Mreggmanfalling (CC)
[disinfo ed.'s note: The following is an excerpt from Lost Secrets of the Gods: The Latest Evidence and Revelations On Ancient Astronauts, Precursor Cultures, and Secret Societies, edited by Michael Pye and with contributions from Jim Marrs (below), Robert Schoch and others.]
Throughout history the two most prominent methods for controlling the human population have been religion and finance. Could these well-honed, time-tested control mechanisms be of extraterrestrial origin?
Early humans, seeing the beauty and symmetry in nature, instinctively knew that some guiding force lay behind the order of life and so they developed a reverence for spiritual matters. Over time, however, and with advances in scientific knowledge, the material trappings and theologies of the various religions should have fallen away. But they haven’t. Today, most of the world’s population continues to follow one religion or another, often leading to conflicts, wars, and genocide. Moreover, most large, organized religions are intertwined with the acquisition of money. When did finance become so enmeshed in religion? What is it that has made religion so important in the minds of so many for so long?
One possibility is that religion may be based on a reality that has been lost today. According to the Old Testament, Sumerian tablets, and the accounts of the Greek and later Romans, there was a time when humans experienced face-to-face encounters with their gods. Virtually every ancient culture on this world told of legends of gods who came from the sky and taught them the fundamentals of civilization—language, mathematics, astronomy, chemistry, law, architecture, and finance.
Today, a growing number of researchers are taking the concept of Ancient Astronauts, the idea that non-humans visited the Earth millennia ago, more seriously. This concept was popularized in the 1970s by Swiss author Erich von Däniken and continues to find purchase in the popular imagination via the popular TV series. The evidence for such visitation—in sacred sites, ancient art, and anomalous artifacts—is quite compelling, in fact almost overwhelming, as detailed in the 2013 book Our Occulted History: Do the Global Elite Conceal Ancient Aliens?.
Our primitive ancestors felt awe and reverence for the technologically advanced visitors who came from the heavens. After all, no human could fly or perform feats that must have seemed like magic. The first humans thought of these visitors merely as Watchers or Messengers (angels) from the heavens. These visitors are referred to in the ancient tablets of Sumer as the Anunnaki, or “those who came to Earth from the heavens.”
Rather than deal directly with the burgeoning human population, the ancient alien-gods ordained an administrative body or priesthood to pass along edicts and instruction as well as interpret policy. Once such clerics got a taste of wealth and power, they were loath to relinquish them. Religion soon evolved into a rigid structure of dogmas, catechisms, tithing, and obedience. Only after the Anunnaki appointed rulers over humanity did the concept of religion come into play.
According to researchers Peter Jiang and Jenny Li,
apparently, these extraterrestrials performed “great feats” in order to be worshipped as “gods.” The reported next step was to provide technology to these Earth humans so that these humans could create impressive looking “rich” structures of religious worship, laid with gold and other mined mineral resources, of religious worship to these extraterrestrial “gods.”1
By the time of the earliest recorded human civilizations, such as Sumer, Assyria, and Babylon, religions were well-established and had merged with the prevailing political structures of the time. These early civilizations firmly established the idea that the clergy could be the only religious authority and that kingship was a divine right. Anointed priests who worshiped one god exhorted their followers to demonize the worshipers of the others. And anyone who failed to offer allegiance to the one true god was castigated as a blasphemer, heathen, devil worshiper, or worse.
But something happened. Either through natural cataclysms or some prehistoric war, the planet, or at least the Near East, was devastated, and the ET gods withdrew from overt human contact. As the gods—the alien visitors—dropped from sight, the religions they created turned metaphysical. The concept of God evolved from a physical being to an omnipresent yet anthropomorphic supernatural entity. The elder conflicts between the ancient astronauts commandeering armies of human subjects were faithfully recorded in the Old Testament. These ancient wars became the metaphorical basis for the struggle between the new monotheistic God and his evil counterpart, Satan.
