2015-06-13

   inserted note:  Some subtitles could be:

DO YOU REALLY WANT THIS WOMAN AS PRESIDENT, WHO DECORATED
THE WHITE HOUSE CHRISTMAS TREE WITH "CONDOMS" ???

SANTA ISN'T ALWAYS WHO YOU MIGHT THINK IT IS.. THE SANTA WHO CAME
TO SEE "JON BENET" LEFT HER VERY DEAD !! IT'S ALL A PART OF THE
BILDERBERG PEDOPHILE - PORN AND "SNUFF" DEATH RINGS.

WE ARE LIVING IN A WORLD OF TOTAL IMMORALITY AND INSANITY AND BEING
ILLEGALLY RULED BY "ALL" THESE SAME "CRAZIES"...

Globalism and the Push for Mandatory Universal Vaccination - The Egregious Lie: "Everyone Needs Doctors All the Time" - "Seeing the Lies of the Secret Program" - One Nation, Under Sedation: Medicare Paid for Nearly 40 Million Tranquilizer Prescriptions in 2013 - Upgrade Brain With Electronic Mesh

Pillage and Class Polarization: The Rise of "Criminal Capitalism"

Soft War on Libya Leads to Violent Warfare - Actors and Social Theatre - NGOs: Clowns In the Circus - NGO Operatives are Fascist Totalitarians - Mr. Cluster F&#k Arrives In Town - USAID's "Special Mission Compound" In Libya

Cloud-Centric Crime Scene Investigation (C2CSI) Radio for June 12, 2015

#2374: Marine Briefs WSJ – Clinton's NORAD Santa Wiretap Of Bilderberg Pedophiles – Soros 8(a) Spot Fixed Hedge Funds – Serco S.B.T.C JonBenet

Globalism and the Push for Mandatory Universal Vaccination - The Egregious Lie: "Everyone Needs Doctors All the Time" - "Seeing the Lies of the Secret Program" - One Nation, Under Sedation: Medicare Paid for Nearly 40 Million Tranquilizer Prescriptions in 2013 - Upgrade Brain With Electronic Mesh

Posted: 12 Jun 2015 12:12 AM PDT

This article appeared at
Jon Rappoport's Blog

Globalism and the push for mandatory universal vaccination

by Jon Rappoport

June 11, 2015

NoMoreFakeNews.com

"Once you really understand the truth behind the lies in a given arena, then you can finally back up far enough and see the actual reasons for the lies. You can see the secret program the lies are protecting. You can see why the program is being pushed. You can see what most people would rather not see." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

In many previous articles, I have established a number of facts about vaccines.

They are not safe. They are not effective. They were not responsible for the major decline in so-called contagious diseases.

In most if not all cases, the diseases they are supposed to prevent affect only a tiny fraction of the people claimed to be at risk.

In some instances, (e.g., seasonal flu, Swine Flu, SARS), the "outbreaks" have virtually nothing to do with the viruses touted as the cause of illness. Therefore, even if vaccines were safe and effective, they would have no relevant effect, because they are targeting viruses which are not causing illness.

The rabid claim that unvaccinated children pose a threat to vaccinated children is, on its face, a lunatic self-contradiction, since those who are vaccinated are supposed to be protected.

Having established these points, it's possible to assess the real reasons for the push to vaccinate every human on the face of the Earth.

Among these reasons, you will recognize the controlling hand of elite Globalists, for whom planetary empire is the goal.

One: The most underrated reason for mandated vaccination is: compliance. Secure compliance from citizens. Put them into a medical channel from birth (even before birth). Induce them to obey orders. Produce a deep blind loyalty: march straight ahead, eyes closed, mouths shut, from cradle to grave.

Two: Because vaccines and medical drugs are grossly toxic, the obedience becomes debilitation, illness, confusion. Death. Populations are unable to think about, much less resist, multiple vectors of tyranny.

Three: In the "developing world," where mega-corporations, in line with the Globalist blueprint, plunder cheap labor, mineral resources, and land, use vaccination as a "solution," when in fact it is a solution that does not work, causes greater destruction—and functions as a cover story to obscure what is really maiming and killing populations: enforced poverty, provoked war, chronically contaminated water supplies, lack of basic sanitation, stolen land, severe generation to generation malnutrition and starvation, overcrowding, industrial pollution.

