From: V.K.Durham@comcast.net
To: V.K.Durham@comcast.net
Sent: 3/16/2013 7:05:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Old Secrets and Lies [ We All 'Need To Know' ]
Old Secrets and Lies
Old Secrets and Lies has
been created as a place for me to post and share my "archives" of
political corruption, lies, secrets and the like for which we the real
Americans have been kept in the dark over.
Thursday, October 30,
2008
Why is Chicago the center
of the NWO?
Below is an article from
my archives. This goes along with my other post "Great Britain owns USA". [ http://oldsecretsandlies.blogspot.com/2008/10/great-britain-owns-usa.html
]
Begin post:
+++++++++++++++++++++++
The Southwest Reporter
Special Edition Sept.
30, 1995
Why Chicago as the
Center for Metro and the New World Order Treasonists?
By David A. Newby &
"Grandma"
As this mystery unravels
we have found more that has been hidden from us. A very dear friend and fellow
researcher asked a relevant question in reference to this Metro mess; "Why
Chicago"? This is a very pertinent question and what the attendant
research revealed will be just one more shock upon those already revealed.
Grandma and I have to do
our work by phone and fax. We don't have the luxury of having the same books to
work from in most cases and this slows down this process of divination of the
mystery. She has copies of the old Charter maps and through these maps we found
that under the original charters Chicago and Connecticut were outside the
Virginia and Massachusetts charters. What we discovered was that Connecticut
and Chicago fell under the Hudson's Bay Company Charter.
Quoting the 11th Edition
of the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1911:
"In the year 1670
Charles II granted a charter to Prince Rupert and seventeen other noblemen and
gentlemen, incorporating them as the 'Governor and Company of Adventures of
England trading into Hudson's Bay', securing to them the "sole trade and
commerce of all those seas, straits, bays, rivers, lake, creeks and streams in
whatever latitude they shall be, that lie within the entrance of the straits
commonly called Hudson's Straits, together with all lands and territories upon
the countries, coasts and islands of the seas, bays, & aforesaid, that are
not already actually possessed by or granted to any of our subjects, or
possessed by the subjects of any other Christian prince or state".
With this broad grant of
latitude of all the waterways it should be pretty obvious that the Charter
included all of the Great Lakes. But aside from all of this granting of land by
the King, the Charter was also granted the whole right to travel for trade to
and from the bays and waterways whether by land or water. This clause of the
Charter has heavy relevance later in this article.
In 1842, a Convention
was concluded, with England, establishing the northern border of the United
States at the 49th parallel. In studying these treaties and the laws, you must
always look at the words, because they always have a relevance. Citing the
Convention as to boundaries, Suppression of the slave Trade, and Extradition of
1842 Article IV states:
"All grants of land
heretofore made by either party, within the limits of the territory which by
this treaty falls within the dominions of the other party, shall by held valid,
ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession under such grant...".
This section states that
any property rights would be honored. In 1863 there was a "Treaty for
Settlement of Claims with the Hudson Bay Company, etc." Article I states
in part:
"...it was
stipulated and agreed that in the future appropriation of the territory south
of the 49th parallel of the north latitude, as provided in the first article of
the said treaty, (1846) the possessory rights of the Hudson's Bay Company...should
by respected".
The verbiage is
identical to the 1846 treaty of the boundaries west of the rockies and similar
to the 1842 Convention. The relevance of all of this in these two treaties is
that Chicago was a fort or outpost of the Hudson's Bay Company. By 1842, and
most definitely by 1863, Chicago was a large city. It is a proper assumption
that the Hudson's Bay Company had substantial property interests and holdings
in the Chicago area and that is why these provisions in the treaties are there.