Baptist minister and author Paul Von Ward wrote about the development of supernatural religion beginning less than 3,000 years ago in Mesopotamia (now Iraq), the cradle of civilization: “Here religions that grew out of absentee-cults that described their gods as immortal, magical beings took the next step toward supernaturalism.”2
Originally the term Satan merely meant any adversary of the gods. Princeton professor of religion Elaine Pagels argues that Satan came to represent human hostility against other humans: “And it’s no accident that the foundational texts of Christian tradition—the gospels of the New Testament, like the Dead Sea Scrolls—all begin with stories of Satan contending against God’s spirit.” Pagels goes on to explain that Christians later “turned the image of Satan against a far wider range of targets—against the Roman empire and its government, which persecuted Christians, and then against other ‘intimate enemies’—other Christians, whom they called ‘heretics.’”3 Von Ward elaborates on Pagels’ idea by writing, “[H]istory makes it clear that the Hebrews had simply followed the example of their patron god. They labeled their opponents, foreign or domestic, Satanic worshipers of Beelzebub, Belial, and the Princes of Darkness. In return, their opponents likely shouted their own epithets of ‘infidel’ (meaning ‘unfaithful to the “true” god’).”4
Various historical events provided the basis for western supernaturalism near the end of the Roman Empire. These events included the development of absentee non-human cult worship in the Middle East; the Hebrew worship of Yahweh, who was believed to be the leader of the gods of old; and the new and compelling reformation cult of Jesus of Nazareth. Von Ward attributes the rise of supernaturalism to the simultaneous rise of powerful institutions—for instance, the development of Roman organizational skills and the creation of a Christ-centered church, the power of Rome to elevate St. Paul’s Christian cult to the status of the state religion, and the Nicean council of bishops that “culled from competing texts a Bible that largely excludes references to the reality of other [Advanced Beings] and Jesus’ humanity.”5
Generations of humans slowly developed a defense mechanism once the ancient gods were no longer visible:
The Anunnaki had apparently decided to go about their own affairs, but humans felt bereft at being deserted. So supernatural theology was the defense mechanism created to help cope with the pain and anxiety of an obvious separation of humans from their gods. One of its purposes was to assure humans that the religious rituals would either bring the departed gods back to Earth or reconnect the humans to them in the supernatural realm.”6
Furthermore, in both early Eastern and Western cultures, rulers gained power and wealth from religion. But, beginning with the Enlightenment and the advent of the printing press, religion waned, especially in highly developed nations. Today, the favored control mechanism is through the lending of money. Author Joseph P. Farrell saw the rapid development of the private issuance of bullion-based monies both in ancient times and in various cultures as suggesting “the evident hand of a hidden international class of bullion-brokers, war merchants, slave traders, and mining operators, for almost invariably, the pattern is the same.”7 This pattern involved blending finance with the prevailing religion, as if money itself were God-ordained. It remains a powerful control mechanism over humanity today.
Farrell has argued that the methodology of aligning religion with money went something like this: Rulers would penetrate and ally with the temple, issue false receipts, substitute bullion for letters of credit as a measure against the false receipts, and thus create a facsimile of money.
Thus, we arrive back at the state of issuing false receipts, only in this instance, these receipts are neither false nor counterfeit, they are simply privately created notes or promises to pay a certain amount of bullion (which they also control). Thus, once again the money supply is not only expanded, but the use of such instruments actually served to allow the bullion brokers to circulate more of such notes than they had actual bullion to redeem. The key, once again, was the sanctifying probity that the temple association gave them. With this step their power and influence over the various states which they penetrated was almost complete, for it gave these ancient bankers, like their modern counterparts, the ability to expand or contract a state’s money supply and to control their economies to create boom or bust.8
The power of exchanging money can be traced back to the Near East where people called money changers were prevalent, exchanging the currencies of the various cities and nations into money acceptable to the temple priests. Money therefore became closely connected to the temples of religion, which also doubled as centers for the study of astronomy and astrology. Recall that it was only in the temple at Jerusalem that Jesus, the “Prince of Peace,” turned violent—and this was against the money changers. The conflict between the money changers and the human population has continued down through the ages.
Despite popular myth, the American colonial revolt against England occurred more over concern for its own currency than a small tax on tea. During a visit to Britain in 1763, Benjamin Franklin explained the prosperity of the American colonists by stating,
That is simple. In the colonies, we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.”9
However, under pressure from the bankers, King George III of England ordered that all colonies must abandon Colonial Scrip and deal only in interest-bearing British pound. Franklin later explained,
The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the Revolutionary War.”10
By the mid-1800s, the bankers of Europe—predominately the banking dynasty of Mayer Amschel Rothschild—had spread worldwide, despite their setback in North America due to the American Revolution. But they didn’t give up in their attempts to regain control of the United States ; in fact, they may have been instrumental in influencing the course of events leading to civil war.
