First and foremost ladies and gentlemen, debate can be an interesting thing. One party can be screaming at the other party to the point where by the end of the argument the two parties hate each other. OR the two parties can sit quietly by and discuss something in a mature fashion, remaining friends forevermore. OR the two parties can be tearing each other’s lungs out one moment, and then having coffee with each other the next. As I said, debate can be an interesting thing. There are a few things we need to know however, before I continue.
One of the things I’ve noticed when it comes to debate is that one party or the other will often speak in the fashion that their side of the argument is correct and that the other is not. The very idea of debate is to offer up another side to an argument that otherwise would not have been offered to the opposing party. This would mean that both parties are members of the debate, to work out what is correct and what is not on either side of the argument. So bearing this in mind, we must be careful with what words we choose when indulging in mature debate.
Example: “the polio vaccine should not be discounted because if it were to be discounted this could be very dangerous to the world.” This statement cannot be made in a debate about vaccines, given that one of the parties does not believe that the polio vaccine helps mankind. The above statement is like saying, “this is the way it is. It’s my way or the highway.” If this is the case then why are you even a part of the debate? A better statement would be, “perhaps the polio vaccine should not be ignored or discounted because there could be a chance that those not vaccinated with the polio vaccine, could be in danger and here is the information I have two offer up.”
There is no doubt about the fact that self-righteousness is a tool that is needed during mature argument and debate. But for a debate to survive any form of longevity, words and sentences should be chosen carefully, so that both parties will endure to see both sides of the story, look up any information and/or facts offered up during the debate. A proper and thorough debate lasts days, weeks and sometimes even months. Especially with subjects and topics such as vaccination, minutes or hours simply do not cut it.
Too many times have I had to witness one party walking away from an oh so important debate, due to the fact that the other party is too forceful, in that they are trying to shove their side of the argument down the other side’s throat, rather than offer an ideal, some information and/or facts, and giving the other party time to digest everything. Such behavior renders the debate useless, redundant or at very least adjourns an important topic.
Whilst I am all for freedom of speech, within any debate freedom of speech has to be treated with delicacy. Not one nor the other party is necessarily correct in an absolute fashion until the debate is complete and both parties have allowed their minds to devour both sides of the argument. And even then, both parties may come to the conclusion that neither side is correct or can be defined correct in some way shape or form.
This is not so much about treading lightly or walking on broken glass. It is simply that any mature, important debate should be treated as such. Please bear this in mind as you read this article.
The Wiki, Encyclo or Any Other Pedia
It’s very easy to look in the Wikipedia and say, “it is in the Wikipedia so it must be correct,” but this is often not the case, just as it is not the case that the mainstream media tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The media have been caught lying by omission and sometimes just blatantly outright lying to your face on many occasions, as has Wikipedia and even the medical industry when it suits to line their pockets.
One of the reasons that people don’t get to see an alternative viewpoint outside the mainstream is because they are told that the man in the Armani suit and a beautiful woman in a red dress on their news at night are correct, absolutely correct and nothing but correct, so people take what they have to say as scripture. And when I say “alternative viewpoint” I’m not talking about alternative opinions that we see on our mainstream news, because even those alternative people that spout the alternative opinion, are hand-picked for the debate. A good example was Andrew Bolt during the Stolen Generation debate in Australia. Whilst Andrew made some great points and proved beyond doubt that the Stolen Generation was an absolute myth, there was still much propaganda coming from his side of the argument and this is because he was handpicked for that debate, given that he is still a part of the Fabian fifth column.
As I discuss vaccines here, I want you to know that I will be discussing it from the side of the mainstream media, the alternative mainstream media, the alternative media (please don’t get any of those three confused) and from the side of alternative peoples that would never usually get recognised by anybody within the mainstream media or the mainstream medical industry, outside of ridicule rather than debate, which as far as I’m concerned is just as bad as not allowing free speech. True free speech.
Let us also please not forget that most of the doctors and nurses that now talk against the mainstream medical industry are now retired and not being paid by “the system”. This allows them to say what it is that they wanted to say for many years, but couldn’t at the risk of being fired. This does not sound like much, for your average Australian that can so easily end up on a pension, but it is a huge deal to those over in the United States or countries with similar legislations and/or policies predominantly handed down by the United Nations, that need to rely on a pay cheque each week otherwise they end up on the Street.
Remember in Australia it’s a right to be paid in many ways, whereas in the United States and other countries it must be earned.
Follow the Money Trail
If there’s one thing I’ve been taught over the many years that I’ve been researching many topics including vaccinations, it’s that the best way to get answers to any argument is by following the money trail. A good example of this is the banking Corporation elite. Should you look up the names Rothschilds, Rockefeller, Morgans etc, and then follow the money trail you’ll fast be led back to the goldsmiths and henceforth your questions quickly answered, albeit by quite a bit of research. The Rockefellers may not have been of the banking elite (some of them were, however nothing compared to that of the Rothschilds), however all of these tycoons scratch each other’s backs. Big Rockefeller was predominantly an oil tycoon, but knew everything there was needed to know about banking, especially fractional reserve banking (due to his earlier family) in order to profit in the most efficient way. In any case, you’re able to learn this by following the money trail. You catch my drift?
