FONDAPARINUX
Fondaparinux is a drug belonging to the group of the antithrombotic agents and are used to prevent deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. It is also used for the treatment of severe venous thrombosis and pulmonary
Още за: фондапаринукс (fondaparinux) | ATC B01AX05
от framar.bg
EMA:Link, US FDA:link
114870-03-0 ………..10x SODIUM SALT
CAS number
114870-03-0 FREE FORM
MF
C31H43N3Na10O49S8 10X SODIUM
MW
1726.77 g/mol 10X SODIUM
GSK-576428 Org-31540 SR-90107SR-90107A
launched 2002
Arixtra, Quixidar, Fondaparinux sodium, Fondaparin sodium, Arixtra (TN), Fondaparinux, Org-31540, AC1LCS4W, SR-90107A
Fondaparinux (Arixtra) is a synthetic pentasaccharide anticoagulant. Apart from the O-methyl group at the reducing end of the molecule, the identity and sequence of the five monomeric sugar units contained in fondaparinux is identical to a sequence of five monomeric sugar units that can be isolated after either chemical or enzymatic cleavage of the polymeric glycosaminoglycan heparin and heparan sulfate (HS). This monomeric sequence in heparin and HS is thought to form the high affinity binding site for the natural anti-coagulant factor, antithrombin III (ATIII).
Binding of heparin/HS to ATIII has been shown to increase the anti-coagulant activity of antithrombin III 1000-fold. Fondaparinux potentiates the neutralizing action ofATIII on activated Factor X 300-fold. Fondaparinux may be used: to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients who have undergone orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs (e.g. hip fracture, hip replacement and knee surgery); to prevent VTE in patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are are at high risk of thromboembolic complications; in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pumonary embolism (PE); in the management of unstable angina (UA) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI); and in the management of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
FONDAPARINUX
Fondaparinux (trade name Arixtra) is an anticoagulant medication chemically related to low molecular weight heparins. It is marketed byGlaxoSmithKline. A generic version developed by Alchemia is marketed within the US by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories.
Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide Factor Xa inhibitor. Apart from the O-methyl group at the reducing end of the molecule, the identity and sequence of the five monomeric sugar units contained in fondaparinux is identical to a sequence of five monomeric sugar units that can be isolated after either chemical or enzymatic cleavage of the polymeric glycosaminoglycans heparin and heparan sulfate (HS). Within heparin and heparan sulfate this monomeric sequence is thought to form the high affinity binding site for the anti-coagulant factor antithrombin III (ATIII). Binding of heparin/HS to ATIII has been shown to increase the anti-coagulant activity of antithrombin III 1000 fold. In contrast to heparin, fondaparinux does not inhibit thrombin.
Fondaparinux is given subcutaneously daily. Clinically, it is used for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients who have had orthopedic surgery as well as for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
One potential advantage of fondaparinux over LMWH or unfractionated heparin is that the risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is substantially lower. Furthermore, there have been case reports of fondaparinux being used to anticoagulate patients with established HIT as it has no affinity to PF-4. However, its renal excretion precludes its use in patients with renal dysfunction.
Unlike direct factor Xa inhibitors, it mediates its effects indirectly through antithrombin III, but unlike heparin, it is selective for factor Xa.[1]
Fondaparinux is similar to enoxaparin in reducing the risk of ischemic events at nine days, but it substantially reduces major bleeding and improves long term mortality and morbidity.[2]
It has been investigated for use in conjunction with streptokinase.[3]
Fondaparinux sodium, a selective coagulation factor Xa inhibitor, was first launched in the U.S. in 2002 by GlaxoSmithKline in a subcutaneous injection formulation for the prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) which may lead to pulmonary embolism in patients at risk for thromboembolic complications who are undergoing hip replacement, knee replacement, hip fracture surgery or abdominal surgery. The product is available in Japan for the treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis and acute pulmonary thromboembolism. In 2004, GlaxoSmithKline launched fondaparinux as an injection to be used in conjunction with warfarin sodium for the subcutaneous treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and DVT.
In 2007, GlaxoSmithKline received approval in the E.U. for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), specifically unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), while in the U.S. an approvable letter was received for this indication. Currently, the drug is in clinical development at GlaxoSmithKline for the treatment of venous limb superficial thrombosis.
Fondaparinux Molecule
GlaxoSmithKline had filed a regulatory application in the E.U. seeking approval of fondaparinux sodium for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE), however; in 2008, the application was withdrawn for commercial reasons. Commercial launch in Japan for the product for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in high risk patients undergoing surgery in the abdomen took place in 2008.
In 2010, the EMA approved a regulatory application filed by GlaxoSmithKline seeking approval of a once-daily formulation of fondaparinux sodium for the treatment of adults with acute symptomatic spontaneous superficial-vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs without concomitant DVT. Product launch took place in the U.K. for this indication the same year.
The antithrombotic activity of fondaparinux is the result of antithrombin III (ATIII)-mediated selective inhibition of Factor Xa. By selectively binding to ATIII, the drug potentiates (about 300 times) the innate neutralization of Factor Xa by ATIII. Neutralization of Factor Xa, in turn, interrupts the blood coagulation cascade and thus inhibits thrombin formation and thrombus development. Fondaparinux does not inactivate thrombin (activated Factor II) and has no known effect on platelet function. At the recommended dose, no effects have been demonstrated on fibrinolytic activity or bleeding time.
Originally developed by Organon and Sanofi (formerly known as sanofi-aventis), fondaparinux sodium is currently available in approximately 30 countries. In 2004, Organon transferred its rights to the drug to Sanofi in exchange for revenues based on future sales from jointly developed antithrombotic products and in early 2005, GlaxoSmithKline also acquired the antithrombotic.
At the beginning of 2005, GlaxoSmithKline signed a two-year agreement with Adolor (acquired by Cubist in 2011) for the copromotion of fondaparinux sodium in the U.S. In Sepetember 2013, Aspen Pharmacare acquired Arixtra global rights (excluding China, India and Pakistan) from GlaxoSmithKline for the treatment of thrombosis with GlaxoSmithKline commercializing the product in Indonesia under licence from Aspen.