For some years, the Rothschilds had financed major projects in the United States on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line. Nathan Rothschild, who owned a large Manchester textile plant, bought his cotton from Southern interests and financed the importation of Southern cotton prior to the war. At the same time, wrote Rothschild biographer Derek Wilson, “He had made loans to various states of the Union, and had been, for a time, the official European banker for the U.S. government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States.”11
The War Between the States was fought more over economics than slavery, despite how modern political correctness aims to convince otherwise. And it was encouraged through secret societies, especially the Knights of the Golden Circle, one member of which was the assassin of President Abraham Lincoln. The Knights organization was founded in 1854 by Dr. George W. L. Bickley and was patterned on the Freemasons. Bickley reportedly was an agent for Nathan Rothschild, who controlled the Bank of England. Lincoln himself made it clear that his “paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.”12
German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once explained,
The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed…. Therefore they sent their emissaries into the field to exploit the question of slavery and to open an abyss between the two sections of the Union.”13
In need of money to fund the war effort, Lincoln did not borrow from the European banks as expected. In 1862, he issued about $450 million in currency printed with green ink called “Greenbacks.” This paper money, legalized by an act of Congress with nothing to back it, was debt-free, fiat money (currency declared legal). Lincoln saw the debt-free creation of money as government’s greatest creative opportunity. But he may have forgotten that the first assassination attempt on an American president was in 1835 against Andrew Jackson, who incurred the wrath of the international bankers by abolishing the country’s central bank. Lincoln also found it was fatal to cross the international bankers. He was shot by John Wilkes Booth while attending Ford’s Theatre on April 14, 1865, and died the next morning. (It should be noted here that President John F. Kennedy also issued interest-free money by authorizing $4.3 billion in silver-backed “United States Notes” in mid-1963. Kennedy, too, was shot in the head in public.)
The money changers of Europe gained even greater power during World War I when many of Europe’s royal houses lost their leadership positions. Their greatest fear came with the rise of communism in Russia. Although the Bolsheviks were aided in their revolution against the Czar by western bankers, their control slipped when Stalin ascended to dictatorial power following Lenin’s death in 1924. With the success of the Bolshevik Revolution, wealthy and titled Russians fled to western nations warning of the dangers to capitalism from international communism. Great fear was engendered among the wealthy. The cry of “Workers of the world unite!” reverberated within communists parties from Berlin and Paris to London and New York.
It may well have been the post–World War I plan of the banker elite to create a Socialist East and pit it against the capitalist West, but the fear of the spread of communism caused a change in plans. Something had to be done to halt the spread of communist Socialism and Germany was in a central position to act as a barrier. However, something first had to be done with the democratic Weimar Republic in Germany. One solution was to combine American capitalism with German corporations in the 1920s under the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan, which were plans to help Germany repay its debt after World War I. These plans used American loans to create and consolidate the German steel and chemical giants, Vereinigte Stahlwerke and I. G. Farben, both major supporters of the fledgling Nazi Party.
The final solution was to finance an Austrian Army corporal who was drawing pay as an undercover agent for his military superiors after failed attempts as an artist. This, of course, was Adolf Hitler, who gained power through the backing of both the occult Thule Society, composed of German aristocrats and wealthy industrialists, as well as western banking interests. One of the largest lenders of money to the Nazis was National City Bank of New York (now Citicorp), then headed by John J. McCloy, who became the U.S. High Commissioner of Germany after the war. Over the course of several years, the former corporal brought his National Socialist German Workers Party (the Nazis) from a handful of members to a national organization of millions.
In early 1933, Hitler was elected Chancellor of Germany. In 1934, with the death of President Paul von Hindenburg, Hitler consolidated his office with that of president and assumed the title of “Fuehrer,” or Leader over the entire nation. But then Hitler made a fatal error—the same one that may have cost the life of Lincoln and Kennedy. He failed to follow the wishes of the moneyed elite to borrow money from the international bankers. Instead, he issued his own debt-free money, Reichmarks, and put the Germans back to work on public projects such as the autobahn highway system and the production of war materials.
