On October 13, Touria Tiouli, a Frenchwoman in town on business, stopped at a hotel bar in Dubai for a Coke. When she got up to leave, three men followed her out and offered her a ride to her hotel. She accepted; then they took her to a different part of town and gang-raped her. Tiouli reported the crime to Dubai police -who, naturally, arrested her. Since one of the men acknowledges he did have sex with Tiouli, but claims it was consensual, she is considered guilty of both adultery and making a false charge of rape, crimes punishable by up to 18 months in prison. According to the Daily Telegraph, ‘Mme Tiouli claims that every lawyer she had contacted in Dubai has refused to help her.’ Which is understandable, we suppose -after all, when was the last time a lawyer won a case, under Sharia, by defending a victim of gang rape? National Review, January 27, 2003, p. 10.
A woman is raped, and she’s arrested and charged with two felonies! And her assailants are turned into her victims! But if you believe that such an outrage and travesty could only happen in the Arab-Muslim world, you couldn’t be more wrong. And, obviously, you don’t live in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. At least Mme Tiouli wasn’t charged with “raping” the men who raped her.
1. Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall
In Milwaukee, on April 7, 1997, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was sentenced to 4-years in prison for having sex with a delinquent who initiated the liaison by raping her and then sustained it by threats and manipulation. * Large headlines the next morning on page 1B of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: “Former teacher gets 4 years for having sex with student: 15-year-old boy apologizes for affair, says he started it.” And a large black-and-white picture of a young thin woman with long curly blonde hair crying as she speaks in court: “Former MPS teacher Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall wipes away tears as she tells Judge Jeffrey Kremers how she did not end the sexual relationship she had with a student.”
“If Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall’s ‘dream’ ended when she lost her teaching job for having a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old student,” the piece begins, “her nightmare began Monday in a courtroom holding cell where she started a four-year prison sentence…” “After her attorneys, friends, mother, and victim spent nearly an hour pleading for mercy, Sorenson-Grohall apologized to her family, former colleagues and the boy she taught at an alternative high school… She wept ‘as she read typewritten remarks while clutching a handkerchief that she held nervously throughout a sentencing nearly two hours long.” (David Doege, “Former teacher gets 4 years for having sex with student: 15-year-old boy apologizes for affair, says he started it,” (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 8, 1997, p. 1B.)
The 28-year-old married woman and former teacher at an “alternative high school” for delinquents was assaulted by the “victim” and “child” when “she visited him at his home on school business,” obviously when no one else was present. The MJS reporter doesn’t describe the assault in even cursory detail. But he does mention that her lawyer “repeatedly” called it “rape” and noted that the “child” might have been “waived” into adult court had she reported the crime.
Did she know that she’d be alone in a house with a thug whose “advances” she had spurned, and physically resisted, many times before. The reporter doesn’t say. And if so, was she adhering, with no discretion, to school policy, or deferring to the wishes of her superiors, or foolishly acting of her own volition? For the rape was an escalation, one could say the culmination, of his sexual aggressiveness toward her. To compound the absurdity and iniquity of the charges and her draconian sentence, she was harassed, tormented, molested, and kissed “against her will” by this predator for months before he raped her. From the first MJS piece on her case:
A Milwaukee Public Schools teacher is scheduled to appear in Circuit Court today on charges that she had a four-month sexual relationship with one of her students…Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was charged in a criminal complaint that says she admitted having a sexual relationship with the 15-year-old boy but insisted that he instigated it..“She states (the student) made advances toward her in June of 1996, but she pushed him away,” the complaint says. “She states that he kept coming on to her and that he would kiss her.” The student acknowledges that he made the first overtures and that Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall fended him off initially but eventually gave in.
David Doege, “Teacher accused of having sex with student, 15, complaint states she admits to relationship but says boy started it,” MJS, 11-8-1996.
Given the facts, I immediately assumed the “child” was black. My assumption was confirmed when I read a letter to the MJS by two black women, sanctimoniously indignant that Cassandra was being “coddled” because she was white and her “victim” African-American,” and rebuking her for blaming the “victim” when she was “fully responsible,” and describing the criminal who raped and molested her as the “real victim” and “an impressionable African-American 15-year-old boy.”
In this case, incongruously, the delinquent was old and mature enough to form the mens rea or criminal intent to rape his teacher, and possibly mature enough to have been “waived” into adult court had she reported the assault, but he was too young and immature to knowingly initiate and enjoy subsequent acts of intercourse with the women he raped. Under the law, he knew what he was doing, legally and morally, when he forced himself on her but not when he initiated sex with her thereafter. He was a rapist when he forced himself on Cassandra, when his aggressions involved criminal force, but a victim of “sexual assault” when his aggressions didn’t involve criminal force. Legally, he was a man, an adult or quasi-adult, when he raped his teacher but a “child,” fundamentally indistinguishable from a prepubertal girl of 9 or 11, when he initiated subsequent acts of coitus with her and manipulated their “relationship.”
The ironies are priceless. To those of us who respect the pure and literal meaning of words, “sexual assault” connotes the use or threat of violence to compel the submission of a victim or the penetration and/or molestation of a prepubertal child too young and innocent to consent in a meaningful and comprehending sense. In this case, the only assault was committed by the “victim” and the only victim of assault was Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, and she goes to prison for “second-degree sexual assault of a child.” And the predator who raped her is turned into a “victim” of “sexual assault,” theoretically “abused” by initiating and enjoying post-rape sex-acts with the women he sexually-assaulted.
Vitiated by MRAs and CSA victimologists, virtually all of them feminists and/or left-liberals, millions would even call her a “rapist” -a “rapist” for assenting to sex with a biological man who initiated the “affair” by raping her- and define the criminal who raped her as a victim of “rape” for penetrating her in subsequent sex-acts that he initiated and rapturously enjoyed.