One of the most important men on the face of the planet in my opinion, Mr. Eustace Mullins (unfortunately no longer with us), said on multiple occasions that we should follow the money trail (See Mr. Mullins’ book Murder by Injection). Dr. David Evans of sciencespeak.com, a rocket scientist over here in Australia, said to me personally on-air during an interview, if you want to find the correct answers, “follow the money trail.” Dr. Evans is not one of these fat cats or bureaucrats that bear false certificates on our nightly news or one of our politicians that have no business in science at all, let alone the medical industry, but rather a true scientist that can show you all of his credentials on paper. Real paper, real certificates.
The People That Inoculate Us Are Trained and Paid by Those That Make the Most Money from It
Many people do not realise, including doctors and nurses themselves, that our medical industry is educated by the very people that profit the most out of inoculations and Band-Aid type medications, including psychotropic drugs, headache pills, etc.
At the turn of the century John D Rockefeller realised the profit to be made in allopathic medicine. In homoeopathy there was no profit to be made, just as there is no profit to be made for a government or a family tycoon when it comes to hemp, because it can so easily be grown around the everyday common household. Hemp contains very little THC, meaning even if they wanted to use the argument that hemp is a dangerous drug because it gets you high, they would be laughed at. Whilst hemp is a part of the cannabinoid family, it contains so little THC that it wouldn’t affect you. So of course there must be another motive behind not allowing hemp in many countries and if you follow the money trails of history you’ll understand why. Hemp, just as many other herbs within homoeopathy can be grown around the household and henceforth there would be no profit to be made by tyrants such as John D Rockefeller. This is the same John D Rockefeller that started injecting mega loads of cash into companies such as Merck, which has a huge hand in training today’s doctors and nurses all around Western Civilisation. These doctors and nurses will tell you today that the hack and slash world of allopathy is better than that of homoeopathy. In fact, doctors and nurses of today will often not even alert you to the fact that homoeopathy exists. That in itself should be a red flag given that homoeopathy, not to mention naturopathy, have proven themselves not only healers but lifesavers so many times in the past.
We already know that Merck paid their doctors to give talks that play in the favour of their company. And this doesn’t just come from people such as Eustace Mullins, Dr. Rebecca Carley or in the past Eleanora McBean. No, this also comes from the mainstream media itself. Let’s take a quick look at something that was written over there at NBCNews.com.
Amid growing criticism of industry influence over which treatments doctors choose for their patients, the company posted a database on its Web site listing speaking fees paid to 1,078 doctors, researchers, nurses and other health professionals. It covers July through September, and Merck – the second major drugmaker to disclose payments to doctors – plans to update it regularly.
Note that NBC News uses the term “health professionals”. On the most part, when anybody looks into these so-called health professionals, (should NBC News or the News outlet at the time of the given subject, finally give out names of these so-called professionals) they fast find that many of these people do not have close to the qualifications needed to discuss such subjects, let alone a certificate of a medical profession.
A good example was when the swine flu scare was taking place here in Australia and around the world back in 2009, I personally wrote to Nicola Roxon about some of the preservatives and adjuvants being used in vaccines. Not only was it evident that both her and those that work around her were using a generic template to answer questions about the swine flu, it was also very clear to me that Nicola Roxon had no business being our Health Minister. When I finally did a little research on Nicola Roxon’s background, I became fast aware that Miss Roxon was as qualified for medicine and inoculation as Al Gore was for so-called climate change.
Doctors and nurses getting paid by Merck to make certain speeches playing in their favour, can make so much money in such little time that it would be insane for anybody in their profiteering mind to pass up. A good example is where one of the doctors that was making these speeches earned himself a tidy $22,693 in no time flat.
The 1,078 speakers gave a total of 2,493 talks and were paid $1,548 on average. The top earner got $22,693, and dozens of doctors received more than $10,000.
Members of Congress themselves have openly criticised what Merck is up to.
Some media and members of Congress have denounced what they see as excessive influence by drug and device makers over doctors, who in the past were openly wined and dined by companies trying to curry favor.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/33384490/ns/health-health_care/t/drugmaker-reveals-which-docs-it-paid-speak/
We have to remember, that after a new Dr walks away with his fresh degree, the only improvement that he really gets put on top of that degree (if you want to call it an improvement) is information coming out of Big Pharma. For those of you unaware of who or what Big Pharma is, Big Pharma is pretty much made up of all of the different pharmaceutical companies, new medical Journal authors (usually the same people) and even those that have their fingers in the agenda pie, such as the Rockefellers.
From http://www.gonando.com/big-pharma.html we read this:
So how does YOUR doctor know what he is talking about? Well after leaving University clutching his degree (a time when any graduate knows as much as he is EVER going to about his degree topic having crammed for a few months before finals)…his ONLY real source of information (for MOST busy GP’s/MD’s) is simply the drug companies bulletins about their range of products and especially any ‘new’ money spinners they have brought onto the market.