These horrendous conditions go unsolved (on purpose), in order to keep populations unable to resist mega-corporate takeovers, while vaccination is touted as a wonderfully humane gift to the people.

Four: The claim of preventing disease before it occurs is one of the strongest propaganda efforts of the global medical cartel. It is used to pump up and justify all other medical druggings and procedures and diagnoses. It is "a banner of pride" flying on the medical flagship.

Five: Vaccination, through its toxic effects, is an attack on what would otherwise be a much healthier early childhood in many countries around the world. In short, if wellness and health staged a strong universal comeback, it would expose the lie that "everyone needs doctors all the time." That egregious and repulsive lie is one of the cornerstones of modern medicine.

Six: Based on the first five reasons, how confident and trusting would you be, when this medical establishment has gained direct access (by needle) to every individual bloodstream in the world? How confident are you that no one would dare enter secret substances in vaccines? The most obvious of these, documented in the Philippines and Kenya, is a hormone (HCG) that causes miscarriages in women who later become pregnant. The altered vaccines are instruments of birth-prevention and population control. The World Health Organization and the Rockefeller Foundation—Globalism personified—have been researching these vaccines for decades.

Seven: The massive propaganda hailing the miraculous benefits of vaccination obscures very unpleasant truths about the crimes of the medical cartel. For example, see the Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000, Dr. Barbara Starfield, "Is US health really the best in the world?" Starfield concludes that, every year in the US, the medical establishment kills 225,000 Americans. That's 2.25 million killings per decade. The strategy is simple: hog and clog the media with positive fairy tales about the medical cartel. Cover up the wholesale destruction.

Eight: The money. Medical care and treatment is a multi-trillion-dollar business, globally.

Nine: Maintaining the all-important fiction that “disease is inevitably caused by germs and nothing else,” the vaccine establishment can trumpet its fairy tale as the triumph of medical science in the war against germs. In doing so, it can, for example, divert attention from the toxic illness-effects of industrial pollution. Needless to say, this diversion is a major goal of polluting mega-corporations who forward the goals of Globalism.

It would be foolish, of course, to suggest that many doctors or medical bureaucrats are aware of all these nine reasons. Most medical personnel are brainwashed, through education, into believing what they support is real and true.

The hallmark of any long-term organized conspiracy is compartmentalization. Each player is only aware of his small part.

Rising through the ranks, players see a bit more of the actual picture, but they continue to believe they are doing the right thing.

And there is always the threat of loss of status, money, job, future career (and even life and limb) to offset the desire to blow the whistle.

At upper levels, players understand still more of whole picture. Few of them, however, are willing to grasp the intentionality of what is being visited on populations.

The top controllers are the contented psychopaths. They, too, believe they’re doing the right thing—but their definition of "right" and "good" is unique. It involves widespread destruction.

Understanding all these points should convince those who resist vaccination that playing defense, hoping for acknowledgment, and pleading for understanding are not enough. Going on the offense with great energy is required.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

________

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health

FULL PART ONE

________

This article appeared
at ProPublica

One Nation, Under Sedation: Medicare Paid for Nearly 40 Million Tranquilizer Prescriptions in 2013

Congress wouldn't allow Medicare to pay for benzodiazepines such as Xanax and Ativan until 2013. Now, the medications are among the most prescribed in its drug program.

by Charles Ornstein and Ryann Grochowski Jones
ProPublica, June 10, 2015



(David Sleight/ProPublica)

This story was co-published with the Boston Globe, the Miami Herald and Health News Florida.

In 2012, Medicare's massive prescription drug program didn't spend a penny on popular tranquilizers such as Valium, Xanax and Ativan.

The following year, it doled out more than $377 million for the drugs.

The Doctors and Drugs in Medicare Part D

Our Prescriber Checkup tool has been updated with 2013 data from Medicare, including controlled substance prescribing for each provider. Explore the app



(Jeff Larson, Jennifer LaFleur, Charles Ornstein, Tracy Weber and Lena Groeger, ProPublica)

While it might appear that an epidemic of anxiety swept the nation's Medicare enrollees, the spike actually reflects a failed policy initiative by Congress.

More than a decade ago, when lawmakers created Medicare's drug program, called Part D, they decided not to pay for anti-anxiety medications. Some of these drugs, known as benzodiazepines, had been linked to abuse and an increased risk of falls and fractures among the elderly, who make up most of the Medicare population.