At sentencing, she testified that she chose not to report the crime for fear that her assailant might go to prison and become “more of a delinquent,” sparing him the fate that she would suffer, the cruelest irony imaginable. “I knew this was wrong yet I was not sure how to stop it without hurting him.” In a letter from prison she told me that psychologists who interviewed and “analyzed” her concluded that the intrigue was not a “sexually-motivated crime but one manipulated by the ‘victim’.” Astonishingly, they also concluded that she was not a “sexual predator,” nor a “threat to society and children.” She described her “crime” as a “mistake made out of over-caring and naivete.” Given her fear of a violent criminal who raped her yet with whom she was still required to maintain a teacher-student relationship, it doesn’t require much imagination to understand what the psychologists meant when they described the sex that followed as not a “sexually-motivated crime but one manipulated by the ‘victim’.” Almost surely, one reason she kept having sex with him was fear of what he’d do if she ended their “affair” and ceased giving him the sex he enjoyed and craved so intensely that he harassed and molested and ultimately raped her.
50 people wrote the judge in a futile effort to spare the woman they knew and loved and admired a prison sentence. Unsurprisingly, the Cassandra depicted in these letters is exactly the kind of woman and teacher who wouldn’t call the police after being raped by a black criminal lest he “go to prison and become more of a delinquent,” and who would then be coerced into an “affair” she didn’t know how to end “without hurting him,” and so forth: compassionate, altruistic, sensitive, loving, a “gentle soul” and “new-age” saint who wouldn’t “hurt a fly,” in her case literally as well as figuratively. A negrophilic racial liberal, I’m sure, and possibly a guilt-addled Amy Biehl-like masochist:
With her sentencing day less than a month away, supporters of former MPS teacher Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall have launched a letter-writing campaign aimed at keeping her out of Taycheedah….Through last week, 50 letters had been sent to the judge who will sentence Sorenson-Grohall and they were filled with terms a lot gentler than “second-degree sexual assault” and “bail jumping.” Aunts, uncles, friends, teachers, parents, a former bridesmaid and even an animal shelter operator, among others, have been telling Circuit Judge Jeffrey A. Kremers that there is more to Sorenson-Grohall than what is described in the two criminal complaints filed against her. They told of an animal lover who filled her house with stray pets and a volunteer who tirelessly cared for a girl with cerebral palsy and for a former college student left a quadriplegic by a high school wrestling accident. “I miss Cassandra and I wish I could be there for her as she has for me so many times,” wrote Joe Entwisle, the paralyzed former student. They wrote of a former 4-H Horse Club member eager to help other members and a vegetarian who had a meatless graduation party because “she steadfastly maintains her belief that life is sacred and should be respected.” Most of all, they wrote of a young women who realized her longtime goal of becoming a teacher for the disabled.They also wrote that they were stunned to learn that Sorenson-Grohall..had a sexual relationship with the boy…“I was so shocked when I had heard about what happened,” Entwisle wrote. “I still clearly remember my mom calling, she had seen the article in the paper. “My mom was having a hard time reading the paper because her hand was shaking so much. I just about died.”
The writers asked Kremers for “leniency,” “compassion,” and “an alternative to incarceration” above all. “Whatever her personal reasons for this situation, she deserves to be given a second chance to prove that she is worthy of another chance,” wrote Lynette Weidner, a woman who worked at an animal shelter with Sorenson-Grohall. “I know the law says she is an offender, but my heart says she is not,” wrote her mother, Colleen J. Sorenson. “I humbly ask you that she be given a chance to prove she is not a threat; to be given a second chance just as she has given those students who threatened her a second chance.”
David Doege, “Letters offer pleas for ex-teacher, MJS, 1997, findarticles.com, 1-11-2007.
Savor the irony that in a country in which it’s “racist” for whites to observe that black males rape and sexually assault over a hundred white females a day, on average, and have raped and sexually assaulted well over a million white females since the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, one being Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Milwaukee’s “African-American community” was enraged and appalled by the “sexual assault” of a black “child” and “little boy” by a white female teacher. And the 3-10 piece and the gist of the letters it quoted, sympathetic toward a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” calling for mercy as if she were guilty of a “heinous” crime, and portraying her, doubtless sincerely, as a “good” and “decent” and even saintly and “wonderful person,” exacerbated their rage and sense of victimhood. And on 3-29-1997, a week and two days before sentencing, the MJS published this letter by Janet Jordan and Janice Ross:
The headline of the March 10 article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel read, “Letters offer pleas for ex-teacher.” The article said that family and friends are sending letters to Judge Jeffrey A. Kremers asking for leniency, compassion and an alternative to incarceration for Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall. The letters of support went to great lengths characterizing Sorenson-Grohall as a wonderful person….(B)ut what kind of wonderful human being would be charged with second-degree sexual assault of a child? Sorenson-Grohall was a teacher who had a responsibility to nurture, guide, teach and be a role model for our children. What disturbs many African-American parents most is that if the tables were turned and Sorenson-Grohall was a 15-year-old white female and she was assaulted by an African-American male teacher, he would never have been released from jail….(emphasis added) There must be serious consequences for adults who harm our children…. Who really is the victim here? The victim is an impressionable African-American 15-year-old boy at Craig Alternative School, a school for students with very special needs. Unfortunately, Sorenson-Grohall is blaming the youth for what happened. Far too often, society blames the victim. As African-American mothers, we encourage this 28-year-old married adult to accept full responsibility for her actions. We hope Kremers remains focused on the real victim.
Janet Jordan, Janice Ross, Milwaukee, “Teacher was not the victim in sexual assault case,” MJS, 3-29-1997
“Blaming the victim”! “We encourage” her to “accept full responsibility for her actions.” That her “victim” tormented, terrorized, manipulated, harassed, molested, and raped her is totally irrelevant, not even even a mitigating factor.
The double-standards and hypocrisy are astounding even by black standards of mendacity and tribalism and self-deception. Imagine the reaction of these women and blacks en masse if an “African-American” teacher was sentenced to 4-years in prison or even 6-months in jail for having consensual sex with a European-American delinquent who manipulated, coerced, terrorized, harassed, molested, and raped her! Or even prosecuted and convicted of a felony with no prison or jail time. Or even arrested and jailed and charged with “sexual assault.” There would be mass protests, marching in the streets, possibly even riots. And, for once, their rage would be justified, short of rioting, if not their accusations of “double standards,” “discrimination,” and “racism”: “If she were white, she wouldn’t even be arrested.”
