2016-07-28

This entry is part 7 of 10 in the series Politics

Crimes of Clintons Emails

Topic: Clintons Emails

By David Cox

As I hear and study this issue, it is totally amazing to me how the Clintons and Obama can act above and beyond the law with impugnity. It is as though they were kings and queens doing anything they want.

The bottom line on the Clinton Email scandal (while she was Secretary of State) is that Hillary Clinton erred in the following:

She did not get permission to move her private and business emails onto a private server in her house.

This was a crime. Whether others did it or not does not matter, any and all of them that did committed crimes in doing so. Colin Powell was the first Secretary of State to begin using emails (for business use) heavily, and the important point in this is that there were not so many rules when he began. While Hillary was Secretary of State, shortly after she began, the Secret Service advised Congress of threats to Government servers by hackers, and they implemented new security measures across the board. Hillary refused to abide by these government rules. By ignoring the new rules, she committed a crime with impugnity. Although Colin Powell did use a private email account (he never had a private server like Hillary Clinton), he only used it once or twice for business purposes because people wrote him on his private email account. If you look at the time line of when he used it this way, and later when Hillary did, the hacker threat was not nearly as great, and there was no official government protection in Powell’s time as there was growing quickly in Hillary’s time. So Hillary’s fragrant breeches of security are hardly comparable, setting up a server and having over 2000 top secret emails originating and coming in that were classified, to several emails that were not classified before emails were even common in government.

Once she set up her server, she took on herself the responsibility of making it secure.

The point here is that she would have had to use certain encryption procedures in order to keep it secret, and there would be security software that would have to be set up on her actual server(s) (because now it seems that there are 6 servers that she was using in different places). The IT guy she had was not qualified to do this revision of her system nor was he being constantly updated as those on the .gov servers were, therefore she should have either asked the Secret Service for help, or moved everything to the .gov servers.

She was complicit with her IT guy in defrauding the US government.

The constant watching of a server and the system on that server is a 24hour/7days a week job. In the case of secret information on that server, there should have been some IT tech guy with the qualifications necessary to counter hacking attempts available and watching the server’s status 24/7. Hillary’s IT guy had a regular government job that he worked 40 hours on (8 to 5) and he was “moonlighting” for Hillary watching her server “on the side”. The revelation of this detail makes that IT guy defrauding the US government. He should go to jail. Since Hillary knew he was working a 40 hour week elsewhere in the US government and could not possibly be on her server 24/7, she was complicit in his defrauding the US government.

She was hacked.

Not only was she hacked, but many in Congress on the .gov, and even the CIA’s servers were hacked. This is why there is so much fuss over email servers, our enemies are hacking into them and bringing them down. As such, the government responds with special propriatary software to protect these servers. Hillary, either by just being belligerent or because she was ignorant, was “not in the loop” on all of this. She had a duty to protect the information that she was seeing from other government people, and that she was generating. Not only were her servers at issue here, Hillary had private cell phones and blackberry devices. These devices were to be protected from hacking. When she received “spam” on one of these devices as she stated in an email that she did, that device was considered to be compromised, and the Secret Service had to be brought in and do an investigation. She knows this because of her security briefing on entering as Secretary of State. Because she did not, she again committed treason. She allowed a compromised device to be used without notifying the proper authorities of the breech of security. On a secure system, spam doesn’t get through. If it does, the entire system can be breeched by somebody clicking a single link in a SPAM email. Clicking it isn’t going to be registered automatically anywhere. Only the damage done is done in secret. Moreover, any hacker that attacks a server is doing so for a purpose. When we compare the hackers that attacked the Congressional servers and the FBI and CIA servers, we understand that these people are spies for other countries seeking information to use against the US. A server that has very little protection because of an ignorant IT guy is just perfect for these professional hackers. They can get in, copy off what they want, and get out without being detected. The fact that the IT guy did not detect them is not to say that they were not hacked. This is why people should not “end-run” around government security. They are not on the top of the knowledge curve of hacking. The US Government maybe not be either, but they have the people and resources to be constantly trying to beat all hackers and spies. In other words, the first time her server was hacked she should have unplugged it and taken it to the Secret Service and told them what happened and asked them to find out if it was compromised with some kind of software that would allow the hacker to come and go and record at will. Her lack of security standards was another crime because Secretary of States swear to keep their information safe.

She committed treason.

Treason is when somebody gives, sells, or causes any confidential or secret information to fall into the hands of somebody outside of Government without the security clearance to be seeing that information. But this crime does not need to have intent involved, so in other words, the traitor does not have to sell anything to anybody nor even deal with anybody. The simple act of leaving a secret document on a desk overnight where a cleaning lady could see it causes that act to be treason. So Hillary’s server in her home was hacked as per emails from her IT guy.

US law clearly states that all government email business has to originate from and terminate to on emails that end with .gov.