But doctors didn't stop prescribing the drugs to Medicare enrollees. Patients just found other ways to pay for them. When Congress later reversed the payment policy under pressure from patient groups and medical societies, it swiftly became clear that a huge swath of Medicare's patients were already using the drugs despite the lack of coverage.

In 2013, the year Medicare started covering benzodiazepines, it paid for nearly 40 million prescriptions, a ProPublica analysis of recently released federal data shows. Generic versions of the drugs — alprazolam (which goes by the trade name of Xanax), lorazepam (Ativan) and clonazepam (Klonopin) — were among the top 32 most-prescribed medications in Medicare Part D that year.

And it appears these were not new prescriptions.

IMS Health, a healthcare analytics company that tracks drug sales nationwide, logged only a tiny increase in all benzodiazepine prescriptions, including those covered by Medicare, from 2012 to 2013. That probably means Medicare paid mostly for refills of existing prescriptions, said Michael Kleinrock, director of research for the IMS Institute.

That millions of seniors are taking Xanax, Ativan and other tranquilizers represents a very real safety concern, said Dr. Brent Forester, a geriatric psychiatrist at Harvard-affiliated McLean Hospital in Belmont, Mass.

The drugs are popular because they are fast-acting — working quickly, for example, to quell debilitating panic attacks. But they can be habit-forming and disorienting and their effects last longer in older patients. For that reason, the American Geriatrics Society discourages their use in seniors for agitation, insomnia or delirium. The group says they may be appropriate to treat seizure disorders, severe anxiety, withdrawal and in end-of-life care.

Forester said he and others who specialize in geriatric psychiatry don't use benzodiazepines as a "first-, second- or third-line treatment because we see more of the downside than the good side."

Some geriatric psychiatrists worry that doctors may have turned to the drugs in place of antipsychotic medications to sedate patients with conditions such as dementia. In the past several years, Medicare has pushed to reduce the use of antipsychotics, particularly in nursing homes, because of strong warnings about their risks.

In 2013, Medicare covered more prescriptions for benzodiazepines than for antipsychotics.

"At the end of the day," Forester said, "in terms of risk, the risk with benzodiazepines seems so much worse to me … There's significant danger and there's no spotlight."

A spokeswoman at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services declined to answer questions about Medicare's suddenly soaring tab for benzodiazepines.

Some doctors who ranked among Medicare's top prescribers of the drugs said any risks were outweighed by their benefits.

Fall River, Mass., psychiatrist Claude Curran wrote more than 11,700 prescriptions for benzodiazepines (including refills) in 2013, ranking him behind only four other doctors, all from Puerto Rico. He said the drugs worked well for his patients, many of whom are trying to kick addictions to narcotics but struggle with anxiety and depression.

"First of all, they're reliable," he said. "Second of all, they're cheap because they're all generic … They tickle the brain in the same way alcohol does."

Without benzodiazepines, he added, patients in recovery often need higher doses of methadone, which carries significant risks of its own. "Anyone who's ever had a panic attack is sympathetic to the use of the benzos," Curran said. "Anyone who has never had a panic attack doesn't understand it."

Medicare Part D Totals by the Numbers, 2013



Notes: Counts include initial prescriptions and refills dispensed. Retail price includes patients’ out-of-pocket costs but does not reflect drug maker rebates. Average prescriptions per patient, per provider has been adjusted to give more weight to doctors who treat more patients. (The unadjusted average is 5.7).

The vast majority of Curran's Medicare patients were younger than 65 and qualified for coverage based on a disability. Disabled patients made up about a quarter of Part D's 35 million enrollees in 2013, but used benzodiazepines disproportionately, accounting for about half of all prescriptions.

Miami psychiatrist Rigoberto Rodriguez also ranked high among Medicare prescribers of benzodiazepines, writing 9,900 prescriptions in 2013, but most of his patients were seniors. Many, he said, are Cuban immigrants who experienced traumas that left them with lingering anxiety, and they have been taking the drugs for years.

Rodriguez readily acknowledged the risks of the drugs for elderly users — recently, researchers found that the longer a person took benzodiazepines, the higher his or her risk of being diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease. The drugs' labels say they are generally for short-term use but many patients take them for years.

Rodriguez said he has been working to reduce his benzodiazepine prescriptions in light of emerging research. He expects that when Medicare releases data for 2014 and 2015, his totals will be lower.