Virtually everything they would say and write in support of this women would be exactly the opposite of what they said and wrote in vilifiying Cassandra and demanding that she be harshly punished and describing the biological man and criminal who terrorized and violated her as “the real victim” and an “impressionable 15-year-old boy.” They and virtually all blacks would not only join the teacher in “blaming the youth” but also demand that he be charged with sexual assault and waived into adult court and sentenced to as many years in prison as a black delinquent would surely receive for sexually assaulting his white teacher. And, consequently, the authorities would realize that the teacher needed to be protected from her tormentor and assailant and not he from her and would act accordingly to punish the real criminal.
But all this is purely hypothetical, of course. And, as usual, blacks have it exactly backwards. If the races of the actors were reversed, it’s most unlikely that a black teacher would even be arrested given the unique mitigating circumstances. And even if a black teacher were arrested and charged with “sexual assault” of a white student under otherwise identical circumstances, by a proseuctor who was less a racial liberal than a fanatical CSA victimologist, all charges would be dismissed, almost immediately, to appease the fury of blacks and their cries of “racism” and “discrimination.” In such a case, the power of blacks would supersede the influence of CSA victimologists.
Moreover, can one imagine a black teacher having sex with a white delinquent who raped her; or, long before that, failing to tell her superiors and/or the police when he first molested her. And, of course, he’d be duly arrested, prosecuted, and punished. Or telling the authorities when he simply harrassed her, no matter how trivial or even imagined the harassment. And punishment would be so swift and severe as to deter him from ever harassing her again. And so, too, even if the young man was in fact innocent and she invented the molestation or harassment for political/ideological or malicious personal reasons.
No matter how hypocritical, contradictory, delusional, mendacious, and iniquitous to whites, the demands and desires of blacks must be obeyed and observed, typically within limits, of course, and however imperfectly from their white-hating, black-excusing, inverted-world, crudely-tribalistic perspective. (Obviously, no prosecutor would recommend and no judge would impose a sentence of 40-years in prison for a first-offender who was raped by her “victim” and whose “crime” wasn’t even “sexually-motivated,” not even those as execrable as Michael McCann and Jeffrey Kremers.) “Paul Kersey’s term ‘black-Run-America’,” Lawrence Auster observes, “.....means that with regard to issues touching on black interests, black self-esteem, black advancement, the truth about black intelligence, the reporting of black crime and so on, the country is, to a very large extent, run for the benefit of blacks. Not totally, not in every instance, of course not. But the bias favoring blacks is systematic and overwhelming…”
But, except for “racists,” everyone knows or affects to “know” that blacks are the victims, not the beneficiaries, of “systematic and overwhelming” bias, the victims of “racism” and “discrimination,” particularly in respect to crime and punishment: that negroes on average are punished far more harshly than whites for the “exact same crimes” even if their actions and motives are far less grave and odious and their criminal records far less extensive and minatory; that, most egregiously, blacks who commit crimes against whites are punished far more severely than whites who commit the “exact same crimes” against blacks under similar or identical circumstances; and thus far too many blacks, disproportionately innocent and innocuous, are in prison, and far too few whites.
And most people, whether or not they’ve been vitiated by or have even heard of MRAs and their depiction of males as a victim-class, “know” that men on average are punished far more severely than women for the “exact same crimes.” Thus black males, the victims of both racial and sexual discrimination, are by far the most severely punished of all criminal defendants. This is the “truth” when, in fact, precisely the inverse is true on average.
And because of such lies and canards and myths and fantasies, combined with the lunacies and absurdities of MRAs and CSA victimologists- the vilification of adult women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing biological men under statutory age to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships; the contention that young men under age 16 or 18 who enjoy having sex with adult women are “victims” of “rape” and “child molestation,” “traumatized” and “scarred for life” even if they’re the aggressors or, as in this case and who knows how many others, even if they initiate the affair by raping their “victimizers”- Cassandra served far more time in a cage and zoo like an animal than myriads of violent, dangerous, and recidivist male criminals, overwhelmingly black, convicted of aggravated assaults, armed robberies, muggings, car-jackings, home invasions, burglaries, gang-related drug trafficking, violent-forcible rape, manslaughter, and even murder. And unlike legions of black criminals, violent and/or recidivist, she was denied “discretionary parole,” release from prison after serving 1/4 of her nominal sentence, and thus served her entire sentence of 32 months, a decision that can only be explained, as with her sentence, by obeisance to and fear of blacks.
Contrary to mythology, all things considered, especially their actions and motives and the nature and totality of their criminal records and histories, black males are the most indulged, by far, of all criminal defendants, not only in sheer numbers, given their rates of violence and criminality, but also on average. And in Wisconson alone, over the last 50 years, I could fill many volumes as long as War and Peace and Ulysses with concise descriptions of the systemic and repeated indulgence of blacks by the prosecutors and judges of a criminal justice system in which, according to Janet Jordan and Janice Ross and virtually all other “African Americans,” a black male teacher who had sex with a white student “would never have been released from jail” and, almost surely, would have received the maximum sentence of 40-years in prison for the “exact same crime” of “repeated sexual assaults of a child” or, at the least, 20-30 years.
(Cassandra was initially charged with “repeated sexual assaults of a child,” a class-B felony like first-degree sexual assault, one degree below first-degree murder, with a maximum prison sentence of 40-years. But an act of clemency, doubtless bestowed only because she’s white, allowed her to plead guilty to the lesser offense of “second-degree sexual assault of a child,” a class-C felony with a maximum prison sentence of “only” 20 years. The maximum penalties have since been increased to 40 and 60 years, respectively.)
