What's the Focus? KDnF or DFOG
← Older revision
Revision as of 02:38, 20 June 2015
Line 61:
Line 61:
I've noticed several skills in certain jobs that's not available in DFOG and likely not in other servers but in KDNF. Might I ask, what is the main focus for the wiki? For Western players, Eastern? [[User:Arrol|Arrol]] ([[User talk:Arrol|talk]]) 23:46, 18 June 2015 (PDT)
I've noticed several skills in certain jobs that's not available in DFOG and likely not in other servers but in KDNF. Might I ask, what is the main focus for the wiki? For Western players, Eastern? [[User:Arrol|Arrol]] ([[User talk:Arrol|talk]]) 23:46, 18 June 2015 (PDT)
:Actually, I've been wondering this as well... For the past few months, I felt that most of the focus was on future content, particularly on the Female Slayer, Kunoichi, Shadow Dancer, 2nd Awakenings, and Knight. It's nice and all to have all the information on future content, but there is only so much accessible information to be had outside of the region lock. It is highly probable that the data collected for the initial future content will be revised and released to DFOG in the revised version, which in turn leaves our data to be obsolete (e.g. the Thief rebalance patch). This in-turn causes the wiki to look more outdated, and makes it less of a credible source. There needs to be a balance between updating unreleased content vs. updating current DFOG content. <br>By focusing so much on future content, it created a backlash and influx of work to update old pages. As of right now, the wiki is in severe lack of current content, particularly in the area of skill data. Just look at the Base Class:M/F Gunner and Priest skills most of them are extremely outdated. Because of this, outdated skill data has become a main priority, and must be updated to have the main structure done as placeholders for future updates (i.e. up to Lv. 85 cap). Hopefully, by doing this this we can lessen the required editing in the future. However, most of the skill pages on the wiki haven't been updated since 2011-2012, and have extremely outdated Rebirth values (e.g. [[Tombstone Triangle]]) which is one of the main reasons why we are doing this massive project overhaul.--[[User:Altair|Altair]] ([[User talk:Altair|talk]]) 02:07, 19 June 2015 (PDT)
:Actually, I've been wondering this as well... For the past few months, I felt that most of the focus was on future content, particularly on the Female Slayer, Kunoichi, Shadow Dancer, 2nd Awakenings, and Knight. It's nice and all to have all the information on future content, but there is only so much accessible information to be had outside of the region lock. It is highly probable that the data collected for the initial future content will be revised and released to DFOG in the revised version, which in turn leaves our data to be obsolete (e.g. the Thief rebalance patch). This in-turn causes the wiki to look more outdated, and makes it less of a credible source. There needs to be a balance between updating unreleased content vs. updating current DFOG content. <br>By focusing so much on future content, it created a backlash and influx of work to update old pages. As of right now, the wiki is in severe lack of current content, particularly in the area of skill data. Just look at the Base Class:M/F Gunner and Priest skills most of them are extremely outdated. Because of this, outdated skill data has become a main priority, and must be updated to have the main structure done as placeholders for future updates (i.e. up to Lv. 85 cap). Hopefully, by doing this this we can lessen the required editing in the future. However, most of the skill pages on the wiki haven't been updated since 2011-2012, and have extremely outdated Rebirth values (e.g. [[Tombstone Triangle]]) which is one of the main reasons why we are doing this massive project overhaul.--[[User:Altair|Altair]] ([[User talk:Altair|talk]]) 02:07, 19 June 2015 (PDT)
+
+
Is it possible we could like like a tag or something explaining that this is future content? [[User:Arrol|Arrol]] ([[User talk:Arrol|talk]]) 19:38, 19 June 2015 (PDT)