In early Nazi meetings, Hitler had listened to the views of German economist Gottfied Feder, who advocated monetary control through a nationalized central bank rather than private banks and that financial interests had enslaved the population by controlling the money supply. One of the platforms of the Nazi Party was the breaking of debt-slavery—in other words, interest payments. Writing in his book Mein Kampf, Hitler stated, “…Germany’s development already stood before my eyes too clearly for me not to know that the hardest battle had to be fought, not against hostile nations, but rather against international capital…. The fight against international finance and loan capital has become the most important point in the program of the German nation’s fight for its independence and freedom.”14
In 1933, Germany, like America, was in the depths of the Great Depression. A large segment of the population was out of work, and the money hyper-inflated. Many recall the stories of Germans needing a wheelbarrow loaded with paper money to buy a single loaf of bread. By the time of the 1936 Berlin Olympics—a mere three years later—Germany had become an economic powerhouse, with near full employment and stable money thanks to its freedom from the international bankers. However, the wealthy elite, who traced their money management secrets back to ancient Sumer, could not afford to have the rest of the world see the benefits of interest-free money, as sought by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and many others throughout history. Winston Churchill, a member of the aristocratic and wealthy elite, summed up their reaction to Hitler’s actions prior to World War II when he stated, “You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the [economic] strength of the German people, which must be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.”15
The Germans lost the war, but the wealthy elite, who had funded Hitler and created the Nazis, did not. In fact, in many ways, they won. The Nazis experimented with new technology in nuclear science, weaponry, energy manipulation, psychiatric drugs, and innovative techniques of propaganda and mind control, all of which helped the elite. They learned the best way to overthrow nations, how to dumb down populations with propaganda enhanced by fluoride and other chemical agents, and how to insinuate fear, torture, and assassination into a civilized society.
They brought these tactics, along with thousands of unrepentant Nazis, to America under a variety of programs including Operation Paperclip, which recruited former Nazi scientists and brought them to the United States. All of this helped them create their new National Security police state. This infiltration of unreconstructed Nazis was largely overseen by banker John J. McCloy and his protégé, Allen Dulles, who as CIA Director whitewashed the Nazis records. Both McCloy and Dulles sat on the Warren Commission, hand-picked by President Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate the assassination of President Kennedy.
One of the hidden tools of elitist financial control may be the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) of the United States Treasury. This little-known agency is one of those government constructs that has morphed into a gigantic money-moving operation with absolutely no oversight by the federal government, the states, or the American people. Yet the ESF uses tax money and its profits to fund operations both inside and outside the country. Texas Congressman Henry B. Gonzalez, a vocal opponent of the Fed, while chairman of the House Banking Committee criticized the ESF for “back-door financing,” and “a complete lack of public accountability.”16
The ESF was created and originally financed by the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. Its purpose, according to an official description, was “to contribute to exchange rate stability and counter disorderly conditions in the foreign exchange market.” The act authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to exclusively deal in gold, foreign exchange, securities, and instruments of credit subject to the approval of the President. This all sounds fine until one learns that it allows the U.S. Treasury Secretary to operate outside U.S. laws. According to minority members of the House Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures who reviewed this law in its preparation,
This [law] in fact, means that the Secretary of the Treasury shall be under no obligation to comply with general laws of the United States in the handling of this fund…. We believe that [this] places autocratic and dictatorial power in the hands of one man directly over the control of the value of money and credit and indirectly over prices…. We believe that this is too great a power to place in the hands of any one man. We believe that it is contrary to every true principle of American Government.”17
When ownership of gold was outlawed for Americans in 1933, the ESF transferred gold out of the country to foreigners in exchange for dollars, in turn draining our gold reserves for years to come. Today when people blame the Federal Reserve for stealing America’s gold reserves, they should know that it was actually the ESF, that agency never scrutinized or questioned by Congress, that drained the Federal Reserve many years ago.