Remember that the
original charter gave the Hudson's Bay Company control over all trade and
travel to and from the "waters". Chicago, today, is a free port under
maritime. With control of the travel and trade granted in the original charter,
it most probably means that the Hudson's Bay Company controlled all the
railroads, ports and roads in Chicago and probably does so to this day. The
Hudson's Bay Company was relinquished to the Crown in 1869. This means that
Chicago, at least in great part, is nothing but a British outpost on American
soil and there is your direct connection between Metro and the Crown! That's
"Why Chicago"!
When one is into
researching this type of data, you never know what you may find. While digging
through the books, I found the 'Proclamation of 1763' in the 'Documents of
American History'. Within this Proclamation, we see the King of England
establishing four new governments; one in Quebec, one in East Florida, one in
West Florida and one in Grenada.
All of this got us to
thinking. Why is the King of England setting up government in these obviously
French and Spanish territories? We discovered that France and Spain had fought
a war against England and concluded it with a treaty, in Paris, in February of
1763. The Proclamation was issued on October 7th of that same year.
We determined that these
aforementioned territories falling under British control, shows that they were
"prizes of war" and taken under treaty. The relevance of all of this
comes to light, when you look at the fact that we supposedly bought the
"Floridas" from Spain in 1819. How could we buy the Floridas from
Spain if Spain gave them to England as war prizes?
The question led us to
the 'Treaty of Friendship of 1795'. Within the treaties of Spain at that time,
the King of Spain was always referred to as His Catholic Majesty. But within
the document of 1795, we find a reference to His Majesty, a distinct difference
and not an oversight. Establishing the Commission for negotiations it states:
"And if on any
account it should be found necessary that the said Commissioners and Surveyors
should be accompanied by guards, they shall be furnished in equal proportions
by the commanding officer of His Majesty's troops in the two Floridas..."
As it appears from the
distinction between His Catholic Majesty and His Majesty, there were British
occupying forces in the Floridas. Here is a plausible hypothetical scenario:
The King of England took over the territories of the Floridas. The King of
Spain had subjects in the cities of St. Augustine and Pensacola and elsewhere.
The King of England took over the land, but let the King of Spain retain rights
to the cities, i.e., the Spanish Territory of the 1819 sale. When the United
States bought the Spanish territories in the Floridas, it only bought the
Spanish cities.
When you read the treaty
of 1819, where the deal was made, "His Majesty" appears again. From
the way the treaty reads, the King of Spain had to petition "His Majesty's
foreign minister" to get permission to make the sale. The British control
of the Floridas also helps explain why Andrew Jackson "fought the bloody
British in the town of New Orleans" during the war of 1812... the British
had a vested land interest!
Grandma states that the
British troops were probably expelled, if they were not already gone, by the
Monroe Doctrine of 1823. Even though there was no physical occupation by the
British, the Crown still maintains the property rights to the Floridas. This
could explain why Dade County, Florida is where the Metro pilot program
started. It also explains why the British sided with the South during the Civil
War; they were part owners!
Another point that must
be considered is that as well educated as the generation of the Founders was,
they must have known of the British ownership of the Floridas. Something of
that magnitude could not be reasonably overlooked. This leads one to thing that
there may possibly have been some kind of deal cut between the United States
government and the Crown.
Not one of us was ever
taught the Proclamation of 1763 which brings this all into question. I am of
the firm conviction nowadays that anything that is hidden, is hidden for a
reason.
We've proven, through
treaties and charters, that the Hudson's Bay Company owned Chicago and the
travel and tread thereto, which includes more than likely the Chicago Transit
Authority, the Port Authority, the municipal water works, power and
tele-communications companies, and the railroads.
Notice, on the list of
CSG Associates, how many public utilities and public transpiration companies
are affiliated. The following will establish the ADL aspect, or the Khazarian
connection. Citing from EIR's book, 'Dope, Inc.':
"The probe turned
up a 70-year legacy of intimate ADL ties with Jewish gangsters, from Meyer
Lansky and his 'Our Crowd' sponsor Arnold Rothstein, to more contemporary
'Dope, Inc.' figures such as Max Fisher, Edgar Bronfman, Edmond Safra, Meshulam
Riklis, and the ADL's own national chairman, Kenneth Bialkin, the lawyer for
the Medellin Cartel's 'American Connection,' Robert Vesco. We also discovered
that much of the ADL's financial backing comes from leading families of
Anglo-American establishment, whose fortunes trace back to the British banks
and trading companies that ran the opium clipper ships in and out of China in
the last century."