But just a few examples, virtually all from 1997-2001. Such travesties and outrages, many even more appalling, execrable, stupefying, outrageous, could be multiplied by the hundreds if not thousands just in Milwaukee alone:
* For 6 or 7 years, and especially during his life as an “adult,” Dontrell Amahd LeFlore must have thought he was given a virtual license by the State of Wisconsin to commit almost every crime imaginable, including murder. Somewhat surprisingly, his illustrious career was limned in some detail in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
A 20-year-old man in constant trouble with the law since 1994 was sentenced Thursday to 64 years in prison for killing a motorist while trying to outrace police through a residential area. Dontrell Amahd LeFlore didn’t finish high school, never held a job, fathered three children and was arrested several times by the age of 19… (Judge Kitty) Brennan said she gave LeFlore the maximum sentence because he had been in continual trouble since age 14. Between February 1998 and January 2000, LeFlore was charged wth felonies including substantial battery, cocaine trafficking, leaving the scene of a fatal accident, second-degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree recklessly endangering safety, according to court documents. While the charges all carried potential prison terms, he only received jail time and probation because they were reduced or dismissed.
“Judge sentences fleeing driver who caused fatal accident to 64 years,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, March 9, 2001, p. 7B
But it wasn’t enough that while fleeing the cops at perilous speeds, he “ran a stop sign” and killed a wife and mother of two small children. After killing the woman, he assaulted at least 2 people. “Leflore still has two other pending cases, however: one with a charge of battery to a witness; and the other with charges of battery to a witness and battery to a prisoner…” (“Jury convicts fleeing driver in fatal car crash,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 31, 2001, p. 3B)
Obviously, the crimes mentioned above are but a small part of his overall criminal history. His record as a juvenile, as a pure and innocent “child,” is “sealed” as if its disclosure would imperil the security of the United States. Almost surely, since age 13 if not earlier, he committed scores if not hundreds of crimes, misdemeanors and felonies, for which he was never convicted, prosecuted, or even arrested. Studies show that “chronic criminals” like young Dontrell commit on average 15-20 felonies a year. And he never served a day in prison until he was convicted of killing someone negligently in a car accident.
* On February 1, 1999, one Mario Mares, a “former” member of the Latin Kings, Milwaukee’s most vicious “Hispanic” gang, was sentenced to 8 years in prison for orchestrating the “‘disciplinary’ pummeling, cutting, and sodomizing” of a “snitch” who cooperated with the police after his arrest for burglary. “The 14 gang members led the victim to a basement where he was beaten, sodomized with a mop handle, urinated upon, slit with a razor and had his wounds rubbed with lemon juice.” (Judge sentences ex-gang member, laments damage done,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, February 2, 1999, pp. 1B, 5B.)
Judge Elsa C. Lamelas, a white “Hispanic,” called the assault “as ugly a beating as I’ve seen.” Nonetheless, despite the “ugliness” and sadism and depravity of the torture-assault and the defendant’s status as a big-league gangster (33 members of the Latin Kings had recently been indicted in federal court), she couldn’t even bring herself to impose the maximum sentence of 12 years. ”’ In some ways, Mr. Mares, there is nothing I would like better than to lock you up for the maximum period (12 years),’ Lamelas said. ‘In some ways you deserve it.’..Yet Mares’ age and relatively limited prior record warranted less than the maximum, she said.” So she imposed a nominal sentence of 8-years.
And one must ask and wonder: why was the maximum prison sentence only 12 years? Jamming a mop handle up a man’s rectum during a beating is first-degree sexual assault under Wisconsin law. By itself, this excruciating but limited part of the beating and torture carried a maximum prison sentence of 40-years. Obviously, the legendary E. Michael McCann dropped the charge of first-degree sexual assault and many other charges as part of a generous plea-bargain. Mares had a “relatively limited prior record”? “Relatively limited” for a Latin King or for the average violent felon? I wonder how many felonies these gangsters, including Mares, committed before the torture-assault. Hundreds, I’m sure, including how many violent acts. And I wonder how many of these crimes resulted in felony convictions. And did even one of these brutes serve a day in prison?
And since 13 other men and “boys” were involved in the torturous assault, the state had a chance to lock up 14 savages for decades, thus preventing hundreds of violent crimes and other mala in se felonies. Or, better yet, if immigrants, legal or illegal, deport them.
Instead, they might have all served less time in prison than Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall! In Wisconsin, in 1999, 8 years wasn’t 8 years but 2 to 5 1/3 years. Quite possibly, Mares was paroled after serving 2 years or 1/4 of his “8 year” sentence. Like many other brutes, sadists, degenerates, gangsters, and predators, he might have received “discretionary parole.” And if so, he served far less time in prison than Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall who, as we’ve seen, was denied “discretionary parole.” And Mares was the “ring-leader.” So it’s reasonable to assume that the other 13 savages were punished even more indulgently, if at all, and that most if not all of them served less time in prison or jail than Cassandra.
Incidentally, Mares’ name and photo and address are on the internet in Wisconsin’s sex offender registry, for the offense of “false imprisonment.” He appears to be a zambo, a mixture of African and Amerindian, but is listed as “white” as, surreally, are all other blacks, mulattos, zambos, and Mestizo/Amerindians with Spanish surnames. Tellingly, the last time I checked, a few months ago, he was listed as “uncooperative” with authorities but, given his address, this hasn’t resulted in his return to prison or, if an immigrant, his deportation. And unlike Cassandra, he doesn’t have to register for life but only 28-years.
Poor Mario: if only he and/or 3-4 of his fellow “Kings” hadn’t “sodomized” the victim with a mop handle, he wouldn’t have to register as a uniquely vile and execrable and dangerous criminal, along with such monsters and deviants as Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall. Unlike them and similar women, his name, mug-shot, and address would not be on Wisconsin’s sex offender registry. He wouldn’t have to bear the new-age scarlet letter of “sex offender.”
And, empirically, I would argue that he and the others should not have been charged with a sexual offense. Obviously, the gangsters who “sodomized” the victim with a mop handle were motivated by sadism and depravity, but not of an erotic kind. I doubt if this violation gave any of them erections or induced them to masturbate, then or after. If heterosexual, I’m sure the sight of this was as disgusting to them as watching two homosexuals sodomize and fellate each other. Their pleasure in savaging and torturing and humiliating a “snitch” by jamming a mop handle into his rectum was no more sexual than viciously beating and urinating on him and cutting him with a razor and rubbing his wounds with lemon juice and who knows what else. So, technically, they should not be on a registry with the likes of Cassandra and Melissa.
