Inducing labor after the water breaks poses no harm to mothers and their babies, according to a new Israeli study.
The study, conducted at Tel Aviv University, has found that natural, spontaneous deliveries and induced deliveries following the rupture of the amniotic sac in the mother share similar outcomes, contradicting common wisdom.
Induced labor — the process of jump-starting delivery using prostaglandin, a fatty acid compound with hormone-like effects, notably the promotion of uterine contractions — “has gotten a bad rep,” Dr. Liran Hiersch, the lead researcher, said in a statement. “We found little justification for this in the case of women whose water broke prematurely.”
SEE ALSO: Excess Weight During Pregnancy Affects Children’s Health
According to Hiersch, “people have an idea that everything natural is better, including childbirth. But induction is not necessarily more dangerous for mother and child than Mother Nature herself.”
No more dangerous than Mother Nature
Most expectant mothers are warned about artificially induced deliveries. These warnings counsel that induction may cause a low fetal heart rate, an increased risk of infection to mother and baby, and uterine rupture or excessive bleeding after delivery. “We have found that induction produces healthy mothers and infants, with risk factors similar to those of spontaneous deliveries,” Hiersch said.
SEE ALSO: Mom’s Stress During Pregnancy Affects Baby’s Iron Levels
The researchers evaluated 625 women admitted to Israel’s Rabin Medical Center with prolonged (24-hour) premature rupture of membranes or water breakage. Women who did not exhibit the spontaneous onset of labor within 24 hours from the moment their water broke underwent prostaglandin induction. These were then compared to those women who did develop the spontaneous onset of labor within 24 hours of being admitted. No significant difference was found between the groups regarding maternal age, parity and obstetrical complications.
Women in the induction group were found to be at an increased risk for Cesarean section, but researchers believe this was due mainly to blocked birth canals and not the induction itself.
Artificial induction is a possibility for all expectant mothers who have approached two weeks past their delivery date, who experience high blood pressure or diabetes, who have a uterine infection or who simply haven’t experienced contractions despite their water having broken. These women are often hospitalized for 24 hours. But after 24 hours have passed without natural delivery, most medical professionals will induce labor artificially to reduce subsequent risks to mother and child.
Patients should be reassured
“There is a palpable fear among women who are waiting for the contractions to begin,” Hiersch says. “They fear fetal distress, they fear infection, umbilical cord trouble, but we have found no basis for their fears. These mothers should be assured that induced labor poses no increased risk to the health of their babies and themselves.”
Hiersch is currently working on predicting which women may spontaneously go into labor following the premature rupture of membranes.
The study, which was recently published in the Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, was conducted by Dr. Liran Hiersch and Dr. Eran Ashwal, both of TAU‘s Sackler School of Medicine and the Helen Schneider Hospital for Women at Rabin Medical Center.
Related Posts
Study: Post-Term Delivery Doubles Risk Of Complications For Newborns
Birth Control Pills Tied To Blood Clots, Study Shows
Study Finds Getting Pregnant Has The Same Effect As Injecting A Youth Serum!
Study: 1 In 4 Women Traumatized By Childbirth