Take note of the name
Meyer Lansky who was the head of the Mafia during the Kennedy administration.
Lansky had definitive connections in Miami, which still serves as a major point
of ingress to this country for illegal drugs. Remember that Attorney General
Janet Reno comes from Miami, or Metro-Dade, and has been accused of covering up
all manner of corruption in the book 'Votescam' and by other individuals who
worked in close association with her. It is very likely that she was probably
picked as USAG specifically because of her ties directly into Metro.
The Khazarian Bronfman
family owns the Seagrams empire, which you will note is a corporate associate
of the CSG. The Anglo-American banking interests include J.P. Morgan &
Associates. Per the citing from 'Dope, Inc.', these selfsame organizations
serve as contributors to the ADL.
The Great Chicago fire
occurred 8 years after the 1863 Settlement of Claims with the Hudson's Bay
Company back to the Crown. One of the prime methods of deleting land titles and
records is by fire. You will find great numbers of burned houses of records in
Peru, Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, and all across the South, during the Civil War,
in order to expunge deeds, as well as the original 13th Amendment.
Franklin Roosevelt once
said that in politics there are no coincidences. It is too coincidental that
two years after the Crown took over the possessions of the Hudson's Bay
Company, the city of Chicago burned to the ground. What an excellent way it
would be to destroy legitimate land titles and put a British beachhead in
America. Grolier's National Encyclopedia states:
"The Great Fire
destroyed 2,024 acres at a cost of $178,000,000, which did not destroy the
hopes of Chicago...which was rebuilt in two years...".
That means about $1
million per acre! We've done some figuring on just where that $178 million came
from and this is what we came up with. Of Course, this is speculation based on
certain real factors. In the series we did on Railroads and Corporations we
discussed the Gold Railroad bonds, issued during the Grant administration, that
made certain Congressmen a 500% profit, for which none were prosecuted. These bonds
totaled about $62 million. Consider that a life insurance policy (Tontine) on
someone was about $2,000 at that time, multiplied by about 1,500 deaths and
that equals $3 million. A rough estimate on property loss runs about $100
million what with residential and commercial property, railroads, granaries and
cattle yards. That leaves over $11 million unaccounted for. We speculated that
the banks that burned called their loans in from the smaller banks, which made
up the other $11 million, which caused reverberations throughout the nation
causing the Bank Panic of 1873. To make more sense out of this:
Railroad
bonds........................ $62 million
Property loss and death
insurance.....$100 million
Bank loans called
in...................$11 million
------------------
Total............$173
million
Which would leave $5
million to be balanced between the property damage, loss of life and the bank
note calls equaling the $178 million required to rebuild. It is our contention
that most of this money came from the Insurance premiums and the Railroad Bonds
in order to build a new "capitol" city in America from which to
launch the New World Order through the Agent called Metro.
"In 1890, Lake
Michigan and the Illinois Michigan canal received Chicago's sewage...the
Chicago River, when the canal was brought in, reversed its course to flow into
the Mississippi..." - (Groliers - 1939).
With the Settlement of
the Hudson's Bay Company of 1863, giving the lawful possessors of land control
of the lands adjoining the water; with the burning of all titles and deeds to
prove ownership, being burned in the fire; with the control of the courts, what
a wonderful opportunity it would be to expand those "holdings" of the
Hudson's Bay Company to encompass all of Chicago. Anyone who disputed the
claims probably lost in court, as they could not produce their deeds, or
titles, due to the fire. Do you see how neat it is? And on top of that, it is a
possibility that the assets of the major people involved, had been spirited
away and stored before "Mrs. O'Leary's cow" started the fire. Could
the Great Chicago fire be nothing more than another insurance scam and power
play by the British to reclaim this nation for herself? The record of provable
deeds is so phenomenal as to numb the mind, so we don't think this is beyond
the realm of possibility. Especially when they modus operandi is the same, only
on a larger scale.
