Recently, Dr Zafar Islam Khan, Editor, Milli Gazzette, forwarded a letter to me, written by a gay sympathiser requesting him to forward the letter to myself. The gentleman is a renowned designer based in Pune. I had an interesting exchange of letters with him, which I am copying below. For the sake of privecy concern I am not disclosing the name of the gentleman—–Dr Javed Jamil.
———
Dear Dr Khan,
Aadaab. Please have a look. Would you please forward this piece to Dr Javed Jamil? This is regarding his article on the movie Aligarh .
Regards,
—–
I’m afraid, Dr Javed Jamil has got it all wrong in his article Aligarh (March 16-31). First of all, Hansal Mehta’s Aligarh is not about eulogising homosexuality. It’s about infringement upon an individual’s privacy. His sexual preferences and orientation are secondary in the movie. AMU made a gross mistake that resulted in Dr Siras’ suicide. You can’t gloss it over. We all have a private space and three layers of personality-Public, private and secret. No person or organization, however big it may be, has the right to tinker with the second and third layers of a human being’s personality. A strict disciplinarian and moralist like Dr Abul Kalam Azad was very well aware of Raghupati Sahay Firaq Gorakhpuri’s avowed homosexuality, practised even on the campus of the famed Allahabad University (please refer to my M Phil dissertation in Urdu, ‘Sukhan-e-Firaq mein humjinsi anasir‘-Homosexual elements in Firaq’s oeuvre, simultaneously received from Leeds and Islamabad varsities). Was the great Firaq ever questioned or sacked from his professorship? But here the professor in question (Dr Siras) was a poor HINDU Maharashtrian man who taught at a predominantly orthodox University, AMU, to be precise.
And as for homosexuality, it’s existed in all societies, communities, races and religions since time immemorial. Homosexuality is engrained in human psyche. Muslims, like the followers of all other man-made faiths, have been equally fascinated and intrigued by homosexuality and wholeheartedly indulged in it. One can deny and defy but the fact remains that homosexuality is NOT alien to Muslims in their history of 1400 years. All Mughals were blatantly homosexuals. Babar wrote in his Turkish-Uzbeki autobiography (He knew no Persian)‘ Tuzuk-e-Babri ‘ (later translated into Persian as Babarnamaby Abdul Rahim Khankhana, one of the nine gems in Akbar’s court) that, ‘Farzeen infa’at ambeer/Faiqa’at infa’at suqeen‘ (Heterosexuality for procreation/Homosexuality for pleasure). Arab Sheikhs enjoy young boys as much as they relish girls. Years ago Egyptian Nobel laureate in literature Dr Naguib Moufiz enigmatically told me in a coffeehouse in Cairo that ‘Arabs tilted and travelled both ways.’ Being very young and not that good at subtle Arabic, I couldn’t get what he meant at that time. But today I understand what he cryptically stated was right. The feudal Pathans of Pakistan’s NWFP still keep catamites (passive partners in homosexual relations) for ‘narrow-gauge humping’ (Sir V S Naipaul’s phrase for homosexual sex). Young boys, used for this purpose, are called ‘umreez‘ (a local Pashto term for catamites). So drop this faux holier-than-thou attitude and accept what’s universally widespread across all races and religions right from the beginning of human civilisation.
——
Mar 24 at 4:46 PM
Dear Mr.,
Thanks for your kind letter. I am pasting below excerpts from one of my books, which answers almost all the questions raised by you in your letter. Here I will like to make only a few comments:
I strongly believe in the human rights of homosexuals but not in homosexuality as a human right;
Any practice, which is extraordinarily dangerous for the life of man cannot be allowed in the name of personal right;
Bad tendencies are part and parcel of society. People tend to be violent to the point of murdering, cheating, stealing and raping. These cannot be allowed in the name of widespread tendencies and personal inclinations. To keep the effects of these tendencies, law and morality have to be applied.
