Power To The People.......
December 26, 2015
Whether Americans know it or not, Hillary Rodham Clinton will be the next President of the United States. Each and every so-called Royal Family, along with the Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, is seeing to it that this happens, which in turn will place Prince William in the seat as King of the New World Order. 2016 will be a time like never before. We watch a lot of science fiction movies and there are those that are utterly fantasy like Star Wars, and others that are really over the top that include a sentient tree and what appears to be a psychopathic raccoon fighting aliens with a green alien hottie and some guy who nick names himself Star Lord. While those movies are fun and non thinking films, there are others like Elysium and Gravity that attempt to pull you into what appear to be real science involving many areas including cultural anthropology. We have been told countless times by scientists that the planet in a lot of respects is doomed to possible climate disruption, environmental toxicity, and the lack of resources. We are also vulnerable with regard to possible radioactive contamination due to disasters that have happened like in the case of Fukushima disaster in Japan or possible Mutually assured destruction due war.
We have new diseases to combat in the future and other possible disasters looming as well. Is this all part of something that is soon to become an extreme extinction level event and are there protocols in place to protect at least some of the inhabitants of earth? With all of the taxpayer money used to watch the comet pass dangerously close to Mars we did not get many pictures, nor many answers from NASA. The best picture was released by an astronomer that used a telescope to capture dramatic footage of the Martian atmosphere exploding as the comet passes overhead some 87,000 miles up. The event was caught by Dr. Fritz Helmut Hemmerich, who recorded the action with a video telescope from his perch on Mount Teide, more than two miles above Tenerife, in the Canary Islands.
Watching the atmosphere explode into a huge ball of fire was impressive and frightening at the same time. The fusion of the comet and the explosion made for one hell of a dynamic astronomical event. Dynamic astronomical events occur on a large scale. Astrophysics is a rapidly changing science, new cataclysmic process are discovered regularly. It is possible that there is a presently unknown mechanism that would cause a planet wide nuclear based detonation if triggered by Plutonium based nuclear explosions. You can be certain that an astronomical scale dynamic event like that would remove all life from the Earth. Once again we could see an event like this happen on earth if by some horrible cosmic bad luck a miscalculation happened at the CERN supercollider caused an unbelievable explosion that would rip a whole in space time or if the reactors at the Fukushima Nuclear plant became hotter than a neutron star causing a chain reaction that could bring about a dynamic astronomical or extinction level event.
We have been also worried about the sun and the astronomical event that could create a geomagnetic disaster from a coronal mass ejection. This would cause satellite shutdown, massive fires and in an extreme case ignite the atmosphere. All of these events are possible, many scientists will say they are improbable, however, astro-dynamics are tricky things and what is labeled as hypothetical science can change rapidly, or as they say in the Bible, in the twinkling of an eye. “Behold, I show you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.” In other words things happen more rapidly that if you blink you mill miss the miracles that will happen as we pass through the astro-dynamic wormhole.
The film Interstellar hints at the apocalypse that we are all too familiar with. An apocalypse that has had the blessing of NASA, some scientists and others. Climate disruption and environmental catastrophe is the invisible phantom that in reality has not prompted a study into possible evacuation of the planet. At least a study that we know of in the mainstream. Many times we have discussed the possibility of plans that the government have discussed privately like Alternative 3. Speculative science about a possible evacuation of planet earth dates back to before the official space program was created by NASA. During the Apollo missions there has been information spread by Richard Hoagland and Timothy Good that when Armstrong landed on the moon there were communications that purport that there were saucer craft lined up to greet the astronauts in 1969 and that one of the purposes of the landing was to do a ritual on the moon in order to communicate with these beings. This was a very important meeting because it started the negotiations with Russia about a joint space program to learn more about these beings.