True the odd Doctor might keep an eye on the press, or on the Lancet, or other medical research journals BUT rest assured these folks are FEW and FAR-BEWTEEN! With patient numbers rising and daily demands at a high, your local Doc just does not have time to keep up with everything that happens in the medical world. It is humanly impossible…and they are after all actually human and NOT God!
This is where Big Pharma has its Ace-in-the-Hole! It pays out literally hundreds of thousands of Reps to travel around plugging their wares to Doctors and pharmacists (That is the numbers of Reps alone in the US approaches 100,000 and there is well over 100,000 throughout Europe!) Generally these guys offer a variety of incentives (sometimes even worth cold hard cash to the practice, if not actually to individuals themselves) to the hard worked Docs to prescribe or promote the use of their latest, greatest innovation in the world of health. And — given what are invariably ‘rosy’ and oh-so-polished reams of research papers that the Reps can provide to support their claims for efficacy of their latest ‘billion-dollar-profit-potential-pill-or-potion’ — who can blame OUR poor Doc’s for swallowing the spoonful of sugar that comes with marketing of these massive medicament money-spinners?!
http://www.gonando.com/big-pharma.html
Not only have we established that Big Pharma is willing to pay its doctors and nurses to convince other doctors and nurses of the medical industry to sway in its favour, we’ve also established that even the mainstream media (NBC news) is well aware of it, as are the alternatives, such as gonando.com, among so many others that you can find for yourself.
Also remember, if it’s so easy for Big Pharma (Merck and such) to convince other doctors of where they want to go (in other words to make profit at the risk of your health) simply by paying doctors to make speeches, imagine how easy it is for them to pay doctors to persuade you!
Many people have said to me in the past, “I have family and friends within the medical profession” as if this should somehow sway me to the side of, “vaccines are good, vaccines are great, vaccines are wonderful” not realising at all that these very family members or friends are influenced sometimes even trained by Big Pharma.
Whilst not every pharmaceutical company have their hands in the training of our doctors and nurses, many at very least are paying huge amounts of money toward fatcats and bureaucrats, universities, even authentic scientists, to train our doctors and nurses in a way that is not so favourable to mankind, all in the name of profit. And please bear in mind that just because I’m using Merck as an example here, does not mean that there aren’t others out there doing the same thing, because there are. Pfizer is another large culprit behind trying to sway popular opinion, in the name of profit gain. When I say popular opinion I mean it in every sense of the term, for if you can convince the doctors you can convince the masses, and thereafter it becomes popular opinion. And since people work almost as if in a sheep mentality, they follow that which is popular. This is why I always ask my audience or readers to critically think for themselves, away from popular opinion and more so as an individual.
Whilst there are literally hundreds of different pharmaceutical companies that make up Big Pharma, we will take one of each from every letter of the alphabet.
Alcon
Biovitrum
Covance
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories
Eli Lilly and Company
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
GPC Biotech
Hetero Drugs
Incepta Pharmaceuticals
Jenapharm, a subsidiary of Bayer Schering Pharma
–No K–
Lupin Limited
Merck & Co.
Noxxon
Octapharma
Pfizer
–No Q–
Rubicon Research
Sigma Pharmaceuticals
Torrent Pharmaceuticals
UNILAB, also known as United Laboratories
VAV Life Sciences
Wallace Pharmaceuticals
–No X–
Yuhan Corporation
Zentiva
You can do a Google search on any one of these companies and you will get plenty of hits to choose from.
Eleanora McBean, Polio Vaccination and the Same Practices
Some years ago, back in 1957, Eleanora MacBean warned us about the dangers of polio vaccine in chapter 10 of the book entitled The Poison Needle. One particular part in chapter 10 that I want to direct your attention to, is the part where there was no testing done first.
SAFETY PROMISED WITHOUT INVESTIGATION OR PROOF
$9,000,000 of public funds were gambled on this financially promising but highly questionable venture before it was even declared safe and usable. Later, when the over dramatized announcement was made that it was “safe” there was still no scientific evidence or factual proof of its safety. The promoters of this inflated vaccine “scheme” expected a 5 billion dollar profit in the first year of operation. (Direct quotations supporting this statement are given under the topic heading, THE MONEY MOTIVE, at the end of the chapter.)
Even after the vaccine had killed 7 people and the number was mounting every day, the propaganda committee put words into the mouths of important government officials, still insisting that the vaccine was “safe” and must be continued.
http://whale.to/v/mcbean.html
This practice is still going on today. If we take a look at what took place during the 2009 swine flu scare, a scare to be known as exactly that by our doctors and nurses all around Western civilisation (three of my doctors all assured me that the swine flu was less to worry about than that of the regular flu strains, and yes I caught the swine flu and I’m an asthmatic), even Australia’s doctors and nurses were bewildered and left staggering at the fact that they were being told to inoculate people with vaccines that had not yet been tested over long-term.
DOCTORS have called for Australia’s swine flu vaccination plans to be put on ice until questions over the safety and practicality of the roll-out are answered. In a letter yesterday to Chief Medical Officer Jim Bishop, seen by The Age, Australian Medical Association president Andrew Pesce said the Government should ”seriously consider” delaying the program.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/doctors-urge-delay-on-vaccine-20090828-f2k6.html
Now if you think that the only reason behind the delay, was everything insurance, when it came to the swine flu vaccination program, you should think again, given that Australia had the leading number of doctors and nurses (per capita) that refused inoculation themselves, (alongside the UK) even AFTER being forced to inoculate others or face being fired.
