2014-05-03

Revise - elaborate on the relevant California rules of professional conduct, and better explain the perspective and nature of our public statements.

← Older revision

Revision as of 00:40, 3 May 2014

Line 1:

Line 1:



{{center|<big><big>'''
The
role
of Wikimedia Foundation
legal

counsel'''</big></big>}}

+

==
The
Role
of
the
Wikimedia Foundation
Legal Team

==

 

+

The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) works "to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally". To serve this mission, the legal team helps make and implement decisions on behalf of the WMF. WMF is part of the community devoted to this mission, but its organizational role is distinct from the roles of other community members.

 

 



If

you

have

participated

in

discussions

with
Wikimedia Foundation legal team
,

you

may

have

noticed

that

advice

is

often

bookended

with

a

disclaimer stating that
the
attorney

acts

as

a

counselor

for

the

Foundation

exclusively
and
that

we

are

not

offering

legal

advice
.
[1]

+

As

part

of

our

support

of

the
Wikimedia Foundation
, the
legal team
sometimes

provides

WMF's

perspective

on

issues

of

interest

to

community

members.

We

(
the
legal

team)

want

everyone

to

understand

what

we

are doing,
and
not

doing,

when

we

provide

that

perspective
.

 

 



As

an

organization

headquartered

in

San

Francisco
,
California
,
our

lawyers

must

abide

by
the
state’s

rules
of
professional

conduct;

otherwise
, we
risk

potentially

being

disciplined

by
the
California

Bar.

Disciplinary

action

could

result
in
reputational

damage
,
disbarment
, or
potential

liability
.

+

The

legal

team

represents

the

Wikimedia

Foundation
,
which makes decisions through the Executive Director and the Board. We [[#calaw|do not represent you]]
,
or

any

other

community

member, or
the
community

in general. Similarly, when the legal team comments on an issue we provide a perspective—the perspective
of
WMF.

This allows WMF to further the mission without legally compromising itself (and thus all the sites).

Accordingly
, we
work

hard

to

make

sure
the
perspective

is

sound

and

well-informed, and input from you and other community members is

invaluable
in
giving

us the information we need to advise WMF on what is at stake on a given issue. Nevertheless
,
the perspective we provide is just that—a perspective. It is the position WMF takes
,
not advice regarding what you
or
any other community member should do or not do in a particular situation. We do things this way to make sure we can effectively represent the Wikimedia Foundation and promote its

mission
.

 

 



*

Under

California’s

Rules

of Professional Conduct, we can only provide professional advice
to
the

Wikimedia

Foundation

itself.[2]

As

in-house

lawyers

for

the

Foundation,

we

may

not represent
other
clients, including unfortunately community

members
.
Compliance with these ethics provisions is not intended to build a wall between an organization and its constituents
,
especially,

when
,
as

here,

there

would

be

no

Foundation without the community. That said
,
the

ethics

directives are firm
that
,

as

in-house

lawyers,

we

can only professionally advise
one
client in this type
of
situation,

namely
the
Foundation.

(When we do advise our client, the Foundation, we almost always outline the perspective and needs of the community given that the mission of the Foundation includes support of the community
.
)

+

We

use

this

disclaimer

template
to
ensure

our

discussions

are

not

misunderstood

as

legal

advice

to

you

or

anyone
other
than

WMF
.
Individuals

may
,
of

course
,
agree

or

disagree

with

WMF’s

legal

perspective
,
but

we

hope
that
this

document

will

be

useful

as
one
source
of
information

for
the
community’s

decision-making

process
.

 

 



*

Individuals’
legal
inquiries

are

shaped

by

the

specific

facts

of

their

case

and
the
laws
of
the

applicable

jurisdiction
.
As

the
legal
team

of

a

nonprofit

organization

with

an

enormous

volunteer

base
,
we

are

not

in

a

position
to
understand

fully

the

facts

of

every

case
,
preventing

us

from

offering

thorough,

individualized

advice,

even
if
it

were

possible.