After the war, the ESF helped design the world’s new monetary system, including its best-known creations—The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The ESF also has been charged with providing unaccountable funds to the CIA. According to Lawrence Houston, the first general counsel of the CIA, “The heart and soul of covert operations is…the provisions of un-vouchered funds, and the inviolability of such funds from outside inspection.”18
Now the ESF has copycat agencies in many states and itself has become nothing more than a slush fund with connections to CIA black operations. There are even accusations of laundering drug money. The slush funds operate outside of legislative oversight and public scrutiny and, while technically legal, outside of the intentions of the U. S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. To pinpoint the movement of tax money to questionable recipients would require a full audit of all the Economic Stabilization Funds and the legislation that regulates transfers of public tax monies to innumerable, clandestine, and questionable, though technically legalized, funds.
Internet commentator Eric deCarbonnel documented an immense amount of information on the ESF and concluded the agency
controls the New York Fed, runs the CIA’s black budget, and is the architect of the world’s monetary system (IMF, World Bank, etc). ESF financing (through the OSS and then the CIA) built up the worldwide propaganda network which has so badly distorted history today (including erasing awareness of its existence from popular consciousness). It has been directly involved in virtually every major U.S. fraud/scandal since its creation in 1934: the London gold pool, the Kennedy assassinations, Iran-Contra, CIA drug trafficking, HIV, and worse….19
Another little-known mechanism for financial control is the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an outgrowth of the Financial Stability Forum, once a part of the Nazi-dominated Bank for International Settlements. President Obama signed the United States on as a member of the FSB during the G-20 meeting of the nations’ finance ministers in April 2009. Critics claim this board of foreign central bankers, in the name of financial stability, now can dictate financial policy to such U.S. institutions as the Federal Reserve System, the Securities & Exchange Commission, and others.
Though the FSB only began in 2009, and the ESF, during the Great Depression, as previously noted the history of banking control goes much further back. Dr. Mujahid Kamran, vice chancellor of the University of Punjab and an expert on corporate America, has concluded that the American banking system is ultimately pernicious. As he wrote in The Grand Deception—Corporate America and Perpetual War:
The advent of the industrial revolution, the invention of a banking system based on usury, and scientific and technological advancements during the past three centuries have had three major consequences. These have made the incredible concentration of wealth in a few hands possible, have led to the construction of increasingly deadly weapons culminating in weapons of mass destruction, and have made it possible to mold the minds of vast populations by application of scientific techniques through the media and control of the educational system. The wealthiest families on planet earth call the shots in every major upheaval that they cause. Their sphere of activity extends over the entire globe, and even beyond, their ambition and greed for wealth and power knows no bounds, and for them, most of mankind is garbage—“human garbage.” It is also their target to depopulate the globe and maintain a much lower population compared to what we have now.20
Dr. Kamran also noted that universities in developing countries operate in close partnership with the large private foundations, and that the only way to truly understand the operation of the world is “to realize the U.S. Government is owned by those who own these foundations.”21
If the idea that a small group of international yet interconnected individuals control the worlds of finance and commerce seems like a paranoid conspiracy theory, consider a 2011 study by three scientists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. Combining mathematics used to model natural systems with comprehensive corporate data, they traced the ownership of the transnational corporations. From a database of 37 million companies and investors, the Swiss team constructed a model of which companies controlled others through shareholding networks, coupled with each company’s operating revenues, to map the structure of economic power. Shockingly, the study confirmed the worst fears of conspiracy theorists and the Occupy Wall Street protestors, as their analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations identified a relatively small group of companies—primarily banks—with disproportionate power over the global economy.
According to an article in New Scientist, the study “revealed a core of 1,318 companies with interlocking ownerships. Each of the 1,318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20. What’s more, although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1,318 appeared to collectively own through their shares the majority of the world’s large blue chip and manufacturing firms—the ‘real’ economy—representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues.”22
The study further untangled the web of ownership, discovering much of it tracked back to a “super-entity” of 147 even more tightly knit companies—all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity—that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network. Most of these firms were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.” As Dr. James B. Glattfelder of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, and one of the authors of the study, explained, “In effect, less than one per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network.”23 Although study members and commentators disparaged talk of conspiratorial control, they did admit that such centralized interconnectedness was worrisome as it could cause instability in world markets.