The warning follows a spate of surveys which suggest that many healthcare workers will refuse the vaccine, despite being on the Government’s ‘priority list’. Up to half of GPs and one in three nurses say that they do not plan to take the vaccine, some because of concerns over safety.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/swine-flu/6087782/Swine-flu-Doctors-who-refuse-vaccine-putting-patients-at-risk.html
The above article argues that because doctors themselves were not being inoculated, that this put the patient that they were working on at risk. Yet all around the world we still see reports of inoculation causing the exact virus/illness that it’s supposed to prevent. This again proves that a lot of the time people are being injected with a live virus. Doctors themselves will tell you that these viruses are treated with ultraviolet light, which renders them inactive. But behind the scenes and “off the record” doctors will also often tell you that this is simply not always true. Try it yourself and question your doctor. You might be surprised, even bewildered, as to what you will hear. One particular doctor even went as far as telling me personally that it kind of works like “dehydrated potato”. You pour the dehydrated potato into a bowl, add water and bam, instant potato. The same thing with vaccines. The ultraviolet light renders the virus/disease inactive until the virus/disease is added to the human body.
From The Guardian:
A survey of GPs published on Healthcare Republic, the website of GP magazine, found that up to 60% of GPs may decline vaccination. Although the numbers who responded were small – 216 GPs – they are in line with a much bigger survey of nurses published a week ago by Nursing Times, which found that a third of 1,500 nurses would refuse vaccination.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2009/aug/24/doctors-refuse-swine-flu-vaccine
These examples are but a few of the many coming from all around the world. When you have doctors and nurses themselves refusing to be inoculated, there is something to be concerned about. No two ifs, buts or maybes! Whether it be because of the lack of testing or simply because these doctors and nurses do not find vaccination safe for human beings (some believe animals are at risk as well) should matter not, but rather form enough of a reason in one’s mind to want to question the idea of being vaccinated.
When it comes to the polio vaccine itself, Eleanora McBean’s The Poisoned Needle does well in explaining the risks that took place with the Salk vaccine. What I wish to discuss first and foremost are the questions that were asked under the main question, “How Safe Is Safe?”
Chapter 10, The Poisoned Needle:
1. Are the men who set themselves up as authorities on polio really qualified to decide the issues of life and death?
2. Have the self-styled medical “experts” been infallible enough in their past decisions to be trusted with the precious lives of our children and our future generations?
3. Have the more effective drugless methods of prevention and treatment of polio been investigated and tested?”
Before entering any of these questions I would first add one more question.
4. Will the men who set themselves up as authorities on polio or any other disease for that matter, inoculate themselves?
Let’s answer question one first. I believe that the men who set themselves up as authorities on polio had already set themselves up in a position to convince the masses that they were qualified in deciding the issues of life and death. I repeat, “set themselves up in a position to CONVINCE the masses” that they were qualified in deciding the issues of life and death. I will go one further however. I believe that these men were playing with people’s lives due to what we now know as the United Nations Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is what I would call “a little too vocal” in its population control. And The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion more than accents this with what little regard its authors have for humankind. The two, alongside the Georgia Guide Stones, scratch each other’s backs and should be read side by side.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion that is passed around today has been noted as a counterfeit. But what is a counterfeit? Is a counterfeit not an exact copy of an original model, but not the original model itself? When somebody creates counterfeit money, are they not making an exact copy of the original print? Minus perhaps a watermark showing its authenticity, the counterfeit money is exactly the same in every way shape and form. So if we are indeed reading an exact copy of the original printed Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, then can we not take what is written within, seriously? And given that absolutely everything that is written into the Protocols has happened, is still happening, and I daresay will continue to happen, should we not be taking that which is written within seriously?
The United Nations Agenda 21 does not hold back when it discusses population control. It does however start to get a little hazy on how the population control will be managed. Are we to become the culled camels of the Australian desert? And if so, are we to be put down mercilessly like a lame horse on a wet racing track or are we to be killed softly, through gradualism and a sick variant of managed death, such as vaccination, medication or perhaps just a means of Karl Marx communism where one child policy would be put in place? You tell me.
Time to enter question two. That being, “Have the self-styled medical experts been infallible enough in their past decisions to be trusted with the precious lives of our children and our future generations?”
Even if these so-called “experts” had good intentions at hand (I do not believe so but what I believe should not matter to you, given that you can make up your own mind after reading this article), they have shown us time and time again in the past that they are incapable of “getting it right”. How many of our children will it take to die at the hands of mistakes within the medical profession/industry before we realise that these so-called “experts” are anything but?
“But Shaun, a few hundred or even a few thousand deaths here and there are worth the many that are saved” (even though there is no evidence to suggest that people are actually saved by vaccinations, but rather that it was their own immune systems that saved them all along) I hear some people say. Come back and tell me that when it’s your son or daughter that dies during a convulsion on the changing table, the living room floor, or even in hospital at the hands of the very people that inoculated that child.
