← Older revision
Revision as of 13:51, May 24, 2015
Line 260:
Line 260:
:::No progress yet about the interwiki prefix? --[[User:Plasmarelais|Plasmarelais]] 10:15, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
:::No progress yet about the interwiki prefix? --[[User:Plasmarelais|Plasmarelais]] 10:15, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
:::'''Solved'''. Interwiki prefix is <code><nowiki>[[pt:]]</nowiki></code>. --[[User:Plasmarelais|Plasmarelais]] 15:31, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
:::'''Solved'''. Interwiki prefix is <code><nowiki>[[pt:]]</nowiki></code>. --[[User:Plasmarelais|Plasmarelais]] 15:31, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
−
−
=== (zh-cn) Chinese version ===
−
−
=== (mu) Mirror Universe edition ===
−
The MU edition of MA could use some attention from admins, mainly deleting superfluous empty articles and categories that don't belong and/or aren't needed. - [[User:Bell'Orso|Bell'Orso]] 14:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
−
−
== Additional suggested versions ==
−
===(tl) Klingon version?===
−
I suggest we create a user project to translate MA into Klingon and convert the Esperanto wiki to that language. Wouldn't it be more sensible for a Star Trek site to have Klingon? [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] 21:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
−
−
:A possible "MA/Klingon" should use the fake language code for the Klingon language (tl/tlh), not misuse the Esperanto one. Anyway, I don't see much potential for that... -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 21:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
−
::i read somewhere that there are 2 million speakers of eo and 700,00 or so speakers of tl. Now, i don't know about the ratios of star trek fans that know eo, but its safe to assume that its a small minority. Everyone who speaks tl is a star trek obsessive, beyond even most of us here. Which makes more sense to have as a language? (And i acknowledge that a Klingon language version would prolly be as active as Esperanto, but at least Klingon is logical. Also, we could prolly bug the [http://www.kli.org KLI] for some help if we wanted to. I'm sure someone would pounce on it.) --[[User:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00FF00;">''6/6''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00a000;">''Neural Transceiver''</span>]]</sub> 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
−
:::P.S. the idea of Esperanto being a real language and Klingon being a fake are mutually exclusive. They are both constructed languages, with full syntaxes, and vocabularies. the only difference is the REASON thy were created. --[[User:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00FF00;">''6/6''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00a000;">''Neural Transceiver''</span>]]</sub> 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
−
−
For all those people that don't know, there is a former Klingon wiki. It is no longer a wiki but just an encyclopedia the URL is http://klingon.wikia.com/wiki/ghItlh%27a%27. The Wikimedia Foundation did not allow the Klingon wiki, so why would they allow subwiki of Klingon on anther site. I do not see a reason for making a subwiki on Memory alpha based in Klingon when they have a perfectly good one, on MA. Plus the link to the wiki is permanently placed under information on the home page of Memory alpha, so anyone that comes to MA will be forwarded to the Klingon encyclopedia if they read through the first page. – [[User:Randomname|Randomname]] 20:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
−
−
:First of all, a better way to get to the Klingon wiki is via the internal link [[w:c:klingon]]. Second of all, it most certainly ''is'' still a wiki and still editable. Third, Wikimedia had nothing against the Klingon encyclopedia (or Klingon Wikipedia), they just felt it wasn't consistent with their mandate and goals (for a variety of reasons). Fourth, Wikimedia has nothing to do with Memory Alpha or any of the other Wikia wikis - Wikimedia and Wikia are two totally separate entities, with two separate sets of goals and reasons for being. Wikimedia has nothing to say about a Klingon wiki on another site, and I believe they probably couldn't care less about the matter. Fifth, if and when a Klingon version is created (and that would only happen if there were enough Klingon-fluent editors available to support said version), it really wouldn't be any different than any of the other language versions of MA - basically the same articles and structure as MA/en, just translated to Klingon. It would be a ''Star Trek'' encyclopedia in Klingon. The Klingon Encyclopedia is a completely different entity - it's a general encyclopedia in Klingon, just as Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia in English and many other languages (just not Klingon any more). And yes, there's a link to the Klingon Encyclopedia at the bottom of the MA main page... but what's your point? If there ever is a Klingon version of MA (MA/tl or MA/tlh), there would be interwiki links on the left in the "in other languages" box just as there is for all the other languages. This would, again, have nothing to do with the Klingon Encyclopedia, but with MA. All clear? :) -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 00:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
−
−
==== from "A Klingon Version of Memory Alpha" ====
−
''Yet another suggestion:''
−
−
Ok, how about a virson of Memory Alpha but it is in the Klingon language. I can translate (some). --From TrekkyStar Live Long and Prosper 00:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
−
:I'm not sure there will be enough support for this. We have a number of real world language versions that are abandoned, and even the Mirror Universe version (which is English) has essentially been abandoned. I don't think the Klingon version would have any better a fate. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 01:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
=== (ro) Romanian version? ===
=== (ro) Romanian version? ===
Line 306:
Line 283:
::::I've added a few more pages to your work area for you to get started on. Meanwhile, I'll put through a request to have the new version created. It will probably take a few days. Keep up the good work! -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] ([[User talk:Renegade54|talk]]) 14:45, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
::::I've added a few more pages to your work area for you to get started on. Meanwhile, I'll put through a request to have the new version created. It will probably take a few days. Keep up the good work! -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] ([[User talk:Renegade54|talk]]) 14:45, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
+
+
=== (zh-cn) Chinese version ===
+
+
=== (mu) Mirror Universe edition ===
+
The MU edition of MA could use some attention from admins, mainly deleting superfluous empty articles and categories that don't belong and/or aren't needed. - [[User:Bell'Orso|Bell'Orso]] 14:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
+
+
== Additional suggested versions ==
+
===(tl) Klingon version?===
+
I suggest we create a user project to translate MA into Klingon and convert the Esperanto wiki to that language. Wouldn't it be more sensible for a Star Trek site to have Klingon? [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] 21:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
+
+
:A possible "MA/Klingon" should use the fake language code for the Klingon language (tl/tlh), not misuse the Esperanto one. Anyway, I don't see much potential for that... -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 21:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
+
::i read somewhere that there are 2 million speakers of eo and 700,00 or so speakers of tl. Now, i don't know about the ratios of star trek fans that know eo, but its safe to assume that its a small minority. Everyone who speaks tl is a star trek obsessive, beyond even most of us here. Which makes more sense to have as a language? (And i acknowledge that a Klingon language version would prolly be as active as Esperanto, but at least Klingon is logical. Also, we could prolly bug the [http://www.kli.org KLI] for some help if we wanted to. I'm sure someone would pounce on it.) --[[User:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00FF00;">''6/6''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00a000;">''Neural Transceiver''</span>]]</sub> 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
+
:::P.S. the idea of Esperanto being a real language and Klingon being a fake are mutually exclusive. They are both constructed languages, with full syntaxes, and vocabularies. the only difference is the REASON thy were created. --[[User:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00FF00;">''6/6''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Sdamon|<span style="color:#00a000;">''Neural Transceiver''</span>]]</sub> 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
+
+
For all those people that don't know, there is a former Klingon wiki. It is no longer a wiki but just an encyclopedia the URL is http://klingon.wikia.com/wiki/ghItlh%27a%27. The Wikimedia Foundation did not allow the Klingon wiki, so why would they allow subwiki of Klingon on anther site. I do not see a reason for making a subwiki on Memory alpha based in Klingon when they have a perfectly good one, on MA. Plus the link to the wiki is permanently placed under information on the home page of Memory alpha, so anyone that comes to MA will be forwarded to the Klingon encyclopedia if they read through the first page. – [[User:Randomname|Randomname]] 20:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
+
+
:First of all, a better way to get to the Klingon wiki is via the internal link [[w:c:klingon]]. Second of all, it most certainly ''is'' still a wiki and still editable. Third, Wikimedia had nothing against the Klingon encyclopedia (or Klingon Wikipedia), they just felt it wasn't consistent with their mandate and goals (for a variety of reasons). Fourth, Wikimedia has nothing to do with Memory Alpha or any of the other Wikia wikis - Wikimedia and Wikia are two totally separate entities, with two separate sets of goals and reasons for being. Wikimedia has nothing to say about a Klingon wiki on another site, and I believe they probably couldn't care less about the matter. Fifth, if and when a Klingon version is created (and that would only happen if there were enough Klingon-fluent editors available to support said version), it really wouldn't be any different than any of the other language versions of MA - basically the same articles and structure as MA/en, just translated to Klingon. It would be a ''Star Trek'' encyclopedia in Klingon. The Klingon Encyclopedia is a completely different entity - it's a general encyclopedia in Klingon, just as Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia in English and many other languages (just not Klingon any more). And yes, there's a link to the Klingon Encyclopedia at the bottom of the MA main page... but what's your point? If there ever is a Klingon version of MA (MA/tl or MA/tlh), there would be interwiki links on the left in the "in other languages" box just as there is for all the other languages. This would, again, have nothing to do with the Klingon Encyclopedia, but with MA. All clear? :) -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 00:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
+
+
==== from "A Klingon Version of Memory Alpha" ====
+
''Yet another suggestion:''
+
+
Ok, how about a virson of Memory Alpha but it is in the Klingon language. I can translate (some). --From TrekkyStar Live Long and Prosper 00:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
+
:I'm not sure there will be enough support for this. We have a number of real world language versions that are abandoned, and even the Mirror Universe version (which is English) has essentially been abandoned. I don't think the Klingon version would have any better a fate. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 01:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
=== (et) Estonian version? ===
=== (et) Estonian version? ===