The problem with all of this is that that law was blatantly ignored by so many, that there should be a general house cleaning in our present government, and Obama is holding that back. First, let me say that government employees are not obligated to use the .gov emails for everything. Personal things SHOULD NOT BE ON THE .GOV. If Hillary wanted privacy of her emails, she was totally within her rights to move it all to a personal email account or set up her own server. What Hillary did that was illegal was to take her US State Department business off the .gov servers and put it on a private server. Moreover, every single government employee that either received or sent an email to Hillary about anything in government (secret or not) was committing a crime. The law was made to protect these conversations, and Hillary and many others clearly violated the law that Congress made. Moreover, some of the highest classified emails sent out or received by Hillary on her server was directly to and from Obama, the president. So Obama is implicated here, and his protection of Hillary, and behind the scenes directing of the Attorney General is because he is trying to stay out of the thing also (i.e. that he would not be indicted).

Hillary has an obligation to make copies and deliver those copies to the Government Accounting office of EVERY SINGLE EMAIL AND LETTER that she either sent or received or was courtesy copied while Secretary of State.

This is nothing new, and it was part of her briefing on entering that position that she was going to have to do that on leaving that office. Those who officially “let her go” as Secretary of State cannot do so until they have her sign a vow under oath that she has delivered over all those documents. To be exact, everything should have been on the .gov servers, and this would have been automatic for her emails. Since she kept all that on a home server, that server in its totality became property of the US government the moment a business email came or was sent out from it. Hillary has not been Secretary of State for a while now, and she signed under oath a statement that SHE HAD DELIVERED ALL GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS OVER TO THE CORRECT AUTHORITY. Therefore Hillary committed the crime of lying under oath when she revealed that she has business emails still in her private possession on her home server. That fact made that server US government property IN ITS ENTIRETY. That means that everything on that server was the government’s. That being the case, and having a court order to deliver it to the government, erasing ANYTHING on that server was a violation of the law. Hillary against broke the law. If she wanted some things to be private on that server, she should have never put government business information on it. She lost her privacy right when she compromised that server with official US Government business. The erasing of anything on it was improper and a crime.

Hillary had ultra top secret information in these emails.

The fact that Hillary stated that she had NO secret or higher information on her server is a big lie. The FBI set that straight. She lied. Moreover, the fact that even the FBI investigating this did not have clearance to see these emails means that she lied big. The issue here is not whether there was secret or top secret information in her emails, but rather that there was ANY official US government business on these email after the law came out stating that everything had to be on the official .gov servers. But having information of this degree just makes the problem worse. Her lying about it also makes the problem worse.

Hillary and staff deliberately circumvented US Government rules and laws.

One thing is to “accidently” send an email with certain information to somebody at a private email address. This is not what happened. There were no “accidents” here. The US government system is specifically designed to prevent “accidents” of this nature. You cannot send a top secret email to a private email address. You cannot just clip and paste from a secure device or computer onto a non-secure one. That is why the government made the system that they have, to prevent a spy from getting momentary access to a government computer and doing just that. Hillary and/or her staff would have had to take a picture of a secure screen with a non-secure camera or phone and then send that. They would have had to have a secure computer beside a non-secure one, and copy by looking at the secure and typing on the non-secure. There is no way this could have been done by accident, and even doing it on purpose, it was very difficult to do. But there are emails from Hillary to her staff to directly remove the TOP SECRET header from an email and send it to her on her private email account. This is tantamount to treason again. Hillary committed treason in transferring secret information from a secret device to a non-secure device. She committed treason by removing secret and top secret labeling from emails so that her staff could fax the information. I mean how much of belligerent behavior do you have to see before somebody goes to jail?

Let me also close a loop-hole here. Hillary has famously made her underlings take the fall for breaking the law in past cases. As Secretary of State, she had way too much knowledge of illegal activities in her own office, and her directions to staff members was way to specific on the illegal side for her to get away with blaming staff here. She knew the law (she is a lawyer), and she broke it knowingly. She has to go down. Nobody can take this rap for her. Moreover, her entire office staff crew needs to be indicted with her. They were all committing crimes with her, and nobody blew the whistle.

What Hillary Clinton did?

This video is about Hillary’s lies related to Clinton Emails and other things. Documented flip-flopping about gay marriages. She is completely for progressive values, but in a conservative crowd, she says she is conservative. Anderson Cooper called her hand on it, and got no response from her.

Emails. Before a congressional hearing, she stated that 90-95% of her work emails were in the government system. Again she was called on that, and they asked her how she knows that number? Who told her that number? And she didn’t answer the question. Inspector Generalfound tht that less than 1% was on a government system. “Everything in anyway connected to work is in possession of the State Department. The server has personal communications between my husband and myself.” Bill Clinton said that he only sent two emails a year, and neither was to Hillary.

If Hillary signed the form OFNO 9 form, which states that they have delivered over all records that they had in their position over to the State Department. But she had 55,000 emails sitting in her home that she did not turn over. If she did not sign the form, how did they exempt her from signing it? This is absolutely necessary for every employee in the State Department. The form refers to classified AND NON-CLASSIFIED documents.

The Secretary of State can only do her job if she is dealing with classified material. EVERYTHING she did, personal or job related goes to public records. That is why you keep personal emails on a personal system, business on a government system so that they can control and record it into public access files.