According to Leslie Watkins, David Ambrose, and Jim Keith, this was all part of a plan called “Alternative 3”, where even before we heard of things like global warming, it was already theorized that the earth was on a collision course with doom. Whether it was from an ecological catastrophe, overpopulation or spent resources the aliens were colluding with American military intelligence to provide an escape plan or an evacuation protocol. The story wound up being presented as a documentary on a British program named “Science Report” and later as a book detailing the plans for a “cosmic Noah’s ark” that would be loaded with human beings for possible colonization on the moon or Mars. While the documentary was a hoax, and aired on April Fool’s Day, Jim Keith called it clever disinformation where the truth was buried in the lie and deserved further investigation. Another possibility is far darker and clandestine and includes a secret society of scientists called “the JASON Society.” This secret group was first spoken of my William Cooper author of the book Behold a Pale Horse. In the book Cooper reports that President Eisenhower put together the Jason Scholars to investigate all things cosmic including extra-terrestrials, UFO’s and the so called breakaway group that would have to evacuate the planet to start civilization elsewhere. There were many proposals for stations on the moon, mars and a more complex project called “The Lucifer Project.”
The theories of Richard Hoagland, and the rumors of William Cooper are taken to their frightening extreme in this dark tale of conspiracy, cover-up and the horrible aftermath of disaster. The Lucifer Project seems improbable and has been said to be impossible However if you look back at space history and how secret societies have had agendas to create a binary star or sun system in our cosmic neighborhood you may want to prepare for a shove into the “new Saturnalian age.” The Lucifer project has been jeered as a load of pseudo science because the mission’s alleged goal is to detonate a huge nuclear explosion on Jupiter or Saturn in order to re ignite the gas giants into suns in order to create Goldilocks conditions with their many moons and outlying planets within their respective systems. These moons and planets would then become inhabitable and warmer in order to sustain life, life that would be comfortable and sustaining with a new sun with the right amount of distance to provide adequate warmth. The Lucifer Project had been conceptualized by the JASON scholars and was later made popular by writer Arthur C. Clarke in the book 2010 as well.
There have been many skeptics that have said that in order for this to happen there would have to be an overwhelming nuclear fission explosion more powerful than we could possibly create in order to convert a gas giant into a sun. Moreover the nuclear reaction would have to be inside the planet and not on the surface of the planet. The potential for a runaway nuclear fusion process that would ignite Saturn as a new sun, Lucifer, appears to be a genuine concern. Based on several accounts, the Lucifer Project is an exo-political topic that if real will impact every life on planet earth. In 2000, a body of work dating back the late 1950’s was released from a library at Kirtland Air Force Base, It was titled, “A Study of Lunar Research Flights.” The reports revealed that the United States of America had been interested in setting off a nuclear detonation on the dark side of the moon. This was known as Project A119. Leonard Reiffel, the physicist who fronted the project, produced eight reports on the plan’s feasibility between May 1958 and January 1959. According to the reports, the motivation for such a project was threefold: scientific, military, and political.
The scientific purpose of the project dealt with the environmental impact of a nuclear explosion on the moon’s surface. The military was interested in placing arms in space, and the political goal was to send a message of threat by example to our Soviet counterparts. The project leaders needed to ascertain the likely extent of the environmental disturbances, such as biological or radiological contamination, that might occur if a bomb were detonated on the surface of the moon. The major obstacle in their path was public opinion. The public was not to know about the project until the political climate could be properly manipulated. But, eventually, the project was scrapped when they could not come up with a way to either obtain public approval or carry the test out in secret. The reports revealed in 2000 had theorized, however, that while the impact of the test would be very low, it would definitely put a blemish on the face of the man in the moon. After Galileo had finished its mission, NASA decided it was time to plunge the probe into Jupiter. This raised the concern of those who knew of what the Jason Scholars wanted to do with project Lucifer. On September 21st, 2003, the probe slammed into Jupiter carrying with it a nuclear payload. Nothing was said about what the result was until October of 2003 when it was reported that there was a enormous black smudge on the planet’s surface. The spot was 7,900 miles wide, roughly the size of planet earth. It was speculated that when Galileo exploded above Jupiter, its plutonium payload ignited the hydrogen filled atmosphere and caused a chain reaction.