The Blood That Rules
But the Swiss researchers limited their study only to official corporate data. They did not seek to determine the family, social, and business relationships between owners and stockholders. Yet, personal relationships do matter, especially in matters of business and politics. Beginning with the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Romans, the leadership of royal families and major corporations has been determined by how closely one was connected to certain bloodlines. Though times have changed drastically since the time of the Habsburgs, the Romanovs, and the Rothschilds, it appears the person closest to the ancient bloodlines seems to always carry the day, especially in United States national elections. In every election the candidate with the most royal genes always wins.
Mainstream news reports in 2000 quoted researchers at Burke’s Peerage as predicting George W. Bush would win the presidency over Al Gore because, while both Bush and Gore were related and of royal blood, the Bush family was the more closely connected. “[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne,” said Burke’s publishing director, Harold Brooks-Baker. “Not one member of [Bush’s] family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class,” he added.24
British conspiracy author David Icke, citing information from Burke’s Peerage, wrote,
Every presidential election in America, since and including George Washington in 1789 to Bill Clinton, has been won by the candidate with the most British and French royal genes. Of the 42 presidents to Clinton, 33 have been related to two people: Alfred the Great, King of England, and Charlemagne, the most famous monarch of France. So it goes on: 19 of them are related to England’s Edward III, who has 2,000 blood connections to Prince Charles. The same goes with the banking families in America. George Bush and Barbara Bush are from the same bloodline—the Pierce bloodline, which changed its name from Percy, when it crossed the Atlantic. Percy is one of the aristocratic families of Britain, to this day.25
In case anyone should think that Barack Hussein Obama must be an exception to these bloodline connections, they would be wrong. According to Lynne Cheney, wife of Dick Cheney, Obama is an eighth cousin to the former vice president. She discovered this familial connection while researching her ancestry for a book. According to a Cheney spokesperson, Obama is a descendent of Mareen Duvall, a French Huguenot whose son married the granddaughter of a Richard Cheney, who had arrived in Maryland in the late 1650s from England.26
Moreover, the New York Post reported that both Obama and Cheney are blood relations to the Bush family. According to the paper, George W. Bush and Obama are tenth cousins once removed. They are linked through a 17th-century Massachusetts couple, Samuel Hinckley and Sarah Soole. Hinckley is a distant relative of George Herbert Walker Bush’s friend John Warnock Hinckley Sr., whose son, John Warnock Hinckley Jr., shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981.27
Gary Boyd Roberts, a former Senior Research Scholar at the New England Historic Genealogical Society, has traced George W. Bush’s family tree to 16 U.S. presidents including George Washington, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, James Garfield, Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, William H. Taft, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, and Gerald Ford.
Moreover, the Bush family, according to several sources, is closely related to the king of Albania and has kinship with every member of the British royal family and the House of Windsor. They are related to 20 British Dukes, the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth. George W. is 13th cousin once removed from Prince Charles and has direct descent from King Henry III, Charles II, and Edward I of England. According to Burke’s Peerage, even former President Bill Clinton is genetically related to the House of Windsor.
Many are unaware that the Windsors, the royal family of England, originally were known by their German name Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha, a German dynasty shortened to Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. The change to Windsor came during World War I when England was at war with Germany and there was considerable anti-German sentiment. To distance themselves from their German heritage, on July 17, 1917, Queen Victoria’s grandson King George V officially declared that all male descendants of Queen Victoria would bear the name Windsor. The name Windsor came from a castle owned by the family. Six British monarchs, including Queen Victoria and King George III, who ruled during the American Revolution, were members of the German House of Hanover. In 1960, Queen Elizabeth II along with her husband Prince Philip, the son of Alice of Battenberg, announced his name would henceforth be Anglicized to Philip Mountbatten.
Phillip Eugene de Rothschild, a descendant of the Rothschilds now living in America, once explained that the German Battenberg bloodline is joined with the Bauer-Rothschild bloodline in a “Rothsburg dynasty,” that traces their ancestry back to Aeneas. In Greek and Roman mythology, Aeneas was a Trojan soldier who was said to be a human hybrid, son of the goddess Venus as well as the father of Romulus and Remus, the founders of Rome.