Prescribing Benzodiazepines and Narcotics

Below are the states with the most doctors who prescribed at least 1,000 prescriptions of both benzodiazepines and narcotics. Experts say combining the two increase the risk of overdoses.

(Charles Ornstein and Ryann Grochowski Jones, ProPublica)

"This is fresh information coming out in the last couple years … telling us that benzos are probably not good and you should try to avoid them,” Rodriguez said. "I totally agree with that."

Roberto Hernando, another Miami psychiatrist who wrote high numbers of benzodiazepine prescriptions in 2013, said he intends to review his prescribing after a reporter told him his totals.

"Some people may need it; some people may not," he said. "You're bringing to my attention something that I wasn't even aware of."

When Congress created Medicare's drug program in 2003, there wasn't much discussion about whether it should cover benzodiazepines.

They were on a larger list of drugs excluded for coverage, along with barbiturates, fertility drugs, and drugs for weight loss and cosmetic purposes. The list mirrored one from a law years earlier allowing states to voluntarily exclude certain drugs from Medicaid programs for the poor. (Medicare now also pays for barbiturates.)

Andrew Sperling, director of federal legislative advocacy for National Alliance on Mental Illness, said it's unclear why Congress made the exclusions mandatory for Medicare when they had only been voluntary for Medicaid. He believes it was a drafting error.

IMS Health data suggests that while the Medicare ban was in effect, seniors and disabled patients paid for benzodiazepines in other ways. Many paid out of pocket for the relatively inexpensive drugs, which can cost less than $10 for a 30-day supply. Some, particularly those with disabilities, qualified for state Medicaid programs, which continued to cover the drugs even though they didn't have to. Another set of patients chose Medicare Advantage plans that offered the drugs as an added benefit.

Dr. Michael Ong, an associate professor at UCLA, co-authored a 2012 paper concluding that many patients continued using benzodiazepines after Congress banned coverage in Medicare Part D and that some turned to more powerful psychiatric drugs.

Most-Prescribed Benzodiazepines

Below are the most-prescribed benzodiazepines in 2013 in Medicare's prescription drug program.

(Charles Ornstein and Ryann Grochowski Jones, ProPublica)

"Just mandating something and saying we're not going to pay for the benzodiazepines is probably not the right type of policy solution to change the behaviors of both the providers who are providing these medications and also the patients who are using them," Ong said.

A worrisome aspect of the newly released data is that some doctors appear to be prescribing benzodiazepines and narcotic painkillers to the same patients, increasing the risk of misuse and overdose. The drugs, paired together, can depress breathing.

ProPublica found that this pattern was most common in southeastern states, which struggle with opioid abuse and overdoses. In 2013, 158 doctors in Florida wrote at least 1,000 prescriptions each for opioids and for benzodiazepines, tops in the nation. Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee also had unusually high numbers of doctors who often prescribed both narcotics and benzodiazepines. The data does not indicate if the prescriptions were given to the same patients, although that prospect worries experts.

Dr. Leonard J. Paulozzi, a medical epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, co-authored an analysis showing that benzodiazepines were involved in about 30 percent of the fatal narcotic overdoses that occurred nationwide in 2010.

"It increases the possibility of overdoses," he said.
________

Recommended further reading:

Vermont: "The First Medically Fascist State in the U.S." - Australia Is a Medical Police State - Callous Hypocrite Tony Abbott, the Pope of Forced Vaccinations - Profit-Mongering by Pharmaceutical Companies - Stand Up for Vaccine Choice!

Reducing the World's Population One Vaccination At a Time - Culling The Human Herd - Vaccinations Are The "Perfect Weapon" - Tetanus Vacccination Zeroed In On Females of Child Bearing Years - Antibodies Attack the Fetus - Five Vectors for Destroying Humanity

Scientists Create Nanotech Injections to Upgrade Brain With Electronic Mesh

India Called on to Resist Western Pressure on Affordable Drugs

The FDA and Big Pharma's Latest Killer Agenda: Destroy Homeopathic Medicine

Pillage and Class Polarization: The Rise of "Criminal Capitalism"

Posted: 11 Jun 2015 04:50 PM PDT

This article appeared
at GlobalResearch

About 75% of US employees work 40 hours or longer, the second longest among all OECD countries, exceeded only by Poland and tied with South Korea. In contrast, only 10% of Danish workers, 15% of Norwegian, 30% of French, 43% of UK and 50% of German workers work 40 or more hours. With the longest work day, US workers score lower on the 'living well' scale than most western European workers.