Apart from the destructive effects of the homosexuality in real terms given in the below pasted excerpts, just imagine this: If the whole mankind becomes homosexual, there will be no human being left on the earth at the most in 80-90 years. There cannot be a bigger threat to human beings (to the persons involved and to the larger society) than homosexuality; and considering the medical fact that homosexuals on average have considerably less life expectancy, the real probability of the annihilation of human species is reduced to around 50 years;
Numbers or rates of incidences do not make anything good; goodness or badness has to be judged by their short and long term impact;
Even if all the religious scholars of Islam, Christianity, Hinduism and other religions declare it lawful; it would not in any way reduce the evilness of this act;
assaid above, like murderers and rapists undergoing punishment, homosexuals also do have human rights. I am against their haunting by society. They need to be carefully tackled and weaned away. However those who institutionalise and commercialise homosexuality or the individuals who refuse to give up their habits, punishments have to be give.
No evil can ever be totally annihilated from the world but effective campaigns, legal measures and love of God tend to drastically reduce their incidences, and therefore, their impact;
A crime becomes a crime in real only when it is caught by the Law. But its sinfulness remains even if it is committed under one thousand layers of secrecy.
Best Regards
Dr. Javed Jamil
Note: article Homosexuality: the Harbinger of Death and Destruction given at the end of the post:
Thanks, Dr Jamil. I’m thankful to Dr Khan for forwarding my piece to you. Well, being brutally candid, let me say that somewhere your religious (read, Islamic) upbringing and Muslim background may be interfering with your medical profession which doesn’t frown upon homosexuality any longer. You may be aware that even doctors till mid 60s believed that masturbation was wrong. But today, they’re unanimous on one count that it’s a part of growing up sexually. Things become clearer with the passage of time and misconceptions get dispelled eventually. What was wrong yesterday is right today. Homosexuality is natural and one needs to look at it rising above one’s religion.
Thanks once again for condescending to mail back.
Warmest regards,
===
Dear Mr.
On the contrary, medical sciences strengthened my belief in Islam. When I was studying in King George’s Medical College, Lucknow I started realising how Islam makes all its dos and don’ts in accordance with their impact on health. This strengthened my conviction that IUslam could not have been brought by anyone other than the Ambassador of God. Practices prohibited in Islam (gambling, alcohol, drugd, sex outside normal marriage between male and female) kills around 70 million humans or humans-in-making every year.
All human weaknesses are natural including tendencies to lie, to be selfish, to run after instant pleasures. Prohibitions are for natural weaknesses and not for things which humans are not inclined to do. Quran speaks of ban on pork, not on the meat of lions because the meats of lions or elephants are not savoured by humans.
Homosexuality is an addiction. Once exposed, like drugs and alcohol, one starts enjoying and then becomes an addict.
If you allow me, I would like you to send my book Quran’s Dynamic Paradigm of Health (soft copy), in which I have severely criticised the current world order which gives supremacy to economics over health.
I am not sure if you are just a sympathiser of gays or a gay yourself. In case you happen to be the latter – I pray you are not – this book will help you understand many things, and will hopefully wean you away.
Forgive me if I hurt you in any way.
Regards
Javed
Dear Dr Jamil,
Don’t mind, this is what I call a condescending attitude. Life and a little education have taught me to take things sportingly. I’m a straight person with no homosexual proclivities. Yet, I sympathise with those who’ve been marginalised by an insensitive world. I’ll continue to fight for the rights of all those who’re oppressed and suppressed by religious moralists like you. I’m a non-believer and have absolutely no faith in all damn man-made religions and their silly tenets. By the way, I studied Islamic theology and comparative religions at Oxford and realised that all religions and their practitioners were pseudo-intellectuals and also pseudo-spiritual.
Hope, I didn’t hurt you. I call a spade a shovel.
Warmest regards,
——–
Dear Mr….
