questions the media doesn't want to answer about Sandy Hook
naturalnews.com printable article
published February 9 2013
the media don't want to discover about Sandy Hook
Slashing through the bland authoritative front the media have presented, people
want to know more about the Sandy Hook massacre. But the elite networks have no
intention of answering the most obvious questions.
Because the follow-up agenda of gun control is all important, and the official
Sandy Hook scenario must stand, in order to forward that agenda.
return to the scene of the crime will:
media coverage from its all-out push to make guns into taboo objects of scorn,
ridicule, fear, and hatred;
attention on reasons for the massacre that have nothing to do with guns;
deep distrust of the Sandy Hook police investigation and therefore, by
association, throw into doubt the notion that law-enforcement personnel should
be the only people carrying guns in America.
are 10 things the media doesn't want to know about and has no intention of
investigating. These are only the basics, amid a wider sea of unanswered
is the video footage from inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School, footage that
surely exists and shows some part of the massacre? Who has that video record?
What does the video reveal? Where is the video (or photo) evidence that Adam
Lanza was the shooter?
did the accused killer, Lanza, gain entrance to the school? Having just
installed a new security system that required outside (and presumably heavy)
doors to be locked, and with a procedure for entry that demanded two-way video
communication with the principal's office---what exactly happened?
available information, it seems almost certain Lanza was seeing a doctor and
was on medication. Who was the doctor and what drugs did he prescribe? Did they
include SSRI antidepressants like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil, or Ritalin and
Adderall---drugs known to cause violent behavior, including suicide and
homicide. If so, then all the focus would shift to excoriating the drugs and
eliminating them from our society.
was the exact story on the two or three other suspects captured and detained by
the police? Who are they? Why were they pursued? What did their questioning
reveal? Why were they released? No vague generalities. Instead, all the
details. And let's have in-depth television interviews with these suspects.
and for all, let's have a definitive statement on what guns were used in the
killings and what guns were found in the trunk of the car. So many lies and
contradictions were floated, it's a sea of confusion. So let's have the
facts---and evidence to back them up. For starters, let's see photos of the
killer and his weapons taken inside the school. Undoctored photos.
is the detailed explanation for the massive shift from Lanza's father being
killed in New Jersey to Lanza's mother being killed in Connecticut? No vague
generalities. No nonsense about "typical early confusion" in
reporting. Let's see the whole chain of information and the people who
forwarded it. Similarly, if the early conclusion pointed to Adam's brother Ryan
as the killer, a conclusion which was withdrawn because Adam was carrying his
brother's ID, explain that. According to reports, Adam hadn't seen his brother
in more than two years. Offer hard evidence that Adam was, in fact, carrying
his brother's ID.
are complete statements and interviews with witnesses who were in the school at
the time of the shooting? We have seen a few short interviews. There must be
more. Let's have them or get them. Are we to believe (as independent
investigator Mike Powell has rightly doubted) that one teacher stuffed all her
children into classroom cabinets, which ordinarily are filled with school
the television interviews with parents of children murdered in the Sandy Hook School, not one parent was angry,
not one parent demanded a deeper investigation. Obviously, this screening of
interviewees was purposeful. Where are the outraged parents? What do they have
to say? Do they know anything we don't know? Have they been told (as people
were at Columbine) to keep quiet?
now, as the gun-control agenda is being pursued, precisely how will new laws
curb the majority of gun violence in America,
violence which is taking place in cities---much of it gang-related. Explain why
President Obama doesn't vigorously and publicly target these high-crime areas,
if his objective is to reduce the gun violence, rather than gun ownership.
pending and often postponed Chicago trial of Jesus Niebla, high-ranking member
of the Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel, experiences delay after delay. What vital
facts are being kept from the public? There are serious defense charges here;
namely, that Niebla and other Sinaloa members have received permanent immunity
from prosecution in a prior deal with the DEA and FBI, in return for supplying
information on rival cartels. In fact, the US federal government has obtained a
suppression of defense-attorney documents in the trial, claiming their exposure
would violate National Security.
Sinaloa have explicit US government permission to deliver tons of cocaine and
heroin into Chicago, and then to cities all over America? This enterprise would
certainly, as a side effect, produce a significant amount of gun violence. Does
the federal government really want to curb this violence, or is its arrangement
with Sinaloa taking precedence?
in the wake of Sandy Hook, how does President Obama's declaration that mental-health
services will be expanded across America add up to reduction of gun violence?
In fact, this will lead to higher levels of prescribed dangerous psychiatric
drugs, which in turn will cause a serious escalation in gun violence and mass
media don't want to know anything about these
points. And yet they're betting they will retain the public trust. But the fact
that their ratings are sinking, month after month, year after year, is a
message from the public.
media refuse to hear it, though. They glide through their rehearsed paces and
pretend they are captains of information. Their elite owners would prefer to
let the media ship go down, rather than tell the truth.
understandable. After all, these owners, and the owners who own them, are
guilty of all sorts of crimes, the reporting of which would make ratings soar
but destroy their own empires, reputations, and lives.
author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for
a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon
has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and
creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free
emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon
a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an
reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics,
and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine,
and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon
delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic,
creative power to audiences around the world.
Cameron Park Therapy Create The
Changes You Want In Your Life Today CameronParkTherapy.com
· Coffee Exposed A shocking secret coffee co's don't want
you to know www.CoffeeFool.com
· Shutterstock Stock Videos High Quality,
Royalty Free Stock Footage At Affordable Prices. Footage.Shutterstock.com
· I Stopped My Hair Loss I spent thousands
on hair growth then I found this $39 solution. naturalwellbeing.com/hair-growth
The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a
candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California.
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for
30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS
Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and
magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on
global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.