Correction to language form and material facts
← Older revision
Revision as of 19:47, 12 February 2015
Line 22:
Line 22:
# [[Radix]] (DotShop Inc.), one of 31 applications filed by the company.
# [[Radix]] (DotShop Inc.), one of 31 applications filed by the company.
# [[Donuts]] (Sugar Maple, LLC) - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/586 here].
# [[Donuts]] (Sugar Maple, LLC) - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/586 here].
−
# [[Commercial Connect, LLC]], [[Community TLD|Community Application]],
'''FAILED INITIAL EVALUATION'''; the application requested
and
passed extended evaluation. It was
the
first
application
to fail IE due to the technical evaluation
.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13575-90-passes-and-2-failures-in-this-weeks-gtld-results 90 passes and 2 failures in this weeks gTLD results, DomainIncite.com]Published June 28, Retrieved 1 July</ref>
+
# [[Commercial Connect, LLC]], [[Community TLD|Community Application]],
Originally applied for .shop in 2000 round
and
has continually worked with
the
eCommerce community to develop a strong mutually beneficial
application
for all stakeholders
.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13575-90-passes-and-2-failures-in-this-weeks-gtld-results 90 passes and 2 failures in this weeks gTLD results, DomainIncite.com]Published June 28, Retrieved 1 July</ref>
# [[BEIJING JINGDONG 360 DU E-COMMERCE LTD]]
# [[BEIJING JINGDONG 360 DU E-COMMERCE LTD]]
# [[Amazon]] - The Japan Association of New Economy (JANE) filed a [[Community Objection|community objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICC.ICANN.org]Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref>
# [[Amazon]] - The Japan Association of New Economy (JANE) filed a [[Community Objection|community objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICC.ICANN.org]Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref>
Line 36:
Line 36:
The application from [[Commercial Connect LLC]] defines its community as e-Commerce operators that run "B2C site[s] that utilize credit card processing requiring them to abide by PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) to operate." The company notes that "We are the original applicant for .SHOP from the 2000 round. While there were other applicants in the initial rounds, Commercial Connect was the only one that made it through the entire qualification process. When delegation of .SHOP was put off until the ʺnextʺ round, CC has been working with the above community to establish its relationship and representation in that community. Initially, since there was no clear community representation, we worked on establishing some form of a member trade association. The result was the creation of ECWR.net (eCommerce World Retailers). This was formed in March, 2004 and clearly predates the 2007 requirement in the Applicant Guidebook. We currently have in excess of 1,000 members representing a substantial amount of eCommerce (these members represent an equilivant in excess of $866 trillion in annual sales)."<ref>Application 1-1830-1672</ref>
The application from [[Commercial Connect LLC]] defines its community as e-Commerce operators that run "B2C site[s] that utilize credit card processing requiring them to abide by PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) to operate." The company notes that "We are the original applicant for .SHOP from the 2000 round. While there were other applicants in the initial rounds, Commercial Connect was the only one that made it through the entire qualification process. When delegation of .SHOP was put off until the ʺnextʺ round, CC has been working with the above community to establish its relationship and representation in that community. Initially, since there was no clear community representation, we worked on establishing some form of a member trade association. The result was the creation of ECWR.net (eCommerce World Retailers). This was formed in March, 2004 and clearly predates the 2007 requirement in the Applicant Guidebook. We currently have in excess of 1,000 members representing a substantial amount of eCommerce (these members represent an equilivant in excess of $866 trillion in annual sales)."<ref>Application 1-1830-1672</ref>
−
The application by [[GMO Registry]] leaves greater room in its use of language for shops providing "offline" commerce services. Their application is supported by a few commerce associations, such as the European Multi-channel and Online Trade Association (EMOTA) and the Japan Foundation for Electronic Commerce (JFEC).
THere
are not strong membership requirements delineated in the application.<ref>Application 1-890-52063</ref>
+
The application by [[GMO Registry]] leaves greater room in its use of language for shops providing "offline" commerce services. Their application is supported by a few commerce associations, such as the European Multi-channel and Online Trade Association (EMOTA) and the Japan Foundation for Electronic Commerce (JFEC).
There
are not strong membership requirements delineated in the application.<ref>Application 1-890-52063</ref>
==Sting Confusion Objection to [[.shopping]]==
==Sting Confusion Objection to [[.shopping]]==