At least one Australian toddler has died, less than 12 hours after receiving the 2010-2011 seasonal flu shot. Her twin also suffered from vomiting and fever, but has reportedly recovered.
So far, more than 250 adverse reactions have been reported in children under the age of five, raising serious questions about the safety of the vaccine for that age group.
CSL’s Fluvax appears to be the main vaccine under investigation. However, CSL has objected to being singled out, claiming that any of the other three vaccines on the Australian market could be to blame.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/15/australia-bans-flu-vaccine.aspx?_escaped_fragment_=#!
If medical errors were a disease, they would be the sixth leading cause of death in America, writes surgeon Dr. Marty Makary in the Wall Street Journal.1
By some estimates, they may actually be the leading cause… These errors kill the equivalent of four jumbo jets’ worth of passengers… every week, Dr. Makary says, and this is likely a conservative estimate.
According to the 2011 Health Grades Hospital Quality in America Study, the incidence rate of medical harm occurring in the United States is estimated to be over 40,000 harmful and/or lethal errors each and EVERY day.2
What’s most shocking is that the harm often is preventable.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/10/27/medical-errors-kill.aspx?_escaped_fragment_=#!
We all know one of those people that say to us, “I have friends and family in the medical profession,” as if this should somehow lend more credibility to what they have to say. But these are the same people that never seem to bring up the fact that its these very people in the medical profession that are also making endless mistakes that are swept under the rug and forgotten about if reported at all. On the most part many of these mistakes, especially those that cause death on the operating table, are after a patient takes a medication or inoculation that kills them, are not even recognised. As Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Centre has spoken about plenty of times in the past, so many of these deaths and vaccine induced injuries are never recognised at all by the WHO, the CDC and the FDA.
So, it’s within my opinion after everything that I have researched when it comes to the medical industry and the medical profession that the answer to question two is obvious. No! I absolutely do not think that those at the top of the medical pyramid have been infallible enough in the past, that they should be making decisions medical or otherwise for our lives. I believe that we should be seeking out as much information and knowledge as possible when it comes to homoeopathy and naturopathy. It was working wonders before John D Rockefeller seen the profit to be made in allopathy and paid to convince the masses that the cut and slash world of allopathic medicine and often unnecessary operation was the better way to go.
3. Have the more effective drugless methods of prevention and treatment of polio been investigated and tested?
Of course they have! And immediately afterwards swept it under the rug!
The powers at the top of the pyramid are not stupid people. To believe that they are, because of the death and destruction that they have caused not just within the medical industries, but in war via the Military Industrial Complex, in our foods via Monsanto, in our water via our very own governments injecting unnatural fluorides, would be absolutely ludicrous and ridiculous. This is a part of why we are in the mess we are in today when it comes to our overall health and well-being. We have relied too much on rulership (I don’t call it leadership for a good reason) and underestimated those that rule over us.
The good news is that more people than ever before in today’s day and age (2016) are looking into homeopathic and naturopathic remedies. Many people have been writing to me after certain broadcasts and people I speak to in everyday life are talking to me about these very things. This says to me that there is a mass awakening taking place when it comes to what we can actually do without a doctor. In fact, YOU become your own doctor. This is the way that we lived for centuries before The Medical Mafia came to fruition. Human beings didn’t continue to exist because they always had a doctor to look after them. Nor did they continue their existence because they had a ruler there to tell them what to do. Also, more than ever before we’re taking back natural birth, employing Kangaroo Care (many Australian hospitals now use Kangaroo Care) and planting our own herbs that help the body heal.
I recently had my landlord’s parents working on my property (or should I say their property?) and the landlord’s mother brought up the fact that she’d been reading about how a lot of the plants in her backyard that had been deemed weeds are actually of healing nature. So she is now very apprehensive about pulling certain “weeds” out, at the sign of dread on her husband’s face.
All in all to answer question three:
Yes I do believe that the more effective drugless methods of prevention and treatment of polio have been investigated and tested, but we all know that this is not where the money is. There is no profit in homoeopathy or naturopathy. So allopathy (inoculations included) will continue to take its place, until not only the masses but our doctors and nurses as well, begin to wake up to the fact that we have been lied to by the very people that train those doctors and nurses.
Please read The Poisoned Needle written by Eleanora McBean in its entirety at this link:
http://whale.to/v/mcbean.html
Are We All Quite Aware of the Preservatives and Adjuvants That Go into Vaccines?
First and foremost let’s get to know what adjuvants are. From the Wikipedia:
An adjuvant (from Latin, adjuvare: to aid) is a pharmacological or immunological agent that modifies the effect of other agents. Adjuvants may be added to vaccine to modify the immune response by boosting it such as to give a higher amount of antibodies and a longer-lasting protection, thus minimizing the amount of injected foreign material. Adjuvants may also be used to enhance the efficacy of a vaccine by helping to modify the immune response to particular types of immune system cells; for example, by activating the T cells instead of antibody-secreting B cells depending on the purpose of the vaccine. Adjuvants are also used in the production of antibodies from immunized animals. There are different classes of adjuvants that can push immune response in different directions, but the most commonly used adjuvants include aluminum hydroxide and paraffin oil.