James Petras (right)

Moreover, despite those long workdays US employees receive the shortest paid holidays or vacation time (one to two weeks compared to the average of five weeks in Western Europe). US employees pay for the costliest health plans and their children face the highest university fees among the 34 countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

In class terms, US employees face the greatest jump in income inequalities over the past decade, the longest period of wage and salary decline or stagnation (1970 to 2014) and the greatest collapse of private sector union membership, from 30% in 1950 down to 8% in 2014.

On the other hand, profits, as a percentage of national income, have increased significantly. The share of income and profits going to the financial sector, especially the banks and investment houses, has increased at a faster rate than any other sector of the US economy.

There are two polar opposite trends: Employees working longer hours, with costlier services and declining living standards while finance capitalists enjoy rapidly rising profits and incomes.

Paradoxically, these trends are not directly based on greater 'workplace exploitation' in the US.

The historic employee-finance capitalist polarization is the direct result of the grand success of the trillion dollar financial swindles, the tax payer-funded trillion dollar Federal bailouts of thecrooked bankers, and the illegal bank manipulation of interest rates. These uncorrected and unpunished crimes have driven up the costs of living and producing for employees and their employers.

Financial 'rents' (the bankers and brokers are 'rentiers' in this economy) drive up the costs of production for non-financial capital (manufacturing). Non-financial capitalists resort to reducing wages, cutting benefits and extending working hours for their employees, in order to maintain their own profits.

In other words, pervasive, enduring and systematic large-scale financial criminality is a major reason why US employees are working longer and receiving less – the 'trickle down' effect of mega-swindles committed by finance capital.

Mega-Swindles, Leading Banks and Complicit State Regulators

Mega-swindles, involving trillions of dollars, are routine practices involving the top fifty banks, trading houses, currency speculators, management fund firms and foreign exchange traders.

These 'white collar' crimes have hurt hundreds of millions of investors and credit-card holders, millions of mortgage debtors, thousands of pension funds and most industrial and service firms that depend on bank credit to meet payrolls, to finance capital expansion and technological upgrades and raw materials.

Big banks, which have been 'convicted and fined' for mega-swindles, include Citi Bank, Bank of America, HSBC, UBS, JP Morgan, Barclay, Goldman Sachs, Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsch Bank and forty other 'leading' financial institutions.

The mega-swindlers have repeatedly engaged in a great variety of misdeeds, including accounting fraud, insider trading, fraudulent issue of mortgage based securities and the laundering of hundreds of billions of illegal dollars for Colombian, Mexican, African and Asian drug and human traffickers.

They have rigged the London Interbank Official Rate ( LIBOR), which serves as the global interest benchmark to which hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial contracts are tied. By raising LIBOR, the financial swindlers have defrauded hundreds of millions of mortgage and credit-card holders, student loan recipients and pensions.

Bloomberg News (5/20/2015) reported on an ongoing swindle involving the manipulation of the multi-trillion-dollar International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) fix, a global interest rate benchmark used by banks, corporate treasurers and money managers to determine borrowing costs and to value much of the $381 trillion of outstanding interest rate swaps.

The Financial Times (5/23/15, p. 10) reported how the top seven banks engaged in manipulating fraudulent information to their clients, practiced illegal insider trading to profit in the foreign exchange market (forex), whose daily average turnover volume for 2013 exceeded $5 trillion dollars.

These seven convicted banks ended up paying less than $10 billion in fines, which is less than 0.05% of their daily turnover. No banker or high executive ever went to jail, despite undermining the security of millions of retail investors, pensioners and thousands of companies.

The Direct Impact of Financial Swindles on Declining Living Standards

Each and every major financial swindle has had a perverse ripple effect throughout the entire economy. This is especially the case where the negative consequences have spread downward through local banks, local manufacturing and service industries to employees, students and the self-employed.

The most obvious example of the downward ripple effect was the so-called ' sub-prime mortgage' swindle. Big banks deliberately sold worthless, fraudulent mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligation (CDO) to smaller banks, pension funds and local investors, which eventually foreclosed on overpriced houses causing low income mortgage holders to lose their down payments (amounting to most of their savings).