Chemical structure
Abbreviations
GlcNS6S = 2-deoxy-6-O-sulfo-2-(sulfoamino)-α-D-glucopyranoside
GlcA = β-D-glucopyranuronoside
GlcNS3,6S = 2-deoxy-3,6-di-O-sulfo-2-(sulfoamino)-α-D-glucopyranosyl
IdoA2S = 2-O-sulfo-α-L-idopyranuronoside
GlcNS6SOMe = methyl-O-2-deoxy-6-O-sulfo-2-(sulfoamino)-α-D-glucopyranoside
The sequence of monosaccharides is D-GlcNS6S-α-(1,4)-D-GlcA-β-(1,4)-D-GlcNS3,6S-α-(1,4)-L-IdoA2S-α-(1,4)-D-GlcNS6S-OMe, as shown in the following structure:
ARIXTRA (fondaparinux sodium) Injection is a sterile solution containing fondaparinux sodium. It is a synthetic and specific inhibitor of activatedFactor X (Xa). Fondaparinux sodium is methyl O-2-deoxy-6-O-sulfo-2-(sulfoamino)-α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-O-β-D-glucopyranuronosyl-( 1→4)-O-2-deoxy-3,6-di-O-sulfo-2-(sulfoamino)-α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-O-2-Osulfo-α-L-idopyranuronosyl-(1→4)-2-deoxy-6-O-sulfo-2-(sulfoamino)-α-D-glucopyranoside, decasodium salt.
The molecular formula of fondaparinux sodium is C31H43N3Na10O49S8 and its molecular weight is 1728. The structural formula is provided below:
ARIXTRA is supplied as a sterile, preservative-free injectable solution for subcutaneous use.
Each single-dose, prefilled syringe of ARIXTRA, affixed with an automatic needle protection system, contains 2.5 mg of fondaparinux sodium in 0.5 mL, 5.0 mg of fondaparinux sodium in 0.4 mL, 7.5 mg of fondaparinux sodium in 0.6 mL, or 10.0 mg of fondaparinux sodium in 0.8 mL of an isotonic solutionof sodium chloride and water for injection. The final drug product is a clear and colorless to slightly yellow liquid with a pH between 5.0 and 8.0.
Molecular formula of fondaparinux sodium is C31H43N3Na10O49S8
Chemical IUPAC Name is decasodium (2R,3S,4S,5R,6R)-3-[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)-5-[(2R,3R,4S,5S,6S)-6- carboxylato-5-[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)- 4,5-dihydroxy-3- (sulfonatoamino)-6-(sulfonatooxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-3,4- dihydroxy-oxan-2-yl]oxy-3-(sulfonatoamino)-4- sulfonatooxy-6-(sulfonatooxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy- 4-hydroxy-6-[(2R,3S,4R,5R,6S)-4-hydroxy-6- methoxy-5-(sulfonatoamino)-2-(sulfonatooxymethyl) oxan-3-yl]oxy-5-sulfonatooxy-oxane-2-carboxylate
Molecular weight is 1726.77 g/mol
……………….
INTRODUCTION
In U.S. Patent No. 7,468,358, Fondaparinux sodium is described as the “only anticoagulant thought to be completely free of risk from HIT-2 induction.” The biochemical and pharmacologic rationale for the development of a heparin pentasaccharide in Thromb. Res., 86(1), 1-36, 1997 by Walenga et al. cited the recently approved synthetic pentasaccharide Factor Xa inhibitor Fondaparinux sodium. Fondaparinux has also been described in Walenga et al., Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs, Vol. 11, 397-407, 2002 and Bauer, Best Practice & Research Clinical Hematology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 89-104, 2004.
Fondaparinux sodium is a linear octasulfated pentasaccharide (oligosaccharide with five monosaccharide units ) molecule having five sulfate esters on oxygen (O-sulfated moieties) and three sulfates on a nitrogen (N- sulfated moieties). In addition, Fondaparinux contains five hydroxyl groups in the molecule that are not sulfated and two sodium carboxylates. Out of five saccharides, there are three glucosamine derivatives and one glucuronic and one L-iduronic acid. The five saccharides are connected to each other in alternate α and β glycosylated linkages (see Figure 1).
Figure 1 Fondaparinux Sodium
Monosaccharide E Monosaccharide D Monosaccharide C Monosaccharide B Monosaccharide A derived from derived from derived from derived from derived from
Monomer E Monomer D Monomer C Monomer B1 Monomer A2
Fondaparinux Sodium
Fondaparinux sodium is a chemically synthesized methoxy derivative of the natural pentasaccharide sequence, which is the active site of heparin that mediates the interaction with antithrombin (Casu et al., J. Biochem., 197, 59, 1981). It has a challenging pattern of O- and N- sulfates, specific glycosidic stereochemistry, and repeating units of glucosamines and uronic acids (Petitou et al, Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Product, 60, 144-209, 1992).
The monosaccharide units comprising the Fondaparinux molecule are labeled as per the convention in Figure 1, with the glucosamine unit on the right referred to as monosaccharide A and the next, an uronic acid unit to its left as B and subsequent units, C, D and E respectively. The chemical synthesis of Fondaparinux starts with monosaccharides of defined structures that are themselves referred to as Monomers A2, Bl, C, D and E, for differentiation and convenience, and they become the corresponding monosaccharides in fondaparinux sodium.
Due to this complex mixture of free and sulfated hydroxyl groups, and the presence of N- sulfated moieties, the design of a synthetic route to Fondaparinux requires a careful strategy of protection and de-protection of reactive functional groups during synthesis of the molecule. Previously described syntheses of Fondaparinux all adopted a similar strategy to complete the synthesis of this molecule. This strategy can be envisioned as having four stages.