Throughout this series
we have laid out substantial proof of our assertions, which, upon
investigation, will prove out the charges levied of sedition, fraud, theft and
treason. The United States government, in concert with the
British/Zionist/Communist controlled Metro organizations and it's Governors'
Conference of the fifty State Governors has worked continuously to destroy this
nation.
Even if we are incorrect
in our assessment and potential reasons for the Great Fire of 1871 (and we
don't think we are), there is still more than enough evidence to convict these
traitors in any court of true justice.
In 1908, the Council of
Governors issued a Declaration to the Congress in reference to Conservation.
This 1908 Declaration reads very similar to the RAMSAR and Bio-diversity treaty
currently put forth through the U.S. Government and the U.N., who is intimately
tied into Metro. The year 2007 keeps coming up in matters before the Congress.
The year 2007 is 99 years from the 1908 Council of Governors Declaration on
Conservation. This Declaration calls for the "COMPLETE CONTROL" of
the waterways, streams, lakes and rivers of this nation as well as for soil and
forest conservation. Sounds just like the environmentalist's "green"
agenda, doesn't it? It is my assertion that, that is exactly what it is.
It appears that anywhere
between 20-40 years before these treaties, declarations and laws are to take
effect by the 99 years rule; under the Law of Perpetuity, the Metro gang create
groups to push for the acceptance of the already decided change. That figures
out to be 1-2 generations, plenty long enough to push their agenda through the
propaganda mills and educate the next generation into acceptance. Look at how
hard the agenda is working for the biodiversity acceptance through the cartoons
your children watch and the commercials being aired on recycling. We are all
being herded like cattle into the new Metro-ized society of the New World Order
of British-Israel.
We all know that the
flooding of the Midwest, in the last two to three years, is unnatural. Is it
possible that these floods are not accidental? With the rerouting and reversing
of the Chicago River and it dumping into the Mississippi, the backwash would
not be evident at the headwaters, but would flood downstream. Does the
connection to the Mississippi River now give the Crown/Hudson's Bay Company a
broadened area of operations? Who is buying up all that land that was flooded
out? Metro and associates, ADM? Always follow the money. Who profits?
These articles are
supposed to make you think and maybe do something to save your country and
yourself. Grandma, Rex and I can't do it all for you. You have to help expose
the lie, and many of you are.
In the last article, we
showed how the Federal Reserve came into being in 1913, but forgot to mention
that two other British controlled organizations came into this country as well,
the American Bar Association was organized in 1913 and so was the ADL. Through
the research of the EIR group, Liberty Lobby and others, it has been revealed
that the ADL is nothing but an extension of the British Intelligence arm MI-6
and is a spying and propaganda organization here to do nothing but to promote
the agenda of British-Israel, or Zionism.
The Intimate ties are
there between the Khazarian elite and the royal heads of Europe and have been
intertwined for centuries. This nation has stood as a bar to worldwide
feudalism for the last two centuries, but the efforts by these same entities to
destroy this nation and her people have almost succeeded. Our own lack of
attention, de-education and laziness have allowed us to come to this. Some
blame lies with Metro et al., the rest lies with us.
Sources: Documents of
American History - Commager U.S. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts,
Protocols and Agreements. Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Ed. 1911 Dope, Inc. EIR
Grolier's National Encyclopedia, 1939 Ed.
Posted by Prospector at 8:57 AM
Labels: Chicago, Florida, Great Britain, Hudson's Bay, NWO, Soverienty
Newer Post Older Post
Home http://oldsecretsandlies.blogspot.com/2008/10/why-is-chicago-center-of-nwo.html