It has been reported from several sources that the Rothschilds believe themselves descended from the Sumerian God-King Nimrod, reportedly the great-grandson of the Biblical Noah. According to the prestigious genealogical publication Burke’s Peerage, one Rothschild child born in 1922 was named Albert Anselm Salomon Nimrod Rothschild.
Several researchers have traced the ancient bloodlines of the Ancient Astronauts, the Anunnaki, as they spread from Sumer, Babylon, Egypt, and even China to encompass the entire world. While conventional history has concentrated on the male descendants of these bloodlines, through the centuries the bloodline actually has been passed through the mitochondrial DNA of the females. While the passing of the true bloodline has primarily been done through incest and intermarrying, as practiced by most of history’s rulers, an extended network of relations also has been created through concubines, mistresses, slaves, hired help, and even rape.
A growing number of researchers and writers are building the case against a mere handful of individuals apparently obsessed with maintaining the privileges of their bloodline. They appear more intent on creating a New World Order based on privilege and control rather than helping the world develop individual worth, creativity, and productivity. The strategy and practices of such a banking elite coupled with religion since ancient times has involved slavery—whether physical or financial—war, starvation, usurpation of the money-creating power of the state, the invention of debt-as-money, and economic cycles based on astrological alignments. But whether spiritual, metaphysical or physical, such control mechanisms appear to have originated from beyond the material world.
Notes
1. From http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/01/26/01340.html.
2. From Paul Von Ward, We Have Never Been Alone. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing Company, 2011, p. 285.
3. From http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/Pagels99.pdf.
4. From Von Ward, Princes of Darkness, p. 47.
5. Ibid.
6. From Von Ward, p. 287.
7. From Joseph P. Farrell, Babylon’s Banksters: The Alchemy of Deep Physics, High Finance and Ancient Religion. Port Townsend, WA: Feral House, 2010, p. 295.
8. Farrell, p. 204.
9. From http://www.opednews.com/articles/How-Benjamin-Franklin-Caus-by-Mike-Kirchubel-110711-773.html.
10. Ibid.
11. From Derek Wilson, Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1988, p. 178.
12. From Thomas R. Dye and L. Harmon Zeigler, The Irony of Democracy: An Uncommon Introduction to American Politics. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1975, p. 83.
13. From G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island. Westlake Village, Calif.: American Media, 1994, p. 374.
14. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1940, pp. 287–288.
15. Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill: British Bulldog—His Career in War and Peace. New York: Exposition Press, 1955, p. 145.
16. “Treasury sets up two-billion fund for stabilization.” The New York Times (May 1, 1934), p. 1.
17. C. Randall Henning, The Exchange Stabilization Fund: Slush Money or War Chest? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1999, p. 12.
18. Eric de Carbonnel, “The Exchange Stabilization Fund Role in Financing CIA Covert Operations,” Market Skeptics, Sept. 4, 2010: http://www.marketskeptics.com/2010/09/exchange-stabilization-fund-role-in.html.
19. Ibid.
20. From http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/who-really-controls-the-world.
21. Ibid.
22. Andy Coghlan and Debora MaxKensie, “Revealed—The Capitalist Network That Runs the World,” New Scientist,(Oct. 24, 2011): http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354.500-revealed–the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world.html.
23. Ibid.
24. Tony Eufinger, “Royal Red Carpet Is Path to White House,” ABC News, Oct. 25, 2000: http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=82279&page=1#.TzgcsFF7R8E.
25. From http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/06/presidential-bloodlines.html.
26. “Lynne Cheney: VP, Obama Are Eighth Cousins,” NBC News (Oct. 17, 2007).
27. Hasani Gittens, “Dissing Cousins: Obama, Cheney, Bush Related,” New York Post (Oct. 17, 2007): www.nypost.com/P/News/Regional/Item_Kjxdkmwzqbghpdxxdgwnep.
©2014 Jim Marrs. Reprinted from Lost Secrets of the Gods: The Latest Evidence and Revelations On Ancient Astronauts, Precursor Cultures, and Secret Societies with the permission of the publisher New Page Books a division of Career Press, Pompton Plains, NJ. EAN: 978-1601633248 List Price: US $15.99
The post Unholy Alliance: Ancient Astronauts and the New World Financial Order appeared first on disinformation.