The strategy in the first stage requires selective de-protection of five out of ten hydroxyl groups. During the second stage these five hydroxyls are selectively sulfonated. The third stage of the process involves the de -protection of the remaining five hydroxyl groups. The fourth stage of the process is the selective sulfonation of the 3 amino groups, in the presence of five hydroxyl groups that are not sulfated in the final molecule. This strategy can be envisioned from the following fully protected pentasaccharide, also referred to as the late-stage intermediate.
In this strategy, all of the hydroxyl groups that are to be sulfated are protected with an acyl protective group, for example, as acetates (R = CH3) or benzoates (R = aryl) (Stages 1 and 2) All of the hydroxyl groups that are to remain as such are protected with benzyl group as benzyl ethers (Stage 3). The amino group, which is subsequently sulfonated, is masked as an azide (N3) moiety (Stage 4). R1 and R2 are typically sodium in the active pharmaceutical compound (e.g., Fondaparinux sodium).
This strategy allows the final product to be prepared by following the synthetic operations as outlined below: a) Treatment of the late- stage intermediate with base to hydrolyze (deprotect) the acyl ester groups to reveal the five hydroxyl groups. The two R1 and R2 ester groups are hydrolyzed in this step as well.
b) Sulfonation of the newly revealed hydroxyl groups.
c) Hydrogenation of the O-sulfated pentasaccharide to de-benzylate the five benzyl- protected hydroxyls, and at the same time, unmask the three azides to the corresponding amino groups.
d) On the last step of the operation, the amino groups are sulfated selectively at a high pH, in the presence of the five free hydroxyls to give Fondaparinux (Figure 1). While the above strategy has been shown to be viable, it is not without major drawbacks. One drawback lies in the procedure leading to the fully protected pentasaccharide (late stage intermediate), especially during the coupling of the D-glucuronic acid to the next adjacent glucose ring (the D-monomer to C-monomer in the EDCBA nomenclature shown in Figure 1). Sugar oligomers or oligosaccharides, such as Fondaparinux, are assembled using coupling reactions, also known as glycosylation reactions, to “link” sugar monomers together. The difficulty of this linking step arises because of the required stereochemical relationship between the D-sugar and the C-sugar, as shown below:
The stereochemical arrangement illustrated above in Figure 2 is described as having a β- configuration at the anomeric carbon of the D-sugar (denoted by the arrow). The linkage between the D and C units in Fondaparinux has this specific stereochemistry. There are, however, competing β- and α-glycosylation reactions.
The difficulties of the glycosylation reaction in the synthesis of Fondaparinux is well known. In 1991 Sanofi reported a preparation of a disaccharide intermediate in 51% yield having a 12/1 ratio of β/α stereochemistry at the anomeric position (Duchaussoy et al., Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett., 1(2), 99-102, 1991).
In another publication (Sinay et al, Carbohydrate Research, 132, C5-C9, 1984) yields on the order of 50% with coupling times on the order of 6- days are reported. U.S. Patent No. 4,818,816 {see e.g., column 31, lines 50-56) discloses a 50% yield for the β-glycosylation.
Alchemia’s U.S. Patent No. 7,541,445 is even less specific as to the details of the synthesis of this late-stage Fondaparinux synthetic intermediate. The ’445 Patent discloses several strategies for the assembly of the pentasaccharide (1+4, 3+2 or 2+3) using a 2-acylated D-sugar (specifically 2-allyloxycarbonyl) for the glycosylation coupling reactions. However, Alchemia’s strategy involves late-stage pentasaccharides that all incorporate a 2-benzylated D- sugar.
The transformation of acyl to benzyl is performed either under acidic or basic conditions. Furthermore, these transformations, using benzyl bromide or benzyl trichloroacetimidate, typically result in extensive decomposition and the procedure suffers from poor yields. Thus, such transformations (at a disaccharide, trisaccharide, and pentasaccharide level) are typically not acceptable for industrial scale production.
Examples of fully protected pentasaccharides are described in Duchaussoy et al, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1 (2), 99-102, 1991; Petitou et al, Carbohydr. Res., 167, 67-75, 1987; Sinay et al, Carbohydr. Res., 132, C5-C9, 1984; Petitou et al., Carbohydr. Res., 1147, 221-236, 1986; Lei et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem., 6, 1337-1346, 1998; Ichikawa et al., Tet. Lett., 27(5), 611-614, 1986; Kovensky et al, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1999, 7, 1567-1580, 1999.
These fully protected pentasaccharides may be converted to the O- and N-sulfated pentasaccharides using the four steps (described earlier) of: a) saponification with LiOHZH2CVNaOH, b) O-sulfation by an Et3N- SO3 complex; c) de-benzylation and azide reduction via H2/Pd hydrogenation; and d) N-sulfation with a pyridine-SO3 complex.
Even though many diverse analogs of the fully protected pentasaccharide have been prepared, none use any protective group at the 2-position of the D unit other than a benzyl group. Furthermore, none of the fully protected pentasaccharide analogs offer a practical, scaleable and economical method for re-introduction of the benzyl moiety at the 2-position of the D unit after removal of any participating group that promotes β-glycosylation.
Furthermore, the coupling of benzyl protected sugars proves to be a sluggish, low yielding and problematic process, typically resulting in substantial decomposition of the pentasaccharide (prepared over 50 synthetic steps), thus making it unsuitable for a large [kilogram] scale production process.
Ref. 1. Sinay et al, Carbohydr. Res., 132, C5-C9, 1984.
Ref. 2. Petitou et al., Carbohydr. Res., 147, 221-236. 1986
It has been a general strategy for carbohydrate chemists to use base-labile ester-protecting group at 2-position of the D unit to build an efficient and stereoselective β-glycosidic linkage. To construct the β-linkage carbohydrate chemists have previously acetate and benzoate ester groups, as described, for example, in the review by Poletti et al., Eur. J. Chem., 2999-3024, 2003.
The ester group at the 2-position of D needs to be differentiated from the acetate and benzoates at other positions in the pentasaccharide. These ester groups are hydrolyzed and sulfated later in the process and, unlike these ester groups, the 2-hydroxyl group of the D unit needs to remain as the hydroxyl group in the final product, Fondaparinux sodium.