In other words adjuvants can be used to make the immune system react in an unnatural way, so that the brain and body will take in the contents of the vaccine, not just without rejection, but more so welcoming.
The preservatives that go into the vaccines are not much better than the adjuvants. Let’s take a look at a list of adjuvants and preservatives that go into vaccines from:
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/toxic-vaccine-adjuvants-the-top-10/
***
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #1: Mercury (Thimerosal or Thiomersal)
Mercury, which constitutes 49.7% of thimerosal (or thiomersal), has been commonly known for a very long time to be a highly toxic agent. Mercury has always been beloved by allopathy ever since its inception; in fact, the 3 main treatments of the early allopaths of the 19th century were bloodletting, surgery and the injection of toxic heavy metals like lead and mercury to purportedly displace disease! The expression “mad as a hatter” comes from the observation that the early hat makers, who used mercury in felt to make hats, became crazy through inhaling the stuff.
Numerous studies have been done on the toxicity of mercury, with evidence it leads to infertility, gastritis (a precancerous stage of gastric cancer), neurodegeneration, mitochondrial abnormalities, nephrotic syndrome, apoptosis (cell death) and autism, yet the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, under the auspices of the Rockefeller-created WHO) still refuses to admit mercury can cause cancer and is leaving mercury categorized as a class 2b possible carcinogen (as opposed to class 2a probable carcinogen or class 1 definite carcinogen). The study above on cell death concluded:
Mercury (Hg) is a highly toxic metal that can exert multiple adverse effects, ultimately leading to cell death. Before causing death, the Hg enters the cells and affects diverse intracellular targets.
Since thimerosal contains about 50% mercury by weight, vaccines with a ratio of 1:10,000 (or 0.01% thimerosal) have about 50 mg/L mercury, which exceeds the 0.2 mg/L hazardous waste toxicity regulatory level for mercury. According to US state and federal hazardous waste management requirements, any vaccines with this level of thimerosal which are discarded need to be treated as hazardous waste.
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #2: Aluminum
Aluminum is another metal which, like mercury, is highly harmful for human health. Aluminum is a “light” metal rather than a heavy metal like lead and mercury, but its health effects are devastating nonetheless. As a vaccine adjuvant, aluminum is normally mixed into the vaccine as a salt, e.g. as aluminium phosphate and aluminium hydroxide.
This study specifically asked the question, “Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?” and found they were not. Other studies have implicated aluminum in the development of impaired congitive function, neurotoxicity, Alzheimer’s and autism. (It should be noted, however, that it is possible to take aluminum into the body if it is tightly bound as a molecule and not suffer any ill effects, because it will pass straight through the body and not be released. An example of this is zeolite, a matrix of aluminum silicates, which is actually a spectacular health supplement that can safely remove toxins like mercury from your body.)
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #3: Human Diploid Cells (Aborted Fetuses)
Believe it or not, fetal DNA tissue in used in vaccine cultures, disguised under the name of diploid cells. A diploid cell is simply a cell with a double set if chromosomes. These cells are human cells, derived from the tissue of babies or fetuses, some of which are definitely aborted! This has being going on for over 50 years. The article Human Fetal Links with Some Vaccines admits that “Two different strains of human diploid cell cultures made from fetuses have been used extensively for vaccine production for decades. One was developed in the United States in 1961 (called WI-38) and the other in the United Kingdom in 1966 (called MRC-5).”
Many people, religious or not, are understandably opposed to allowing themselves to be injected with the tissue of dead babies. Would you want to be injected with that? There are major ethical ramifications here, not to mention grave health issues too. A study by Dr. Deisher found a connection between the injection of human diploid cells and autism. The basis of this is that when you inject something foreign into your body, your cells will either assimilate it (whereby the foreign human DNA will be transported into nuclei and be integrated into host genome, causing phenotype change) or attack it (meaning you develop an auto-immune response, leading to the auto-immune diseases of the ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder]). Either way, residual human fetal DNA fragments in vaccines can be one of causes of autism in children. Dr. Deisher’s study concluded:
Autistic disorder change points years are coincident with introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines, containing fetal and retroviral contaminants, into childhood vaccine regimens. This pattern was repeated in the US, UK, Western Australia and Denmark. Thus, rising autistic disorder prevalence is directly related to vaccines manufactured utilizing human fetal cells. I also recommend watching Clint Richardson’s fantastic documentary “Lethal Injection” where he delves into the issue of aborted diploid cells and offers further research and analysis.
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #4: Animal Cells
Almost all vaccines need something in which to grow the culture, and that normally means animal cells. All sorts of animals are used for this, including chickens, pigs, dogs, monkeys, horses, rabbits, cows and more. All these animal cells remain in trace amounts in the vaccine, as admitted by the FDA. This means that when you allow a vaccine to be injected into your body, you are allowing animal DNA into your body, which of course are foreign protein cells. Is this really a good idea for your body? Consider that:
many vaccines contain egg-derived albumin, which is responsible for a lot of allergic reactions according to this study; pig/swine viruses were discovered in the Rotarix vaccine which the FDA suspended in 2010;
the polio vaccines of the 1960s, which contained monkey cells, were contaminated with a virus known as SV40 (simian virus 40). This later was shown to cause widespread cancer. New vaccines are now being developed which contain dog cells (e.g. Flucelvax). Additionally, albumin can be human-derived, but it’s still a problem. This study concluded side effects were grossly under-reported, and there are still have concerns over the safety of it.
