DELTA FOCUS|Funded Programs|Violence Prevention|Injury Center|CDC
The DELTA FOCUS Program: Intimate Partner Violence is Preventable
On this Page
About the Program
Program Concepts
History
National Engagement
Evaluation and Resources
Contact Information for Grantees
About the Program
DELTA FOCUS (Domestic Violence Prevention Enhancements and Leadership Through Alliances, Focusing on Outcomes for Communities United with States) is a five-year cooperative agreement funding 10 state domestic violence coalition grantees to engage in primary prevention of intimate partner violence (IPV). Primary prevention means stopping IPV before it occurs.
Use map to access website's of funded state domestic violence coalitions.
Intimate partner violence is a serious, preventable public health problem that affects millions of Americans and results in serious consequences for victims, families, and communities.
In an average minute, about 24 people are victims of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner.1
In 2010, 241 males and 1095 females were murdered by an intimate partner.2
In one year, more than 12 million women and men reported being a victim of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner.1
In their lifetime, 1 in 4 women (24.3%) and 1 in 7 men (13.8%) report experiencing severe physical violence (e.g., hit with a fist or something hard, beaten, slammed against something) by an intimate partner.1
For additional information on why IPV is an important public health issue, see our web page about the magnitude and consequences.
The DELTA FOCUS Program
DELTA FOCUS grantees support IPV prevention at the national, state and local level through strategies that address the structural determinants of health at the outer layers (societal and community) of the social-ecological model. This means, in addition to addressing individual and relationship factors associated with IPV outcomes, grantees support work to change the environments and conditions in which people live, work and play. To do this, economic and social policies and processes and norms that shape the health of individuals and communities must be addressed. This may involve strategies that integrate issues related to education, employment, reducing gender bias, and more.
Each grantee supports one or two coordinated community response teams (CCRs) to implement strategies at the local level. CCRs are local coalitions comprised of members from a variety of sectors engaged in intimate partner violence prevention. Eighteen CCRs are supported by DELTA FOCUS. The project period of DELTA FOCUS is March 2013 to February 2018.
Goals of Current Strategies to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
Strategies that prevent intimate partner violence should ultimately:
Reduce the occurrence of intimate partner violence through the promotion of healthy, respectful, nonviolent relationships.
Reduce known risk factors for IPV and promote protective factors.
Address all levels of the social ecology.
Common strategies used in the field to prevent intimate partner violence include:
Promoting healthy relationships and communication skills
Engaging men and boys in violence prevention
Developing youth assets and leaders
Encouraging bystander intervention
Changing gender and violence social norms
Informing policy and systems change
Building coalitions
Mobilizing communities
Anticipated Outcomes
At the end of the five-year program, anticipated outcomes for DELTA FOCUS are:
Changes in programs, processes, structures and other social determinants of health at state and local levels that have the potential to impact intimate partner violence;
Increases in protective factors and reductions in risk factors for intimate partner violence;
Establishment of a program evaluation database on violence prevention strategies that will contribute to the evidence base for IPV prevention at the societal and community levels of the social ecology.
Top of Page
Program Concepts
Primary Prevention: Approaches that take place before intimate partner violence has occurred. Prevention strategies are guided by a set of principles including:
Preventing first-time perpetration and first-time victimization
Reducing risk factors associated with IPV
Promoting protective factors that reduce the likelihood of IPV
Implementing evidence-supported strategies that incorporate behavior change and social change theories
Evaluating prevention strategies
Using results to inform future plans
Social-Ecological Model: A four-level model that considers the complex interplay between individual, relationship, community, and societal factors and allows us to address the factors that put people at risk for perpetrating or experiencing violence. Learn more about the social-ecological model.
Social Norms Change: Changes to the informal, shared beliefs and standards of behavior within a community with regard to violence and relationships.
Social Determinants of Health: The conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age that influence their opportunities for a healthy, productive life. These circumstances are shaped by access to money, power and resources at global, national and local levels. The social determinants of health
contribute to health inequities - the unfair and avoidable differences in health status seen within and between countries.
Structural Determinants of Health: The economic and social policies, processes and norms that structure opportunities for the health of individuals, communities, and jurisdictions; they include but are not limited to equitable access to quality early childhood development opportunities, education, employment/jobs with livable wages, food security, health services, housing, safe neighborhoods, and social inclusion.
Empowerment Evaluation: "Empowerment evaluation places an explicit emphasis on building the evaluation capacity of individuals and organizations so that evaluation is integrated into the organization’s day-to-day management processes… Empowerment evaluators coach individuals and organizations through an evaluation of their own strategies by providing them with the knowledge, skills, and resources they need to conduct just such an evaluation."3
Top of Page
History
In 2002, authorized by the Family Violence Prevention Services Act (FVPSA), CDC developed the Domestic Violence Prevention Enhancements and Leadership Through Alliances (DELTA) Program to focus on primary prevention of IPV. For the next ten years, DELTA funded state domestic violence coalitions (SDVCs) to engage in statewide primary prevention efforts and to provide training, technical assistance, and financial support to local communities for primary prevention efforts.
DELTA (2002-2013) built capacity for IPV primary prevention in 14 funded state domestic violence coalitions, their local CCRs and at the state level. Stakeholders were identified and partnerships were built that did not exist prior to DELTA. Empowerment evaluation was used to assess capacity-building efforts and programmatic activities.