She would have had to swear under oath to sign that document. All documents that you generate in any way related to work belong to the US Government. They also must be recorded by the government. To leave office without turning them all over to the government is a crime. Clinton Emails

Hillary willfully ignored and disregarded the Law

U.S. Code Title 18, Part I Chapter 101, Section 2071 Paragraph b. Hillary broke this law by not turning over all documents before she left office. It was her decision to mix her work and personal files on the same server in her house. Doing that immediately made personal and work emails ALL government records available for Freedom of Information Act requests. By her deleting ANYTHING on that server before turning them over to the government, she is guilty of obstruction of justice.

Furthermore, ANY government employee which received or sent to the Secretary of State via an email address which did not end in .gov was complicit in this crime. Obama admitted that he corresponded with Hillary on her private server email address.

Clinton Emails Server Got Hacked

Clinton’s own emails admit from her IT guy that he had to take down the server several times because it was hacked.

What are the consequences of Hillary’s Actions?

The Inspector General’s report clearly found that Hillary violated the federal law which states you cannot remove federal documents from federal protected environment. She removed it to her house without seeking permission. She signed a document saying that she returned all documents to the State Department. Later she destroy 30,000 emails which were government documents because she had federal work documents on her server. This is obstruction of justice. 1924 unauthorized removal of federal documents.

You don’t need knowledge to be guilty of a crime. She convicted perjury and obstruction of justice beside. When debating Bernie Sanders, she accused big banking and investing banking as the culprits of the banking crisis. She stated that she would go after them. But 4 of Clinton’s top 5 contributors are investment banking. How does that work?

Hillary said she actually dodged bullets (under sniper fire) when visiting Bosnia. But actually there was no sniper fire, and she was giving signatures to kids. She just lied all over herself.

Clinton says she was a critic of NAFTA, but she worked on getting it passed. She is pro-NAFTA. Which is she? Does her position change with the wind?

Clinton Emails

More Clinton Foundation Problems

What the Clinton Foundation publicly says its finances are does not check against other people’s public information about what they have given to the Clinton Foundation. Press releases by the Clinton Foundation after fundraising are different from internal reports made public by themselves. When other countries have given money to the Clinton Foundation by other countries also is public in their own countries. These don’t check against what the Clintons say was donated.

Charity fraud enters in when they report one thing when in fact the facts are otherwise. A charity that gives to disaster relief and other officially recognized issues, that money has to be really given to those in that situation. Again there are irregularites (statements by the Clintons that don’t check with what the people receiving the money say as to how much was given versus how much was actually received). This is charity fraud. Another issue is that as a political charity (a charity owned by a politician), they cannot solicit donations, but the Clintons admit that they are soliciting donations, and specifically noting people who have given to the Foundation. So again this is charity fraud.

The Clinton Foundation is declaring that they have recently received 2 billion dollars in donations, and even that number is low according to the donors records of what was given. But this fraud goes beyond 2 billion dollars. American Indian Foundation 1 billion, operation in Haiti which 12-13 billion, Global Fund 10s to 20s billions, and the distribution of HIV medicines around the world is a fraud (maybe these medicines are not valid HIV medicine).

The states are not doing their job. The IRS is also responsible to investigate this, but it is under Obama, so they are not to be trusted.

www.charlesortel.com is the whistleblower. Most of this information is in the Public Domain. 2007 Hillary ran for president, and a Genova organization sent to the Clinton Foundation says they sent 100 million dollars than what the Foundation reported.

Documentary on Clinton Crimes

The Clinton Chronicles (Clinton Emails)

In Arkansas, Bill Clinton gave loans through his Arkansas Development Finance Authority. They gave loans to people who never paid anything against the loan, and afterwards the loan debit was zeroed out. They were laundering drug money. Valid loans were based on campaign donations to the Clintons. 100 million dollars a month in laundered drug money. In the Dan Lasater laundering of money case it came out in the evidence that they were giving away kilos and kilos of cocaine to young girls in the Clinton’s parties. Dan Lasater is one of Bill Clinton’s best friends. They were trafficking of 100 million dollars of cocaine a month, so Lasater took some off the top.

Clinton pardoned Lasater his last day in office. Bill Clinton created this “political system”. All these fake loans were personally signed by Bill Clinton. Supposed this low interest loan company was supposed to give it to churches and such. The loan to Parkometer was for 2.5 million dollars, and this loan was never paid off, nothing was ever paid. Parkometer made nose cones to retrofit them on small planes, and then sent overseas, and they were used to smuggle drugs into the US. Barry Seal set up a drug smuggling operation in Arkansas.

Bill Clinton was even hooked on cocaine when in Arkansas. A woman gives testimony to seeing Bill Clinton take cocaine that she got for him in front of her. Many people in these days actually saw Bill Clinton doing drugs. Although an extreme number of people were eye witnesses, but they were waiting for indictments which never happened. Key witnesses began to strangely die in strange ways.

The post Crimes of Clinton Emails appeared first on Missionary David Cox - Mexico.

Show more