* On January 8, 2001, one Xavier E. Love was sentenced to 30-years in prison for “backing up a friend in an ambush that left the friend and an intended victim dead.” The crime for which he was put away -“being a party to first-degree reckless homicide,” a plea-bargain- was his 8th felony conviction. For the previous seven -five as a juvenile, two as an adult- he was released to the tender ministrations of probation officers. At most, he served a few months in county jail. Not a day in prison… “Things are getting so bad that people are becoming afraid of leaving their homes at night and sometimes in the day,” lamented Judge John J. DiMotto. “‘We know that you were neglected as a child,’ DiMotto said. ‘We know that you were abused as a child…But even a child knows right from wrong, and you know right from wrong.” The “child” was 25 on the day he was sentenced to prison “for the first time.” (“Man given 30 years for aiding attack,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 9, 2001, p. 3B.
* On June 30, 2001, the MJS reported that a gang of vicious thugs called the “Murda Mobb” was under suspicion for “the killing of at least 3 young northside men this month….” In June alone, there were 14 murders in the “drug-plagued area of Metcalfe Park. One of the victims was a noble young man named James “Motion” Galliard, age 27, a leader of the “Brothers of Struggle” gang, who “was being sought by police for attempted murder” when he was dispatched to the great crack-house in the sky by “Murda Mobb” rivals in the drug trade. A 17-year-old “child” named “Mike” was quoted in the MJS: “Motion was a person you didn’t want to be around unless you wanted to get shot at. He was always getting into stuff, causing a commotion. So many people wanted him dead. It all started between them two years ago. He (Motion) has shot a bunch of them (Vice Lords). But it was never like this…”
According to the MJS, “Galliard had been arrested three times in murder cases during the 1990s but was never convicted in them…Last fall, authorities say he shot a woman in the buttocks when she angered him by beeping her car horn, Milwaukee County Circuit Court records show.” (“Gangs suspected in rash of killings,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, June 30, 2001, pp. 1A, 10A.) All this and who knows what else -dozens of murders and assaults and shootings- and he was still prowling the streets of Milwaukee like a rabid dog, causing death and mayhem and “commotion.” Apparently, he never served a day in prison. (Incidentally, the MJS doesn’t say if shooting a “Ho” in the rump was the attempted murder for which he was “being sought” at the time of his unfortunate demise.)
* In Milwaukee, in March of 1999, a 21-year-old man “who had unprotected sex with a woman although he knew for a year he was HIV-positive has been placed on probation for five years and ordered to spend three months in jail” on a charge of first-degree recklessly endangering safety. “Antonio Dewayne Buford also was ordered Thursday to spend three months at home under electronic monitoring.” The criminal complaint “said he told the woman that he had known of his condition and was trying to infect her as revenge, even though he had been infected by someone else.” (“Man gets jail time for trying to give AIDS to woman,” Herald Times-Reporter, March 13, 1999, p. A-4.) 3 months in jail for attempted murder!
* With 187 prior arrests from 1971 to 2001- most, apparently, for his specialty, breaking into hospital rooms and stealing from patients- Donald Williams, age 50, was finally sentenced to 10-years in prison by Judge Jeffrey Cohen. “I’m not going to place him on probation for the 72nd time, or whatever the case may be,” the judge exclaimed. “Mr. Williams hasn’t gotten the message,” repined Assistant District Attorney Michael Mahoney. (“187 arrests later, hospital thief sentenced to 10 years in prison,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 11, 2001, p. 3B.) 187 arrests, 71 felony convictions or “whatever,” and not a day in prison!! And think of all the times, hundreds I’m sure, he wasn’t even arrested. Imagine all the people -young children, women, old people, cripples, paraplegics- he terrorized, and whom he could have murdered, raped, assaulted. “188 strikes and you’re out.”
But blacks and MRAs, pathologically dishonest “cherry-pickers,” practitioners of the logical fallacy of “confirmation bias” to “confirm” their delusions of systematic anti-black and anti-male discrimination, would contrast Williams’ 10-year prison sentence with that of a white female, a hypothetical nonviolent first-offender, who was sentenced to 30-days in jail for entering a hospital room and stealing from a patient. Yes, the outrageous anti-black and anti-male discrimination! A black man was sentenced to 10-years in prison and a white female to 30-days in jail for the “exact same crime.” But Williams wasn’t sentenced to 10-years in prison, finally, for one act of theft but for 30-years of predation and 188 arrests and 72 felony convictions for breaking into hospital rooms and stealing from patients and who know what else. Even if the white female was sentenced to 30 days in jail for her tenth conviction for hospital theft, the juxtaposition of her punishment with that of Williams would actually be proof of egregious anti-white and anti-female discrimination, all things considered. And so, too, with all the other cases I discuss and myriads of others in which black males and whites females are guilty of the “exact same crimes.”
* And this, surely, is a typical case of a “nonviolent” offender sentenced to prison for drug trafficking. Writes John J. DiIulio: “In a 1996 study I conducted with George Mitchell of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, we reconstructed almost the entire adult and juvenile criminal histories of a sample of prisoners from Milwaukee County. Take the case of the prisoner serving two years for ‘possession WITD’ (with intent to deliver) a tenth of a gram of cocaine. He had five prior arrests, three prior incarcerations, and was a habitual parole and probation violator. He began building his diversified criminal portfolio with juvenile burglaries. He leavened it as an adult with occasional armed robberies.” (John J. DiIulio, “Against Mandatory Minimums,” National Review, May 17, 1999, p. 49.) All this -scores of burglaries and armed robberies in additon to cocaine trafficking- and only 6-16 months in prison.
* Another man sentenced to prison for “drug possession” was George “Mule” Jones. On November 28, 1997, the MJS reported that Jones, 52, was “charged Wednesday with murdering Shameika Carter, 24…” And that he was also “under investigation in the strangulations of nine of 10 other North Side women dating as far back as 1986.”