Marti Oakley in an article on Activist Post entitled “Vaccines: Human and Animal DNA” points out that:
Cell lines, which can be derived from aborted human babies, can last for decades and are developed from a single type of cell. Yet it is known that after continuous culturing these lines begin to mutate into cancer-causing agents. If these cell lines do this spontaneously in the lab, what are the chances they are doing the same thing once inside the human body where the culturing never ends? … We are being injected via vaccine with bits and pieces of other human beings; with the bits and pieces of other mammals. Whatever the intended purpose of vaccines was initially, it is apparent that too little is either known or acknowledged regarding the potential adverse side affects from co-mingling the DNA of humans and animals and the potential for viral and bacterial cross-contaminations that can and do occur.
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #5: MSG (Monosodium Glutamate)
MSG (monosodium glutamate or sodium glutamate) is the sodium salt of the glutamic acid (glutamate), which is one of the amino acids or protein building blocks. Free glutamic acid is a neurotransmitter that your brain, nervous system, eyes, pancreas and other organs need to function and start certain processes in your body. MSG has become notorious for being a hidden ingredient in many foods which creates the illusion of protein or more food being present in what you’re eating – when they’re really not. In 1959, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) labeled MSG as “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS), yet since then it has acknowledged the existence of an “MSG Symptom Complex” which describes short-term reactions to MSG. These include numerous side effects which people experience after eating MSG, such as numbness, headaches, fatigue, disorientation and heart palpitations.
Despite its GRAS rating, the FDA commissioned a study on MSG in 1995, probably because of people complaining about “Chinese Restaurant Syndrome”. This study found that MSG Symptom Complex can involve symptoms such as:
Burning sensation
Facial pressure or tightnes
Chest pain or difficulty breathin
Headache
Nausea
Palpitation
Numbness
Tingling
Bronchospasm
Drowsiness
Weakness
How many people are sensitive to MSG? It has been estimated up to 40%. Dr. Russell Blaylock, a board-certified neurosurgeon and author of “Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills”, has done considerable research on MSG. He calls it an excitotoxin, meaning it overexcites your cells to the point of damage or death, causing brain damage to varying degrees, and potentially triggering or worsening amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig’s disease), Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s. All three diseases can develop gradually.
Why is MSG being used in vaccines? It’s being used because it is a stabilizer that prevents or slows down oxidation or damage from light. This website claims that MSG is only added to some vaccines: “Glutamate is added as a nutrient to the growth medium for MMR-II and is not in the final product in significant amounts; monosodium glutamate is added to FluMist (0.188 mg/0.2 mL dose); monosodium L-glutamate is added to ProQuad (.4mg), Zostavax (.62mg) and Varivax (.5mg); and potassium glutamate is added to RabAvert (1mg).”
Still, since MSG is a known toxin with deleterious effects on human health, why do doctors willingly inject it into people?
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #6: Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde is a foul-smelling chemical used a preservative and biocide. The IARC categorizes it as a class 1 definite carcinogen, and the National Toxicology Program concluded in this study that:
Formaldehyde is known to be a human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity from studies in humans and supporting data on mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Formaldehyde was first listed in the Second Annual Report on Carcinogens in 1981 as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence from studies in experimental animals. Since that time, additional cancer studies in humans have been published …
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #7: Antibiotics
Antibiotics are typically used in vaccine production and manufacture. Antibiotics were once the crown jewel of Western medicine, with their ability to wipe out infectious diseases, but many have long known they are a double-edged sword. Antibiotics indiscriminately kill all the bacteria in your system, helpful or harmful. This obviously destroys the balance of bacteria in your gut, which forms the basis of your immune system. Thus, antibiotics invite all sorts of future problems and disease (unless you quickly re-establish the proper balance of bacteria, e.g. with probiotics), including fungal attacks.
I have previously written about the phenomenon of antibiotic overuse. There have been many reports in the last few years that Big Pharma is no longer investing in antibiotics, because every time they invent a new antibiotic drug, the bacteria adapt to it and change. This process is fueling the rise of superbugs. The FDA states some of the antibiotics used during vaccine manufacture include neomycin, polymyxin B, streptomycin and gentamicin. Some of these belong to the aminoglycoside class of antibiotics, which include side effects such as dizziness, nausea, renal (kidney) toxicity and ototoxicity (hearing loss).
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #8: Squalene
Squalene was an experimental toxic vaccine adjuvant added to vaccines around the time of the first Gulf War. Squalene has been implicated in GWS (Gulf War Syndrome) in this study, and the DoD (Department of Defense) conveniently “lost” (read destroyed) 700,000 immunization records, which might have told us why squalene was showing up in Gulf War veterans’ blood samples. ProjectCensored.com commented:
A military lab researcher interviewed by Insight was quoted as saying, “We have found soldiers who are not sick that do not have the antibodies, and we found soldiers who never left the United States, but who got shots (administered by the military) who are sick—and they have squalene in their systems. We found people who served overseas in various parts of the desert that are sick who have squalene. And we found people who served in the desert but were civilians who never got the shots, who are not sick and do not have squalene.”