+

If

you feel you need personal
legal
advice,

we

encourage

you

to

contact

a

lawyer

who

can

represent you. Some non-profit organizations, like
the
[https://www.eff.org/pages/legal-assistance Electronic Frontier Foundation], sometimes agree to represent users
of
websites

and

advise on particular issues
.
You may also consult free
legal
referral

services

like

[http://www.omln.org/

Online

Media

Legal

Network],

the [http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/nonprofit-legal-assistance Digital Media Law

Project]
,
and

various

Legal

Aid

programs

listed [http://www.ptla.org/links here]
to
get

in

touch

with

a

lawyer

that can assist you. Additionally
,
some

contributors

may

qualify

for

[[wmf:Legal_Fees_Assistance_Program|WMF’s

Legal

Fees Assistance Program]]
if
you

need

help

defending

against unfounded legal claims based on your activity on Wikimedia projects.

 

 



For these reasons, we use the disclaimer template to ensure our discussions are not misunderstood as legal advice to others as we discuss generally with community members topics of legal interest. If a community member wants official legal advice, they should contact their own lawyer. Some non-profit organizations, like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, sometimes agree to represent users of websites and advise on particular issues.

+

{{anchor|calaw}}

 

+

===The ethical obligations of the Wikimedia Foundation legal team ===

 

+

In discussions with the Wikimedia Foundation legal team, you may have noticed that our statements are accompanied with a disclaimer stating that the attorney acts as a counselor for the Foundation exclusively, we provide the Foundation's perspective on issues, and that we are not offering legal advice to community members. We do this to ensure we comply with the [http://rules.calbar.ca.gov/Rules/RulesofProfessionalConduct.aspx California Rules of Professional Conduct].

 

 



___________

+

Our legal team works from our headquarters in San Francisco, California. Our lawyers therefore must abide by California’s rules of professional conduct. These rules are legally binding and are enforced by the state bar and, in some cases, courts. A finding that any of our lawyers failed to comply with the rules could result in reputational damage, disbarment, or potential liability for the lawyer, and would be bad for the Foundation as well.

 

+

* California’s Rules of Professional Conduct require that our lawyers follow the principle that our client is the Wikimedia Foundation itself.<ref>See [http://rules.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/10/documents/2013_CaliforniaRulesofProfessionalConduct.pdf California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-600(A)]

 

+

</ref> Our lawyers therefore do not represent other clients, including unfortunately community members. Compliance with these ethics provisions is not intended to build a wall between the Foundation and the community, especially because there would be no Foundation without the community. In this context, the purpose of the rule is to make sure the Foundation is well served by its lawyers and that members understand the legal team’s role and the constraints on its work.

 

+

* As one example of this point, when the legal team advises the Foundation, or explains the Foundation’s perspective on an issue, the team addresses the Foundation’s interest. Individual problems are necessarily shaped by the specific facts of particular situations and by the laws of the applicable jurisdiction. As the legal team of a nonprofit organization with an enormous volunteer base, we are not in a position to understand fully the facts and law applicable to every case, so we could not offer individualized advice, even if it were otherwise possible under the rules.

 

+

For these reasons, we use the disclaimer template to ensure our discussions with community members are not confused as advice to, or representation of, those members. If a community member wants official legal advice, they should contact their own lawyer.

 

 



[1] Our disclaimer:

+

<references

/>



 



::{| style="border:darkgrey solid 1px;padding:7px"

 



|-

 



| [[File:Information icon.svg|40px]]

 



| style="padding-left:10px" | '''Note - This Is Not Legal Advice''':

 



 



* The pages listed below may not be accurate, and may fall out of date over time.

 



* These pages are '''not''' legal advice or a representation of the viewpoints of the Wikimedia Foundation.

 



* The legal team can '''only''' represent the Wikimedia Foundation on legal matters, so these pages are not official advice to the community.

 



* The legal team '''cannot''' provide consultations, and contacting the legal team does '''not''' create any confidential relationship.

 



* This page is '''not''' intended to address a specific factual situation.

 



 



For more information on this disclaimer, see [[Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer|here]].

 



|}

 



 



[2] See Rule 3-100 cmt. 1; 3-600(D) http://rules.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/10/documents/2013_CaliforniaRulesofProfessionalConduct.pdf

 

Show more