I didn’t mind what you said. Out of ignorance or self motives, people say things like that. It is the propagated “normalisation” followed by institutionalisation and largescale commercialisation that vices spread. I speak against the vices and not against those who become victims of the vices. My campaign against vices and their institutionalisation and commercialisation will continue. Fortunately, in almost all the religions with more sophistication in Islam, which is in truth the final version of all religions established by God, vices are no manmade things, but are the practices that truly endanger the lives of not only those who practise them but also a larger humanity. When we campaign against vices, we campaign against death, destruction and chaos. When people campaign in favour of vices in the name of “freedom of choice” and “privacy” they are either doing so for purely commercial interests or have become misguided by the forces of economics that dominate the world today. In effect they bring death, destruction and chaos.
But I am happy that you have not been inflicted by the vice yourself. May God save all!
Thanks for your letters. You can continue to keep dialogue if you like or can stop any further exchange. I will keep praying for you. You don’t believe in “man-made” God so you can at least wish if not pray good for me.
Best Regards
Javed Jamil
Dear Dr Jamil,
Aadaab. We’re all stubborn individuals. You may be right from your perspective and I could be right from my angle. We’d better cease our exchange of mails before it turns murkier.
Nice to know your views.
Wish you well. Stay connected.
Warmest regards,
—–
Homosexuality: the Harbinger of Death and Destruction
To meet the interminable demands, merchants are always ready to offer novelties to the customers. In order to compete with one another, and to further swell their coffers, they began to popularise sexual perversions. Mass sex, sadism and masochism became common. Homosexuality was soon introduced as a new brand in the market. The combination of heterosexual and homosexual promiscuity would entrap almost everybody on the surface of the earth, at least in their calculations. It is not that sodomy did not exist before in history. Several religious scriptures have given grim accounts of how the citizens of the twin cities of Gomorrah and Sodom had become addicts of anal sex. So prevalent in fact it had become that there were not even ten righteous persons left in the city, according to Bible. Bible and Qur’an both have narrated how the twin cities were ultimately ‘stoned to death’ by way of a tempestuous rain of sulphur stones from the sky. It is a known fact that homosexuality is still very much there in most of the countries. According to some estimates, 5-10% of males may be having such propensities. But there is a basic difference between homosexuality rampant in West and the one in some other countries. In Islamic and the majority of Asian countries, homosexuality is considered to be a big sin even by those who practise it. There is no question at all of glorifying or justifying it and the gays’ associations have only recently been making clandestine appearance in some metropolitan and cosmopolitan cities. In Western countries, on the other hand, it has turned commercial.
The gay movement has also followed the commercialisation way. It is to facilitate business that sturdy gay movements have been organised; and under their pressure, one government after the other has chosen to legalise it. Gay clubs and literature are now booming in almost every city of Western world. Furthermore, while in Asian countries, homosexuality is not usually isolated, with most homosexuals also having heterosexual liaisons, in West, organised gay campaigns have led to exclusive homosexuality. Women too have not remained far behind, and lesbianism is also on the increase. The other reasons for giving huge publicity to the gay movements are that it would help in controlling population that occupies a central place in the strategy of the economic fundamentalists, and would also accelerate the disintegration of family system.
The demoniac march of the commercialised sex has necessitated that all perversions must be considered “normal and natural” behaviour and any stigma associated with them should be struck with a fatal blow. The chiefs of homosexual net and their marshals have been advancing the nonsense argument that relations between two persons belonging to the same sex are natural as a sizeable percentage of human population has such propensities. The commercial convenience makes them forget the truth that “natural” and “human” are not synonymous. The natural phenomena are essentially good for mankind; these defend humans against death, disease and destruction, for they are aimed at the common rather than the individual good. Even when they seem to be destructive (natural tragedies), they are the manifestations of an effort on the part of the Nature to bring back the harmony that has somehow been disturbed. The natural tragedies are therefore aimed at averting bigger tragedies in the future. The human tendencies, on the other hand, are generally the result of self-gratification and tend to disturb the natural equilibrium. It is the human (not natural) weaknesses that have given rise to crimes, diseases and abnormal acts including sexual perversions. If homosexual proclivities are accepted as natural, murderous instincts and tendencies to rape, steal or impinge upon others’ rights must also be regarded natural. And if the latter deserve outright condemnation, reform and punishment, the former also require the same treatment.
