← Older revision
Revision as of 10:39, 11 January 2014
(includes 1 intermediate revision)
Line 102:
Line 102:
*[[Coca-Cola]]
*[[Coca-Cola]]
*[[X later]]
*[[X later]]
-
*[[Homestar Runner Smiling]]
*[[James Bond]]
*[[James Bond]]
*[[Snow Cones]]
*[[Snow Cones]]
-
*[[Twitter]]
(even though I don't like the subject matter)
+
*[[Twitter]]
-
*[[Strong Bad's
Computer Exceeding Its Technical Speculations
]]
+
*[[Strong Bad's
Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities
]]
*[[Lasagna]]
*[[Lasagna]]
*[[Multiple Negatives]]
*[[Multiple Negatives]]
Line 131:
Line 130:
*[[Crazy Cartoon]] ([[subtitles:crazycartoon/fr]])
*[[Crazy Cartoon]] ([[subtitles:crazycartoon/fr]])
*[[79 Seconds Left]] ([[subtitles:79secondsleft/fr]])
*[[79 Seconds Left]] ([[subtitles:79secondsleft/fr]])
-
*[[underlings]] ([[subtitles:sbemail171/fr]]) (for some reason, this particular subtitles script is popular, having amassed over
1
,
500
views, which is
impressive for a
subtitles script
that
was created during
this
hiatus)
+
*[[underlings]] ([[subtitles:sbemail171/fr]]) (for some reason, this particular subtitles script is popular, having amassed over
2
,
000
views, which is
high by
subtitles script
standards, especially since this one
was created during
the
hiatus)
*[[A Jumping Jack Contest]] ([[subtitles:jumpinjacks2/fr]])
*[[A Jumping Jack Contest]] ([[subtitles:jumpinjacks2/fr]])
*[[The Li'l Brudder Show]] ([[subtitles:lilbrudder/fr]])
*[[The Li'l Brudder Show]] ([[subtitles:lilbrudder/fr]])
Line 218:
Line 217:
*I've drafted FA write-ups for every not-yet-featured Strong Bad Email up to [[bedtime story]].
*I've drafted FA write-ups for every not-yet-featured Strong Bad Email up to [[bedtime story]].
*I did not create [[Gum]], but I made it a worthwhile page.
*I did not create [[Gum]], but I made it a worthwhile page.
-
-
==HRWiki-related things that annoy me==
-
*THE LONG HIATUS (It is just like a Brother Chap to break his promise! We asked for a simple toon, but I suppose no-one asks favours of the Brothers Chaps!) (Kudos if you get the reference.)
-
*When anonymous users sign themselves with a user name
-
*When a user makes more than two edits to a single page in the span of just a minute or two, ''especially if the page is one that was previously not edited for a long time''
-
**That, more often than not, it is anonymous users who do this
-
*When a user doesn't listen to Show Preview concerns
-
*When a user gets away with not using the Show Preview button
-
*When I don't sign my own comments
-
*When I have to proof-read my comments
-
*When a user makes an edit only to immediately revert it
-
**Especially when it's done to make a moronic point such as [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Swears&diff=733191&oldid=733067 this] [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Swears&diff=733192&oldid=733191 one]
-
*Long-unfinished subtitles scripts (why do we keep long-unfinished subtitles scripts, anyway?)
-
*When pages are in [[:Category:Articles for Discussion]] or a similar deletion category for a very long time
-
*Alternating capitalisation ([[:Category:Real band Running gags]], [[Template:subtitlesLinks]], just to name a few)
-
*Adding a link to a category in the middle of a page, and that page becoming a member of that category
-
*When the Wiki is unedited for hours
-
*When a user changes their signature for a holiday and never changes it back
-
*When a user points out in an edit summary that they need to go to bed or something along those lines
-
*When a user creates a new article and links to that article on every page that mentions it
-
*That contribution pages are case-sensitive
-
*Outdated lists
-
*Overly-descriptive edit summaries
-
*Edit summaries that get cut off
-
*User pages that have (almost) every single userbox in [[HRWiki:Userboxes#Fun Userboxes|Fun Userboxes]] on them
-
*When I check new messages on my talk page while logged out, and have to deal with the Orange Bar of Death as soon as I log in
-
*When a user considers a small addition to an article a "major contribution"
-
*Edit conflicts
-
*Redundant piping (e.g. <nowiki>[[Strong Bad|Strong Bad's]]</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>[[Strong Bad]]'s</nowiki>) (I really don't understand why people who use redundant piping don't just use the other way, since it's a lot less effort)
-
*Abuse of "revision (insert number here)" in edit summaries (for example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Monkey_Island&diff=prev&oldid=717759]
-
[http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=1983&diff=prev&oldid=719940]
-
[http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Subtitles:sbemailiarized/en&diff=prev&oldid=721040]
-
[http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Subtitles:sbemail54/en&diff=prev&oldid=723950] [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lharbauer&diff=726775&oldid=726771] [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=extra_plug&diff=728465&oldid=727170])
-
*Sarcasm, especially when it's wrong (err, right) and/or offensive (for example, [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=726054&oldid=726052])
-
*Comments in mainspace or project discussion pages that belong on someone's talk page, especially if that someone is me (like [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40#No Hands On Deck!|this one right here]])
-
*That [[the basics]] has the least page views of any Sbemail article despite the fact that Strong Bad himself has said that it is his favourite e-mail
-
*That everyone seems to like [[local news]] purely for the "its/it's" song and the other grammar songs instead of that e-mail's actual subject
-
*That everyone seems to think Strong Mad is older than Strong Bad - he may be much bigger, but that doesn't mean he's older, especially given his intelligence
-
*When people criticise [[160 Seconds]] for being too similar to [[rock opera]] - sure, they were designed based on similar rules, but they're not the same ones
-
*That we get special logos quite often these days and that they are up longer than usual - I personally think that since we're in a hiatus, we should lighten up on these
-
*When people say "no links in transcripts" when they mean "no links in dialogue"
-
*When "the"'s are treated as [[Integral Article|integral]] when they're not
-
*[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_21-30#Everybody_to_the_Limit|This comment]] (specifically, the one that says "Good. Also, I beat RickTommy.") (You did NOT beat me. I CHOSE not to post for that week because of the warning on my talk page.)
-
*When long-untouched topics on the forum get bumped (I think there should be a <s>rule</s> feature that when a topic does not get any more posts for a set amount of time, it will be archived, just like at Gamefaqs)
-
*Forum posts that just say "Oh", "Thanks", or any other single word that adds nothing to the topic
-
*Forum posts that say "All the old users are coming back" or something along those lines
-
*When someone replies to a spam post on the forum and once the spam post is deleted, the post in reply to it remains despite no longer making sense
-
*That the vast majority of recent posts on the forum are spam and that the vast majority of recent users on the forum are spammers
-
*When people would [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection&diff=702814&oldid=702757 interfere with ohers' suggestions instead of adding their suggestions to a new week] in the old format
-
*[[videography]] (well, mostly the fact that it's been the newest sbemail for {{monthssince|October 5, 2009}} MONTHS AND COUNTING now)
==Other interests==
==Other interests==