Some of the current ester choices for the synthetic chemists in the field include methyl chloro acetyl and chloro methyl acetate [MCA or CMA] . The mild procedures for the selective removal of theses groups in the presence of acetates and benzoates makes them ideal candidates. However, MCA/CMA groups have been shown to produce unwanted and serious side products during the glycosylation and therefore have not been favored in the synthesis of Fondaparinux sodium and its analogs. For by-product formation observed in acetate derivatives see Seeberger et al., J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 4081-93.
Similar by-product formation is also observed using chloroacetate derivatives. See Orgueira et al., Eur. J. Chem., 9(1), 140-169, 2003.
The levulinyl group can be rapidly and almost quantitatively removed by treatment with hydrazine hydrate as the deprotection reagent as illustrated in the example below. Under the same reaction conditions primary and secondary acetate and benzoate esters are hardly affected by hydrazine hydrate. See, e.g., Seeberger et al, J. Org. Chem., 69, 4081-4093, 2004.
The syntheses of Fondaparinux sodium described herein takes advantage of the levulinyl group in efficient construction of the trisaccharide EDC with improved β- selectivity for the coupling under milder conditions and increased yields.
Substitution of the benzyl protecting group with a THP moiety provides its enhanced ability to be incorporated quantitatively in position-2 of the unit D of the pentasaccharide. Also, the THP group behaves in a similar manner to a benzyl ether in terms of function and stability. In the processes described herein, the THP group is incorporated at the 2-position of the D unit at this late stage of the synthesis (i.e., after the D and C units have been coupled through a 1,2-trans glycosidic (β-) linkage). The THP protective group typically does not promote an efficient β- glycosylation and therefore is preferably incorporated in the molecule after the construction of the β-linkage.
Fondaparinux and sodium salt thereof can be prepared from pure compound of Formula II by following the teachings from Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 1(2), p. 95-98 (1991). A second aspect of the present invention provides a process for the preparation of 4-0- -D-glucopyranosyl-l,6-anhydro- -D-glucopyranose, represented by STR BELOW
……………………………..
SYNTHESIS
EP2464668A2 AND US8288515
The scheme below exemplifies some of the processes of the present invention disclosed herein.
The tetrahydropyranyl (THP) protective group and the benzyl ether protective group are suitable hydroxyl protective groups and can survive the last four synthetic steps (described above) in the synthesis of Fondaparinux sodium, even under harsh reaction conditions. Certain other protecting groups do not survive the last four synthetic steps in high yield.
Synthesis of Fondaparinux
Fondaparinux was prepared using the following procedure:
Synthetic Procedures
The following abbreviations are used herein: Ac is acetyl; ACN is acetonitrile; MS is molecular sieves; DMF is dimethyl formamide; PMB is p-methoxybenzyl; Bn is benzyl; DCM is dichloromethane; THF is tetrahydrofuran; TFA is trifluoro acetic acid; CSA is camphor sulfonic acid; TEA is triethylamine; MeOH is methanol; DMAP is dimethylaminopyridine; RT is room temperature; CAN is ceric ammonium nitrate; Ac2O is acetic anhydride; HBr is hydrogen bromide; TEMPO is tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxide; TBACl is tetrabutyl ammonium chloride; EtOAc is ethyl acetate; HOBT is hydroxybenzotriazole; DCC is dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; Lev is levunlinyl; TBDPS is tertiary-butyl diphenylsilyl; TCA is trichloroacetonitrile; O-TCA is O-trichloroacetimidate; Lev2O is levulinic anhydride; DIPEA is diisopropylethylamine; Bz is benzoyl; TBAF is tetrabutylammonium fluoride; DBU is diazabicycloundecane; BF3.Et2O is boron trifluoride etherate; TMSI is trimethylsilyl iodide; TBAI is tetrabutylammonium iodide; TES-Tf is triethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (triethylsilyl triflate); DHP is dihydropyran; PTS is p-toluenesulfonic acid.
Synthesis of Fondaparinux
Fondaparinux was prepared using the following procedure:
The ester moieties in EDCBA Pentamer were hydrolyzed with sodium and lithium hydroxide in the presence of hydrogen peroxide in dioxane mixing at room temperature for 16 hours to give the pentasaccharide intermediate API1. The five hydroxyl moieties in API1 were sulfated using a pyridine-sulfur trioxide complex in dimethylformamide, mixing at 60° C. for 2 hours and then purified using column chromatography (CG-161), to give the pentasulfated pentasaccharide API2. The intermediate API2 was then hydrogenated to reduce the three azides on sugars E, C and A to amines and the reductive deprotection of the five benzyl ethers to their corresponding hydroxyl groups to form the intermediate API3. This transformation occurs by reacting API2 with 10% palladium/carbon catalyst with hydrogen gas for 72 hours. The three amines on API3 were then sulfated using the pyridine-sulfur trioxide complex in sodium hydroxide and ammonium acetate, allowing the reaction to proceed for 12 hours. The acidic work-up procedure of the reaction removes the THP group to provide crude fondaparinux which is purified and is subsequently converted to its salt form. The crude mixture was purified using an ion-exchange chromatographic column (HiQ resin) followed by desalting using a size exclusion resin or gel filtration (Biorad Sephadex G25) to give the final API, fondaparinux sodium
Experimental Procedures Preparation of IntD1 Bromination of Glucose Pentaacetate
To a 500 ml flask was added 50 g of glucose pentaacetate (C6H22O11) and 80 ml of methylene chloride. The mixture was stirred at ice-water bath for 20 min HBr in HOAc (33%, 50 ml) was added to the reaction mixture. After stirring for 2.5 hr another 5 ml of HBr was added to the mixture. After another 30 min, the mixture was added 600 ml of methylene chloride. The organic mixture was washed with cold water (200 ml×2), Saturated NaHCO3(200 ml×2), water (200 ml) and brine (200 ml×2). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and the mixture was evaporated at RT to give white solid as final product, bromide derivative, IntD1 (˜95% yield). C14H19BrO9, TLC Rf=0.49, SiO2, 40% ethyl acetate/60% hexanes; Exact Mass 410.02.