Homosexual relations, particularly man to man relations, need to be confronted with utmost severity. Homosexuality is the most unhealthy and unhygienic of all forms of sexual relations, as it carries the highest risk in spreading infections. Syphilis, Gonorrhoea and AIDS – all have started in homosexuals and spread later to heterosexuals. However, distinction has to be made between lesbianism and sodomy. I think lesbianism cannot be recognised as a full sexual activity, as it involves neither penetration nor an exchange of fluids. At the most, it can be described as a form of mutual masturbation. As it does not involve penetration or exchange of fluids, it does not pose such huge risks to life as sodomy. But studies have demonstrated that even lesbianism is responsible for significant reduction in life expectancy and has to be vigorously discouraged. But the punishment for lesbianism cannot be as hard as for sodomy. Gays should be given exemplary punishments, which should however be preceded by a period of intensive counselling and forced abstinence to wean them out of their addiction. Their actions threaten the very survival of mankind.
It is needless to say that the rise in the demand of legalizing homosexuality in the world has intensified with the rising fortunes of gay market. It is already a big market in western countries. The truth is that Sex market as a whole is the largest growing market, and gay market is the largest growing sex market. A report on gay tourism says:
“..They claim since same-sex marriage has been legalized in British Columbia in 2003, Whistler has been the ideal place to get married. They even advertise their own wedding planners, called “Two Dears and a Queer”. And nothing is complete without a full advertisement to honeymooners as well, so after having the wedding, the couple as well as guests can stay to celebrate. Whistler then becomes a one-place stop for every wedding need, and they have event planners and organizers to prepare everything for you, enabling visitors to just be there to escape and have a fun relaxing time. It’s an extremely clever marketing scheme: since the queer community comes here for two main reasons, to visit Whistler or to get married, why not get everything done at one spot?”
In short, according to a commentator, “The US has made a billion dollar industry off of homosexual media – HBO shows, movies, books, magazines. Like most things in the US anything that has the potential to generate profit will be considered15.”
But that does not make homosexuality acceptable because it has huge effects on the longevity as well as the quality of life. Obviously, homosexuality is a threat to the whole mankind, and it is the biggest threat to the life of homosexuals themselves. In India , HIV prevalence, according to NACO surveys, is almost 8 times more than normal population. If legalising it helps anyone it is the market. Hardly any gays are punished by the court India . Legalising helps the big market bosses to float companies. Gay literature, gay clubs and gay porn will mushroom with the result that more and more people will fall victim to homosexuality. To argue that it will help in the control of AIDS is absolutely nonsense. A little change in the law that ensures care of gay of HIV patients would have sufficed for that. AIDS cannot be controlled unless there is an effective campaign against prostitution, pornography, homosexuality and promiscuity.
The following arguments are being given in support of homosexuality:
That it exists since antiquity: a fallacious argument because all sins and crimes exist in human society since ancient times. On the contrary, it is right time to try to reduce them rather than glorify them if we want to prove ourselves progressive.
That it is nonsense to object if it is between two consenting adult individuals (as if consent makes every act legal.)
That legalizing homosexuality would mean acceptance of right to life. In fact he exact opposite is true. If institutionalized, it threatens the whole human species; it is a threat to life of those who practice it as well as others who come in their sexual contact.
That it is based on the principle of Freedom of Choice: Freedom of Choice is understandable only if it is the freedom of good choices. Freedom of dangerous choices and death cannot be given to the people.
Normal hygienic and healthy behaviours are important components of civilisation. Perversions cannot be but the antidote of civilisation. The perversions that threaten the lives of individuals and peaceful survival of the most notable natural institution of family cannot be described anything but barbarism at its worst. What can then be said of the “Civilised World” that safeguards, promotes and commercialises the Sexual perversion of the most abominable kind and the most life threatening — the Homosexuality?
The attempt to legalise Homosexuality is nothing but the continuation of the same series of worldwide strategies of “development” in which every human susceptibility is first given a legal and social sanction, then it is glorified in the media as a victory of “Freedom of Choice” and “Human Rights” and then with all the obstacles removed it is commercialized at huge level.