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #9: Peanut Oil #65
Peanuts are known as a very common allergen, yet despite this, there are some vaccines which contain peanut oil. It has been used for a very long time. In fact, Dr. Lawrence Palevsky writes that it has been in use since 1960, and since Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers are not required by law to list every single ingredient used in culturing vaccines, there may be no real way to now which vaccines have traces of it. He writes:
If current vaccine package inserts do not contain the specific evidence that peanut oil, or peanut meal, is contained within the final vaccine product, it does not mean that peanut antigen is not in the final vaccine product. Vaccine manufacturers use different growth media on which to manufacture the vaccines. They do not report, and I believe are not required to report, the exact ingredients in all of the growth media. Therefore, we may not know whether peanut antigen is used in the vaccine manufacturing process just by reading through the package inserts … and, it may, or may not, have anything to do with an attempt to purposely hide the information that peanut antigen is present in vaccines.
Peanut oil is far from the only adjuvant used in vaccines which is highly allergenic. Other vaccine antigens, such as those used in Hepatitis B vaccines and the HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccine Gardasil, are manufactured in yeast cells. Yeast proteins have been shown to cause allergic reactions in people. Do you want this stuff in your bloodstream?
Toxic Vaccine Adjuvant #10: GMOs
On top of all the toxic vaccine adjuvants listed above, the GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) issue also pertains to vaccines, because vaccines are now being made with genetically engineered viruses. This goes to show that, sadly, the so-called sacred precautionary principle of science is often thrown to the wind when the potential for massive profit arises. We simply do not know what effect genetically engineered viruses will have on the human body long term. What happens when foreign DNA is inserted into the body? Does it trigger undesirable changes in human cells? Does the human body treat it as foreign and attack it? Does it combine with human DNA, and if so, is the new combined DNA an enhancement or impairment? Will it transfer to future generations? We’re clearly moving into unknown and potentially very dangerous territory by allowing this stuff to be be injected into our bodies.
This study warned of the dangers of using genetically engineered viruses in vaccines:
Genetically modified (GM) viruses and genetically engineered virus-vector vaccines possess significant unpredictability and a number of inherent harmful potential hazards … Important questions concerning effects on nontargeted individuals within the same species or other species remain unknown. Horizontal transfer of genes, though lacking supportive experimental or epidemiological investigations, is well established. New hybrid virus progenies resulting from genetic recombination between genetically engineered vaccine viruses and their naturally occurring relatives may possess totally unpredictable characteristics with regard to host preferences and disease-causing potentials. Furthermore, when genetically modified or engineered virus particles break down in the environment, their nuclei acids are released … There is inadequate knowledge to define either the probability of unintended events or the consequences of genetic modifications.
Other Toxic Vaccine Adjuvants
In addition the above top 10 toxic vaccine adjuvants, it would also be wise to take note of many other possible vaccine fillers and ingredients, which include:
• acetone (solvent used in fingernail polish remover)
• ammonium sulfate
• amphotericin B
• betapropiolactone
• formalin
• gelatin
• glycerol
• hydrolized gelatin
• phenol red indicator
• phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
• potassium diphosphate
• potassium monophosphate
• polymyxin B
• polysorbate 20
• polysorbate 80
• residual MRC5 proteins
• sorbitol
• streptomycin (antibiotic)
• tri(n)butylphosphate (neurotoxin)
Investigating vaccines fully and deeply is like opening a witch’s “Pandora’s box” brew … who knows what creatures and concoctions are lurking in that syringe?
***
Again, check out the website http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/toxic-vaccine-adjuvants-the-top-10/and see for yourself.
Now there are many people out there that would argue that the Web is not a good way to study vaccines, among many other things. I hate to burst their bubble. It takes nothing more nor less than to find a retired nurse or doctor and have a little chat with them about what we are discussing here, and you fast find the truth of the matter.
As I stated plenty of times before, some of the biggest culprits exist within the circles of our friends and family. And it’s very easy to believe friends and family because we trust them so much. They cannot work outside of their indoctrination, let alone the fact that they could be fired if they do not toe the line.
I’ve spoken to numerous retired nurses especially and everyone of them have said the same thing, “there is no way I would get a vaccine, nor would I advise inoculation on any level.” You can have a listen to the broadcast that Jimmy X and myself done back in 2010 with his mother, whom was a nurse all of her life. Maybe Jimmy’s mother would have said something different had she still been employed? That is left to conjecture. The fact is though, Jimmy’s mother wasn’t the only nurse of course that we had discussed this very issue with.
As it is that this article is becoming extremely long, I will end this here for now. I will soon write part two, where I will start by explaining how men of War were being accused of bringing back diseases from other countries, however had never left their shores. Instead they’d been inoculated with the very diseases that they were accused of bringing back from foreign countries.
Thank you for reading and please don’t forget to check out some of the other great articles here on the Renegade Tribune.