Preparation of IntD2 by Reductive Cyclization
To a stirring mixture of bromide IntD1 (105 g), tetrabutylammonium iodide (60 g, 162 mmol) and activated 3 Å molecular sieves in anhydrous acetonitrile (2 L), solid NaBH4 (30 g, 793 mmol) was added. The reaction was heated at 40° C. overnight. The mixture was then diluted with dichloromethane (2 L) and filtered through Celite®. After evaporation, the residue was dissolved in 500 ml ethyl acetate. The white solid (Bu4NI or Bu4NBr) was filtered. The ethyl acetate solution was evaporated and purified by chromatography on silica gel using ethyl acetate and hexane as eluent to give the acetal-triacetate IntD2 (˜60-70% yield). TLC Rf=0.36, SiO2 in 40% ethyl acetate/60% hexanes.
Preparation of IntD3 by De-Acetylation
To a 1000 ml flask was added triacetate IntD2 (55 g) and 500 ml of methanol. After stirring 30 min, the reagent NaOMe (2.7 g, 0.3 eq) was added and the reaction was stirred overnight. Additional NaOMe (0.9 g) was added to the reaction mixture and heated to 50° C. for 3 hr. The mixture was neutralized with Dowex 50Wx8 cation resin, filtered and evaporated. The residue was purified by silica gel column to give 24 g of trihydroxy-acetal IntD3. TLC Rf=0.36 in SiO2, 10% methanol/90% ethyl acetate.
Preparation of IntD4 by Benzylidene Formation
To a 1000 ml flask was added trihydroxy compound IntD3 (76 g) and benzaldehyde dimethyl acetate (73 g, 1.3 eq). The mixture was stirred for 10 min, after which D(+)-camphorsulfonic acid (8.5 g, CSA) was added. The mixture was heated at 50° C. for two hours. The reaction mixture was then transferred to separatory funnel containing ethyl acetate (1.8 L) and sodium bicarbonate solution (600 ml). After separation, the organic layer was washed with a second sodium bicarbonate solution (300 ml) and brine (800 ml). The two sodium carbonate solutions were combined and extracted with ethyl acetate (600 ml×2). The organic mixture was evaporated and purified by silica gel column to give the benzylidene product IntD4 (77 g, 71% yield). TLC Rf=0.47, SiO2 in 40% ethyl acetate/60% hexanes.
Preparation of IntD5 by Benzylation
To a 500 ml flask was added benzylidene acetal compound IntD4 (21 g,) in 70 ml THF. To another flask (1000 ml) was added NaH (2 eq). The solution of IntD4 was then transferred to the NaH solution at 0° C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min, then benzyl bromide (16.1 ml, 1.9 eq) in 30 ml THF was added. After stirring for 30 min, DMF (90 ml) was added to the reaction mixture. Excess NaH was neutralized by careful addition of acetic acid (8 ml). The mixture was evaporated and purified by silica gel column to give the benzyl derivative IntD5. (23 g) TLC Rf=0.69, SiO2 in 40% ethyl acetate/60% hexanes.
Preparation of IntD6 by Deprotection of Benzylidene
To a 500 ml flask was added the benzylidene-acetal compound IntD5 (20 g) and 250 ml of dichloromethane, the reaction mixture was cooled to 0° C. using an ice-water-salt bath. Aqueous TFA (80%, 34 ml) was added to the mixture and stirred over night. The mixture was evaporated and purified by silica gel column to give the dihydroxy derivative IntD6. (8 g, 52%). TLC Rf=0.79, SiO2 in 10% methanol/90% ethyl acetate.
Preparation of IntD7 by Oxidation of 6-Hydroxyl
To a 5 L flask was added dihydroxy compound IntD6 (60 g), TEMPO (1.08 g), sodium bromide (4.2 g), tetrabutylammonium chloride (5.35 g), saturated NaHCO3 (794 ml) and EtOAc (1338 ml). The mixture was stirred over an ice-water bath for 30 min To another flask was added a solution of NaOCl (677 ml), saturated NaHCO3 (485 ml) and brine (794 ml). The second mixture was added slowly to the first mixture (over about two hrs). The resulting mixture was then stirred overnight. The mixture was separated, and the inorganic layer was extracted with EtOAc (800 ml×2). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (800 ml). Evaporation of the organic layer gave 64 g crude carboxylic acid product IntD7 which was used in the next step use without purification. TLC Rf=0.04, SiO2 in 10% methanol/90% ethyl acetate.