But the truth remains that the economics of homosexuality cannot cover for the menace, which homosexuality is. The attempts to legalise homosexuality are shocking. This is like legalising murders, terrorism and rapes. Homosexuality is in fact much more dangerous than any of these, as it has led, leads to and can lead to a much bigger loss of life.
Obviously, homosexuality is a threat to the whole mankind, and it is the biggest threat to the life of homosexuals themselves. In India , HIV prevalence, according to NACO surveys, is almost 8 times more in gays than in normal population. If legalising it helps anyone it is the market. Hardly any gays are taken to the court and punished. What is then the need to legalise it? Legalising is surely meant for commerce. Once legalised, it helps the big market bosses to float companies. Media, literature and tourism – all get new avenues. Gay literature, gay clubs and gay porn will mushroom with the result that more and more people will fall victim to homosexuality. To argue that it will help in the control of AIDS is absolutely nonsense. A little change in the law that ensures care of gay HIV patients (rather than their habits) would have sufficed for that. AIDS cannot be controlled unless there is an effective campaign against prostitution, pornography, homosexuality and promiscuity. It is to be noted that sexual misdemeanours have a much larger depressing effect on life expectancy than other evils like smoking, drinking and gambling. This is because sex related problems affect foetuses and men and women of younger age groups. “Sexual Revolution” is killing either foetuses and infants or the young people of 20-45 years in such big numbers that it is bound to reduce life expectancy by 20-40 years.
By legalising gay marriages, homosexuality is being sought to be institutionalised. Otherwise what can explain why on the one hand marriages in general are being discouraged and on the other hand gay marriages are being aggressively promoted? This is surely aimed at boosting the population of gays. The children growing in the company of their gay “parents” will have bigger chances of succumbing to homosexual tendencies than the normal population. Moreover, these “parents” cannot be a replacement of natural parents. Their love for their “children” is not natural. The affection between parents and children can never be as fruitful as between the natural parents and children; and the probability of child abuse will surely be much greater.
To say that homosexuality is natural is like saying criminal tendencies are natural. These are not natural but human aberrations of most dangerous kind. Such aberrations are present in notorious criminals also. Can the crimes be legalized to help them? Can they be given protection by the law on the ground of not discriminating against persons? Even otherwise, homosexuality is a relationship that does not produce any progeny. So genes if any related to hardcore unadulterated homosexuality cannot be transmitted. Even if it is accepted as natural, it remains an anomaly like many other congenital diseases. The anomalies and diseases need treatment and counselling rather than acceptance and encouragement.
As already explained, homosexuality in West is very much different from that in Asian countries, and this is because Western countries chose to legalise, institutionalize and glorify it. In Asian countries, homosexuality is more often than not an opportunist encounter. Denied marriage after puberty, and girls hard to find, some men would lure young boys into having sex. Once they get married, most if not all would sooner or later give this up. Family pressures, fear of law and society and the desire to have a good family life keep people away from a long term homosexual life. Moreover, in Asian countries, this is normally a one way relationship. There is one who penetrates the other. In the Western world, with the institutionalization and commercialization of homosexuality, and the availability of porn literature and films, homosexuals act both ways; they penetrate and get penetrated. They are made to believe that the kind of sex they are enjoying is not possible in a heterosexual relationship. Soon they become addicts. The relationship between sex and homosexuality is the same as between nutrition and alcohol/drugs. Alcohol/drugs are not part of natural nutrition, but if someone is exposed to them, he or she may soon become addict of it. Homosexuality is an addiction that should be treated both through legal measures (including ban, boycott and detention) and medical treatment for those who seek to change their behaviour. Homosexuality has already become the harbinger of the death of at least 40 million people that have died of AIDS so far. (Promiscuous heterosexuality has also played its part but homosexuality is one of the major killers.) Its legalization will surely lead to more people succumbing to it with greater spread of AIDS and other sex related diseases. There is a need to sexually isolate the HIV infected rather than legalizing homosexuality in the name of AIDS so that they do not spread HIV to others.