In 1973, in his native Mississippi, the “Mule” was sentenced to 5-years in prison for “killing a woman during a sex-related attack.” Shortly after his release, apparently, he took the overground railroad to Milwaukee. Whatever his motives, he couldn’t have made a wiser decision. “Despite a series of arrests dating to 1980 that resulted in his being booked into the Milwaukee County Jail about 20 times, Jones served less than one year in prison a decade ago and a smattering of jail time since. More often than not, he walked away a free man…Arrested three times this year alone for attacking women, the man know as ‘mule” was recently sent back to the streets with orders to take an anger management course…He was arrested numerous times in Wisconsin for possession of drugs, at least once with intent to deliver, as well as various weapons offenses.” (“Man avoided prison despite may arrests,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 28, 1997, pp. 1A, 8A.)
The MJS offered a chart of Jones’ arrests in Milwaukee alone, from September 13, 1980 to November 26, 1997, when he was charged with “first-degree intentional homicide.” The 20 some “incidents,” many involving multiple offenses, included charges of “disorderly conduct,” “battery,” “carrying a concealed weapon,” “reckless use of a weapon,” “sexual assault,” “theft,” “domestic abuse,” “criminal damage,” many drug offenses, culminating in his arrest for murder in Fall of 1997. (And, one must add, these were only the crimes for which he was arrested. After all, he might have committed 10 murders and who knows what else during his 17-year reign of terror. If he averaged 15-20 felonies a year, like similar “chronic criminals,” he might have committed as many as 250-300 felonies.) And he only served 6-months in prison!! On November 17, 1987, he was arrested on “suspicion of possession with intent to deliver,” and sentenced to 2-years in prison. But despite his record and history -decades of violence and habitual criminality, doubtless beginning at age 14 or 13 or even 12, including a rape/murder conviction- he was granted “discretionary parole” in August 1988!! And imagine all the crimes he committed in his teens and early-middle 20s, probably including rapes and murders, before he was convicted of “killing a woman during a sex-related attack” and sentenced to 5-years in prison in “racist”/“redneck” Mississippi!
* In a MJS debate on prisons with Gregory Stanford, George Mitchell writes of the “anti-prison” lobby’s “most important goal, namely, strengthening community corrections programs such as probations and parole.” And, predictably, he mentions “the all-but-abandoned intensive sanctions program,” under which “many ‘low-risk’ participants committed murders, robberies, sexual assaults, and burglaries.” (George A. Mitchell, “Don’t buy the hype that prisons take money from schools: half-truths mark prison, school debates,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, February 14, 1999, p. 2J.) In late August and early September of 1997, just a few months after Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was sentenced to 4 years in prison, “intensive sanctions” offenders committed 3 murders that were reported on the front page of the MJS.“Another murder in Milwaukee has been linked to a man being supervised in the community under the state’s intensive sanctions program. Freddie D. Nash, 21, confessed to police that he shot and killed Robert Cameron, 24, on July 23 on the north side, according to a police report…Intensive sanctions is a program that allows offenders to serve their prison time at home on an electronic bracelet and leave a prison bed for a more serious criminal. The controversial prison alternative was criticized last week when it was leaned that Patrick Neal Rucker, a man arrested in a double murder on the Northwest side on Aug. 21, was supposed to be at home under the control of his ankle bracelet. (“Sanctions offender held in murder,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, September 3, 1997, p. 1A.)
By the time of his arrest for murder, Nash “had abided by the rules sufficiently to earn his way off electronic monitoring. Nash is a twice-convicted felon. He pleaded guilty to armed burglary in late 1994 for breaking into a home with two other men. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge John Franke sentenced him to five years in intensive sanctions. In January 1997, Nash committed another felony, fleeing from a police officer in his car. Again he pleaded guilty and was sentenced on Feb. 24 of this year to nine months in the Milwaukee County House of Corrections.”
* Then, a few days later, another embarrassment for the fools and idiots who run Milwaukee’s criminal justice system. “A habitual criminal with a history of parole and intensive sanctions violations burglarized at least 139 apartments this year while under supervision by the State Department of Corrections, police said Monday. Johnny L. Miller, 42, remained in the community under increasingly less supervision despite years of broken rules, failed drug tests and a stint with the state’s intensive sanctions program that resulted in Miller assaulting a police officer who encountered him burglarizing a Shorewood apartment building. His criminal record dates to 1975. In 1993, Miller was sentenced on two counts of burglary to intensive sanctions by Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey Wagner. In March 1995 -because Miller again was ‘craving cocaine’...-he smashed the lobby door of an apartment building…Miller was wearing the monitoring bracelet at the time. A Shorewood police officer confronted Miller, who kicked the officer in the calf, punched him in the chest and then grabbed the officer’s thumb, dislocating and fracturing it. Reserve Judge William P. Moser sentenced Miller to a prison term of two years…” (“Supervision didn’t stop burglary career, police say,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, September 9, 1997, pp. 1A, 11A.)
On September 10, the MJS reported that Judge Wagner was ”’ frankly amazed’ that Miller was not behind bars…” “On Tuesday morning, Wagner heard the case of habitual criminal Dwight A. White…Despite having racked up at least 33 arrests in Milwaukee since 1980, and despite being suspected in more than 300 burglaries, White was placed on intensive sanctions by the Department of Corrections partway through a 1994 prison sentence for burglary…White escaped from intensive sanctions and was appearing in court Tuesday on charges of burglary, criminal trespassing, and obstructing an officer.” (“Judge who sentenced burglar ‘amazed’ at result,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, September 10, 1997, pp. 1A, 8A.)