Preparation of Monomer D by Benzylation of the Carboxylic Acid
To a solution of carboxylic acid derivative IntD7 (64 g) in 600 ml of dichloromethane, was added benzyl alcohol (30 g) and N-hydroxybenzotriazole (80 g, HOBt). After stirring for 10 min triethylamine (60.2 g) was added slowly. After stirring another 10 min, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, (60.8 g, DCC) was added slowly and the mixture was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure followed by chromatography on silica gel to provide 60.8 g (75%, over two steps) of product, Monomer D. TLC Rf=0.51, SiO2 in 40% ethyl acetate/60% hexanes.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 1. Preparation of BMod1, Levulination of Monomer B1
A 100 L reactor was charged with 7.207 Kg of Monomer B1 (21.3 moles, 1 equiv), 20 L of dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) and agitated to dissolve. When clear, it was purged with nitrogen and 260 g of dimethylamino pyridine (DMAP, 2.13 moles, 0.1 equiv) and 11.05 L of diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA, 8.275 kg, 63.9 moles, 3 equiv) was charged into the reactor. The reactor was chilled to 10-15° C. and 13.7 kg levulinic anhydride (63.9 mol, 3 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. When the addition was complete, the reaction was warmed to ambient temperature and stirred overnight or 12-16 hours. Completeness of the reaction was monitored by TLC (40:60 ethyl acetate/hexane) and HPLC. When the reaction was complete, 20 L of 10% citric acid, 10 L of water and 25 L of ethyl acetate were transferred into the reactor. The mixture was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer (EtOAc layer) was extracted with 20 L of water, 20 L 5% sodium bicarbonate and 20 L 25% brine solutions. The ethyl acetate solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.) and dried overnight. The yield of the isolated syrup of BMod1 was 100%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 2. Preparation of BMod2, TFA Hydrolysis of BMod1
A 100 L reactor was charged with 9296 Kg of 4-Lev Monomer B1 (BMod1) (21.3 mol, 1 equiv). The reactor chiller was turned to <5° C. and stirring was begun, after which 17.6 L of 90% TFA solution (TFA, 213 mole, 10 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. When the addition was complete, the reaction was monitored by TLC and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 2-3 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, the reactor was chilled and 26.72 L of triethylamine (TEA, 19.4 Kg, 191.7 mole, 0.9 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. An additional 20 L of water and 20 L ethyl acetate were transferred into the reactor. This was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer was extracted (EtOAc layer) with 20 L 5% sodium bicarbonate and 20 L 25% brine solutions. The ethyl acetate solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 50:50, 80:20 (EtOAc/heptane), 100% EtOAc, 5:95, 10:90 (MeOH/EtOAc). The pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The yield of the isolated syrup, BMod2 was 90%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 3. Preparation of BMod3, Silylation of BMod2
A 100 L reactor was charged with 6.755 Kg 4-Lev-1,2-DiOH Monomer B1 (BMod2) (17.04 mol, 1 equiv), 2328 g of imidazole (34.2 mol, 2 equiv) and 30 L of dichloromethane. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to −20° C., then 5.22 L tert-butyldiphenylchloro-silane (TBDPS-Cl, 5.607 Kg, 20.4 mol, 1.2 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. When addition was complete, the chiller was turned off and the reaction was allowed to warm to ambient temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC (40% ethyl acetate/hexane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 3 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, 20 L of water and 10 L of DCM were transferred into the reactor and stirred for 30 min, after which the layers were separated. The organic layer (DCM layer) was extracted with 20 L water and 20 L 25% brine solutions. Dichloromethane solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The yield of BMod3 was about 80%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 4. Preparation of BMod4, Benzoylation
A 100 L reactor was charged with 8.113 Kg of 4-Lev-1-Si-2-OH Monomer B1 (BMod3) (12.78 mol, 1 equiv), 9 L of pyridine and 30 L of dichloromethane. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to −20° C., after which 1.78 L of benzoyl chloride (2155 g, 15.34 mol, 1.2 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. When addition was complete, the reaction was allowed to warm to ambient temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC (40% ethyl acetate/heptane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 3 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, 20 L of water and 10 L of DCM were transferred into the reactor and stirred for 30 min, after which the layers were separated. The organic layer (DCM layer) was extracted with 20 L water and 20 L 25% brine solutions. The DCM solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). Isolated syrup BMod4 was obtained in 91% yield.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 5. Preparation of BMod5, Desilylation
A 100 L reactor was charged with 8.601 Kg of 4-Lev-1-Si-2-Bz Monomer B1 (BMod4) (11.64 mol, 1 equiv) in 30 L terahydrofuran. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to 0° C., after which 5.49 Kg of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF, 17.4 mol, 1.5 equiv) and 996 mL (1045 g, 17.4 mol, 1.5 equiv) of glacial acetic acid were transferred into the reactor. When the addition was complete, the reaction was stirred at ambient temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC (40:60 ethyl acetate/hexane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 6 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, 20 L of water and 10 L of DCM were transferred into the reactor and stirred for 30 min, after which the layers were separated. The organic layer (DCM layer) was extracted with 20 L water and 20 L 25% brine solutions. The dichloromethane solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 40:60, 50:50, 60:40, 70:30, 80:20 (EtOAc/heptane) and 200 L 100% EtOAc. Pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The intermediate BMod5 was isolated as a syrup in 91% yield.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 6: Preparation of BMod6, TCA Formation
A 100 L reactor was charged with 5.238 Kg of 4-Lev-1-OH-2-Bz Monomer B1 (BMod5) (10.44 mol, 1 equiv) in 30 L of DCM. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to 10-15° C., after which 780 mL of diazabicyclo undecene (DBU, 795 g, 5.22 mol, 0.5 equiv) and 10.47 L of trichloroacetonitrile (TCA, 15.08 Kg, 104.4 mol, 10 equiv) were transferred into the reactor. Stirring was continued and the reaction was kept under a nitrogen atmosphere. After reagent addition, the reaction was allowed to warm to ambient temperature. The reaction was monitored by HPLC and TLC (40:60 ethyl acetate/heptane). The reaction took approximately 2 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, 20 L of water and 10 L of dichloromethane were transferred into the reactor. This was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer (DCM layer) was separated with 20 L water and 20 L 25% brine solutions. The dichloromethane solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 40:60 and 50:50 (EtOAc/Heptane). Pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The isolated yield of BMod6 was 73%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 7. Preparation of AMod1, Acetylation of Monomer A2