There is a difference between “homosexual rights” of humans and “human rights” of homosexuals. The former are unacceptable but the latter should be ensured. Homosexuals need attention: social and medical. They need to be protected from unauthorised punishments by other members of society and they need the psychological support for giving up their habit so that they can join society as normal people. Once there is an effective ban on homosexuality and its commercialisation and institutionalisation, not only new homosexuals will not be produced in as many numbers but the already addicted ones will also find it easier to give up. It should remain a crime for those who want to sustain their habit; but those who want an escape route should be helped. The right to treatment is of course for every human including even the murderers.
Facts and Statistics about Homosexuals
One study reports 70% of homosexuals admitting to having sex only one time with over 50% of their partners,
One study reports that the average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year. The average heterosexual has 8 partners in a lifetime. Many homosexual sexual encounters occur while drunk, high on drugs, or in an orgy setting.
Many homosexuals don’t pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: “Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behaviour”.
Homosexuals got homosexuality removed from the list of mental illnesses in the early 70s by storming the annual American Psychiatric Association (APA) conference on successive years. “Guerrilla theatre tactics and more straight-forward shouting matches characterized their presence”.
Since homosexuality has been removed from the APA list of mental illnesses, so has paedophilia (except when the adult feels “subjective distress”).
Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhoea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions (other than for STDs) in the United States .
Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhoea, Hepatitis B, the “gay bowel syndrome” (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus.
73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is not due to social stigmatization.
25-33% of homosexuals and lesbians are alcoholics.
Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 500 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands (or, as one homosexual admits in the film “The Castro”, one minute stands).
Also, it is a favourite past-time of many homosexuals to go to “cruisy areas” and have anonymous sex. 78% of homosexuals are affected by STDs.
Judge John Martaugh, chief magistrate of the New York City Criminal Court has said, “Homosexuals account for half the murders in large cities”.
Captain William Riddle of the Los Angeles Police says, “30,000 sexually abused children in Los Angeles were victims of homosexuals”.
50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuals.
Dr. Daniel Capron, a practicing psychiatrist, says, “Homosexuality by definition is not healthy and wholesome. The homosexual person, at best, will be unhappier and more unfulfilled than the sexually normal person”.
For other psychiatrists who believe that homosexuality is wrong, please see National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality. It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us.
Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States , and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 50% of the AIDS cases in the United States , which is quite a large number considering that they account for only 1-2% of the population. Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco , 29% in Denver , 66% in New York City , 56% in Toronto , 42% in Montreal , and 26% in Melbourne .
37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco , classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism.
41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs.
Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries.
The median age of death of homosexuals is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75.
The median age of death of lesbians is 45 (only 24% live past age 65). The median age of death of a married heterosexual woman is 79. Homosexuals are 100 times more likely to be murdered (usually by another homosexual) than the average person, 25 times more likely to commit suicide, and 19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident.
21% of lesbians die of murder, suicide or traffic accident, which is at a rate of 534 times higher than the number of white heterosexual females aged 25-44 who die of these things.
50% of the calls to a hotline to report “queer bashing” involved domestic violence (i.e., homosexuals beating up other homosexuals).
About 50% of the women on death row are lesbians.
Homosexuals prey on children
3% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex.
There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is “SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE.” This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States.
Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molester, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molester.
73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age.
Many homosexuals admit that they are paedophiles: “The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality”.
Because homosexuals can’t reproduce naturally, they resort to recruiting children. Homosexuals can be heard chanting “TEN PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT” in their homosexual parades. A group called the “Lesbian Avengers” prides itself on trying to recruit young girls. They print “WE RECRUIT” on their literature. Some other homosexuals aren’t as overt about this, but rather try to infiltrate society and get into positions where they will have access to the malleable minds of young children (e.g., the clergy, teachers, Boy Scout leaders, etc.)16
Legalisation popularises homosexuality
The legalisation leads to commercialisation and the commercialisation is sure to influence the choices of the people. There are nearly 1.2 million gay people living with a same sex partner in America . This is a huge increase from the 1990 census, which identified only 145,000 same sex unmarried households. 17
The Popularity of Homosexuality
According to a report, “The hetero and homo “promiscuity index” (well, actually they called it “sociosexuality” and it didn’t just measure promiscuity but we’re going with promiscuity just the same) as it was dubbed, lists the 15 countries that do the most whoring around as follows18:
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Czech Republic
Australia
USA
France
Turkey
Mexico
Canada
Italy
Poland
Spain
Greece
Portugal”
Wikipedia report19 says: “These charts show a list of the top 10 US metropolitan areas with the highest LGB population in terms of numbers of total gay, lesbian and bisexual residents, based on estimates published in 2006 by the Williams Institute of the UCLA School of Law.