During the latter years of DELTA, another project was implemented: DELTA PREP. DELTA PREP (Preparing and Raising Expectations for Prevention) was funded from 2008-2011 by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in collaboration with the CDC and the CDC Foundation. The DELTA PREP project provided an additional 19 SDVCs with training, technical assistance and a small amount of funding to incorporate primary prevention into their organizational, local and state IPV efforts.
DELTA and DELTA PREP offered many lessons learned, including the importance of capacity building at local, state, and organizational levels; the importance of ongoing program evaluation and continuous quality improvement; the importance of working at all levels of the social ecology; and the importance of concentrating resources (saturation) for greater impact.
The new DELTA FOCUS Program builds on DELTA's history by providing focused funding to states and communities for intensive implementation and evaluation of IPV primary prevention strategies that address the social and structural determinants of health at the societal and community levels of the social-ecological model (SEM).
While DELTA FOCUS grows from and builds on DELTA and DELTA PREP, it differs in the following key ways:
10 grantees
Greater emphasis on implementation of prevention strategies, and less on initial capacity building (the project works with grantees who are already at high capacity)
Increased focus on program evaluation to help build practice-based evidence
Substantially increased implementation supports
Reformulation of local partner groups
The new direction is intended to focus limited resources for maximum impact, building upon previous efforts and highlighting the project's success and contributions to the field.
For more information on the history of the DELTA program, visit our webpage.
Top of Page
National Engagement
CDC is working with the Family Violence Prevention and Services office of the Administration for Children and Families and the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence to foster leadership and support for primary prevention throughout the domestic violence prevention field. This includes any and all state, territorial, and tribal domestic violence coalitions (STTDVCs); local programs; national organizations; and allied partners interested in advancing intimate partner violence prevention. Some key activities related to this goal include:
Providing support and technical assistance (TA) to the IPV Prevention Council in its development of a primary prevention agenda and implementation plan
Developing a Prevention Focus Area on the Domestic Violence Evidence Project website
Facilitating the development and dissemination of materials that tell the story of current and former IPV prevention initiatives and that promote emerging best practices, tools, and resources
Linking STTDVCs, local programs, national partners and other allies interested in advancing a national prevention agenda through the development and/or maintenance of an effective and inclusive online community of practice.
Top of Page
Evaluation and Resources
Program Evaluation
Program evaluation is an essential activity for the DELTA FOCUS program at both the national and grantee levels. There are four basic evaluation expectations for the DELTA FOCUS program.
Describe the program
Understand and plan the evaluation
Document what happened
Improve the program
Empowerment evaluators for each grantee support grantees in meeting the program evaluation expectations. CDC staff have the same expectations for the project-wide evaluation of the program.
Describe the Program
Through grantees’ implementation of the DELTA FOCUS Program, intensive training and technical assistance support, and regular documentation and evaluation, the DELTA FOCUS program will achieve its program goals.
DELTA FOCUS Theory of Change expanded
Text version of chart (content is revealed on activation): collapsed
Understand and Plan the Evaluation
The DELTA FOCUS program will include an assessment of program performance that covers ongoing monitoring and reporting (performance measurement), examining how the program is being implemented (program evaluation), and seeking to inform program improvements (data-to-action).
Document What Happened and Improve the Program
The performance measurement and program evaluation will support the documentation of what is happening through the project, and the data-to-action process will support continuous quality improvement of the DELTA FOCUS program.
Top of Page
Contact Information for Grantees:
Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and Sexual AssaultProject Coordinator
Lori Grassgreen
130 Seward Street, Suite 230
Juneau, AK 99801
(907) 586-6564
lgrassgreen@andvsa.org
California Partnership to End Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Lisa Fujie Parks
P.O. Box 1798
Sacramento, CA 95812-1798
(800) 524-4765
lisa@cpedv.org
Delaware Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Noel Duckworth
100 W. 10th Street, Suite 903
Wilmington DE 19801
(302) 658-2958
thrive@dcadv.org
Florida Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Kristen Pavlik
425 Office Plaza Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 325-3705
pavlik_kristen@fcadv.org
Idaho Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Kimberly Matulonis
300 E. Mallard Drive, Suite 130
Boise, Idaho 83706
(208) 384-0419 ext. 307
info@engagingvoices.org
Indiana Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Colleen Yeakle
1915 W. 18th Street, Suite B
Indianapolis, IN 46202
(317) 917-3685
cyeakle@icadvinc.org
Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual ViolenceProject Coordinator
Lisa Winchell-Caldwell
3893 Okemos Road, Suite B2
Okemos, MI 48864-4209
(517) 347-7000 ext. 38
Lisa.Winchell-Caldwell@mcedsv.org
North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Catherine Guerrero
123 W. Main Street, Suite 700
Durham, NC 27701
(919) 956-9124
cguerrero@nccadv.org
Ohio Domestic Violence NetworkProject Coordinator
Rebecca Cline
4807 Evanswood Drive, Suite 201
Columbus, Ohio 43229
(614) 781-9651
RClineODVN@aol.com
Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceProject Coordinator
Lucy Rios
422 Post Road
Warwick, RI 02888
(401) 467-9940
Lucy@ricadv.org
Top of Page
References
1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, Chen J, Stevens MR. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2. United States Department of Justice. (2011). Crime in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports.
3. Cox PJ, Keener D, Woodard T, Wandersman A. (2009). Evaluation for Improvement: A Seven Step Empowerment Evaluation Approach for Violence Prevention Organizations. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Available athttp://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/evaluation_improvement.html.