In an article on “intensive sanctions” immediately following the second murder case, Mary Zahn and Alan J. Borsuk reported that “convicts placed in 1996 in the state’s controversial program of intensive supervision outside prison typically had lengthy criminal histories…An examination of the records of 83 cases involving people from Milwaukee County who were placed in intensive sanctions in 1996 by the Department of Corrections found that, on average, offenders had been charged with 4.8 felonies and 3.8 misdemeanors before entering the program. One had 13 previous criminal cases. And the records of 34 of the offenders (41% of the group) included a charge of habitual criminality. More than half had been charged previously with a violent offense -most often domestic violence or battery- and a third of the group had charges related to guns on their records. The newspaper’s analysis also showed that about 60% of a sample of 249 convicts put on intensive sanctions in Milwaukee County were people who were already on parole or probation and who committed either a new crime or a serious infraction of their parole or probation conditions. (“Convicts in program have long records: repeat felons in sanctions,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, September 7, 1997, pp. 1A, 16A.)
* And over ten years later, the deranged, outrageous, “inconceivable,” and “amazing” indulgence continues:
Antoine Drew Jr. wanted Jovanee Stewart’s gold chains on the night of April 8, 2009, so he pulled out a handgun, pointed it at the teenager and threatened to shoot him…Drew took the 17-year-old’s jewelry, his cell phone, his shoes, and even his gold teeth covers and split the loot with his accomplice, Harold Cropp…Drew faced up to 40 years in prison and Cropp was looking at as much as 19, but neither was sent to prison…The pair escaped serious punishment for robbing Stewart because neither the judge nor the prosecutor appears to have considered the crime or their past records to be serious, according to the transcripts of the sentencing. Rather than a brazen holdup that threatened Stewart’s life, they referred to the crime as “silly” and “stupid.”
Ten months later, police arrested Drew on another robbery.This time, prosecutors say, he killed someone…“It is just inconceivable to me that you can commit a robbery with a firearm and not do time,” said Milwaukee Police Chief, Edward Flynn. “These are cases, more than any other, where judges should err on the side of protecting the community.”
John Dedrich and Ryan Haggerty, “‘Stupid’ crime means no time: pair dodge prison sentences for involvement in gun robbery,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 10-31-2010, pp. 1A, 14A.
If I were a billionaire or multi-millionaire, I’d give a $1,000,000 -hell, make it 10 million, why not 50 million- to anyone who could find even one white female Dontrel Ahmad LeFlore, “Mule” Jones,” Donald Williams, Johnny Miller, Dwight White, etc., ad infinitum. I’m certain my fortune would remain fully intact.
* And what of black men convicted of having sex with underaged teenage girls? This from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: “Anthony Mason of the Charlotte Hornets was arrested on assault charges early Saturday after a fight outside a bar in New York…Mason has run into trouble with the law in New York before. During the league’s all-star weekend in February 1998, he was charged with two counts of statutory rape and was later sentenced to 200 hours of community service after a plea bargain to a lesser charge…Mason was arrested in 1996 after fighting with New York police officers over a parking ticket, later pleading guilty to a disorderly conduct charge, and has faced several lawsuits from bar patrons who accused him of assault at Manhattan nightclubs.” (Mason arrested once more in New York,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, February 27, 2000, p. 4C.)
Mason is a thug, a violent recidivist who only differs from most of those above by the millions of dollars he receives for playing a little boy’s game. He assaults police, he assaults people in bars and elsewhere, I’m sure he had an extensive criminal record as a juvenile and college athlete, and I’m sure he’s committed dozens of crimes (assaults, theft, robbery, rape, etc.) for which he’s never even been arrested. But despite his record and history of violence and criminality, he was allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor and sentenced to 200 hours of community service for having intercourse and who knows what else with two underage adolescent girls, ages 14 and 15. He didn’t even serve a day in county jail! .
So too, with Utah Jazz forward DeShawn Stevenson: “After being charged with statutory rape for having sex with a 14-year-old in June 2001,” he “received two years of probation after pleading no contest to misdemeanor charges of having sex with a minor.” (Stephen A. Smith, “NBA has few guidelines to deal with felonies,” The Philadelphia Inquirer, July 11, 2002.) Apparently, he didn’t even serve a day in county jail.
And Cassandra was sentenced to 4-years in prison and denied “discretionary parole”!! The victim of her “victim” who, unlike her victim, never commited a violent or malum in se crime in her life and never will and was in no sense a threat to anyone but herself; a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and objectively victimless and quintessential malum prohibitum “crime” - then a legal act in many if not most European countries, apparently even for teachers who have sex with students who don’t rape and/or molest them, to say nothing of all the other nations of the world, and probably still a legal act in some European nations, notwithstanding pressure from the United States*- she served her full sentence of 32 months in prison, over two years longer than “Mule” Jones during his 17-year reign of terror in Milwaukee alone, beginning in 1980 and ending in 1997 with his arrest for murder!
Imprisonment was a result of judicial and prosecutorial “discretion.” The non-incarceration penalties were mandatory. In addition to 32-months of abusive and degrading imprisonment, she was forced to endure years of “sex offender treatment,” both in prison and after her release, to cure her of what exactly? What complusions and anomalies were supposed to be “treated” by intensive and mandatory psychotherapy? She was a victim of rape whose “crimes” weren’t even “sexually-motivated.”
And after her release from prison, over 5-years of “active community supervision,” prison without bars and cages and razor-wire fences, quasi-totalitarian restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to even the most vicious and brutal male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense. I quote at length from a document that not even dystopian novelists like Orwell and Kafka could have invented:
“Public safety is the primary objective of sex offender supervision. The offender’s potential for reoffense must remain paramount in the minds of staff responsible for the supervision of sex offenders. The implications of reoffense and further victimization are extremely serious given the nature of these types of offenses.” The “experts” are worried that, “(a)t first glance, rules for sex offenders may appear onerous, extreme, or overly cautious…” But “(s)ex offenders are not like other offenders in that factors such as stable employment, financial stability, offender compliance, and a prosocial lifestyle may not necessarily indicate a reduced level of risk.” “...Violations, which may be considered minor for other types of offenders, are often serious for sex offenders…For sex offenders, even ‘minor’ rules violations may warrant revocation…” “Behaviors serving as precursors to re-offense are often subtle and seemingly unrelated to sexual deviance.”