While the effects of the swindle spread outward and downward, the US Treasury propped up the mega-swindlers with a trillion-dollar bailout in working people's tax money. They anointed their mega-give-away as the bail out for ' banks that are just too big to fail'! They transferred funds from the public treasury for social services to the swindlers.

In effect, the banks profited from their widely exposed crimes while US employees lost their jobs, homes, savings and social services. As the US Treasury pumped trillions of dollars into the coffers of the criminal banks (especially on Wall Street), the builders, major construction companies and manufacturers faced an unprecedented credit squeeze and laid off millions of workers, and reduced wages and increased the hours of un-paid work.

Service employees in consumer industries were hit hard as wages and salaries declined or remained frozen. The costs of the FOREX, LIBOR and ISDA fix swindles' fell heavily on big business, which passed the pain onto labor: cutting pension and health coverage, hiring millions of 'contingent or temp' workers at minimum wages with no benefits.

The bank bailouts forced the Treasury to shift funds from 'job-creating' social programs and national infrastructure investment to the FIRE (finance, insurance and real estate) sector with its highly concentrated income structure.

As a result of the increasing concentration of wealth among the financial swindlers, inequalities in income grew; wages and salaries were frozen or reduced and manufacturers outsourced production, resulting in declines in production.

Employees, suffering from the loss of income brought on by the mega-swindles, found that they were working longer hours for less pay and fewer benefits. Productivity suffered. With the total breakdown of the ' capitalist rules of the game', investors lost confidence and trust in the system. Mega-swindles eroded 'confidence' between investors and traders, and made a mockery of any link between performance at work and rewards. This severed the nexus between highly motivated workers, engaged in 'hard work, long hours' and rising living standards, and between investment and productivity.

As a result, profits in the finance sector grew while the domestic economy floundered and living standards stagnated.

Financial Impunity: Regulatees Controlling the Regulators

Despite the proliferation of mega-swindles and their pervasive ripple effects throughout the economy and society, none of the dozens of federal or state regulatory agencies intervened to stop the swindle before it undermined the domestic economy. No CEO or banker was ever arrested for their part in the swindle of trillions. The regulators only reacted after trillions had 'disappeared' and swindles were ' a done deal'. The impunity of the swindlers in planning and executing the pillage of hundreds of millions of employees, taxpayers and mortgage holders was because the federal and state regulatory agencies are populated by 'regulatory administrators' who came from or aspired to join the financial sector they were tasked with 'regulating'.

Most of the high officials appointed to lead the regulatory agencies had been selected by the 'Lords of Wall Street, Frankfurt, the City of London or Zurich.' Appointees are chosen on the basis of their willingness to enable financial swindles. It therefore came as no surprise on May 28 2015 when US President Obama approved the appointment of Andrew Donahue, Managing Director and Associate General Council for the repeatedly felonious, mega-swindling banking house of Goldman Sachs to be the 'Chief of Staff' of the Security and Exchange Commission. His career has been typical of the Washington-Wall Street 'Revolving Door'.

Only after fraud and swindles evoked the nationwide public fury of mortgage holders, investors and finance companies did the regulators 'investigate' the crimes and even then not a single major banker was jailed, not a single major bank was closed down.

There were a few low-level bond traders and bank employees who were fired or jailed as scapegoats. The banks paid puny (for them) fines, which they passed on to their customers. Despite pledges to 'mend their ways' the bankers concocted new schemes with their windfalls of billions of Federal 'bailout' money while the regulators looked on or polished their CV's for the next pass through the 'revolving door'.

Every top official in Treasury, Commerce and Trade, and every regulator in the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) who 'retired to the private sector' has ended up working for the same mega-criminal banks and finance houses they had investigated, regulated and 'slapped on the wrist'.

As one banker, who insists on anonymity, told me: 'The most successful swindlers are those who investigated financial transgressions'.

Conclusion

Mega-swindles define the nature of contemporary capitalism. The profits and power of financial capital is not the outcome of 'market forces'. They are the result of a system of criminal behavior that pillages the Treasury, exploits the producers and consumers, evicts homeowners and robs taxpayers.

The mega swindlers represent much less than 1% of the class structure. Yet they hold over 40% of personal wealth in this country and control over 80% of capital liquidity.

