Super-DMZ Rx 2.0
by Mike Arnold
As many of our previous customers know, Super DMZ was an enormously successful product, containing two of the most popular and effective designer steroids ever produced. This time around IML has gone one step further and brought to market an even more potent product bearing a similar name, known as Super-DMZ Rx 2.0. Super-DMZ Rx 2.0 contains two designer drugs, which are commonly known as Dimethazine and Methylstenbolone. Users of the original product may be familiar with Dimethazine, as it was one of the two primary compounds responsible for bringing about the dramatic effects Super DMZ was known for. The 2nd molecule included in this potent duo of designer drugs is known as Methylstenbolone. While being less well known, it surpasses Dimethazine in muscle-building capacity, making it the dominant mass & strength compound in this stack.
So, how did Super-DMZ Rx 2.0 come to be and what makes the newest version of the DMZ line so special? Well, with the impending ban of SD soon before us, it made sense to come up with a suitable alternative before SD was pulled off the shelf. We didn’t want to be left with our pants down, so to speak, so we set about looking for SD’s replacement while we still had time. We knew there would be more than few people sad to see SD go…and with good reason, as SD was the most potent designer to hit the market since the banning of M1T in 2004. However, SD’s popularity was attributable to more than just its mass-building potential. Specifically, it was known for stimulating “quality” increases in muscular size, not just wet bulk characteristic of so many other mass-building steroids today. In searching for SD’s replacement, we knew we had to set our sights high. We needed a compound that was not only capable of performing at the same level as SD, but one which could potentially outperform it in terms of muscle growth, while still offering the same high quality gains SD was prized for.
No doubt, this was a tall order and one which not too long ago, would’ve been difficult to fill. Fortunately, due the re-emergence of Methylstenbolone, which was first synthesized decades ago in an American laboratory, we knew we had found our player. Let’s take a closer look at some of Methylstenbolone’s defining characteristics, in order to familiarize ourselves with what is destined to become the next great OTC designer.
In 1966 M-Sten (short for Methylstenbolone) was researched by Searle Laboratories, along with several other compounds; several of which have become well known in the OTC designer steroid world. Some of the steroids included in this research were Desoxymethyltestosterone (Pheraplex), Methyl-1-Testosterone (M1T), and 17a-methyl-1-androstenediol (M1-Alpha). At the conclusion of this research, the results were compared against several other well known steroids, all of which are still regularly used today. The results of this comparison were shocking, with the researchers commenting that “Even the least active compound in Table 6 (see below) possessed a higher relative myotropic (muscle-building) potency than had previously been obtained with several clinically interesting compounds, which have been studied under identical conditions, such as Oxymetholone (Anadrol), Oxandrolone (Anavar), Stanozolol (Winstrol), and Methandrostenolone (Dianabol).”
Even a novice in the world of steroids understands that Anadrol and Dianabol are considered “strong” steroids. In fact, Anadrol was long believed by many to be the most potent oral steroid in the world when it came to adding overall muscle mass. For every single steroid studied in Table 6 (below) to be considered more myotropic than Anadrol (aside from methyltestosterone), we are indeed looking at a powerful class of compounds.
As you can see by the chart above, M-Sten (highlighted in red) is over 2/3rd as myotropic as the insanely powerful M1T, per mg. In comparison, Superdrol’s anabolic rating is about 400, making M-Sten over 1/3rd more potent than SD. While a drug’s anabolic rating doesn’t always directly correlate with its ability to induce size & strength gains (think Anavar), if we use other drugs in this class as a guidepost for what kind of results to expect relative to their myotropic rating, M-Sten can be expected to deliver great gains in size & strength. Fortunately, we do not have to guess when it comes to this steroid’s muscle building potential, as real-world results provide us with clear answers. In terms of lean tissue, M-Sten ranks right up there at the top of the heap, likely providing greater gains per mg than not only every other OTC designer currently on the market, but also every prescription steroid which is available through a pharmaceutical company.
Structurally, M-Sten is an amalgamation between SD & M1T, sharing significant characteristics of both. However, in terms of visual results, M-Sten will more closely resemble Superdrol, providing the user with a hard, dense, and dry appearance to his muscularity. When it comes to strength enhancement, M-Sten will perform impressively, rivaling steroids such as Superdrol and Anadrol. Certainly, this is a drug strength athletes will be able to put to good use. In accordance with other DHT derivatives, M-Sten also lacks the ability to aromatize to any degree, nor is it capable of 5a-reduction.