At intake, a standard set of sex offender rules is imposed for all (emphasis added) sex offenders placed on supervision…The following are some examples of supervision rules specifically (emphasis added) for sex offenders:
1. You shall not enter into any area frequented by persons under age 18 years including but not limited to: schools, day care centers, playgrounds, parks, beaches, pools, shopping malls, theaters, or festivals without prior agent approval.
2. You shall have no contact with any person under the age of 18 years without prior agent approval and unless accompanied by an adult sober chaperone approved by your agent. This includes face-to-face, telephone, mail, electronic, third party or “drive-by” contact.
3. You shall fully cooperate with, participate in, and successfully complete all evaluations, counseling and treatment as required by the agent, including but not limited to sex offender treatment.
4. You shall fully cooperate with all procedures required to undergo lie detector examinations in accord with 1995 WI Statue 301.132 as directed by the agents.
5. You shall not subscribe to or use any sexually explicit phone service whatsoever including but not limited to 900 sex telephone lines without prior agent approval.
6. You shall have no contact with _____ nor any victims nor their family members without prior agent approval. This includes face-to-face, telephone, mail, electronic, third party or “drive by” contact.
7. You shall not establish, pursue, nor maintain any dating and/or romantic and/or sexual relationship without prior agent approval.
8. You shall not reside nor “stay” overnight in any place other than a pre-approved residence without prior agent approval. “Overnight” is defined as the daily period of time between_____ unless redefined by your agent in advance.
9. You shall not possess nor view any sexually explicit material -visual, auditory, or computer-generated without prior agent approval.
10. You shall not alter your physical appearance, nor shall you in any manner attempt to conceal your identity without prior approval from your agent.
Wisconsin Department of Corrections Sex Offender Registry Program, Sex Offender Supervision and Rules
http://offender.doc.state.wi.us/public/proginfo/rules.jsp
And these are some of the rules that apply “specifically for sex offenders,” from rapists who torture and murder their victims to men who prey on young children to adult men of 19 and 20 who have sex with girls of 14 and 15 to harmless women like Cassandra and innocent women like Melissa Bittner who were sexually assaulted by their “victims.”
And, finally, Cassandra must register with the police and state of Wisc. for the rest of her life as a uniquely vile and execrable and dangerous criminal. Life registration is mandatory for anyone convicted of “second- degree sexual assault,” regardless of the nature of the offense or actions and motives of the “victim” and offender: e.g., whether one is a rapist who terrorizes and brutalizes his victim with “the use or threat of force or violence” or a woman who was raped and/or molested by her theoretical “victim.” *
Theoretically, she is more dangerous, far more of a “threat to society” and to all men and women and especially children, than myriads of brutes, savages, predators, monsters, gangsters, cut-throats, and degenerates guilty of dozens and scores and even hundreds of violent crimes, including murder, but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense, albeit most if not nearly all of them have raped women or girls in the free world and/or males in prisons and jails. Ergo, such creatures are about a million times more likely to commit violent sexual assaults, virtually all of them rapes (which only males, humans with penises, can commit in the pure and literal sense), and sex-murders than not only Cassandra and Melissa but also hundreds of women on sex-offender registries for allowing young men under statutory age to penetrate or simply fondle and kiss them in factually consensual relationships.
So her name, mug shot, and address will be on the internet, in Wisconsin’s “sex offender registry,” until she passes from this world at age 87 or 94 or 102! In the year 2064 or 2072, half-blind and senile and confined to a wheel-chair, she might escape from a nursing home and “sexually assault” another young man under statutory age. Or if a young man under age 18 visits his great-grandmother, she might lure him into her room and violate him.
And quite recently, I believe less than five years ago, the addresses of all sex offenders were added to the online registry along with maps showing exactly where they live. So now her tormentor, the criminal who raped and could have murdered or seriously injured her, assuming he’s not dead or buried in prison, can go online and find out where she lives and, possibly, visit her some warm summer night. If so, she’ll probably be arrested and sent back to prison for contacting the “victim.”
To call all of this insane would be an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.
* Thus, statistically, the number of rapes and sexual assaults that white males supposedly commit against women of all races are speciously inflated while the number of rapes and sexual assaults that nonwhite males commit against women of all races are speciously diminished. And, statistically, nonwhite “Hispanics” don’t commit any sexual or nonsexual crimes! Myriads of rapes, gang-rapes, sexual assaults (including “statutory rape” and child molestation), aggravated assaults, armed robberies, muggings, home invasions, burglaries, and murders committed by Mestizos/Amerindians, “Zambos,” “Pados,” mulattos, and pure blacks are officially attributed to “white males.” So the sexual and nonsexual criminality of white males is contrived to appear far more serious and pervasive that it actually is while the sexual and nonsexual criminality of nonwhite “Hispanics” doesn’t even exist statistically.
According to the Color of Crime…, between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged 900 white-on-black rapes per year.” But “whites” include “Hispanics.” A “Hispanic” is anyone with a Spanish surname, whether they’re white (of pure or almost pure Spanish heritage), like Marco Rubio; Mestizo (a mixture of white and Amerindian); pure or almost pure Amerindian; “Zambo” (a mixture of African and Amerindian); or “Pardo” (a melange of European, Amerindian, and African, like George Zimmerman.) And over 90% of “Hispanics” in the United States are nonwhite, overwhelmingly Mestizos/Amerindians, largely from Mexico, but also a large and growing minority of blacks, mulattos, zambos, and pardos. And all these nonwhites are classified as “white” when they commit aggravated assaults, robberies, burglaries, murders, rapes, etc. So, statistically, nonwhite “Hispanic” crime doesn’t exist! Statistically, nonwhite “Hispanics” don’t commit rapes and sexual assaults! So what percentage and number of these 900 “white-on-black” rapes were in fact committed by nonwhite “Hispanics”? Surely a large minority, at least, and possibly a majority. And how many were committed by “Hispanics” who are wholly or partly African?
* “Through courts, cops, and corrections agencies, government combats but never comes close to conquering crime, least of all violent crime…,” laments John J. DiIulio. “Even on its most aggressive day, the justice system works like a sorting machine, incarcerating only a small fraction even of known, adjudi