Top Ranked by Percent:
Rank
City
Percentage
of city
population
GLB Population
Population
Rank
1
San Francisco
15.4%
94,234
4
2
Seattle
12.9%
57,993
9
3
Atlanta
12.8%
39,805
12
4
Minneapolis
12.5%
34,295
16
5
Boston
12.3%
50,540
10
6
Sacramento
9.8%
32,108
20
7
Portland
8.8%
35,413
14
8
Denver
8.2%
33,698
17
9
Washington
8.1%
32,599
18
10
Orlando
7.7%
12,508
36
Top Ranked by Total Population:
Rank
City
Percentage
of city
population
GLB Population
Population
Rank
1
New York City
6%
272,493
1
2
Los Angeles
5.6%
154,270
2
3
Chicago
5.7%
114,449
3
4
San Francisco
15.4%
94,234
4
5
Phoenix
6.4%
63,222
5
6
Houston
4.4%
61,976
6
Rank
City
Percentage
of city
population
GLB Population
Population
Rank
7
San Diego
6.8%
61,945
7
8
Dallas
7.0%
58,473
8
9
Seattle
12.9%
57,993
9
10
Boston
12.3%
50,540
10
11
Philadelphia
4.2%
43,320
11
12
Atlanta
12.8%
39,085
12
13
San Jose
5.8%
37,260
13
The statistics are truly alarming. The legalization of gay marriages, the gay pornography and gay associations are playing havoc with the sexual preferences of the people with the result that increasingly greater numbers of people are succumbing to provocations.
The argument that if there is consent between two adult individuals, what objections can others have to their homosexual liaisons is also fallacious. If consent is the only reason for deciding the criminality or non-criminality of an act, why is bribery by consent a criminal offence? It is well known that in many countries including India , bribe even for genuine reasons is arranged by consent of two or more individuals. Similarly, why is sex determination test of foetus a crime if it takes place between the consent of a woman/couple and a radiologist? And suicide too is a crime though it is an individual’s own choice. If there is consent between two individuals about one helping the other in choosing death, is it not a crime? In Hindu community, according to the current Indian laws, if a man marries another woman with the consent of his wife, why does it constitute crime?
The human rights organisations and other advocates base their campaign in favour of gay rights on the ground of discrimination. This is indeed a fascinating logic. Unfortunately for the activists though, it is equally foolish. The whole fabric of moral and legal institutions is woven around ‘discrimination’. Good and bad cannot be put on the same table. There has to be discrimination between good and bad acts, and between good and bad people. How can law breakers and law abiding citizens be placed in equal footing? How can murderers and common men be treated equally? Even the patients infected with communicable diseases are kept away from the public. How can then people with abnormal sexual behaviours threatening the life and peace of mankind be given the same treatment as given to the normal people who contribute to the health functioning of the humanity. Putting normal with the abnormal will in effect be a discrimination against the normal. Discrimination on the ground of acceptability or unacceptability of behaviours and acts is the essence of equality.
There is a need to define crime. Obviously evilness of an act neither depends on the time or place nor on the consent or choice. Evilness depends on the impact of an act on individual/individuals, family and society. The criminality of an act is proportional to the amount of damage to others. Unfortunately, in today’s world controlled by economics, certain acts are accepted even if they have huge damaging effects, especially if the effects are not instant and dramatic. Homosexuality (and promiscuity of all kinds) has huge damaging effects on (1) the individuals involved (the life expectancy of individuals is considerably shortened, there are a number of physical, mental and social problems) (2) the survival of human species if large sections of people choose to adopt it (3) rest of mankind if gays are also promiscuous (which they are more often than not) and (4) on the lives of the children they choose to adopt exposing them to an unnatural parenthood and parents’ sexual preferences.
