC
Attorneys: Steven War
Young Pickett & Lee; Texarkana, TX
Attorneys: Damon Michael Young
Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC; Dallas, TX
Attorneys: Eric William Buether, Niknaz Forughi Bukovcan, Brian Andrew Carpenter, Christopher Michael Joe, Mark Davin Perantie & Monica Nguyen Tavakoli
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,585,516
Method and system for computerized visual behavior analysis, training, and by Alabaster
14. DietGoal Innovations v. Meredith
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presided by: Thomas P. Griesa
Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-08384-TPG
Defendant(s) :
1. Meredith — represented by
Troutman Sanders LLP; Richmond, VA
Attorneys: Robert Armistead Angle
Harrison Scott Kelly
Klarquist Sparkman LLP; Portland, OR
Attorneys: John Christopher Carraway
Plaintiff(s) :
DietGoal Innovations LLC — represented by
McNeely Hare & War LLP; Washington, DC
Attorneys: Steven War
Young Pickett & Lee; Texarkana, TX
Attorneys: Damon Michael Young
Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC; Dallas, TX
Attorneys: Eric William Buether, Niknaz Forughi Bukovcan, Brian Andrew Carpenter, Christopher Michael Joe, Mark Davin Perantie & Monica Nguyen Tavakoli
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,585,516
Method and system for computerized visual behavior analysis, training, and by Alabaster
15. DietGoal Innovations v. Time
Filed on : Nov. 25, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presided by: George B. Daniels
Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-08381-GBD
Defendant(s) :
1. Time — represented by
Troutman Sanders LLP; Richmond, VA
Attorneys: Robert Armistead Angle
Harrison Scott Kelly
Klarquist Sparkman LLP; Portland, OR
Attorneys: John Christopher Carraway
Plaintiff(s) :
DietGoal Innovations LLC — represented by
McNeely Hare & War LLP; Washington, DC
Attorneys: Steven War
Young Pickett & Lee; Texarkana, TX
Attorneys: Damon Michael Young
Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC; Dallas, TX
Attorneys: Eric William Buether, Niknaz Forughi Bukovcan, Brian Andrew Carpenter, Christopher Michael Joe, Mark Davin Perantie & Monica Nguyen Tavakoli
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,585,516
Method and system for computerized visual behavior analysis, training, and by Alabaster
16. Technibilt v. Orchid Retail Services
Filed on : Nov. 22, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presided by: Richard Voorhees
Civil Action No: 5:13-cv-00159-RLV-DCK
Defendant(s) :
1. Orchid Retail Services USA, Inc.
Plaintiff(s) :
Technibilt, Ltd. — represented by
Van Winkle Buck Wall Starnes & Davis PA; Asheville, NC
Attorneys: David M. Carter & David Matthew Wilkerson
The Van Winkle Law Firm; Asheville, NC
Attorneys: R Brian Johnson
Patent(s) in Suit :
6,659,294
Multi-configurational wire-rod display rack
by Simard
17. InterMetro Industries v. Rubbermaid
Filed on : Nov. 22, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presided by: Robert D. Mariani
Civil Action No: 3:13-cv-02857-RDM
Defendant(s) :
1. Rubbermaid
Plaintiff(s) :
InterMetro Industries — represented by
Harness,Dickey & Pierce, PLC; Troy, MI
Attorneys: Glenn E. Forbis
George D. Moustakas
Neal D. Sanborn
Woodcock Washburn LLP; Philadelphia, PA
Attorneys: Dale M. Heist
John Frank Murphy
Patent(s) in Suit :
7,009,840
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
7,594,668
Medical cart, medication module, height adjustment mechanism, and method of medication transport by Arceta et. al.
7,612,999
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
7,990,691
Mobile computer workstation by Clark et. al.
7,791,866
Mobile computer workstation by Clark et. al.
6,493,220
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
8,526,176
Mobile computer workstation by Clark et. al.
6,721,178
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
18. InterMetro Industries v. Capsa Solutions
Filed on : Nov. 22, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presided by: Robert D. Mariani
Civil Action No: 3:13-cv-02853-RDM
Defendant(s) :
1. Capsa Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff(s) :
InterMetro Industries — represented by
Harness,Dickey & Pierce, PLC; Troy, MI
Attorneys: Glenn E. Forbis
George D. Moustakas
Neal D. Sanborn
Woodcock Washburn LLP; Philadelphia, PA
Attorneys: Dale M. Heist
John Frank Murphy
Patent(s) in Suit :
7,009,840
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
7,594,668
Medical cart, medication module, height adjustment mechanism, and method of medication transport by Arceta et. al.
7,612,999
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
7,990,691
Mobile computer workstation by Clark et. al.
7,791,866
Mobile computer workstation by Clark et. al.
6,493,220
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
8,526,176
Mobile computer workstation by Clark et. al.
6,721,178
Mobile clinical workstation by Clark et. al.
19. InterMetro Industries v. Enovate Medical
Filed on : Nov. 22, 2013
Type: Complaint for Patent Infringement
Court : U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presided by: Robert D. Mariani
<td bgco