They grow inexorably rich and richer, even as the rest of the economy wallows in crisis and stagnation. Their swindles send powerful ripples across the national economy, which ultimately freeze or reduce the income of the skilled (middle class) employees and undermine the living conditions for poor working-class whites, and especially under and unemployed Afro-American and Latino American young workers.

Efforts to 'moralize' capital have failed repeatedly since the regulators are controlled by those they claim to 'regulate'.

The rare arrest and prosecution of any among the current tribe of mega-swindlers would only results in their being replaced by new swindlers. The problem is systemic and requires deep structural changes.

The only answer is to build a political movement independent of the two party system, willing to nationalize the banks and to pass legislation outlawing derivatives, forex trading and other unnatural parasitic speculative activities.

________

Further reading:

Death, drugs, and HSBC: How fraudulent blood money makes the world go round

The "Mother of All Reforms": Monetary Reform - The Opaque Eurodollar Empire - The Monetary System of Empire - Endgame - Swiss Bank Julius Baer - Bank for International Settlements (BIS) - Bahamas, Bermuda and Cayman Islands Sit Trillions of US$

CIA Laundering Money Through Inflated Art Prices - US Paying Countries to Wage War - Bankers Using Paintings as Decoys for Illicit Payments - Greek Shipping Company Transporting Libyan Oil - Congress Is Powerless - The Truth Is Stinking and Putrid

Failures of Central Banks, Interest Rates, Derivatives and Crisis in the Credit Market

Related topic:

Fourth-generation warfare

Soft War on Libya Leads to Violent Warfare - Actors and Social Theatre - NGOs: Clowns In the Circus - NGO Operatives are Fascist Totalitarians - Mr. Cluster F&#k Arrives In Town - USAID's "Special Mission Compound" In Libya

Posted: 11 Jun 2015 03:10 PM PDT

Libya: The Clowns Come To Town

Part 2

When George Bush announced the plan for a Middle East Free Trade Area (MEFTA), he was declaring social war on them. Social war is a different kind of war. It uses actors and social theatre, outside change agents and domestic insurgents, media for propaganda and social manipulation, overt financial assistance for "economic development", covert financial assistance for anti-government factions, and the injection of non-governmental organizations that purport to represent "community consensus". All of these groups and individuals are clowns in the circus of social transformation.

Social war invariably leads to armed conflict because the introduction of artificial social change brought into an area by the clowns of the global social community must necessarily sow their seeds of discontent quickly so that they can move to another location to destroy. They have a playbook from which they draw their scripts, objectives and strategies. Libya is a good country to study because there is a clear beginning and because for better or for worse, Muammar Qaddafi was always larger than life on the global stage.

I did a search on PBS - Frontline to see if they had any documentaries on Libya. They did have one probably not coincidental to George Bush's announcement of MEFTA-MENA. It's an excellent view of Libya in 2003 – before the clowns came to town. It has a date on it of August 3, 2006 so presumably that's when they posted it as a brief. At the end of the video, the producer mentions that a few weeks after the video was shot, the US removed Libya from the list of sponsors of terrorism and would begin the process of restoring full diplomatic relations.

2002 Before a President makes an announcement like that, there are diplomatic negotiations that go on before that. According to this webpage, the U.S.-Middle East Partnership Initiative began in 2002.

2003 Libya: Out of the Shadows

2004 Mr. Cluster Ph…k arrives in town. Michael Porter, Harvard Professor, teaches fascism – monopoly control under the label "competitiveness". Porter founded the Institute for Strategy & Competitiveness and the Monitor Group. The first step in conversion to a fascist organizational structure is to do a Cluster Study. Porter and his group provide the clowns for the circus.

Side note: I first encountered Michael Porter and his Cluster Study reports when I was analyzing a construct in Boise, Idaho that I called a Trojan Triangle because I needed a name for it. It turns out that what the construct is – is an inland port, zone of economic domination for a city. It comes with fascist leadership – public-private partnership just like Warren Christopher described in his 1995 speech. You'll notice that in Boise they were going to try to use Chinese money.

The Trojan Triangle
"The CORE" – Trojan Triangle
Inland Ports – Chokepoints for the Economy
Inland Port District for International Commerce
From Ivy League Rackets to Treason to Crimes Against Humanity
The question that comes to mind after seeing what happened in Libya, since a stadium always seems to be on the standardized list of cluster study recommendations, does Michael Porter bring the Muslim Brotherhood with him? Or does he pave the way for them to come? That's not as outrageous as it might seem – research it – starting with the Minneapolis Airport.