A 100 L reactor was charged with 6.772 Kg of Monomer A2 (17.04 mole, 1 eq.), 32.2 L (34.8 Kg, 340.8 moles, 20 eq.) of acetic anhydride and 32 L of dichloromethane. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to −20° C. When the temperature reached −20° C., 3.24 L (3.63 Kg, 25.68 mol, 1.5 equiv) of boron trifluoride etherate (BF3.Et2O) was transferred into the reactor. After complete addition of boron trifluoride etherate, the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. The completeness of the reaction was monitored by HPLC and TLC (30:70 ethyl acetate/heptane). The reaction took approximately 3-5 hours for completion. When the reaction was complete, extraction was performed with 3×15 L of 10% sodium bicarbonate and 20 L of water. The organic phase (DCM) was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.) and allowed to dry overnight. The syrup was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140 L each of the following gradient profiles: 5:95, 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 40:60 and 50:50 (EtOAc/heptane). Pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The isolated yield of AMod1 was 83%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 8. Preparation of AMod3,1-Methylation of AMod1
A 100 L reactor was charged with 5891 g of acetyl Monomer A2 (AMod1) (13.98 mole, 1 eq.) in 32 L of dichloromethane. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and was chilled to 0° C., after which 2598 mL of trimethylsilyl iodide (TMSI, 3636 g, 18 mol, 1.3 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. When addition was complete, the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. The completeness of the reaction was monitored by HPLC and TLC (30:70 ethyl acetate/heptane). The reaction took approximately 2-4 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was diluted with 20 L of toluene. The solution was evaporated to a syrup and was co-evaporated with 3×6 L of toluene. The reactor was charged with 36 L of dichloromethane (DCM), 3.2 Kg of dry 4 Å Molecular Sieves, 15505 g (42 mol, 3 equiv) of tetrabutyl ammonium iodide (TBAI) and 9 L of dry methanol. This was stirred until the TBAI was completely dissolved, after which 3630 mL of diisopropyl-ethylamine (DIPEA, 2712 g, 21 moles, 1.5 equiv) was transferred into the reactor in one portion. The completion of the reaction was monitored by HPLC and TLC (30:70 ethyl acetate/heptane). The reaction took approximately 16 hours for completion. When the reaction was complete, the molecular sieves were removed by filtration. Added were 20 L EtOAc and extracted with 4×20 L of 25% sodium thiosulfate and 20 L 10% NaCl solutions. The organic layer was separated and dried with 8-12 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 5:95, 10:90, 20:80, 30:70 and 40:60 (EtOAc/heptane). The pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to give intermediate AMod3 as a syrup. The isolated yield was 75%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 9. Preparation of AMod4, DeAcetylation of AMod3
A 100 L reactor was charged with 4128 g of 1-Methyl 4,6-Diacetyl Monomer A2 (AMod3) (10.5 mol, 1 equiv) and 18 L of dry methanol and dissolved, after which 113.4 g (2.1 mol, 0.2 equiv) of sodium methoxide was transferred into the reactor. The reaction was stirred at room temperature and monitored by TLC (40% ethyl acetate/hexane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 2-4 hours for completion. When the reaction was complete, Dowex 50Wx8 cation resin was added in small portions until the pH reached 6-8. The Dowex 50Wx8 resin was filtered and the solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The syrup was diluted with 10 L of ethyl acetate and extracted with 20 L brine and 20 L water. The ethyl acetate solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.) and dried overnight at the same temperature. The isolated yield of the syrup AMod4 was about 88%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 10. Preparation of AMod5,6-Benzoylation
A 100 L reactor was charged with 2858 g of Methyl 4,6-diOH Monomer A2 (AMod4) (9.24 mol, 1 equiv) and co-evaporated with 3×10 L of pyridine. When evaporation was complete, 15 L of dichloromethane, 6 L of pyridine were transferred into the reactor and dissolved. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to −40° C. The reactor was charged with 1044 mL (1299 g, 9.24 mol, 1 equiv) of benzoyl chloride. When the addition was complete, the reaction was allowed to warm to −10° C. over a period of 2 hours. The reaction was monitored by TLC (60% ethyl acetate/hexane). When the reaction was completed, the solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). This was co-evaporated with 3×15 L of toluene. The syrup was diluted with 40 L ethyl acetate. Extraction was carried out with 20 L of water and 20 L of brine solution. The Ethyl acetate solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 5:95, 10:90, 20:80, 25:70 and 30:60 (EtOAc/heptane). The pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The isolated yield of the intermediate AMod5 was 84%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 11. Preparation of BA1, Coupling of Amod5 with BMod6
A 100 L reactor was charged with 3054 g of methyl 4-Hydroxy-Monomer A2 (AMod5) from Step 10 (7.38 mol, 1 equiv) and 4764 g of 4-Lev-1-TCA-Monomer B1 (BMod6) from Step 6 (7.38 mol, 1 equiv). The combined monomers were dissolved in 20 L of toluene and co-evaporated at 40° C. Co evaporation was repeated with an additional 2×20 L of toluene, after which 30 L of dichloromethane (DCM) was transferred into the reactor and dissolved. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and was chilled to below −20° C. When the temperature was between −20° C. and −40° C., 1572 g (1404 mL, 11.12 moles, 1.5 equiv) of boron trifluoride etherate (BF3.Et2O) were transferred into the reactor. After complete addition of boron trifluoride etherate, the reaction was allowed to warm to 0° C. and stirring was continued. The completeness of the reaction was monitored by HPLC and TLC (40:70 ethyl acetate/heptane). The reaction required 3-4 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, 926 mL (672 g, 6.64 mol, 0.9 equiv) of triethylamine (TEA) was transferred into the mixture and stirred for an additional 30 minutes, after which 20 L of water and 10 L of dichloromethane were transferred into the reactor. The solution was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer (DCM layer) was separated with 2×20 L water and 20 L 25% 4:1 sodium chloride/sodium bicarbonate solution. The dichloromethane solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.) and used in the next step. The isolated yield of the disaccharide BA1 was about 72%.
Synthesis of the BA Dimer
Step 12, Removal of Levulinate Methyl [(methyl 2-O-benzoyl-3-O-benzyl-α-L-Idopyranosyluronate)-(1→4)-2-azido-6-O-benzoyl-3-O-benzyl]-2-deoxy-α-D-glucopyranoside
A 100 L reactor was charged with 4.104 Kg of 4-Lev BA Dimer (BA1) (4.56 mol, 1 equiv) in 20 L of THF. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and chilled to −20 to −25° C., after which 896 mL of hydrazine hydrate (923 g, 18.24 mol, 4 equiv) was transferred into the reactor. Stirring was continued and the reaction was monitored by TLC (40% ethyl acetate/heptane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 2-3 hour for the completion, after which 20 L of 10% citric acid, 10 L of water and 25 L of ethyl acetate were transferred into the reactor. This was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer (ETOAc layer) was extracted with 20 L 25% brine solutions. The ethyl acetate solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 40:60 and 50:50 (EtOAc/heptane). The pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to dryness. The isolated yield of the BA Dimer was 82%. Formula: C42H43N3O13; Mol. Wt. 797.80.