The explosion was 2,800 times the size of the largest atomic bomb that had ever been detonated on planet earth. That bomb was the largest ever made at 50 megatons. When it was detonated on earth it caused a fireball that was about 2.8 miles in diameter. Now keep in mind that William Cooper claimed that the JASON Society have been working together and conducting experiments using nuclear fusion to somehow ignite gas giants like Jupiter or Saturn in order to create a distant sun capable of sustaining life on the moons of both Saturn and Jupiter and other outlying planetoids. However it seemed that the JASON-like experiments were continuing in order to explore the possibility of water on the moon. Water that could be used for interstellar missions, and other missions to Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. On June 18th, 2009, the LCROSS mission was designed to search for water on the moon by sending a rocket crashing into the moon, causing a massive explosion on the lunar surface. This explosion released materials from the lunar surface that were analyzed for the presence of hydrated minerals to tell researchers if water is there or not. The two main components of the LCROSS mission were the Shepherding Spacecraft and the Centaur upper stage rocket.
The Shepherding Spacecraft guided the rocket to a site selected on the moon with a high probability of containing water. They had only one chance with this mission in finding water, the researchers had to be very precise where they programmed the Shepherding Spacecraft to guide the rocket. The result was a huge explosion that could be seen from earth. In December of 2012, when doomsday prognosticators were looking to the skies for clues to our demise, it was shown that many of the planets in the solar system were going through some major upheavals. The planets Jupiter and Saturn were showing signs of pole shifting and Jupiter, it was reported became magnetically inverted. The Cassini spacecraft passed very close to Saturn and sent back pictures of a horrific looking blood red vortex. It was a hurricane near its north pole. Cassini initially spotted the storm in 2004 through its heat-seeking infrared camera, when the North Pole was shrouded in darkness during winter. The spacecraft first caught the storm in visible light in 2009, when NASA controllers altered Cassini’s orbit so that it could view the poles.
The result was an image of a hexagon at the pole. This was a creepy synchronicity because the hexagon and the number 6 have always had a relationship with the god Saturn. Saturn has always been associated with the black sun or the dark twin to our Sun. Saturn is also associated with the golden age a time where there were no seasons. In a time of two suns, the question is whether or not the seasons would change. The hexagon of Saturn is an alchemical symbol for the black sun and it was there that NASA and the so-called JASON scholars had considered aiming the Cassini space probe and having it barrel into the planet and detonate it after it was decommissioned. NASA decided that the hexagon needed more observance and kept Cassini orbiting the planet.
Now, what William Cooper says is true, and if the JASON Scholars have been busy trying to find planets to inhabit or suns to ignite then their third and final try to ignite Saturn could happen in September of 2017. Starting in late 2016, the Cassini space probe will zip between Saturn and its innermost ring a total of 22 times in a mission phase now known as the “Cassini Grand Finale,” which will end in September 2017 when the probe intentionally dives into the gas giant’s atmosphere into the hexagon and detonates its nuclear payload inside the planet. Will the Cassini space probe be used as a nuclear trigger to ignite Saturn and terra-form its moons for human colonization?
In the Hollywood film depiction of Philip K. Dick’s Minority Report, there is a scene where Tom Cruise is called into work in the year 2054. As he gets into his futuristic car we notice that he does not drive it. The car is automatically inserted into traffic and we learn that even though there are no drivers in the future there still are traffic jams to deal with. The difficult thing to handle is not exactly the fact that in the future you don’t have to get behind the wheel, the hard part is getting used to driving sideways and in some cases not even using roads at all, which harkens back to another futuristic film Back to the Future where professor Brown returns in his time-traveling Delorean and tells young Marty McFly — that where they are going they don’t need roads. Self-driving cars have captured the imagination of Hollywood for decades, but it could become a reality in the next five years.