Herr Porter

Countries (where the Institute for Strategy & Competitiveness have done their dirty deeds).

2006 The Monitor Group (Michael Porter and Mark Fuller, co-founder) offered to help Qaddafi update his security. The plan was to establish a new agency called the National Security Organization – no doubt the Libyan version of the Department of Homescam Security.

2010 In 2010, right before the Libyan revolution, Qaddafi gave an interview to a British journalist.

2011 Muammar Qaddafi is murdered.

2012 Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Management Officer; Sean Smith, Security Officers Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were murdered.
The facility where Stevens, Smith, Woods and Doherty were murdered was not a standard State Department facility for diplomats. The facility was called a 'Special Mission Compound'.

What might a 'Special Mission Compound' have been? How about a USAID facility?

2014 The Frontline Club of London which apparently is the British version of the National Press Club produced a video of a discussion group to talk about Libya.
The title of the video Is Libya: A Failed State?

Somebody located Ambassador Stevens' daily journal and they published it. His final entry:

Never ending security threats…. September 11, 2012
From 1993 through 1997, the polish General John Shalikashvili was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This was in the critical timeframe when the technocratic tyranny - reinvention of our government was being implemented.

Shalikashvili's initiative was called Focused Logistics. If you compare the elements of Shalikashvili's plan with what was being done in Libya - and as Herr Porter's turnkey economic program is dropped into location after location around the world, then you will see the parallels. It's unmistakable.

Initiative for Global Development     NBR

Focused Logistics

General John Shalikashvili

"He [Shalikashvili] also serves on the board of directors of The Boeing Company, United Defense, L-3 Communications Corporation, the Frank Russell Trust Company, United, Inc., as well as the Atlantic Council and various military organizations."

Vicky Davis
June 8, 2015
________

Further reading:

The Road to Benghazi Part 1: The "Road to Benghazi" Started in Amman, Jordan - The Middle East Is Open For Business - Middle East "Free Trade Zone": War, Destruction and Death - Seven Governments Destroyed to Achieve Regional Technates - Global Technocratic Fascist Hierarchy

Cloud-Centric Crime Scene Investigation (C2CSI) Radio for June 12, 2015

Posted: 11 Jun 2015 02:40 PM PDT

This briefing presented
by C2CSI - Abel Danger

Abel Danger Broadcast for June 12, 2015

Walter Fitzpatrick Sends SOS From Ten...

Listen: Abel Danger Broadcast

#2374: Marine Briefs WSJ – Clinton's NORAD Santa Wiretap Of Bilderberg Pedophiles – Soros 8(a) Spot Fixed Hedge Funds – Serco S.B.T.C JonBenet

Posted: 11 Jun 2015 02:36 PM PDT

United States Marine Field McConnell -- Online Briefing of Brett Stevens, Deputy Editor, The Wall Street Journal at bstephens@wsj.com in re "The FIFA-Clinton Method" http://topics.wsj.com/person/

A/biography/5463

From Plum City Online - (AbelDanger.net) - June 11, 2015

1. Hillary Clinton used Comverse (now Verint) to develop the NORAD Santa wiretapping network which forced Bilderberg pedophiles to support her husband's 1992 presidential campaign and provide SBA loans for the 1993 bombing of NYC’s World Trade Center.

2. George Soros's hedge funds use Verint call center monitoring networks to trade child pornography over the onion router for actionable intelligence needed by Small Business Administration (SBA) 8(a) companies to spot fix forex, sports and mass-casualty events.

3. Bilderbergers allegedly used Serco's Small Business Time Clock (S.B.T.C) to time stamp snuff-film money shots as was allegedly the case at the wiretapped NORAD Santa crime scene where JonBenet Ramsey appears to have died at 02:00SBT on 12:26:1996.

McConnell notes that the 1996 Bilderberg delegates in Toronto included George Soros, President of Soros Fund Management, and Jean Chretien, the former Prime Minister of Canada whose pedophile-pimping pilot Russell Williams apparently scripted the NORAD Santa program which led JonBenet to open the door to a Serco 8(a) snuff-film crew which described itself as a small foreign faction and signed itself with "S.B.T.C Victory" on the ransom note.

<img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Pl1WZW7z

Show more