Synthesis of the EDC Trimer
Step 1. Preparation of EMod1, Acetylation
A 100 L reactor was charged with 16533 g of Monomer E (45 mole, 1 eq.), 21.25 L acetic anhydride (225 mole, 5 eq.) and 60 L of dichloromethane. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and was chilled to −10° C. When the temperature was at −10° C., 1.14 L (1277 g) of boron trifluoride etherate (BF3.Et2O, 9.0 moles, 0.2 eq) were transferred into the reactor. After the complete addition of boron trifluoride etherate, the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. The completeness of the reaction was monitored by TLC (30:70 ethyl acetate/heptane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 3-6 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was completed, the mixture was extracted with 3×50 L of 10% sodium bicarbonate and SOL of water. The organic phase (DCM) was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.) and allowed to dry overnight. The isolated yield of EMod1 was 97%.
Synthesis of the EDC Trimer
Step 2. Preparation of EMod2, De-Acetylation of Azidoglucose
A 100 L reactor was charged with 21016 g of 1,6-Diacetyl Monomer E (EMod1) (45 mole, 1 eq.), 5434 g of hydrazine acetate (NH2NH2.HOAc, 24.75 mole, 0.55 eq.) and 50 L of DMF (dimethyl formamide). The solution was stirred at room temperature and the reaction was monitored by TLC (30% ethyl acetate/hexane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 2-4 hours for completion. When the reaction was completed, 50 L of dichloromethane and 40 L of water were transferred into the reactor. This was stirred for 30 minutes and the layers were separated. This was extracted with an additional 40 L of water and the organic phase was dried in 6-8 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.) and dried overnight at the same temperature. The syrup was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 20:80, 30:70, 40:60 and 50:50 (EtOAc/heptane). Pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The isolated yield of intermediate EMod2 was 100%.
Synthesis of the EDC Trimer
Step 3. Preparation of EMod3, Formation of 1-TCA
A 100 L reactor was charged with 12752 g of 1-Hydroxy Monomer E (EMod2) (30 mole, 1 eq.) in 40 L of dichloromethane. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and stirring was started, after which 2.25 L of DBU (15 moles, 0.5 eq.) and 15.13 L of trichloroacetonitrile (150.9 moles, 5.03 eq) were transferred into the reactor. Stirring was continued and the reaction was kept under nitrogen. After the reagent addition, the reaction was allowed to warm to ambient temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC (30:70 ethyl acetate/Heptane) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 2-3 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was complete, 40 L of water and 20 L of DCM were charged into the reactor. This was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer (DCM layer) was extracted with 40 L water and the DCM solution was dried in 6-8 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 10:90 (DCM/EtOAc/heptane), 20:5:75 (DCM/EtOAc/heptane) and 20:10:70 DCM/EtOAc/heptane). Pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to give Intermediate EMod3 as a syrup. Isolated yield was 53%.
Synthesis of the EDC Trimer
Step 4. Preparation of ED Dimer, Coupling of E-TCA with Monomer D
A 100 L reactor was charged with 10471 g of 6-Acetyl-1-TCA Monomer E (EMod3) (18.3 mole, 1 eq., FW: 571.8) and 6594 g of Monomer D (16.47 mole, 0.9 eq, FW: 400.4). The combined monomers were dissolved in 20 L toluene and co-evaporated at 40° C. This was repeated with co-evaporation with an additional 2×20 L of toluene, after which 60 L of dichloromethane (DCM) were transferred into the reactor and dissolved. The reactor was purged with nitrogen and was chilled to −40° C. When the temperature was between −30° C. and −40° C., 2423 g (2071 mL, 9.17 moles, 0.5 eq) of TES Triflate were transferred into the reactor. After complete addition of TES Triflate the reaction was allowed to warm and stirring was continued. The completeness of the reaction was monitored by HPLC and TLC (35:65 ethyl acetate/Heptane). The reaction required 2-3 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was completed, 2040 mL of triethylamine (TEA, 1481 g, 0.8 eq.) were transferred into the reactor and stirred for an additional 30 minutes. The organic layer (DCM layer) was extracted with 2×20 L 25% 4:1 sodium chloride/sodium bicarbonate solution. The dichloromethane solution was dried in 6-8 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The syrup was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 15:85, 20:80, 25:75, 30:70 and 35:65 (EtOAc/heptane). Pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. The ED Dimer was obtained in 81% isolated yield.
Synthesis of the EDC Trimer
Step 5. Preparation of ED1 TFA, Hydrolysis of ED Dimer
A 100 L reactor was charged with 7.5 Kg of ED Dimer (9.26 mol, 1 equiv). The reactor was chilled to <5° C. and 30.66 L of 90% TFA solution (TFA, 370.4 mol, 40 equiv) were transferred into the reactor. When the addition was completed the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC (40:60 ethyl acetate/hexanes) and HPLC. The reaction took approximately 3-4 hours to reach completion. When the reaction was completed, was chilled and 51.6 L of triethylamine (TEA, 37.5 Kg, 370.4 mole) were transferred into the reactor, after which 20 L of water & 20 L ethyl acetate were transferred into the reactor. This was stirred for 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic layer (EtOAc layer) was extracted with 20 L 5% sodium bicarbonate and 20 L 25% brine solutions. Ethyl acetate solution was dried in 4-6 Kg of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was evaporated to a syrup (bath temp. 40° C.). The crude product was purified in a 200 L silica column using 140-200 L each of the following gradient profiles: 20:80, 30:70, 40:60, 50:50, 60:40 (EtOAc/heptane). The pure fractions were pooled and evaporated to a syrup. Isolated yield of ED1 was about 70%.
Synthesis of the EDC Trimer
Step 6. Preparation of ED2, Silylation of ED1
A 100 L reactor was charged with 11000 g of 1,2-diOH