This new technology is being spearheaded not only by automakers, but also Google. Earlier in December, the company announced that it has developed its first complete prototype of a driver-less car. According to the project’s director, Chris Urmson, the commercialization of such vehicles will begin around between 2017 and 2020. Google plans to participate in the upcoming Automotive News World Congress scheduled for January 13-15 to showcase the vehicle to prominent auto manufacturers. Automakers, on the other hand, have also been working on developing their own autonomous driving systems. Tesla has worked with Google on the system but said that it was too expensive. The electronic car marker’s D series of its iconic Model S vehicle features a semi-autonomous system. The company plans to launch its fully autonomous vehicle by 2023. During an interview with Bloomberg, Tesla’s Elon Musk said that the company is targeting a driving experience “where you could literally get in the car, go to sleep and wake up at your destination.”
Meanwhile, General Motors could start installing semi-autonomous driving feature, called super cruise, in its Cadillac by as early as 2016. Other automakers, such as Nissan’s Infiniti and Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz have already been offering some forms of limited autonomous driving systems. While car companies are trying to get the jump on driverless vehicles, city planners have already become aware of the future of public transportation which includes pilotless aircraft, remote controlled city train transit and driverless busses. It is now being proposed that this type of travel will be preferred in the future because of traffic congestion and other problems that the driverless cars bring to the road. Public transit consultants agree that driverless cars have a bright future ahead, but human transit is more practical especially on highly congested roads. Luca Guala of transport think tank Mobility Think Lab writes in a letter the following:
"Driverless cars very likely have a bright future, but cars they will always be. They may be able to go and park themselves out of harm’s way, they may be able to do more trips per day, but they will still need a 10 ft wide lane to move a flow of 3600 persons per hour. In fact, the advantage of robotic drivers in an extra-urban setting may be very interesting, but their advantages completely fade away in an urban street, where the frequent obstacles and interruptions will make robots provide a performance that will be equal, or worse than, that of a human driver, at least in terms of capacity and density."
Driverless buses, Guala argues, “are more efficient because they can carry more people than cars and eventually may be cheaper than the regular bus system because you don’t have to pay a driver.” Another advantage of driverless buses over cars is that they follow set routes, so they are much easier to implement and run. The routes can be changed if needed. Navigation is less of an issue when compared to cars because buses use travel specific lines — they aren’t roaming all over the place. Alongside legal technicalities, this has traditionally been the biggest challenge to overcome if automated technology becomes synonymous on roads. Based on its record, America leads the commercial airline industry in safety. And for most passengers, that information alone provides all the confidence in the world. But there will always be nervous fliers who need to know: Who are they trusting with their lives, human or machine? Today, in the quest for safety, many of us are unaware that airplanes largely fly themselves. Airline computers and electronic control systems allow pilots to fly “hands off” beginning soon after takeoff, continuing through the flight route and — in very rare cases — all the way through touchdown. However that does not mean that Pilots are not there to observe how things are going.
The future though, is leaning towards shrinking the crew down to a few people. Improved technology has contributed to shrinking cockpit staff. Before the Boeing 757 began service in the 1980s, most large airliners had a standard flight deck staff of three. They were the pilot, co-pilot and a flight engineer who managed pressurization, heating, fuel and pneumatic systems. When those systems became automated, the standard flight deck crew went from three to two. Going from two to one pilot would be a difficult threshold for the airline community to cross. Two onboard pilots allow for a safety net — and that is just about it. Eventually computers will replace the pilots. Which begs the question, as the future unfolds would you ride on a plane that is pilotless? Would you ride in or own a car that does not need a driver, and would you trust public transportation if there was no one on board you paid your fare to? Nobody thinks twice about riding an automated train. There are three separate automatic train transit systems operating at McCarran International Airport near Las Vegas, Nevada.
The people mover system consists of three separate lines, one connecting the Main Terminal to the C Gate Concourse, another connecting the Main Terminal to the D Gate Concourse, and the third connecting the D Gate Concourse to Terminal 3, which opened in July 2012. There will be a fourth transit automated people mover that will be built which will be an extension of the Las Vegas Monorail, this will link Terminal 1 and Terminal 3 with central Las Vegas four miles away from the airport. That is four miles on a train that will be under robot and computer control. Is that something you would trust to get you from the airport to your hotel on the strip? Many people who fear technology can think of many disadvantages to the new world of driverless transportation. Many people are very concerned when they realize that a computer has the responsibility of getting you safely to your destination and during that time you are placing your safety and well being into the hands of technology.