Like all methylated steroids, M-Sten will exhibit some degree of liver toxicity, but when used responsibly, this should remain a non-issue. When discussing hair loss, it should be remembered that the likelihood of experiencing this side effect is largely based on the individual’s genetic predisposition. Still, M-Sten does not seem to be particularly prone to causing this side effect, being much less likely than Testosterone or Trenbolone to initiate hair loss. Overall, the uses for which this steroid finds itself suitable are numerous. It can be used effectively in off-seasons BB’rs, pre-contest competitors, or strength athletes all with good effect.
The 2nd anabolic agent in this stack, Dimethazine, is no slouch in the muscle growth department itself. In fact, according to the university research shown below, Dimethazine was shown to deliver greater muscle-building results than Winstrol, Testosterone propionate, Methyltestosterone, and even Anadrol, on a mg to mg basis.
Biological activity of Dimethazine in the protein-anabolic field.
Matscher, R.; Lupo, C.; De, P. Ruggieri. Lab. Ric. Ormonoter. Richter, Milan, Bollettino – Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale (1962), 38 988-90. CODEN: BSIBAC ISSN: 0037-8771. Journal language unavailable. CAN 58:34623 AN 1963:34623 CAPLUS
Abstract
“Dimethazine (I), 2,17-dimethyl-5-androstan-17-ol-3,3′-azine, was compared to methyltestosterone, oxymethalone, androstanazole and testosterone propionate in its protein-anabolic activity. The tests were made on castrated rats with a single hypodermic injection of 250 , on young male and female rats with increasing daily oral doses from 100 to 1000 for 30 days, and on adult male rats with daily oral doses of 1000 for 25 days. It was shown that I did not interfere with the growth of young animals; that adult rats treated with I gained, on an av., 20 g. more in wt. than the controls; and that I had a greater myotropic effect on castrates than the other steroids, and induced a higher N retention than methyltestosterone in adult males.”
Most people are not aware of just how strong this compound is, but most people understand that when a steroid surpasses Anadrol in terms of growth potential, we are dealing with one bad-ass drug…and Dimethazine is no exception. In terms of both structure and effect, Dimethazine is amazingly similar to SD. Technically, Dimethazine is simply two SD molecules held together by an azine bond. Once the compound is ingested, the bond is severed, liberating free SD and releasing it into the bloodstream to interact with the androgen receptor. This makes Dimethazine a non-aromatizing, non-progestagenic, methylated oral steroid, which exhibits a reduced degree of liver toxicity in comparison to SD.
Super-DMZ Rx 2.0 should not be underestimated nor should dosing recommendations be exceeded. With the arrival of Super-DMZ Rx 2.0, IronMagLabs has brought to market the highest dosed version of Methylstenbolone yet. As usual, IML doesn’t cut corners by offering under-dosed products designed only to spare profits, which occurs so frequently with other companies. This formulation will provide a full 10 mg of Methylstenbolone and 10 mg of Dimethazine per cap! To put this in perspective, the next-closest competitor doses their Methylstenbolone product at only 4 mg per cap and contains no additional compounds. For the 1st time, consumers will be provided with the opportunity to take full advantage of Methylstenbolone since its release onto the marketplace. Just like with the original Super DMZ, 1-2 caps per day is all that is required in order to witness extreme changes in one’s physique and strength levels. If you liked Super DMZ, you will love Super-DMZ Rx 2.0!
With most oral AAS, the best mass & strength builders are almost always accompanied by varying degrees of water retention and/or significant androgenic side effects. When it comes to Super-DMZ Rx 2.0, not only does it provide superior growth potential and rival or surpass the best strength builders on the market (legal or otherwise), but it does so while making you drier, harder, denser, and more vascular at the same time. In addition, it is less likely to cause oily skin, acne, hair loss, or other androgenic side effects when comparing it to steroids of similar potency.
With Super-DMZ Rx 2.0, visually stunning results combine with massive strength increases to make it the most impressive product on the market. After using just a single bottle, we are confident you will agree wholeheartedly. Not one to be outperformed, IML went above and beyond in the formulation of this product because we understand that our customers want and deserve only the best.