The homosexuality needs to be treated at par with drug addiction. Those that choose to get out of this addiction can be de-addicted through rehabilitation centres. The first time caught gays can also be shifted to asylums, and the punishment can be increased in subsequent repetitions. The people who commercialise or institutionalise homosexuality must be severely punished.
LUT ( LOT ) (AS)
Before concluding this chapter, it will be worthwhile to reproduce here Qur’anic account of the sexual corruption that prevailed at the time of Prophet Lot (AS) and the punishment they received for that. Qur’an says:
The people of Lut rejected the apostles. Behold, their brother Lut said to them: “Will you not fear (God))? I am to you an apostle worthy of all trust. So fear God and obey me. No reward do I ask of you for it: my reward is only from the lord of the Worlds. Of all the creatures in the world, will you approach males, and leave those whom God has created for you to be your mates? Nay, you are a people transgressing (all limits)!” (26: 160-166/A)
* We also (sent) Lut: He said to his people: “Do you commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For you practise your lusts on men in preference to women: you are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.” (7: 80-81/A)
(He said to his people): “Do you indeed approach men, and cut off the highway-and practise wickedness (even) in your councils?” (29: 29/A)
And his people gave no answer but this: they said, “Drive them out of your city: these are indeed men who want to be clean and pure!” (7: 82/A)
But his people gave no answer but this: they said: “Bring us the Wrath of God if you tell the truth.” (29: 29/A)
He said: “I do detest your doings. O my Lord! Deliver me and my family from such things as they do!” (26: 168-169/A)
He said: “O my Lord! Help me against people who do mischief!” When Our Messengers came to Abraham with the good news, they said: “We are indeed going to destroy the people of this township: for truly they are (addicted to) crime.” He said: “But there is Lut there.” They said: “Well do we know who is there: we will certainly save him and his following, except his wife: she is of those who lag behind!” (29: 30-32/A)
……he began to plead with Us for Lut’s people. For Abraham was, without doubt, forbearing (of faults), compassionate, and given to look to God. Abraham! Seek not this. The decree of your Lord has gone forth: for them there comes a penalty that cannot be turned back! When Our messengers came to Lut, he was grieved on their account and felt himself powerless (to protect) them. He said: “This is a distressful day.” And his people came rushing towards him, and they had been long in the habit of practising abominations. He said: “O my people! Here are my daughters: they are purer for you (if you marry)! Now fear God, and cover me not with shame about my guests! Is there not among you a single right-minded man?” They said: “Well you do know we have no need of your daughters: indeed you know quite well what we want!” He said: “Would that I had power to suppress you or that I could betake myself to some powerful support.” (The Messengers) said: “O Lut! We are Messengers from thy Lord! By no means shall they reach you! Now travel with your family while yet a part of the night remains, and let not any of you look back: but your wife (will remain behind); to her will happen what happens to the people. Morning is their time appointed: Is not the morning nigh?” When Our Decree issued, We turned (the cities) upside down, and rained down on them brimstones hard as baked clay, spread, layer on layer,- marked as from your Lord: Nor are they ever far from those who do wrong! (11: 74-83/A)
But the (mighty) Blast overtook them before morning, and We turned (the cities) upside down, and rained down on them brimstones hard as baked clay. Behold! In this are Signs for those who by tokens do understand. And the (cities were) right on the high-road. (15: 73-76/A)
It is interesting to note that the story of Lot has been described even in greater details in Old Testament. The additional part in that story is the repeated pleading by Abraham to Jehovah to spare the twin cities if there were at least some straight people there. From 50, he kept pleading down to 5 people as a condition of averting the scourge, and ultimately it came out that there were not even 5 straight people there that could have saved the city from being destroyed.
—