Also manufacturers of this technology are working with an all electronic system run by various software. Computers, software, satellite communication. All of the following can be hacked. When hackers get into this information there is no limit to what they can do with it. Track our travel destinations, time we spend out of our house, where our homes are and even worse be able to control our cars. It has been demonstrated that electronic systems in your car now can be hacked, where things like acceleration, braking and steering can be controlled form an anonymous source. Driverless cars could put the nation’s 232,300 taxi drivers and chauffer’s out of work. Then there’s the 647,500 bus drivers, 70% of whom work for school districts, they would be out of work too. Just fewer than eight hundred and eighty thousand people would be laid off because of the new technology. According to the article “Google Cars Drive Themselves, In Traffic,” by John Markoff, Markoff explains how there are a bunch of legal issues that may erupt if robotic cars were legal. Under current law, a human must be in control of a car at all times, but what does that mean if the human is not really paying attention as the car crosses through, say, a school zone, figuring that the robot is driving more safely than he would?
In the event of an accident, you have to figure out who would be liable — would it be the person in the car or the maker of the software?” These are serious consequences that the government must take into consideration. In the article by Markoff involving the Google Car, the only accident that did occur was that it was rear ended by a human driver. Robotic cars won’t fully eliminate car accidents, but will reduce them significantly. If say in 2020, we do have robotic cars, it would be very difficult to have all vehicles be robotic unless there were to be a law passed. Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk believes that cars you can control will eventually be outlawed in favor of ones that are controlled by robots. The simple explanation: Musk believes computers will do a much better job than us to the point where, statistically, humans would be a liability on roadways.
“I don’t think we have to worry about autonomous cars, because that’s sort of like a narrow form of AI,” Musk told NVidia co-founder and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang at the technology company’s annual developers conference today. “It would be like an elevator. They used to have elevator operators, and then we developed some simple circuitry to have elevators just automatically come to the floor that you’re at … the car is going to be just like that.” So what happens when we get there? Musk said that the obvious move is to outlaw driving cars. “It’s too dangerous,” Musk said. “You can’t have a person driving a two-ton death machine.” Even if that were to be the case, Musk cautioned what would be a slow sea change in the automotive industry, something that’s already been the case with hybrid and electric vehicles.
Musk noted that the hardest part of helping cars drive themselves is what happens when vehicles are traveling between 15 and 50 miles per hour. “That’s where you get a lot of unexpected things,” Musk said. That list includes road closures, open manhole covers, children playing, and bicyclists. There are lots of things that your robot car could run into without human remorse. The conversion of the driverless cars could be daunting when one wonders if the autopilots of robotic cars wouldn’t be able to detect the unpredictability of human driving. Down the road, eliminating the driver from vehicles could change the way land space is developed. Because people may be more willing to commute further to work, pushing out suburban sprawl. Considerable space is currently tied up for parking in cities could be freed up and used for development if cars could drop off their passenger and go park themselves further away. Eliminating the human could cut down on drunk driving and careless mistakes, by replacing them with autonomous controls triggered by sensors that automatically brake if there’s a quick stop in front of the car.
To know if autonomous vehicles really are safer, or advantageous to society, or if it’s even feasible to pull this idea off on a large scale, we have to get the robot cars on the road to study their impact, which means people have to start buying and using them. Some form of government incentive, like with electric vehicles, are a possible solution. Google claims that their driverless vehicles have gone 500.000 miles without a crash…however there was one fender bender when human driver behind the driverless car rear ended the vehicle. As much as the thought of these vehicles sounds a bit difficult — reports and statistics look optimistic for a future with driverless vehicles. Now it is up to the consumer to decide, and the lawmakers to provide the laws for these vehicles.